I forced partication in gogle chrome of what materials are oscene and why they should lock...

[Guest MIAMIVICE 48]

. Google Chrome forced my hand when they placed a "security lock" on my chrome browser. ,thus shutting down any sites they deem are dangerous .I immedately made a formal compliant to Fl..Attorney Gerneral stating " goggle was infringing on my first admendment rights of free expression. they telling me that "we can not let consumers surf the web .without our permission., they may see, hear , or expierence a psycological reaction. I will not accept. that. I have moved my programing to microsoft edge. and I am full able to surf ,when ,and where I want. if it was voluntary to put a content protection lock on the browser i would understand. but this is not . what a disgrace. The United States Supreme court in its last case involving pornography " Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 481 (1957). Justice Brennan later changed his mind on this score, arguing that, because the Court had failed to develop a workable standard for distinguishing the obscene from the non-obscene, regulation should be confined to the protection of children and non-consenting adults. SeeParis Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49, 73 (1973).that has been the standard as to protection of children in a home but I think goggle is pushing their protection of everyone against obscenity. the supreme court left that to community standards. not the law or stand of Goggle.

 

Continue reading...