Guest naza Posted July 4, 2008 Posted July 4, 2008 Hi, I have got a machine with no keyboard mouse and screen, so I have to control it with remote desktop. I have set it to auto-logon and creates as session automatically, which list's the sound card and uses it. When I connect via remote desktop it creates a new session which I do not want, I want to continue with the one that was create by auto- logon. I can change via task manager but I want it to join that specific one, is there a way to do this? I have tried /console and it does not work and I have restricted the user to one sessions but that does not work either
Guest Pegasus \(MVP\) Posted July 4, 2008 Posted July 4, 2008 Re: Continue with existing session "naza" <naza911@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:0ceff242-3c69-4a0b-8658-47e7fd6a8bdf@x35g2000hsb.googlegroups.com... > Hi, > I have got a machine with no keyboard mouse and screen, so I have to > control it with remote desktop. I have set it to auto-logon and > creates as session automatically, which list's [lists?] the sound card and > uses > it. When I connect via remote desktop it creates a new session which I > do not want, I want to continue with the one that was create by auto- > logon. I can change via task manager but I want it to join that > specific one, is there a way to do this? > > I have tried /console and it does not work and I have restricted the > user to one sessions but that does not work either The /console switch is only available for server hosts, and perhaps not even for all server versions.
Guest naza Posted July 5, 2008 Posted July 5, 2008 Re: Continue with existing session > The /console switch is only available for server hosts, and perhaps > not even for all server versions. Well it looks that wont be possible. One other question though. I am going to use the computer for like dedicated downloading, but sort of like leaving it on overnight, because it uses a hell of a lot less power and make less noise because of the lack of fans, but I does not really have the storage on there. It would manage to store on download easily but not many. There is plenty of space on my main PC which is connected to the network and has network shares. I basically need some sort of file synchronisation setup which, if the network share is not available then the files are store locally and as soon as it does become available the files are copied the the main machine(network share) and deleted from the server machine. Note that the network connection will always be available just the share wont when the main PC is off. Any Ideas on how I would set this up.
Guest Pegasus \(MVP\) Posted July 5, 2008 Posted July 5, 2008 Re: Continue with existing session "naza" <naza911@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:18207fa6-cc01-4598-8be2-e7cae5dacce3@e39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... >> The /console switch is only available for server hosts, and perhaps >> not even for all server versions. > > Well it looks that wont be possible. One other question though. > > I am going to use the computer for like dedicated downloading, but > sort of like leaving it on overnight, because it uses a hell of a lot > less power and make less noise because of the lack of fans, but I does > not really have the storage on there. It would manage to store on > download easily but not many. There is plenty of space on my main PC > which is connected to the network and has network shares. > > I basically need some sort of file synchronisation setup which, if the > network share is not available then the files are store locally and as > soon as it does become available the files are copied the the main > machine(network share) and deleted from the server machine. Note that > the network connection will always be available just the share wont > when the main PC is off. > > Any Ideas on how I would set this up. You could use this command: dir \\StoragePC\ShareName to check if the storage machine is available. If the command is successful (as shown by %ErrorLevel%) then you could use xcopy.exe or robocopy.exe to synchronise your files. If your question relates to workstations (as opposed to servers) then it might be better to post it in the appropriate newsgroup (Windows XP? Windows 2000? Vista? Other?), if only because replies in this Server group tend to assume a level of experience that a server administrator usually has.
Recommended Posts