Guest Paul Posted July 3, 2008 Posted July 3, 2008 I managed to slipstream Net framework 1.1 and 2 (with updates). Only thing is, in add/remove programs it said 1.1 maybe corrupt. I thought installing Net framework 2 corrupted the 1.1 install. So, to test this, I removed the NF 2 files, and installed the 1.1 files. Same thing happened. Is there a trick to installing Net framework 1.1 or something?? Since it doesnt matter if I install it by itself or slipstream it with Net framework 2, or install it after I install XP (not slipstreamed) the install is still corrupt Or is it one of the 1.1 updates that screw the NF 1.1 install up??
Guest MowGreen [MVP] Posted July 3, 2008 Posted July 3, 2008 Re: Are the Net framework 1.1 install files stuffed or something Paul, What security software [antivirus, security suite, etc.] is installed ? Which software installed requires .NET Framework 1.1 ? When you say " in add/remove programs it said 1.1 maybe corrupt ", are you referring to clicking on Change and attempting to Repair .NET 1.1 ? You can run this tool to verify the state of installed .NET Frameworks: http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/archive/2008/03/03/8015158.aspx That tool is more reliable than the info reported by the Change/Repair option in ARP. Suggest you contact Aaron if .NET 1.1 can not install without becoming corrupted: http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/contact.aspx MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== Paul wrote: > I managed to slipstream Net framework 1.1 and 2 (with updates). > > Only thing is, in add/remove programs it said 1.1 maybe corrupt. > > I thought installing Net framework 2 corrupted the 1.1 > install. So, to test this, I removed the NF 2 files, and installed the 1.1 > files. Same thing happened. > > Is there a trick to installing Net framework 1.1 or something?? Since it > doesnt matter if I install it by itself or slipstream it with Net framework > 2, or install it after I install XP (not slipstreamed) the install is still > corrupt > > Or is it one of the 1.1 updates that screw the NF 1.1 install up?? > >
Guest Paul Posted July 3, 2008 Posted July 3, 2008 Re: Are the Net framework 1.1 install files stuffed or something No firewall besides XP's. Avast is installed BUT I usually install Avast AFTER XP has has been installed The only thing that I'm running (well that needs Net Framework 2 are the ATI drivers) Do these drivers need 1.1 to be installed?? Before the ATI drivers will work?? Correct in add/remove programs (under 1.1), it points toC:\windows\microsoft.net\framework\v1.1.4322\1033\repairresdist.htm And says to type n:\<installaton source>\dotnetfx.exe /t:%temp% /c:"msiexec.exe /fvecms %temp% \netfx.msi" I'm going to try and see if its one of the patches that are stuffing it up (I'll just install the 1.1 install file and nothing else. "MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> wrote in message news:eax2tUT3IHA.2332@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > Paul, > > What security software [antivirus, security suite, etc.] is installed ? > Which software installed requires .NET Framework 1.1 ? > > When you say " in add/remove programs it said 1.1 maybe corrupt ", are you > referring to clicking on Change and attempting to Repair .NET 1.1 ? > > You can run this tool to verify the state of installed .NET Frameworks: > http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/archive/2008/03/03/8015158.aspx > > That tool is more reliable than the info reported by the Change/Repair > option in ARP. > Suggest you contact Aaron if .NET 1.1 can not install without becoming > corrupted: http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/contact.aspx > > MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] > =============== > *-343-* FDNY > Never Forgotten > =============== > > > > Paul wrote: > >> I managed to slipstream Net framework 1.1 and 2 (with updates). >> >> Only thing is, in add/remove programs it said 1.1 maybe corrupt. >> >> I thought installing Net framework 2 corrupted the 1.1 >> install. So, to test this, I removed the NF 2 files, and installed the >> 1.1 files. Same thing happened. >> >> Is there a trick to installing Net framework 1.1 or something?? Since it >> doesnt matter if I install it by itself or slipstream it with Net >> framework 2, or install it after I install XP (not slipstreamed) the >> install is still corrupt >> >> Or is it one of the 1.1 updates that screw the NF 1.1 install up?? >>
Guest Paul Posted July 3, 2008 Posted July 3, 2008 Re: Are the Net framework 1.1 install files stuffed or something Hm I wonder if this entry for 1.1 in add/remove programs is misleading. Because, I used that verifier tool to check 1.1 and 2, and both succeeded? On the computer I'm on now. Which has the same entry (under NF 1.1 in add/remove programs), which I posted previously "Paul" <noone@home.com> wrote in message news:486d32c3@news01.wxnz.net... > No firewall besides XP's. Avast is installed > > BUT I usually install Avast AFTER XP has has been > installed > > The only thing that I'm running (well that needs Net Framework 2 are the > ATI drivers) > > Do these drivers need 1.1 to be installed?? > > Before the ATI drivers will work?? > > Correct in add/remove programs (under 1.1), it points > toC:\windows\microsoft.net\framework\v1.1.4322\1033\repairresdist.htm > > And says to type > > n:\<installaton source>\dotnetfx.exe /t:%temp% /c:"msiexec.exe /fvecms > %temp% \netfx.msi" > > I'm going to try and see if its one of the patches that are stuffing it up > (I'll just install the 1.1 install file and nothing else. > > > > > > > > > > "MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> wrote in message > news:eax2tUT3IHA.2332@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> Paul, >> >> What security software [antivirus, security suite, etc.] is installed ? >> Which software installed requires .NET Framework 1.1 ? >> >> When you say " in add/remove programs it said 1.1 maybe corrupt ", are >> you referring to clicking on Change and attempting to Repair .NET 1.1 ? >> >> You can run this tool to verify the state of installed .NET Frameworks: >> http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/archive/2008/03/03/8015158.aspx >> >> That tool is more reliable than the info reported by the Change/Repair >> option in ARP. >> Suggest you contact Aaron if .NET 1.1 can not install without becoming >> corrupted: http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/contact.aspx >> >> MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] >> =============== >> *-343-* FDNY >> Never Forgotten >> =============== >> >> >> >> Paul wrote: >> >>> I managed to slipstream Net framework 1.1 and 2 (with updates). >>> >>> Only thing is, in add/remove programs it said 1.1 maybe corrupt. >>> >>> I thought installing Net framework 2 corrupted the 1.1 >>> install. So, to test this, I removed the NF 2 files, and installed the >>> 1.1 files. Same thing happened. >>> >>> Is there a trick to installing Net framework 1.1 or something?? Since it >>> doesnt matter if I install it by itself or slipstream it with Net >>> framework 2, or install it after I install XP (not slipstreamed) the >>> install is still corrupt >>> >>> Or is it one of the 1.1 updates that screw the NF 1.1 install up?? >>> >
Guest Paul Posted July 4, 2008 Posted July 4, 2008 Re: Are the Net framework 1.1 install files stuffed or something Got it fixed. Managed to find an addon for Nlite on the mfsn.org site Which inc 1.1/20/3 SP1 and 3.5. Extracted the file added it to the SVCPACK folder and to svcpack.in_ and the reg fix. And she's all go! Tested the installed versions with that tool. All 4 succeeded ! "Paul" <noone@home.com> wrote in message news:486d3b38@news01.wxnz.net... > Hm I wonder if this entry for 1.1 in add/remove programs is misleading. > > Because, I used that verifier tool to check 1.1 and 2, and both succeeded? > On the computer I'm on now. > > Which has the same entry (under NF 1.1 in add/remove programs), which I > posted previously > > "Paul" <noone@home.com> wrote in message news:486d32c3@news01.wxnz.net... >> No firewall besides XP's. Avast is installed >> >> BUT I usually install Avast AFTER XP has has been >> installed >> >> The only thing that I'm running (well that needs Net Framework 2 are the >> ATI drivers) >> >> Do these drivers need 1.1 to be installed?? >> >> Before the ATI drivers will work?? >> >> Correct in add/remove programs (under 1.1), it points >> toC:\windows\microsoft.net\framework\v1.1.4322\1033\repairresdist.htm >> >> And says to type >> >> n:\<installaton source>\dotnetfx.exe /t:%temp% /c:"msiexec.exe /fvecms >> %temp% \netfx.msi" >> >> I'm going to try and see if its one of the patches that are stuffing it >> up (I'll just install the 1.1 install file and nothing else. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> wrote in message >> news:eax2tUT3IHA.2332@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>> Paul, >>> >>> What security software [antivirus, security suite, etc.] is installed ? >>> Which software installed requires .NET Framework 1.1 ? >>> >>> When you say " in add/remove programs it said 1.1 maybe corrupt ", are >>> you referring to clicking on Change and attempting to Repair .NET 1.1 ? >>> >>> You can run this tool to verify the state of installed .NET Frameworks: >>> http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/archive/2008/03/03/8015158.aspx >>> >>> That tool is more reliable than the info reported by the Change/Repair >>> option in ARP. >>> Suggest you contact Aaron if .NET 1.1 can not install without becoming >>> corrupted: http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/contact.aspx >>> >>> MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] >>> =============== >>> *-343-* FDNY >>> Never Forgotten >>> =============== >>> >>> >>> >>> Paul wrote: >>> >>>> I managed to slipstream Net framework 1.1 and 2 (with updates). >>>> >>>> Only thing is, in add/remove programs it said 1.1 maybe corrupt. >>>> >>>> I thought installing Net framework 2 corrupted the 1.1 >>>> install. So, to test this, I removed the NF 2 files, and installed the >>>> 1.1 files. Same thing happened. >>>> >>>> Is there a trick to installing Net framework 1.1 or something?? Since >>>> it doesnt matter if I install it by itself or slipstream it with Net >>>> framework 2, or install it after I install XP (not slipstreamed) the >>>> install is still corrupt >>>> >>>> Or is it one of the 1.1 updates that screw the NF 1.1 install up?? >>>> >> > >
Guest MowGreen [MVP] Posted July 5, 2008 Posted July 5, 2008 Re: Are the Net framework 1.1 install files stuffed or something Nice work here, Paul. Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner but it's the July 4th weekend and all that. After reviewing your previous posts ... the ATI Catalyst Control Center *may* be the cause of the corruption of .NET 1.1. What happens is that once it's installed and then tries to update with SP1 [ or any other update for it ], the Catalyst Control Center holds files in use that need to be updated/replaced. Since the Control Center fires up first on a reboot, the files are never updated/replaced. Some folks have posted that stopping the Control Center from loading on startup allows the .NET 1.1 files to be updated/replaced correctly. If there are no features that you need/want from the Control Center then suggest you just install the required drivers. They are available on the ATI [AMD] web site as a separate download. MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== Paul wrote: > Got it fixed. > > Managed to find an addon for Nlite on the mfsn.org > site > > Which inc 1.1/20/3 SP1 and 3.5. Extracted the file added it to the SVCPACK > folder and to svcpack.in_ and the reg fix. And she's all go! > > Tested the installed versions with that tool. > > All 4 succeeded ! > > "Paul" <noone@home.com> wrote in message news:486d3b38@news01.wxnz.net... > >>Hm I wonder if this entry for 1.1 in add/remove programs is misleading. >> >>Because, I used that verifier tool to check 1.1 and 2, and both succeeded? >>On the computer I'm on now. >> >>Which has the same entry (under NF 1.1 in add/remove programs), which I >>posted previously >> >>"Paul" <noone@home.com> wrote in message news:486d32c3@news01.wxnz.net... >> >>>No firewall besides XP's. Avast is installed >>> >>>BUT I usually install Avast AFTER XP has has been >>>installed >>> >>>The only thing that I'm running (well that needs Net Framework 2 are the >>>ATI drivers) >>> >>>Do these drivers need 1.1 to be installed?? >>> >>>Before the ATI drivers will work?? >>> >>>Correct in add/remove programs (under 1.1), it points >>>toC:\windows\microsoft.net\framework\v1.1.4322\1033\repairresdist.htm >>> >>>And says to type >>> >>>n:\<installaton source>\dotnetfx.exe /t:%temp% /c:"msiexec.exe /fvecms >>>%temp% \netfx.msi" >>> >>>I'm going to try and see if its one of the patches that are stuffing it >>>up (I'll just install the 1.1 install file and nothing else. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>"MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> wrote in message >>>news:eax2tUT3IHA.2332@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>> >>>>Paul, >>>> >>>>What security software [antivirus, security suite, etc.] is installed ? >>>>Which software installed requires .NET Framework 1.1 ? >>>> >>>>When you say " in add/remove programs it said 1.1 maybe corrupt ", are >>>>you referring to clicking on Change and attempting to Repair .NET 1.1 ? >>>> >>>>You can run this tool to verify the state of installed .NET Frameworks: >>>>http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/archive/2008/03/03/8015158.aspx >>>> >>>>That tool is more reliable than the info reported by the Change/Repair >>>>option in ARP. >>>>Suggest you contact Aaron if .NET 1.1 can not install without becoming >>>>corrupted: http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/contact.aspx >>>> >>>>MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] >>>>=============== >>>> *-343-* FDNY >>>>Never Forgotten >>>>=============== >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Paul wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>I managed to slipstream Net framework 1.1 and 2 (with updates). >>>>> >>>>>Only thing is, in add/remove programs it said 1.1 maybe corrupt. >>>>> >>>>>I thought installing Net framework 2 corrupted the 1.1 >>>>>install. So, to test this, I removed the NF 2 files, and installed the >>>>>1.1 files. Same thing happened. >>>>> >>>>>Is there a trick to installing Net framework 1.1 or something?? Since >>>>>it doesnt matter if I install it by itself or slipstream it with Net >>>>>framework 2, or install it after I install XP (not slipstreamed) the >>>>>install is still corrupt >>>>> >>>>>Or is it one of the 1.1 updates that screw the NF 1.1 install up?? >>>>> >>> >> > >
Guest Paul Posted July 6, 2008 Posted July 6, 2008 Re: Are the Net framework 1.1 install files stuffed or something Umm it was corrupted way before I installed the ATI drivers. I tested this, by just slipstreaming 1.1 and its updates. Add/remove programs for 1.1 still said the install maybe corrupt. If I slipstreamed Net framework 2, (and its updates) it was fine. The ATI CC drivers werent slipstreamed (I'm using the ASUS ATI drivers, since these are ASUS cards (And the ATI drivers seem to be fine on this pc,but crash on the other PC. Why I dont know. It still says it maybe corrupt now (for 1.1), but that verifier tool, said it was fine (it succeeded). Along with the other versions of Net framework, I slipstreamed (all succeded). "MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> wrote in message news:OiVeWot3IHA.784@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > Nice work here, Paul. Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner but it's the > July 4th weekend and all that. > After reviewing your previous posts ... the ATI Catalyst Control Center > *may* be the cause of the corruption of .NET 1.1. What happens is that > once it's installed and then tries to update with SP1 [ or any other > update for it ], the Catalyst Control Center holds files in use that need > to be updated/replaced. Since the Control Center fires up first on a > reboot, the files are never updated/replaced. > Some folks have posted that stopping the Control Center from loading on > startup allows the .NET 1.1 files to be updated/replaced correctly. > If there are no features that you need/want from the Control Center then > suggest you just install the required drivers. They are available on the > ATI [AMD] web site as a separate download. > > MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] > =============== > *-343-* FDNY > Never Forgotten > =============== > > > > Paul wrote: >> Got it fixed. >> >> Managed to find an addon for Nlite on the mfsn.org >> site >> >> Which inc 1.1/20/3 SP1 and 3.5. Extracted the file added it to the >> SVCPACK folder and to svcpack.in_ and the reg fix. And she's all go! >> >> Tested the installed versions with that tool. >> >> All 4 succeeded ! >> >> "Paul" <noone@home.com> wrote in message news:486d3b38@news01.wxnz.net... >> >>>Hm I wonder if this entry for 1.1 in add/remove programs is misleading. >>> >>>Because, I used that verifier tool to check 1.1 and 2, and both >>>succeeded? On the computer I'm on now. >>> >>>Which has the same entry (under NF 1.1 in add/remove programs), which I >>>posted previously >>> >>>"Paul" <noone@home.com> wrote in message news:486d32c3@news01.wxnz.net... >>> >>>>No firewall besides XP's. Avast is installed >>>> >>>>BUT I usually install Avast AFTER XP has has been >>>>installed >>>> >>>>The only thing that I'm running (well that needs Net Framework 2 are the >>>>ATI drivers) >>>> >>>>Do these drivers need 1.1 to be installed?? >>>> >>>>Before the ATI drivers will work?? >>>> >>>>Correct in add/remove programs (under 1.1), it points >>>>toC:\windows\microsoft.net\framework\v1.1.4322\1033\repairresdist.htm >>>> >>>>And says to type >>>> >>>>n:\<installaton source>\dotnetfx.exe /t:%temp% /c:"msiexec.exe /fvecms >>>>%temp% \netfx.msi" >>>> >>>>I'm going to try and see if its one of the patches that are stuffing it >>>>up (I'll just install the 1.1 install file and nothing else. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>"MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> wrote in message >>>>news:eax2tUT3IHA.2332@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>> >>>>>Paul, >>>>> >>>>>What security software [antivirus, security suite, etc.] is installed ? >>>>>Which software installed requires .NET Framework 1.1 ? >>>>> >>>>>When you say " in add/remove programs it said 1.1 maybe corrupt ", are >>>>>you referring to clicking on Change and attempting to Repair .NET 1.1 ? >>>>> >>>>>You can run this tool to verify the state of installed .NET Frameworks: >>>>>http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/archive/2008/03/03/8015158.aspx >>>>> >>>>>That tool is more reliable than the info reported by the Change/Repair >>>>>option in ARP. >>>>>Suggest you contact Aaron if .NET 1.1 can not install without becoming >>>>>corrupted: http://blogs.msdn.com/astebner/contact.aspx >>>>> >>>>>MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] >>>>>=============== >>>>> *-343-* FDNY >>>>>Never Forgotten >>>>>=============== >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Paul wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>I managed to slipstream Net framework 1.1 and 2 (with updates). >>>>>> >>>>>>Only thing is, in add/remove programs it said 1.1 maybe corrupt. >>>>>> >>>>>>I thought installing Net framework 2 corrupted the 1.1 >>>>>>install. So, to test this, I removed the NF 2 files, and installed the >>>>>>1.1 files. Same thing happened. >>>>>> >>>>>>Is there a trick to installing Net framework 1.1 or something?? Since >>>>>>it doesnt matter if I install it by itself or slipstream it with Net >>>>>>framework 2, or install it after I install XP (not slipstreamed) the >>>>>>install is still corrupt >>>>>> >>>>>>Or is it one of the 1.1 updates that screw the NF 1.1 install up?? >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>
Recommended Posts