Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest aga151
Posted

Hi, just as a metter of interest:

What would you guys recommend as a good old round printer/all-in-one for

home users?

 

aga

  • Replies 22
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Guest Bob I
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

I prefer new, rather than old. And as far as recommendations for all in

one. Well, they can cause a large amount of grief getting them to work.

HP and LEXmark seem to be the worst. Perhaps a review site would be more

in line with what you are looking for.

 

aga151 wrote:

> Hi, just as a metter of interest:

> What would you guys recommend as a good old round printer/all-in-one for

> home users?

>

> aga

Guest Thee Chicago Wolf
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

>Hi, just as a metter of interest:

>What would you guys recommend as a good old round printer/all-in-one for

>home users?

 

The problem with all-in-one printers is that if one component breaks,

you lose functionality. Are you married to the idea of all-in-one?

What functionality do you need from a printer? Do you prefer ink-jet

based or are you open to laser?

 

- Thee Chicago Wolf

Guest HeyBub
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

aga151 wrote:

> Hi, just as a metter of interest:

> What would you guys recommend as a good old round printer/all-in-one

> for home users?

>

 

The inkjet printers follow the Gillette business model: Give away the razor

and sell the blades. Or the newer cell-phone model: give away the phone and

sell the minutes.

 

If you get an inkjet, be sure you can re-fill the cartridges, else get a

laser printer.

Guest Ken Blake, MVP
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:08:04 -0700, aga151

<aga151@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

> Hi, just as a metter of interest:

> What would you guys recommend as a good old round printer/all-in-one for

> home users?

 

 

Several points:

 

1. I recommend against all-in-one units. The problem is that if one

component fails, the entire unit has to be replaced. As far as I'm

concerned, the only justification for using an all-in-one is lack of

desk space.

 

2. The main question you have to answer for yourself is whether you

need color, or whether black and white will suffice. A black-and-white

laser printer is the most economical way to go (not so much in terms

of purchase price, but in terms of expendables--the per page printed

price).

 

3. If you do get a color inkjet, be sure to choose one with cartridges

you can fill yourself, or with a supply of quality cartridges

available from third parties. If you have to buy the manufacturer's

cartridges, it will be very expensive.

 

4. In color inkjets, I recommend the Canon Pixma line of inexpensive

printers. In black-and-white lasers, there are several good choices. I

use an old Konica-Minolta PagePro 1350W that I'm happy with.

 

--

Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience

Please Reply to the Newsgroup

Guest aga151
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

Hi Bob,

Thanks for your comments,interesting I bought a New Lexmark 4580

all-in-one,it's been a b*^%&y nightmare and that's really not the word I

would use?

And the worst bit isssssssssssssss. I've still got it

 

aga

 

"Bob I" wrote:

> I prefer new, rather than old. And as far as recommendations for all in

> one. Well, they can cause a large amount of grief getting them to work.

> HP and LEXmark seem to be the worst. Perhaps a review site would be more

> in line with what you are looking for.

>

> aga151 wrote:

>

> > Hi, just as a metter of interest:

> > What would you guys recommend as a good old round printer/all-in-one for

> > home users?

> >

> > aga

>

>

Guest aga151
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

Hi cw,

as you can see what BOB wrote and my answer well, it's really NOT for

printing (excuse the 'pun') the main reason was to get a scanner and copier

too,I have spoken to a mate of mine who has an Epsom all in one and so far no

problems,but the Lexmark, wow what a B%&*&$y nightmare and it's only 3

months old

 

Thanks fopr you input.

 

regards

aga

 

"Thee Chicago Wolf" wrote:

> >Hi, just as a metter of interest:

> >What would you guys recommend as a good old round printer/all-in-one for

> >home users?

>

> The problem with all-in-one printers is that if one component breaks,

> you lose functionality. Are you married to the idea of all-in-one?

> What functionality do you need from a printer? Do you prefer ink-jet

> based or are you open to laser?

>

> - Thee Chicago Wolf

>

Guest aga151
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

Hi HB,

Don't know much about laser printers at all but I'm always open to

suggestions, as long as it's not you know who!!!

 

thanks

regards

aga

 

"HeyBub" wrote:

> aga151 wrote:

> > Hi, just as a metter of interest:

> > What would you guys recommend as a good old round printer/all-in-one

> > for home users?

> >

>

> The inkjet printers follow the Gillette business model: Give away the razor

> and sell the blades. Or the newer cell-phone model: give away the phone and

> sell the minutes.

>

> If you get an inkjet, be sure you can re-fill the cartridges, else get a

> laser printer.

>

>

>

Guest Unknown
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

Do you ever read Consumer Reports?

"aga151" <aga151@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:D0EB3368-DECF-4A03-AC92-0EE41896D8CA@microsoft.com...

> Hi Bob,

> Thanks for your comments,interesting I bought a New Lexmark 4580

> all-in-one,it's been a b*^%&y nightmare and that's really not the word I

> would use?

> And the worst bit isssssssssssssss. I've still got it

>

> aga

>

> "Bob I" wrote:

>

>> I prefer new, rather than old. And as far as recommendations for all in

>> one. Well, they can cause a large amount of grief getting them to work.

>> HP and LEXmark seem to be the worst. Perhaps a review site would be more

>> in line with what you are looking for.

>>

>> aga151 wrote:

>>

>> > Hi, just as a metter of interest:

>> > What would you guys recommend as a good old round printer/all-in-one

>> > for

>> > home users?

>> >

>> > aga

>>

>>

Guest beamish
Posted

RE: printer!!!

 

 

 

"aga151" wrote:

> Hi, just as a metter of interest:

> What would you guys recommend as a good old round printer/all-in-one for

> home users?

>

> aga

Hello,

Suggest finding a all-in-one that can be used as a stand alone when needed.

This means that the all-in-one does not need to be attached to a computer to

function.

Check on the cost of the ink.

Ink cartridges can be purchased from non OEM dealers for half the price.

Most of the major OEM printer producers are installing different types of

programming to cause using non-oem ink difficult. My opinion.

 

I used a Epson Stylus Photo RX500, until it cause photo printing problems.

Then installed a Canon Pixma printer, and a stand alone scanner.

 

Still use the Epson without a computer. Scans,copies, reads SD cards and

prints photo's without glitches. Epson and on-line help never found the

problem area.

 

I liked having the convenience of a all-in-one close to my main computer unit.

 

take care.

beamish.

Guest Tim Slattery
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

"HeyBub" <heybub@gmail.com> wrote:

 

>The inkjet printers follow the Gillette business model: Give away the razor

>and sell the blades.

 

They sure do! Last year I bought a new laptop at Micro Center. They

threw in a "free" Epson all-in-one: pay up front, mail-in rebate

refunds the entire purchase price. I will say that Epson was *very*

good on the rebate (as opposed to the $50 rebate from Toshiba on the

computer, that took forever)! And the print quality is very good.

 

So we got it hooked up, which was very easy. It turns out that a set

of replacement cartridges cast as much as the printer did (before

rebate)!

 

I haven't really used the thing. My wife has, and she says you have to

keep cleaning the heads, which apparently consumes ink. Can somebody

who knows more about these beasts confirm or refute this?

>If you get an inkjet, be sure you can re-fill the cartridges, else get a

>laser printer.

 

I have no idea whether the carts on the Epson are refillable. Nor

whether refilled carts would yield photos as good as the originals.

 

--

Tim Slattery

MS MVP(Shell/User)

Slattery_T@bls.gov

http://members.cox.net/slatteryt

Guest aga151
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

Hi Tim,

Thanks for your thoughts,it's a problem knowing what's best,thought

the all in one takes up less room than components all scattered round the

room,think your missus might be right spoke to a nmate of mine and he said

the same thing always needing the heads cleaned.

My last printer was a Stylus c62 it really was a good old printer and

it had no problems with cheap cartridges.

 

Back to the drawing board I guess

 

thanks

 

regards

aga

 

"Tim Slattery" wrote:

> "HeyBub" <heybub@gmail.com> wrote:

>

>

> >The inkjet printers follow the Gillette business model: Give away the razor

> >and sell the blades.

>

> They sure do! Last year I bought a new laptop at Micro Center. They

> threw in a "free" Epson all-in-one: pay up front, mail-in rebate

> refunds the entire purchase price. I will say that Epson was *very*

> good on the rebate (as opposed to the $50 rebate from Toshiba on the

> computer, that took forever)! And the print quality is very good.

>

> So we got it hooked up, which was very easy. It turns out that a set

> of replacement cartridges cast as much as the printer did (before

> rebate)!

>

> I haven't really used the thing. My wife has, and she says you have to

> keep cleaning the heads, which apparently consumes ink. Can somebody

> who knows more about these beasts confirm or refute this?

>

> >If you get an inkjet, be sure you can re-fill the cartridges, else get a

> >laser printer.

>

> I have no idea whether the carts on the Epson are refillable. Nor

> whether refilled carts would yield photos as good as the originals.

>

> --

> Tim Slattery

> MS MVP(Shell/User)

> Slattery_T@bls.gov

> http://members.cox.net/slatteryt

>

Guest aga151
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

Hi Ken,

Thanks for your thoughts,it's abit of a headache getting it

right,certainly the Lexmark,is a nightmare,it' really mucks up the spooler

system but apparently it's a problem with Lexmark,as one said: they really

haven't got the brains to get their printers to work without 'screwing up'

the spooler.

 

Will just keep looking and see what turns up

 

Thanks

 

Regards

 

aga

 

"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:08:04 -0700, aga151

> <aga151@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

>

> > Hi, just as a metter of interest:

> > What would you guys recommend as a good old round printer/all-in-one for

> > home users?

>

>

> Several points:

>

> 1. I recommend against all-in-one units. The problem is that if one

> component fails, the entire unit has to be replaced. As far as I'm

> concerned, the only justification for using an all-in-one is lack of

> desk space.

>

> 2. The main question you have to answer for yourself is whether you

> need color, or whether black and white will suffice. A black-and-white

> laser printer is the most economical way to go (not so much in terms

> of purchase price, but in terms of expendables--the per page printed

> price).

>

> 3. If you do get a color inkjet, be sure to choose one with cartridges

> you can fill yourself, or with a supply of quality cartridges

> available from third parties. If you have to buy the manufacturer's

> cartridges, it will be very expensive.

>

> 4. In color inkjets, I recommend the Canon Pixma line of inexpensive

> printers. In black-and-white lasers, there are several good choices. I

> use an old Konica-Minolta PagePro 1350W that I'm happy with.

>

> --

> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience

> Please Reply to the Newsgroup

>

Guest aga151
Posted

RE: printer!!!

 

Hi Beamish,

Yes I got to agree with you,it's certainly not a clutter

around,I'm sure there's got to be a good 'un around will just keep

looking,thanks for your thoughts,to all you guys,

 

Much Appreciated

 

regards

aga

 

"beamish" wrote:

>

>

> "aga151" wrote:

>

> > Hi, just as a metter of interest:

> > What would you guys recommend as a good old round printer/all-in-one for

> > home users?

> >

> > aga

> Hello,

> Suggest finding a all-in-one that can be used as a stand alone when needed.

> This means that the all-in-one does not need to be attached to a computer to

> function.

> Check on the cost of the ink.

> Ink cartridges can be purchased from non OEM dealers for half the price.

> Most of the major OEM printer producers are installing different types of

> programming to cause using non-oem ink difficult. My opinion.

>

> I used a Epson Stylus Photo RX500, until it cause photo printing problems.

> Then installed a Canon Pixma printer, and a stand alone scanner.

>

> Still use the Epson without a computer. Scans,copies, reads SD cards and

> prints photo's without glitches. Epson and on-line help never found the

> problem area.

>

> I liked having the convenience of a all-in-one close to my main computer unit.

>

> take care.

> beamish.

>

>

>

>

>

>

Guest Bill Sharpe
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

aga151 wrote:

> Hi, just as a metter of interest:

> What would you guys recommend as a good old round printer/all-in-one for

> home users?

>

> aga

I'm sure there's disagreement here, but my HP psc1315 all-in-one inkjet

(less fax, which I don't need) has been working just fine for four years.

 

I ignore the popup I get saying the printer is low on ink and keep

printing until the printouts start getting too light. There are two

cartridges -- one for black ink, one for color.

 

It's also great for copies and scanning. There's a PictBridge connector

on the front for printing pictures, but I haven't ever used it.

 

This unit replaced an Epson inkjet and a separate scanner.

 

Bill

Guest apistomaster
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

I bought a Brother AIO with built in wireless, Model MFC-665-CW a

year ago for $300, and it has worked great.

It even has a hand set, answering machine function, key dialing, and

all the pictbridge, scan, copy, photos and reg print functions

The same one is still available for half the price I paid.

Just buy a set of 4 color ink cartridges since like everyone else,

those included with the machine are just "starters."

Even so, I got nearly one year of printing from the original ink

cartridges.

The software plays nice with Windows XP and the wireless set up is

painless.

Guest Ken Blake, MVP
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:43:01 -0700, aga151

<aga151@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

> Hi Ken,

> Thanks for your thoughts,it's abit of a headache getting it

> right,certainly the Lexmark,is a nightmare,it' really mucks up the spooler

> system but apparently it's a problem with Lexmark,as one said: they really

> haven't got the brains to get their printers to work without 'screwing up'

> the spooler.

>

> Will just keep looking and see what turns up

>

> Thanks

 

 

You're welcome. Glad to help.

 

 

> "Ken Blake, MVP" wrote:

>

> > On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:08:04 -0700, aga151

> > <aga151@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

> >

> > > Hi, just as a metter of interest:

> > > What would you guys recommend as a good old round printer/all-in-one for

> > > home users?

> >

> >

> > Several points:

> >

> > 1. I recommend against all-in-one units. The problem is that if one

> > component fails, the entire unit has to be replaced. As far as I'm

> > concerned, the only justification for using an all-in-one is lack of

> > desk space.

> >

> > 2. The main question you have to answer for yourself is whether you

> > need color, or whether black and white will suffice. A black-and-white

> > laser printer is the most economical way to go (not so much in terms

> > of purchase price, but in terms of expendables--the per page printed

> > price).

> >

> > 3. If you do get a color inkjet, be sure to choose one with cartridges

> > you can fill yourself, or with a supply of quality cartridges

> > available from third parties. If you have to buy the manufacturer's

> > cartridges, it will be very expensive.

> >

> > 4. In color inkjets, I recommend the Canon Pixma line of inexpensive

> > printers. In black-and-white lasers, there are several good choices. I

> > use an old Konica-Minolta PagePro 1350W that I'm happy with.

> >

> > --

> > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience

> > Please Reply to the Newsgroup

> >

 

--

Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience

Please Reply to the Newsgroup

Guest Edric
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:08:04 -0700, aga151

<aga151@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

>Hi, just as a metter of interest:

>What would you guys recommend as a good old round printer/all-in-one for

>home users?

>

>aga

Why are you asking this HERE? What printer you want has NOTHING to do

with XP OS. Do your own research and buy what YOU want.

 

Ask elsewhere

Guest HeyBub
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

Tim Slattery wrote:

> "HeyBub" <heybub@gmail.com> wrote:

>

>

>> The inkjet printers follow the Gillette business model: Give away

>> the razor and sell the blades.

>

> They sure do! Last year I bought a new laptop at Micro Center. They

> threw in a "free" Epson all-in-one: pay up front, mail-in rebate

> refunds the entire purchase price. I will say that Epson was *very*

> good on the rebate (as opposed to the $50 rebate from Toshiba on the

> computer, that took forever)! And the print quality is very good.

>

> So we got it hooked up, which was very easy. It turns out that a set

> of replacement cartridges cast as much as the printer did (before

> rebate)!

>

> I haven't really used the thing. My wife has, and she says you have to

> keep cleaning the heads, which apparently consumes ink. Can somebody

> who knows more about these beasts confirm or refute this?

>

>> If you get an inkjet, be sure you can re-fill the cartridges, else

>> get a laser printer.

>

> I have no idea whether the carts on the Epson are refillable. Nor

> whether refilled carts would yield photos as good as the originals.

 

Most assuredly they are. But here's a trick: Some printer manufacturers

(Epson, who shall remain nameless, and others), put a CHIP on each

cartridge. The alleged purpose of this chip is to inform the computer that

you're out of ink so don't bother trying to send any printing!

 

You can re-fill the cartridge 'till the cows come home, but the chip will

still prevent the drivers from sending data to the printer.

 

But, be of good cheer. The same people who sell bulk ink also sell

CHIP-RESETTERS (about $3.00) which brain-fry the friggin' chip into thinking

it's brand new!

 

Check Ebay for bulk ink, chips, and refill kits.

 

We use an ink-jet to print CDs and we print several hundred a month. We've

actually removed the cartridges and replaced them with an INK RESERVOIR

system - each of the six color buckets holds about a fluid ounce of ink and

connects to the nozzle gizmos with small tubing. The ink buckets are

refilled from six ounce bulk bottles we get from Sam's Club online store.

This setup - with an initial supply of ink - cost about $60 (much less than

the manufacturer's price for a single set of cartridges).

Guest Lil' Dave
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

The answer depends on how many copies per minute, how quickly to scan, dpi

for color and b/w, what you want to copy in terms of paper size (legal for

instance), and if you want the copy strictly on the PC or on paper, or both.

 

So far, you indicated a need for a scanner/copier. Not a printer.

 

--

Dave

 

Speculation on a product or material that is

an obvious need, is not speculation per se

as there is no risk to the speculator.

Common were those selling food and other

supplies in the gold rush days.

In this case, its oil and its everyone who

bites the bullet. And most everyone has no gold

to be made, just business as usual.

 

"aga151" <aga151@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:6ECAE66B-DBB3-4C61-9320-7560D2379B18@microsoft.com...

> Hi cw,

> as you can see what BOB wrote and my answer well, it's really NOT

> for

> printing (excuse the 'pun') the main reason was to get a scanner and

> copier

> too,I have spoken to a mate of mine who has an Epsom all in one and so far

> no

> problems,but the Lexmark, wow what a B%&*&$y nightmare and it's only 3

> months old

>

> Thanks fopr you input.

>

> regards

> aga

>

> "Thee Chicago Wolf" wrote:

>

>> >Hi, just as a metter of interest:

>> >What would you guys recommend as a good old round printer/all-in-one for

>> >home users?

>>

>> The problem with all-in-one printers is that if one component breaks,

>> you lose functionality. Are you married to the idea of all-in-one?

>> What functionality do you need from a printer? Do you prefer ink-jet

>> based or are you open to laser?

>>

>> - Thee Chicago Wolf

>>

Guest Bill Sharpe
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

Edric wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:08:04 -0700, aga151

> <aga151@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

>

>> Hi, just as a metter of interest:

>> What would you guys recommend as a good old round printer/all-in-one for

>> home users?

>>

>> aga

> Why are you asking this HERE? What printer you want has NOTHING to do

> with XP OS. Do your own research and buy what YOU want.

>

> Ask elsewhere

>

Get on the stick, Edric. You've got to jump in a lot faster than 12

hours after the initial post. There have been 15 replies already...

 

Bill

Guest aga151
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

Good evening to you Edric,

 

You got 'shares' in Lexmark?????

 

aga

 

"Edric" wrote:

> On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:08:04 -0700, aga151

> <aga151@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

>

> >Hi, just as a metter of interest:

> >What would you guys recommend as a good old round printer/all-in-one for

> >home users?

> >

> >aga

> Why are you asking this HERE? What printer you want has NOTHING to do

> with XP OS. Do your own research and buy what YOU want.

>

> Ask elsewhere

>

>

Guest aga151
Posted

Re: printer!!!

 

 

Hi Bill,

Seems there is always one,just thought I'd ask people like you guys

for your thoughts.

 

Thanks

aga

 

 

"Bill Sharpe" wrote:

> Edric wrote:

> > On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:08:04 -0700, aga151

> > <aga151@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

> >

> >> Hi, just as a metter of interest:

> >> What would you guys recommend as a good old round printer/all-in-one for

> >> home users?

> >>

> >> aga

> > Why are you asking this HERE? What printer you want has NOTHING to do

> > with XP OS. Do your own research and buy what YOU want.

> >

> > Ask elsewhere

> >

> Get on the stick, Edric. You've got to jump in a lot faster than 12

> hours after the initial post. There have been 15 replies already...

>

> Bill

>

>


×
×
  • Create New...