Guest Peter Posted July 22, 2008 Posted July 22, 2008 I get error 7023 repeatedly whenever I delete a programme. I can't understand how to get the Hotfix below, and whether it is applicable to XP SP3. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328213/en-us help! JB
Guest MowGreen [MVP] Posted July 23, 2008 Posted July 23, 2008 Re: Error 7023 Is the system event log showing the exact same error as in the KB article ? Update.exe should have been updated to a much higher version [the latest is V. 6.3.13.0] than what is showing in the article by the installation of SP2 and SP3, along with the myriad security updates issued since this KB was published. MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] =============== *-343-* FDNY Never Forgotten =============== Peter wrote: > I get error 7023 repeatedly whenever I delete a programme. > > I can't understand how to get the Hotfix below, and whether it is applicable > to XP SP3. > > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328213/en-us > > help! > > JB > >
Guest Peter Posted July 25, 2008 Posted July 25, 2008 Re: Error 7023 As far as Error 7023, it only happens when I Add/Delete a program (I think only deleting). I have other Errors: 10010 DCOM which happens EVERY TIME I start the computer and I don't know what to do; and ID1 ACPIEC which is happening more and more frequently and again I am at a loss. Any help on these would be much appreciated, so that I try to understand what is going on in my very slow computer. All the MS updates are up to date. I have XP Home SP3. Below the errors that I keep getting: Product: Windows Operating System ID: 7023 Source: Service Control Manager Version: 5.0 Component: System Event Log Symbolic Name: EVENT_SERVICE_EXIT_FAILED Message: The %1 service terminated with the following error: %2 Explanation The specified service stopped unexpectedly with the error indicated in the message. The service closed safely. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product: Windows Operating System ID: 10010 Source: DCOM Version: 5.0 Component: System Event Log Symbolic Name: EVENT_RPCSS_SERVER_START_TIMEOUT Message: The server %1 did not register with DCOM within the required timeout. Explanation The Component Object Model (COM) infrastructure tried to start the named server; however, the server did not reply within the required timeout period. There might be a deadlock, or the program might not have responded to the server initialization code within the timeout period of two minutes ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product: Windows Operating System ID: 1 Source: ACPIEC Version: 5.2 Symbolic Name: ACPIEC_ERR_WATCHDOG Message: %1: The embedded controller (EC) hardware didn't respond within the timeout period. This may indicate an error in the EC hardware or firmware, or possibly a poorly designed BIOS which accesses the EC in an unsafe manner. The EC driver will retry the failed transaction if possible. "MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> escreveu na mensagem news:O2XcQDO7IHA.1952@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Is the system event log showing the exact same error as in the KB article > ? Update.exe should have been updated to a much higher version [the latest > is V. 6.3.13.0] than what is showing in the article by the installation of > SP2 and SP3, along with the myriad security updates issued since this KB > was published. > > MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] > =============== > *-343-* FDNY > Never Forgotten > =============== > > > Peter wrote: > >> I get error 7023 repeatedly whenever I delete a programme. >> >> I can't understand how to get the Hotfix below, and whether it is >> applicable to XP SP3. >> >> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328213/en-us >> >> help! >> >> JB
Guest R. McCarty Posted July 25, 2008 Posted July 25, 2008 Re: Error 7023 Has this computer ever had a Registry Cleaner used on it ? Also has any Services had their Start Mode modified. It seems to me like you've got a series of dependency group failures. I would clear both the App and System Event Logs and do a reboot. Then check both logs for all warnings and errors. Does your boot cycle time run ~45-60 Seconds or is it significantly longer. As to the hardware issue does your Device Manager have a clean listing ? - ( No Red X's or Yellow Exclamation marks ). "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message news:O3TlWRk7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > As far as Error 7023, it only happens when I Add/Delete a program (I think > only deleting). I have other Errors: 10010 DCOM which happens EVERY TIME > I start the computer and I don't know what to do; and ID1 ACPIEC which is > happening more and more frequently and again I am at a loss. > > Any help on these would be much appreciated, so that I try to understand > what is going on in my very slow computer. All the MS updates are up to > date. I have XP Home SP3. > > Below the errors that I keep getting: > > > Product: Windows Operating System > ID: 7023 > Source: Service Control Manager > Version: 5.0 > Component: System Event Log > Symbolic Name: EVENT_SERVICE_EXIT_FAILED > Message: The %1 service terminated with the following error: > %2 > > Explanation > The specified service stopped unexpectedly with the error indicated in the > message. The service closed > > safely. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Product: Windows Operating System > ID: 10010 > Source: DCOM > Version: 5.0 > Component: System Event Log > Symbolic Name: EVENT_RPCSS_SERVER_START_TIMEOUT > Message: The server %1 did not register with DCOM within the required > timeout. > > Explanation > The Component Object Model (COM) infrastructure tried to start the named > server; however, the server > > did not reply within the required timeout period. There might be a > deadlock, or the program might not > > have responded to the server initialization code within the timeout period > of two minutes > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Product: Windows Operating System > ID: 1 > Source: ACPIEC > Version: 5.2 > Symbolic Name: ACPIEC_ERR_WATCHDOG > Message: %1: The embedded controller (EC) hardware didn't respond within > the timeout period. This > > may indicate an error in the EC hardware or firmware, or possibly a poorly > designed BIOS which > > accesses the EC in an unsafe manner. The EC driver will retry the failed > transaction if possible. > > > > > > > > > > > "MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> escreveu na mensagem > news:O2XcQDO7IHA.1952@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> Is the system event log showing the exact same error as in the KB article >> ? Update.exe should have been updated to a much higher version [the >> latest is V. 6.3.13.0] than what is showing in the article by the >> installation of SP2 and SP3, along with the myriad security updates >> issued since this KB was published. >> >> MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] >> =============== >> *-343-* FDNY >> Never Forgotten >> =============== >> >> >> Peter wrote: >> >>> I get error 7023 repeatedly whenever I delete a programme. >>> >>> I can't understand how to get the Hotfix below, and whether it is >>> applicable to XP SP3. >>> >>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328213/en-us >>> >>> help! >>> >>> JB > >
Guest Peter Posted July 25, 2008 Posted July 25, 2008 Re: Error 7023 Thank you very much for your help. As for Registry cleaner the answer is yes. Over the years (4/5) I have used in the past RegCleaner and more recently CCleaner. I nver played around with Services, other than in MSconfig, where I disabled most of what I felt was not necessary at Startup. The boot is very long! I get the clock after some 15 seconds followed by the battery and the sound icons, but then I have to wait some 90/120 seconds for the Internet and McAfee to come up, strangely usually Internet before McAfee. I have cable connected to a router and then to the computer through a cable. The delay, I guess in my ignorance may be due to handshaking between the computer and the router with McAfee making things worse. Even after all the icons are up I find it difficult to open anything at all for some time. Eventually everything works reasonable well, until McAfee or someone else decides to check updates and then the susytem goes into a crawl, as if the memory was being hijacked. Checking on CPU use does not show excessive use which makes it strange why the computer should virtually hang if the CPU has over 90% free usage. Incidentally, I have done repeatedly all sorts of Virus/trojan/etc checks and I am confident that the computer is clean; unmless of course all the different programmes are useless... Thank you again for your help. JB I will wait for your response before clearing the App and System Event Logs. "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem news:ui4l7Yk7IHA.4532@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Has this computer ever had a Registry Cleaner used on it ? Also has > any Services had their Start Mode modified. It seems to me like you've > got a series of dependency group failures. I would clear both the App > and System Event Logs and do a reboot. Then check both logs for all > warnings and errors. Does your boot cycle time run ~45-60 Seconds > or is it significantly longer. > > As to the hardware issue does your Device Manager have a clean > listing ? - ( No Red X's or Yellow Exclamation marks ). > > > "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message > news:O3TlWRk7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> As far as Error 7023, it only happens when I Add/Delete a program (I >> think only deleting). I have other Errors: 10010 DCOM which happens >> EVERY TIME I start the computer and I don't know what to do; and ID1 >> ACPIEC which is happening more and more frequently and again I am at a >> loss. >> >> Any help on these would be much appreciated, so that I try to understand >> what is going on in my very slow computer. All the MS updates are up to >> date. I have XP Home SP3. >> >> Below the errors that I keep getting: >> >> >> Product: Windows Operating System >> ID: 7023 >> Source: Service Control Manager >> Version: 5.0 >> Component: System Event Log >> Symbolic Name: EVENT_SERVICE_EXIT_FAILED >> Message: The %1 service terminated with the following error: >> %2 >> >> Explanation >> The specified service stopped unexpectedly with the error indicated in >> the message. The service closed >> >> safely. >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Product: Windows Operating System >> ID: 10010 >> Source: DCOM >> Version: 5.0 >> Component: System Event Log >> Symbolic Name: EVENT_RPCSS_SERVER_START_TIMEOUT >> Message: The server %1 did not register with DCOM within the required >> timeout. >> >> Explanation >> The Component Object Model (COM) infrastructure tried to start the named >> server; however, the server >> >> did not reply within the required timeout period. There might be a >> deadlock, or the program might not >> >> have responded to the server initialization code within the timeout >> period of two minutes >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Product: Windows Operating System >> ID: 1 >> Source: ACPIEC >> Version: 5.2 >> Symbolic Name: ACPIEC_ERR_WATCHDOG >> Message: %1: The embedded controller (EC) hardware didn't respond within >> the timeout period. This >> >> may indicate an error in the EC hardware or firmware, or possibly a >> poorly designed BIOS which >> >> accesses the EC in an unsafe manner. The EC driver will retry the failed >> transaction if possible. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> escreveu na mensagem >> news:O2XcQDO7IHA.1952@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>> Is the system event log showing the exact same error as in the KB >>> article ? Update.exe should have been updated to a much higher version >>> [the latest is V. 6.3.13.0] than what is showing in the article by the >>> installation of SP2 and SP3, along with the myriad security updates >>> issued since this KB was published. >>> >>> MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] >>> =============== >>> *-343-* FDNY >>> Never Forgotten >>> =============== >>> >>> >>> Peter wrote: >>> >>>> I get error 7023 repeatedly whenever I delete a programme. >>>> >>>> I can't understand how to get the Hotfix below, and whether it is >>>> applicable to XP SP3. >>>> >>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328213/en-us >>>> >>>> help! >>>> >>>> JB >> >> > >
Guest R. McCarty Posted July 25, 2008 Posted July 25, 2008 Re: Error 7023 Using McAfee almost always inflicts a "Noticeable" performance loss. So some of your issues are most definitely related to McAfee. The boot sequence indicates service time outs ( up to 30 Seconds ). The kind of errors you report can be the result of Registry Cleaning. It's like death of a thousand cuts for a PC. The registry is a large database of "HIGHLY" interdependent links and associations. Removing what seems to be invalid keys/values may not result in immediate damage, but will show up later as that association is called on. Registry Cleaning ( & it's merits ) ranks as the top on-going issue here. This post is likely to kick off the "Yes it works", "No it Doesn't" threads. Unfortunately once the Registry is hacked on, there is no method of repair to a known valid state. You can probably get the machine back to a working state, but you'll never know or trust the integrity of the Registry. The time it will take to get a Clean/Error free boot may not be worth the effort. I'd be inclined to recommend a fresh install and choose another Security product excluding any McAfee or Norton brand. If you can't resist the urge to clean the Registry at the least invest in an imaging program like Acronis True Image and make regular images. This way when something gets broken you can roll the machine back to a working/reliable state. "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message news:%23fpI6pk7IHA.4040@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Thank you very much for your help. > > As for Registry cleaner the answer is yes. Over the years (4/5) I have > used in the past RegCleaner and more recently CCleaner. > > I nver played around with Services, other than in MSconfig, where I > disabled most of what I felt was not necessary at Startup. > > The boot is very long! I get the clock after some 15 seconds followed by > the battery and the sound icons, but then I have to wait some 90/120 > seconds for the Internet and McAfee to come up, strangely usually Internet > before McAfee. I have cable connected to a router and then to the > computer through a cable. The delay, I guess in my ignorance may be due > to handshaking between the computer and the router with McAfee making > things worse. Even after all the icons are up I find it difficult to open > anything at all for some time. Eventually everything works reasonable > well, until McAfee or someone else decides to check updates and then the > susytem goes into a crawl, as if the memory was being hijacked. Checking > on CPU use does not show excessive use which makes it strange why the > computer should virtually hang if the CPU has over 90% free usage. > > Incidentally, I have done repeatedly all sorts of Virus/trojan/etc checks > and I am confident that the computer is clean; unmless of course all the > different programmes are useless... > > Thank you again for your help. > > JB > > I will wait for your response before clearing the App and System Event > Logs. > "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem > news:ui4l7Yk7IHA.4532@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >> Has this computer ever had a Registry Cleaner used on it ? Also has >> any Services had their Start Mode modified. It seems to me like you've >> got a series of dependency group failures. I would clear both the App >> and System Event Logs and do a reboot. Then check both logs for all >> warnings and errors. Does your boot cycle time run ~45-60 Seconds >> or is it significantly longer. >> >> As to the hardware issue does your Device Manager have a clean >> listing ? - ( No Red X's or Yellow Exclamation marks ). >> >> >> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >> news:O3TlWRk7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>> As far as Error 7023, it only happens when I Add/Delete a program (I >>> think only deleting). I have other Errors: 10010 DCOM which happens >>> EVERY TIME I start the computer and I don't know what to do; and ID1 >>> ACPIEC which is happening more and more frequently and again I am at a >>> loss. >>> >>> Any help on these would be much appreciated, so that I try to understand >>> what is going on in my very slow computer. All the MS updates are up to >>> date. I have XP Home SP3. >>> >>> Below the errors that I keep getting: >>> >>> >>> Product: Windows Operating System >>> ID: 7023 >>> Source: Service Control Manager >>> Version: 5.0 >>> Component: System Event Log >>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_SERVICE_EXIT_FAILED >>> Message: The %1 service terminated with the following error: >>> %2 >>> >>> Explanation >>> The specified service stopped unexpectedly with the error indicated in >>> the message. The service closed >>> >>> safely. >>> >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Product: Windows Operating System >>> ID: 10010 >>> Source: DCOM >>> Version: 5.0 >>> Component: System Event Log >>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_RPCSS_SERVER_START_TIMEOUT >>> Message: The server %1 did not register with DCOM within the required >>> timeout. >>> >>> Explanation >>> The Component Object Model (COM) infrastructure tried to start the named >>> server; however, the server >>> >>> did not reply within the required timeout period. There might be a >>> deadlock, or the program might not >>> >>> have responded to the server initialization code within the timeout >>> period of two minutes >>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> Product: Windows Operating System >>> ID: 1 >>> Source: ACPIEC >>> Version: 5.2 >>> Symbolic Name: ACPIEC_ERR_WATCHDOG >>> Message: %1: The embedded controller (EC) hardware didn't respond within >>> the timeout period. This >>> >>> may indicate an error in the EC hardware or firmware, or possibly a >>> poorly designed BIOS which >>> >>> accesses the EC in an unsafe manner. The EC driver will retry the failed >>> transaction if possible. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> "MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> escreveu na mensagem >>> news:O2XcQDO7IHA.1952@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>>> Is the system event log showing the exact same error as in the KB >>>> article ? Update.exe should have been updated to a much higher version >>>> [the latest is V. 6.3.13.0] than what is showing in the article by the >>>> installation of SP2 and SP3, along with the myriad security updates >>>> issued since this KB was published. >>>> >>>> MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] >>>> =============== >>>> *-343-* FDNY >>>> Never Forgotten >>>> =============== >>>> >>>> >>>> Peter wrote: >>>> >>>>> I get error 7023 repeatedly whenever I delete a programme. >>>>> >>>>> I can't understand how to get the Hotfix below, and whether it is >>>>> applicable to XP SP3. >>>>> >>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328213/en-us >>>>> >>>>> help! >>>>> >>>>> JB >>> >>> >> >> > >
Guest Peter Posted July 25, 2008 Posted July 25, 2008 Re: Error 7023 Thank you so much. Could you give me an idea of what the ID: 1: ACPIEC is all about? Best JB "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem news:uVUMwVl7IHA.1420@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Using McAfee almost always inflicts a "Noticeable" performance loss. > So some of your issues are most definitely related to McAfee. The boot > sequence indicates service time outs ( up to 30 Seconds ). > > The kind of errors you report can be the result of Registry Cleaning. It's > like death of a thousand cuts for a PC. The registry is a large database > of "HIGHLY" interdependent links and associations. Removing what > seems to be invalid keys/values may not result in immediate damage, but > will show up later as that association is called on. > > Registry Cleaning ( & it's merits ) ranks as the top on-going issue here. > This post is likely to kick off the "Yes it works", "No it Doesn't" > threads. > > Unfortunately once the Registry is hacked on, there is no method of > repair to a known valid state. You can probably get the machine back to > a working state, but you'll never know or trust the integrity of the > Registry. > The time it will take to get a Clean/Error free boot may not be worth the > effort. I'd be inclined to recommend a fresh install and choose another > Security product excluding any McAfee or Norton brand. > > If you can't resist the urge to clean the Registry at the least invest in > an > imaging program like Acronis True Image and make regular images. This > way when something gets broken you can roll the machine back to a > working/reliable state. > > > "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message > news:%23fpI6pk7IHA.4040@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> Thank you very much for your help. >> >> As for Registry cleaner the answer is yes. Over the years (4/5) I have >> used in the past RegCleaner and more recently CCleaner. >> >> I nver played around with Services, other than in MSconfig, where I >> disabled most of what I felt was not necessary at Startup. >> >> The boot is very long! I get the clock after some 15 seconds followed by >> the battery and the sound icons, but then I have to wait some 90/120 >> seconds for the Internet and McAfee to come up, strangely usually >> Internet before McAfee. I have cable connected to a router and then to >> the computer through a cable. The delay, I guess in my ignorance may be >> due to handshaking between the computer and the router with McAfee making >> things worse. Even after all the icons are up I find it difficult to >> open anything at all for some time. Eventually everything works >> reasonable well, until McAfee or someone else decides to check updates >> and then the susytem goes into a crawl, as if the memory was being >> hijacked. Checking on CPU use does not show excessive use which makes it >> strange why the computer should virtually hang if the CPU has over 90% >> free usage. >> >> Incidentally, I have done repeatedly all sorts of Virus/trojan/etc checks >> and I am confident that the computer is clean; unmless of course all the >> different programmes are useless... >> >> Thank you again for your help. >> >> JB >> >> I will wait for your response before clearing the App and System Event >> Logs. >> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >> news:ui4l7Yk7IHA.4532@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>> Has this computer ever had a Registry Cleaner used on it ? Also has >>> any Services had their Start Mode modified. It seems to me like you've >>> got a series of dependency group failures. I would clear both the App >>> and System Event Logs and do a reboot. Then check both logs for all >>> warnings and errors. Does your boot cycle time run ~45-60 Seconds >>> or is it significantly longer. >>> >>> As to the hardware issue does your Device Manager have a clean >>> listing ? - ( No Red X's or Yellow Exclamation marks ). >>> >>> >>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >>> news:O3TlWRk7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>> As far as Error 7023, it only happens when I Add/Delete a program (I >>>> think only deleting). I have other Errors: 10010 DCOM which happens >>>> EVERY TIME I start the computer and I don't know what to do; and ID1 >>>> ACPIEC which is happening more and more frequently and again I am at a >>>> loss. >>>> >>>> Any help on these would be much appreciated, so that I try to >>>> understand what is going on in my very slow computer. All the MS >>>> updates are up to date. I have XP Home SP3. >>>> >>>> Below the errors that I keep getting: >>>> >>>> >>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>> ID: 7023 >>>> Source: Service Control Manager >>>> Version: 5.0 >>>> Component: System Event Log >>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_SERVICE_EXIT_FAILED >>>> Message: The %1 service terminated with the following error: >>>> %2 >>>> >>>> Explanation >>>> The specified service stopped unexpectedly with the error indicated in >>>> the message. The service closed >>>> >>>> safely. >>>> >>>> >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>> ID: 10010 >>>> Source: DCOM >>>> Version: 5.0 >>>> Component: System Event Log >>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_RPCSS_SERVER_START_TIMEOUT >>>> Message: The server %1 did not register with DCOM within the required >>>> timeout. >>>> >>>> Explanation >>>> The Component Object Model (COM) infrastructure tried to start the >>>> named server; however, the server >>>> >>>> did not reply within the required timeout period. There might be a >>>> deadlock, or the program might not >>>> >>>> have responded to the server initialization code within the timeout >>>> period of two minutes >>>> >>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>> ID: 1 >>>> Source: ACPIEC >>>> Version: 5.2 >>>> Symbolic Name: ACPIEC_ERR_WATCHDOG >>>> Message: %1: The embedded controller (EC) hardware didn't respond >>>> within the timeout period. This >>>> >>>> may indicate an error in the EC hardware or firmware, or possibly a >>>> poorly designed BIOS which >>>> >>>> accesses the EC in an unsafe manner. The EC driver will retry the >>>> failed transaction if possible. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> "MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> escreveu na mensagem >>>> news:O2XcQDO7IHA.1952@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>>>> Is the system event log showing the exact same error as in the KB >>>>> article ? Update.exe should have been updated to a much higher version >>>>> [the latest is V. 6.3.13.0] than what is showing in the article by the >>>>> installation of SP2 and SP3, along with the myriad security updates >>>>> issued since this KB was published. >>>>> >>>>> MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] >>>>> =============== >>>>> *-343-* FDNY >>>>> Never Forgotten >>>>> =============== >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Peter wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I get error 7023 repeatedly whenever I delete a programme. >>>>>> >>>>>> I can't understand how to get the Hotfix below, and whether it is >>>>>> applicable to XP SP3. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328213/en-us >>>>>> >>>>>> help! >>>>>> >>>>>> JB >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
Guest R. McCarty Posted July 25, 2008 Posted July 25, 2008 Re: Error 7023 Newer motherboards employ an APIC ( Advanced Programmable Interrupt Controller ). This extends the original PC IRQ range up to 23 Interrupt lines. This helps a PC to map devices using IRQ Sharing. When XP is first installed it interrogates the BIOS to see if the motherboard supports extended IRQ mapping and loads a HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) driver appropriate for the type of hardware. From the name, I'd suspect that you have an issue with some form of APIC support. You can usually determine if your setup has APIC by using System Info tool, Hardware Resources category, IRQs - and noting the highest numbered IRQ in the map. "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message news:%23T8wBfl7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > Thank you so much. > > Could you give me an idea of what the ID: 1: ACPIEC is all about? > > Best > > JB > > > "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem > news:uVUMwVl7IHA.1420@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> Using McAfee almost always inflicts a "Noticeable" performance loss. >> So some of your issues are most definitely related to McAfee. The boot >> sequence indicates service time outs ( up to 30 Seconds ). >> >> The kind of errors you report can be the result of Registry Cleaning. >> It's >> like death of a thousand cuts for a PC. The registry is a large database >> of "HIGHLY" interdependent links and associations. Removing what >> seems to be invalid keys/values may not result in immediate damage, but >> will show up later as that association is called on. >> >> Registry Cleaning ( & it's merits ) ranks as the top on-going issue here. >> This post is likely to kick off the "Yes it works", "No it Doesn't" >> threads. >> >> Unfortunately once the Registry is hacked on, there is no method of >> repair to a known valid state. You can probably get the machine back to >> a working state, but you'll never know or trust the integrity of the >> Registry. >> The time it will take to get a Clean/Error free boot may not be worth the >> effort. I'd be inclined to recommend a fresh install and choose another >> Security product excluding any McAfee or Norton brand. >> >> If you can't resist the urge to clean the Registry at the least invest in >> an >> imaging program like Acronis True Image and make regular images. This >> way when something gets broken you can roll the machine back to a >> working/reliable state. >> >> >> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >> news:%23fpI6pk7IHA.4040@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>> Thank you very much for your help. >>> >>> As for Registry cleaner the answer is yes. Over the years (4/5) I have >>> used in the past RegCleaner and more recently CCleaner. >>> >>> I nver played around with Services, other than in MSconfig, where I >>> disabled most of what I felt was not necessary at Startup. >>> >>> The boot is very long! I get the clock after some 15 seconds followed >>> by the battery and the sound icons, but then I have to wait some 90/120 >>> seconds for the Internet and McAfee to come up, strangely usually >>> Internet before McAfee. I have cable connected to a router and then to >>> the computer through a cable. The delay, I guess in my ignorance may be >>> due to handshaking between the computer and the router with McAfee >>> making things worse. Even after all the icons are up I find it >>> difficult to open anything at all for some time. Eventually everything >>> works reasonable well, until McAfee or someone else decides to check >>> updates and then the susytem goes into a crawl, as if the memory was >>> being hijacked. Checking on CPU use does not show excessive use which >>> makes it strange why the computer should virtually hang if the CPU has >>> over 90% free usage. >>> >>> Incidentally, I have done repeatedly all sorts of Virus/trojan/etc >>> checks and I am confident that the computer is clean; unmless of course >>> all the different programmes are useless... >>> >>> Thank you again for your help. >>> >>> JB >>> >>> I will wait for your response before clearing the App and System Event >>> Logs. >>> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >>> news:ui4l7Yk7IHA.4532@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>> Has this computer ever had a Registry Cleaner used on it ? Also has >>>> any Services had their Start Mode modified. It seems to me like you've >>>> got a series of dependency group failures. I would clear both the App >>>> and System Event Logs and do a reboot. Then check both logs for all >>>> warnings and errors. Does your boot cycle time run ~45-60 Seconds >>>> or is it significantly longer. >>>> >>>> As to the hardware issue does your Device Manager have a clean >>>> listing ? - ( No Red X's or Yellow Exclamation marks ). >>>> >>>> >>>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >>>> news:O3TlWRk7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>>> As far as Error 7023, it only happens when I Add/Delete a program (I >>>>> think only deleting). I have other Errors: 10010 DCOM which happens >>>>> EVERY TIME I start the computer and I don't know what to do; and ID1 >>>>> ACPIEC which is happening more and more frequently and again I am at a >>>>> loss. >>>>> >>>>> Any help on these would be much appreciated, so that I try to >>>>> understand what is going on in my very slow computer. All the MS >>>>> updates are up to date. I have XP Home SP3. >>>>> >>>>> Below the errors that I keep getting: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>> ID: 7023 >>>>> Source: Service Control Manager >>>>> Version: 5.0 >>>>> Component: System Event Log >>>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_SERVICE_EXIT_FAILED >>>>> Message: The %1 service terminated with the following error: >>>>> %2 >>>>> >>>>> Explanation >>>>> The specified service stopped unexpectedly with the error indicated in >>>>> the message. The service closed >>>>> >>>>> safely. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>> ID: 10010 >>>>> Source: DCOM >>>>> Version: 5.0 >>>>> Component: System Event Log >>>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_RPCSS_SERVER_START_TIMEOUT >>>>> Message: The server %1 did not register with DCOM within the required >>>>> timeout. >>>>> >>>>> Explanation >>>>> The Component Object Model (COM) infrastructure tried to start the >>>>> named server; however, the server >>>>> >>>>> did not reply within the required timeout period. There might be a >>>>> deadlock, or the program might not >>>>> >>>>> have responded to the server initialization code within the timeout >>>>> period of two minutes >>>>> >>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>> ID: 1 >>>>> Source: ACPIEC >>>>> Version: 5.2 >>>>> Symbolic Name: ACPIEC_ERR_WATCHDOG >>>>> Message: %1: The embedded controller (EC) hardware didn't respond >>>>> within the timeout period. This >>>>> >>>>> may indicate an error in the EC hardware or firmware, or possibly a >>>>> poorly designed BIOS which >>>>> >>>>> accesses the EC in an unsafe manner. The EC driver will retry the >>>>> failed transaction if possible. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> escreveu na mensagem >>>>> news:O2XcQDO7IHA.1952@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>>>>> Is the system event log showing the exact same error as in the KB >>>>>> article ? Update.exe should have been updated to a much higher >>>>>> version [the latest is V. 6.3.13.0] than what is showing in the >>>>>> article by the installation of SP2 and SP3, along with the myriad >>>>>> security updates issued since this KB was published. >>>>>> >>>>>> MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] >>>>>> =============== >>>>>> *-343-* FDNY >>>>>> Never Forgotten >>>>>> =============== >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Peter wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I get error 7023 repeatedly whenever I delete a programme. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I can't understand how to get the Hotfix below, and whether it is >>>>>>> applicable to XP SP3. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328213/en-us >>>>>>> >>>>>>> help! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
Guest Peter Posted July 25, 2008 Posted July 25, 2008 Re: Error 7023 IRQ 15 is the highest number. Does this sound to you as if I could do with a Bios upgrade? Thank you veru much for your very comprehensive and professional information. JB "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem news:O$$29kl7IHA.1080@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Newer motherboards employ an APIC ( Advanced Programmable > Interrupt Controller ). This extends the original PC IRQ range up > to 23 Interrupt lines. This helps a PC to map devices using IRQ > Sharing. When XP is first installed it interrogates the BIOS to see > if the motherboard supports extended IRQ mapping and loads a > HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) driver appropriate for the type > of hardware. From the name, I'd suspect that you have an issue with > some form of APIC support. You can usually determine if your > setup has APIC by using System Info tool, Hardware Resources > category, IRQs - and noting the highest numbered IRQ in the map. > > "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message > news:%23T8wBfl7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> Thank you so much. >> >> Could you give me an idea of what the ID: 1: ACPIEC is all about? >> >> Best >> >> JB >> >> >> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >> news:uVUMwVl7IHA.1420@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>> Using McAfee almost always inflicts a "Noticeable" performance loss. >>> So some of your issues are most definitely related to McAfee. The boot >>> sequence indicates service time outs ( up to 30 Seconds ). >>> >>> The kind of errors you report can be the result of Registry Cleaning. >>> It's >>> like death of a thousand cuts for a PC. The registry is a large database >>> of "HIGHLY" interdependent links and associations. Removing what >>> seems to be invalid keys/values may not result in immediate damage, but >>> will show up later as that association is called on. >>> >>> Registry Cleaning ( & it's merits ) ranks as the top on-going issue >>> here. >>> This post is likely to kick off the "Yes it works", "No it Doesn't" >>> threads. >>> >>> Unfortunately once the Registry is hacked on, there is no method of >>> repair to a known valid state. You can probably get the machine back to >>> a working state, but you'll never know or trust the integrity of the >>> Registry. >>> The time it will take to get a Clean/Error free boot may not be worth >>> the >>> effort. I'd be inclined to recommend a fresh install and choose another >>> Security product excluding any McAfee or Norton brand. >>> >>> If you can't resist the urge to clean the Registry at the least invest >>> in an >>> imaging program like Acronis True Image and make regular images. This >>> way when something gets broken you can roll the machine back to a >>> working/reliable state. >>> >>> >>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >>> news:%23fpI6pk7IHA.4040@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>> Thank you very much for your help. >>>> >>>> As for Registry cleaner the answer is yes. Over the years (4/5) I have >>>> used in the past RegCleaner and more recently CCleaner. >>>> >>>> I nver played around with Services, other than in MSconfig, where I >>>> disabled most of what I felt was not necessary at Startup. >>>> >>>> The boot is very long! I get the clock after some 15 seconds followed >>>> by the battery and the sound icons, but then I have to wait some 90/120 >>>> seconds for the Internet and McAfee to come up, strangely usually >>>> Internet before McAfee. I have cable connected to a router and then to >>>> the computer through a cable. The delay, I guess in my ignorance may >>>> be due to handshaking between the computer and the router with McAfee >>>> making things worse. Even after all the icons are up I find it >>>> difficult to open anything at all for some time. Eventually everything >>>> works reasonable well, until McAfee or someone else decides to check >>>> updates and then the susytem goes into a crawl, as if the memory was >>>> being hijacked. Checking on CPU use does not show excessive use which >>>> makes it strange why the computer should virtually hang if the CPU has >>>> over 90% free usage. >>>> >>>> Incidentally, I have done repeatedly all sorts of Virus/trojan/etc >>>> checks and I am confident that the computer is clean; unmless of course >>>> all the different programmes are useless... >>>> >>>> Thank you again for your help. >>>> >>>> JB >>>> >>>> I will wait for your response before clearing the App and System Event >>>> Logs. >>>> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >>>> news:ui4l7Yk7IHA.4532@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>>> Has this computer ever had a Registry Cleaner used on it ? Also has >>>>> any Services had their Start Mode modified. It seems to me like you've >>>>> got a series of dependency group failures. I would clear both the App >>>>> and System Event Logs and do a reboot. Then check both logs for all >>>>> warnings and errors. Does your boot cycle time run ~45-60 Seconds >>>>> or is it significantly longer. >>>>> >>>>> As to the hardware issue does your Device Manager have a clean >>>>> listing ? - ( No Red X's or Yellow Exclamation marks ). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:O3TlWRk7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>>>> As far as Error 7023, it only happens when I Add/Delete a program (I >>>>>> think only deleting). I have other Errors: 10010 DCOM which happens >>>>>> EVERY TIME I start the computer and I don't know what to do; and ID1 >>>>>> ACPIEC which is happening more and more frequently and again I am at >>>>>> a loss. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any help on these would be much appreciated, so that I try to >>>>>> understand what is going on in my very slow computer. All the MS >>>>>> updates are up to date. I have XP Home SP3. >>>>>> >>>>>> Below the errors that I keep getting: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>>> ID: 7023 >>>>>> Source: Service Control Manager >>>>>> Version: 5.0 >>>>>> Component: System Event Log >>>>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_SERVICE_EXIT_FAILED >>>>>> Message: The %1 service terminated with the following error: >>>>>> %2 >>>>>> >>>>>> Explanation >>>>>> The specified service stopped unexpectedly with the error indicated >>>>>> in the message. The service closed >>>>>> >>>>>> safely. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>>> ID: 10010 >>>>>> Source: DCOM >>>>>> Version: 5.0 >>>>>> Component: System Event Log >>>>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_RPCSS_SERVER_START_TIMEOUT >>>>>> Message: The server %1 did not register with DCOM within the required >>>>>> timeout. >>>>>> >>>>>> Explanation >>>>>> The Component Object Model (COM) infrastructure tried to start the >>>>>> named server; however, the server >>>>>> >>>>>> did not reply within the required timeout period. There might be a >>>>>> deadlock, or the program might not >>>>>> >>>>>> have responded to the server initialization code within the timeout >>>>>> period of two minutes >>>>>> >>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>>> ID: 1 >>>>>> Source: ACPIEC >>>>>> Version: 5.2 >>>>>> Symbolic Name: ACPIEC_ERR_WATCHDOG >>>>>> Message: %1: The embedded controller (EC) hardware didn't respond >>>>>> within the timeout period. This >>>>>> >>>>>> may indicate an error in the EC hardware or firmware, or possibly a >>>>>> poorly designed BIOS which >>>>>> >>>>>> accesses the EC in an unsafe manner. The EC driver will retry the >>>>>> failed transaction if possible. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> escreveu na mensagem >>>>>> news:O2XcQDO7IHA.1952@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>>>>>> Is the system event log showing the exact same error as in the KB >>>>>>> article ? Update.exe should have been updated to a much higher >>>>>>> version [the latest is V. 6.3.13.0] than what is showing in the >>>>>>> article by the installation of SP2 and SP3, along with the myriad >>>>>>> security updates issued since this KB was published. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] >>>>>>> =============== >>>>>>> *-343-* FDNY >>>>>>> Never Forgotten >>>>>>> =============== >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Peter wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I get error 7023 repeatedly whenever I delete a programme. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I can't understand how to get the Hotfix below, and whether it is >>>>>>>> applicable to XP SP3. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328213/en-us >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> help! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
Guest Peter Posted July 25, 2008 Posted July 25, 2008 Re: Error 7023 I have just noted something strange (to me) in System Information: I have 256 MB of physical memory, but only 24.85 available... I have a .pdf file, a Word document, Outlook Express and 1 IE page open. Is this normal? Best JB "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem news:O$$29kl7IHA.1080@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Newer motherboards employ an APIC ( Advanced Programmable > Interrupt Controller ). This extends the original PC IRQ range up > to 23 Interrupt lines. This helps a PC to map devices using IRQ > Sharing. When XP is first installed it interrogates the BIOS to see > if the motherboard supports extended IRQ mapping and loads a > HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) driver appropriate for the type > of hardware. From the name, I'd suspect that you have an issue with > some form of APIC support. You can usually determine if your > setup has APIC by using System Info tool, Hardware Resources > category, IRQs - and noting the highest numbered IRQ in the map. > > "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message > news:%23T8wBfl7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> Thank you so much. >> >> Could you give me an idea of what the ID: 1: ACPIEC is all about? >> >> Best >> >> JB >> >> >> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >> news:uVUMwVl7IHA.1420@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>> Using McAfee almost always inflicts a "Noticeable" performance loss. >>> So some of your issues are most definitely related to McAfee. The boot >>> sequence indicates service time outs ( up to 30 Seconds ). >>> >>> The kind of errors you report can be the result of Registry Cleaning. >>> It's >>> like death of a thousand cuts for a PC. The registry is a large database >>> of "HIGHLY" interdependent links and associations. Removing what >>> seems to be invalid keys/values may not result in immediate damage, but >>> will show up later as that association is called on. >>> >>> Registry Cleaning ( & it's merits ) ranks as the top on-going issue >>> here. >>> This post is likely to kick off the "Yes it works", "No it Doesn't" >>> threads. >>> >>> Unfortunately once the Registry is hacked on, there is no method of >>> repair to a known valid state. You can probably get the machine back to >>> a working state, but you'll never know or trust the integrity of the >>> Registry. >>> The time it will take to get a Clean/Error free boot may not be worth >>> the >>> effort. I'd be inclined to recommend a fresh install and choose another >>> Security product excluding any McAfee or Norton brand. >>> >>> If you can't resist the urge to clean the Registry at the least invest >>> in an >>> imaging program like Acronis True Image and make regular images. This >>> way when something gets broken you can roll the machine back to a >>> working/reliable state. >>> >>> >>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >>> news:%23fpI6pk7IHA.4040@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>> Thank you very much for your help. >>>> >>>> As for Registry cleaner the answer is yes. Over the years (4/5) I have >>>> used in the past RegCleaner and more recently CCleaner. >>>> >>>> I nver played around with Services, other than in MSconfig, where I >>>> disabled most of what I felt was not necessary at Startup. >>>> >>>> The boot is very long! I get the clock after some 15 seconds followed >>>> by the battery and the sound icons, but then I have to wait some 90/120 >>>> seconds for the Internet and McAfee to come up, strangely usually >>>> Internet before McAfee. I have cable connected to a router and then to >>>> the computer through a cable. The delay, I guess in my ignorance may >>>> be due to handshaking between the computer and the router with McAfee >>>> making things worse. Even after all the icons are up I find it >>>> difficult to open anything at all for some time. Eventually everything >>>> works reasonable well, until McAfee or someone else decides to check >>>> updates and then the susytem goes into a crawl, as if the memory was >>>> being hijacked. Checking on CPU use does not show excessive use which >>>> makes it strange why the computer should virtually hang if the CPU has >>>> over 90% free usage. >>>> >>>> Incidentally, I have done repeatedly all sorts of Virus/trojan/etc >>>> checks and I am confident that the computer is clean; unmless of course >>>> all the different programmes are useless... >>>> >>>> Thank you again for your help. >>>> >>>> JB >>>> >>>> I will wait for your response before clearing the App and System Event >>>> Logs. >>>> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >>>> news:ui4l7Yk7IHA.4532@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>>> Has this computer ever had a Registry Cleaner used on it ? Also has >>>>> any Services had their Start Mode modified. It seems to me like you've >>>>> got a series of dependency group failures. I would clear both the App >>>>> and System Event Logs and do a reboot. Then check both logs for all >>>>> warnings and errors. Does your boot cycle time run ~45-60 Seconds >>>>> or is it significantly longer. >>>>> >>>>> As to the hardware issue does your Device Manager have a clean >>>>> listing ? - ( No Red X's or Yellow Exclamation marks ). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:O3TlWRk7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>>>> As far as Error 7023, it only happens when I Add/Delete a program (I >>>>>> think only deleting). I have other Errors: 10010 DCOM which happens >>>>>> EVERY TIME I start the computer and I don't know what to do; and ID1 >>>>>> ACPIEC which is happening more and more frequently and again I am at >>>>>> a loss. >>>>>> >>>>>> Any help on these would be much appreciated, so that I try to >>>>>> understand what is going on in my very slow computer. All the MS >>>>>> updates are up to date. I have XP Home SP3. >>>>>> >>>>>> Below the errors that I keep getting: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>>> ID: 7023 >>>>>> Source: Service Control Manager >>>>>> Version: 5.0 >>>>>> Component: System Event Log >>>>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_SERVICE_EXIT_FAILED >>>>>> Message: The %1 service terminated with the following error: >>>>>> %2 >>>>>> >>>>>> Explanation >>>>>> The specified service stopped unexpectedly with the error indicated >>>>>> in the message. The service closed >>>>>> >>>>>> safely. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>>> ID: 10010 >>>>>> Source: DCOM >>>>>> Version: 5.0 >>>>>> Component: System Event Log >>>>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_RPCSS_SERVER_START_TIMEOUT >>>>>> Message: The server %1 did not register with DCOM within the required >>>>>> timeout. >>>>>> >>>>>> Explanation >>>>>> The Component Object Model (COM) infrastructure tried to start the >>>>>> named server; however, the server >>>>>> >>>>>> did not reply within the required timeout period. There might be a >>>>>> deadlock, or the program might not >>>>>> >>>>>> have responded to the server initialization code within the timeout >>>>>> period of two minutes >>>>>> >>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>>> ID: 1 >>>>>> Source: ACPIEC >>>>>> Version: 5.2 >>>>>> Symbolic Name: ACPIEC_ERR_WATCHDOG >>>>>> Message: %1: The embedded controller (EC) hardware didn't respond >>>>>> within the timeout period. This >>>>>> >>>>>> may indicate an error in the EC hardware or firmware, or possibly a >>>>>> poorly designed BIOS which >>>>>> >>>>>> accesses the EC in an unsafe manner. The EC driver will retry the >>>>>> failed transaction if possible. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> escreveu na mensagem >>>>>> news:O2XcQDO7IHA.1952@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>>>>>> Is the system event log showing the exact same error as in the KB >>>>>>> article ? Update.exe should have been updated to a much higher >>>>>>> version [the latest is V. 6.3.13.0] than what is showing in the >>>>>>> article by the installation of SP2 and SP3, along with the myriad >>>>>>> security updates issued since this KB was published. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] >>>>>>> =============== >>>>>>> *-343-* FDNY >>>>>>> Never Forgotten >>>>>>> =============== >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Peter wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I get error 7023 repeatedly whenever I delete a programme. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I can't understand how to get the Hotfix below, and whether it is >>>>>>>> applicable to XP SP3. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328213/en-us >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> help! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
Guest R. McCarty Posted July 25, 2008 Posted July 25, 2008 Re: Error 7023 No problem on providing assistance. Usually the key to BIOS updating is HOW many revisions down your current BIOS firmware is from the latest available. It's also a good idea to read the change log for each release. (Readme.Txt or a .Pdf file ) & note whether any releases address APIC compliance issues. The issue with capped IRQs at 15 may be a BIOS setup problem. On some motherboards the APIC controller can be disabled. It might help to know what Vendor/Model motherboard you have in your PC. There are just too many variables to give you a definitive answer on why your setup isn't fully mapping IRQs. This problem might also be the lack of a proper Chipset driver being installed. ( Or out of date ). "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message news:OcLqttl7IHA.5024@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > IRQ 15 is the highest number. > > Does this sound to you as if I could do with a Bios upgrade? > > Thank you veru much for your very comprehensive and professional > information. > > JB > > > > "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem > news:O$$29kl7IHA.1080@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> Newer motherboards employ an APIC ( Advanced Programmable >> Interrupt Controller ). This extends the original PC IRQ range up >> to 23 Interrupt lines. This helps a PC to map devices using IRQ >> Sharing. When XP is first installed it interrogates the BIOS to see >> if the motherboard supports extended IRQ mapping and loads a >> HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) driver appropriate for the type >> of hardware. From the name, I'd suspect that you have an issue with >> some form of APIC support. You can usually determine if your >> setup has APIC by using System Info tool, Hardware Resources >> category, IRQs - and noting the highest numbered IRQ in the map. >> >> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >> news:%23T8wBfl7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>> Thank you so much. >>> >>> Could you give me an idea of what the ID: 1: ACPIEC is all about? >>> >>> Best >>> >>> JB >>> >>> >>> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >>> news:uVUMwVl7IHA.1420@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>> Using McAfee almost always inflicts a "Noticeable" performance loss. >>>> So some of your issues are most definitely related to McAfee. The boot >>>> sequence indicates service time outs ( up to 30 Seconds ). >>>> >>>> The kind of errors you report can be the result of Registry Cleaning. >>>> It's >>>> like death of a thousand cuts for a PC. The registry is a large >>>> database >>>> of "HIGHLY" interdependent links and associations. Removing what >>>> seems to be invalid keys/values may not result in immediate damage, but >>>> will show up later as that association is called on. >>>> >>>> Registry Cleaning ( & it's merits ) ranks as the top on-going issue >>>> here. >>>> This post is likely to kick off the "Yes it works", "No it Doesn't" >>>> threads. >>>> >>>> Unfortunately once the Registry is hacked on, there is no method of >>>> repair to a known valid state. You can probably get the machine back to >>>> a working state, but you'll never know or trust the integrity of the >>>> Registry. >>>> The time it will take to get a Clean/Error free boot may not be worth >>>> the >>>> effort. I'd be inclined to recommend a fresh install and choose another >>>> Security product excluding any McAfee or Norton brand. >>>> >>>> If you can't resist the urge to clean the Registry at the least invest >>>> in an >>>> imaging program like Acronis True Image and make regular images. This >>>> way when something gets broken you can roll the machine back to a >>>> working/reliable state. >>>> >>>> >>>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >>>> news:%23fpI6pk7IHA.4040@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>>> Thank you very much for your help. >>>>> >>>>> As for Registry cleaner the answer is yes. Over the years (4/5) I >>>>> have used in the past RegCleaner and more recently CCleaner. >>>>> >>>>> I nver played around with Services, other than in MSconfig, where I >>>>> disabled most of what I felt was not necessary at Startup. >>>>> >>>>> The boot is very long! I get the clock after some 15 seconds followed >>>>> by the battery and the sound icons, but then I have to wait some >>>>> 90/120 seconds for the Internet and McAfee to come up, strangely >>>>> usually Internet before McAfee. I have cable connected to a router >>>>> and then to the computer through a cable. The delay, I guess in my >>>>> ignorance may be due to handshaking between the computer and the >>>>> router with McAfee making things worse. Even after all the icons are >>>>> up I find it difficult to open anything at all for some time. >>>>> Eventually everything works reasonable well, until McAfee or someone >>>>> else decides to check updates and then the susytem goes into a crawl, >>>>> as if the memory was being hijacked. Checking on CPU use does not >>>>> show excessive use which makes it strange why the computer should >>>>> virtually hang if the CPU has over 90% free usage. >>>>> >>>>> Incidentally, I have done repeatedly all sorts of Virus/trojan/etc >>>>> checks and I am confident that the computer is clean; unmless of >>>>> course all the different programmes are useless... >>>>> >>>>> Thank you again for your help. >>>>> >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> I will wait for your response before clearing the App and System Event >>>>> Logs. >>>>> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >>>>> news:ui4l7Yk7IHA.4532@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>>>> Has this computer ever had a Registry Cleaner used on it ? Also has >>>>>> any Services had their Start Mode modified. It seems to me like >>>>>> you've >>>>>> got a series of dependency group failures. I would clear both the App >>>>>> and System Event Logs and do a reboot. Then check both logs for all >>>>>> warnings and errors. Does your boot cycle time run ~45-60 Seconds >>>>>> or is it significantly longer. >>>>>> >>>>>> As to the hardware issue does your Device Manager have a clean >>>>>> listing ? - ( No Red X's or Yellow Exclamation marks ). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:O3TlWRk7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>>>>> As far as Error 7023, it only happens when I Add/Delete a program (I >>>>>>> think only deleting). I have other Errors: 10010 DCOM which happens >>>>>>> EVERY TIME I start the computer and I don't know what to do; and ID1 >>>>>>> ACPIEC which is happening more and more frequently and again I am at >>>>>>> a loss. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any help on these would be much appreciated, so that I try to >>>>>>> understand what is going on in my very slow computer. All the MS >>>>>>> updates are up to date. I have XP Home SP3. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Below the errors that I keep getting: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>>>> ID: 7023 >>>>>>> Source: Service Control Manager >>>>>>> Version: 5.0 >>>>>>> Component: System Event Log >>>>>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_SERVICE_EXIT_FAILED >>>>>>> Message: The %1 service terminated with the following error: >>>>>>> %2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Explanation >>>>>>> The specified service stopped unexpectedly with the error indicated >>>>>>> in the message. The service closed >>>>>>> >>>>>>> safely. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>>>> ID: 10010 >>>>>>> Source: DCOM >>>>>>> Version: 5.0 >>>>>>> Component: System Event Log >>>>>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_RPCSS_SERVER_START_TIMEOUT >>>>>>> Message: The server %1 did not register with DCOM within the >>>>>>> required timeout. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Explanation >>>>>>> The Component Object Model (COM) infrastructure tried to start the >>>>>>> named server; however, the server >>>>>>> >>>>>>> did not reply within the required timeout period. There might be a >>>>>>> deadlock, or the program might not >>>>>>> >>>>>>> have responded to the server initialization code within the timeout >>>>>>> period of two minutes >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>>>> ID: 1 >>>>>>> Source: ACPIEC >>>>>>> Version: 5.2 >>>>>>> Symbolic Name: ACPIEC_ERR_WATCHDOG >>>>>>> Message: %1: The embedded controller (EC) hardware didn't respond >>>>>>> within the timeout period. This >>>>>>> >>>>>>> may indicate an error in the EC hardware or firmware, or possibly a >>>>>>> poorly designed BIOS which >>>>>>> >>>>>>> accesses the EC in an unsafe manner. The EC driver will retry the >>>>>>> failed transaction if possible. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> escreveu na mensagem >>>>>>> news:O2XcQDO7IHA.1952@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>>>>>>> Is the system event log showing the exact same error as in the KB >>>>>>>> article ? Update.exe should have been updated to a much higher >>>>>>>> version [the latest is V. 6.3.13.0] than what is showing in the >>>>>>>> article by the installation of SP2 and SP3, along with the myriad >>>>>>>> security updates issued since this KB was published. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] >>>>>>>> =============== >>>>>>>> *-343-* FDNY >>>>>>>> Never Forgotten >>>>>>>> =============== >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Peter wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I get error 7023 repeatedly whenever I delete a programme. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I can't understand how to get the Hotfix below, and whether it is >>>>>>>>> applicable to XP SP3. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328213/en-us >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> help! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
Guest Peter Posted July 25, 2008 Posted July 25, 2008 Re: Error 7023 Here goes my life story... Hope it makes more sense to you than it does to me... Also, even if I have just restarted computer and opened nothing more than OE and SystemInformation, memory is down to 8.52 MB. Is this normal? Nome do SO Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition Versão 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 Compilação 2600 Fabricante do SO Microsoft Corporation Nome do sistema SMALL Fabricante do sistema TOSHIBA Modelo do sistema Satellite 1900 Tipo do sistema X86-based PC Processador x86 Family 15 Model 2 Stepping 4 GenuineIntel ~1993 Mhz Data/versão de BIOS TOSHIBA V2.10, 10/07/2003 Versão SMBIOS 2.31 Directório do Windows C:\WINDOWS Directório do sistema C:\WINDOWS\system32 Dispositivo de arranque \Device\HarddiskVolume1 Localização Espanha Camada de abstracção de hardware (HAL) Versão = "5.1.2600.5512 (xpsp.080413-2111)" Nome de utilizador SMALL\Qim Fuso horário Hora de Verão de GMT Memória física total 256.00 MB Memória física disponível 8.52 MB Memória virtual total 2.00 GB Memória virtual disponível 1.96 GB Espaço de ficheiro de página 626.25 MB Ficheiro de paginação C:\pagefile.sys I have a laptop Toshiba Satellite1900-303. "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem news:uBA9U2l7IHA.2064@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > No problem on providing assistance. > > Usually the key to BIOS updating is HOW many revisions down your > current BIOS firmware is from the latest available. It's also a good idea > to read the change log for each release. (Readme.Txt or a .Pdf file ) & > note whether any releases address APIC compliance issues. > > The issue with capped IRQs at 15 may be a BIOS setup problem. On > some motherboards the APIC controller can be disabled. It might > help to know what Vendor/Model motherboard you have in your PC. > > There are just too many variables to give you a definitive answer on > why your setup isn't fully mapping IRQs. This problem might also be > the lack of a proper Chipset driver being installed. ( Or out of date ). > > "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message > news:OcLqttl7IHA.5024@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> IRQ 15 is the highest number. >> >> Does this sound to you as if I could do with a Bios upgrade? >> >> Thank you veru much for your very comprehensive and professional >> information. >> >> JB >> >> >> >> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >> news:O$$29kl7IHA.1080@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>> Newer motherboards employ an APIC ( Advanced Programmable >>> Interrupt Controller ). This extends the original PC IRQ range up >>> to 23 Interrupt lines. This helps a PC to map devices using IRQ >>> Sharing. When XP is first installed it interrogates the BIOS to see >>> if the motherboard supports extended IRQ mapping and loads a >>> HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) driver appropriate for the type >>> of hardware. From the name, I'd suspect that you have an issue with >>> some form of APIC support. You can usually determine if your >>> setup has APIC by using System Info tool, Hardware Resources >>> category, IRQs - and noting the highest numbered IRQ in the map. >>> >>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >>> news:%23T8wBfl7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>> Thank you so much. >>>> >>>> Could you give me an idea of what the ID: 1: ACPIEC is all about? >>>> >>>> Best >>>> >>>> JB >>>> >>>> >>>> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >>>> news:uVUMwVl7IHA.1420@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>>> Using McAfee almost always inflicts a "Noticeable" performance loss. >>>>> So some of your issues are most definitely related to McAfee. The boot >>>>> sequence indicates service time outs ( up to 30 Seconds ). >>>>> >>>>> The kind of errors you report can be the result of Registry Cleaning. >>>>> It's >>>>> like death of a thousand cuts for a PC. The registry is a large >>>>> database >>>>> of "HIGHLY" interdependent links and associations. Removing what >>>>> seems to be invalid keys/values may not result in immediate damage, >>>>> but >>>>> will show up later as that association is called on. >>>>> >>>>> Registry Cleaning ( & it's merits ) ranks as the top on-going issue >>>>> here. >>>>> This post is likely to kick off the "Yes it works", "No it Doesn't" >>>>> threads. >>>>> >>>>> Unfortunately once the Registry is hacked on, there is no method of >>>>> repair to a known valid state. You can probably get the machine back >>>>> to >>>>> a working state, but you'll never know or trust the integrity of the >>>>> Registry. >>>>> The time it will take to get a Clean/Error free boot may not be worth >>>>> the >>>>> effort. I'd be inclined to recommend a fresh install and choose >>>>> another >>>>> Security product excluding any McAfee or Norton brand. >>>>> >>>>> If you can't resist the urge to clean the Registry at the least invest >>>>> in an >>>>> imaging program like Acronis True Image and make regular images. This >>>>> way when something gets broken you can roll the machine back to a >>>>> working/reliable state. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:%23fpI6pk7IHA.4040@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>>>> Thank you very much for your help. >>>>>> >>>>>> As for Registry cleaner the answer is yes. Over the years (4/5) I >>>>>> have used in the past RegCleaner and more recently CCleaner. >>>>>> >>>>>> I nver played around with Services, other than in MSconfig, where I >>>>>> disabled most of what I felt was not necessary at Startup. >>>>>> >>>>>> The boot is very long! I get the clock after some 15 seconds >>>>>> followed by the battery and the sound icons, but then I have to wait >>>>>> some 90/120 seconds for the Internet and McAfee to come up, strangely >>>>>> usually Internet before McAfee. I have cable connected to a router >>>>>> and then to the computer through a cable. The delay, I guess in my >>>>>> ignorance may be due to handshaking between the computer and the >>>>>> router with McAfee making things worse. Even after all the icons are >>>>>> up I find it difficult to open anything at all for some time. >>>>>> Eventually everything works reasonable well, until McAfee or someone >>>>>> else decides to check updates and then the susytem goes into a crawl, >>>>>> as if the memory was being hijacked. Checking on CPU use does not >>>>>> show excessive use which makes it strange why the computer should >>>>>> virtually hang if the CPU has over 90% free usage. >>>>>> >>>>>> Incidentally, I have done repeatedly all sorts of Virus/trojan/etc >>>>>> checks and I am confident that the computer is clean; unmless of >>>>>> course all the different programmes are useless... >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you again for your help. >>>>>> >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> I will wait for your response before clearing the App and System >>>>>> Event Logs. >>>>>> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >>>>>> news:ui4l7Yk7IHA.4532@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>>>>> Has this computer ever had a Registry Cleaner used on it ? Also has >>>>>>> any Services had their Start Mode modified. It seems to me like >>>>>>> you've >>>>>>> got a series of dependency group failures. I would clear both the >>>>>>> App >>>>>>> and System Event Logs and do a reboot. Then check both logs for all >>>>>>> warnings and errors. Does your boot cycle time run ~45-60 Seconds >>>>>>> or is it significantly longer. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As to the hardware issue does your Device Manager have a clean >>>>>>> listing ? - ( No Red X's or Yellow Exclamation marks ). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:O3TlWRk7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>>>>>> As far as Error 7023, it only happens when I Add/Delete a program >>>>>>>> (I think only deleting). I have other Errors: 10010 DCOM which >>>>>>>> happens EVERY TIME I start the computer and I don't know what to >>>>>>>> do; and ID1 ACPIEC which is happening more and more frequently and >>>>>>>> again I am at a loss. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Any help on these would be much appreciated, so that I try to >>>>>>>> understand what is going on in my very slow computer. All the MS >>>>>>>> updates are up to date. I have XP Home SP3. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Below the errors that I keep getting: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>>>>> ID: 7023 >>>>>>>> Source: Service Control Manager >>>>>>>> Version: 5.0 >>>>>>>> Component: System Event Log >>>>>>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_SERVICE_EXIT_FAILED >>>>>>>> Message: The %1 service terminated with the following error: >>>>>>>> %2 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Explanation >>>>>>>> The specified service stopped unexpectedly with the error indicated >>>>>>>> in the message. The service closed >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> safely. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>>>>> ID: 10010 >>>>>>>> Source: DCOM >>>>>>>> Version: 5.0 >>>>>>>> Component: System Event Log >>>>>>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_RPCSS_SERVER_START_TIMEOUT >>>>>>>> Message: The server %1 did not register with DCOM within the >>>>>>>> required timeout. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Explanation >>>>>>>> The Component Object Model (COM) infrastructure tried to start the >>>>>>>> named server; however, the server >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> did not reply within the required timeout period. There might be a >>>>>>>> deadlock, or the program might not >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> have responded to the server initialization code within the timeout >>>>>>>> period of two minutes >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>>>>> ID: 1 >>>>>>>> Source: ACPIEC >>>>>>>> Version: 5.2 >>>>>>>> Symbolic Name: ACPIEC_ERR_WATCHDOG >>>>>>>> Message: %1: The embedded controller (EC) hardware didn't respond >>>>>>>> within the timeout period. This >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> may indicate an error in the EC hardware or firmware, or possibly a >>>>>>>> poorly designed BIOS which >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> accesses the EC in an unsafe manner. The EC driver will retry the >>>>>>>> failed transaction if possible. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> escreveu na mensagem >>>>>>>> news:O2XcQDO7IHA.1952@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>>>>>>>> Is the system event log showing the exact same error as in the KB >>>>>>>>> article ? Update.exe should have been updated to a much higher >>>>>>>>> version [the latest is V. 6.3.13.0] than what is showing in the >>>>>>>>> article by the installation of SP2 and SP3, along with the myriad >>>>>>>>> security updates issued since this KB was published. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] >>>>>>>>> =============== >>>>>>>>> *-343-* FDNY >>>>>>>>> Never Forgotten >>>>>>>>> =============== >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Peter wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I get error 7023 repeatedly whenever I delete a programme. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I can't understand how to get the Hotfix below, and whether it is >>>>>>>>>> applicable to XP SP3. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328213/en-us >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> help! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
Guest R. McCarty Posted July 25, 2008 Posted July 25, 2008 Re: Error 7023 256 Megabytes of physical RAM isn't enough with today's average use. The operating system itself will likely allocate and use ~200 Megabytes leaving little for background services and applications to run with. Based on the age of the PC, I'd either upgrade RAM or consider a newer system. The cost of upgrading your current one wouldn't deliver the best value for the money. A MB/CPU & RAM swap can be done for as little as $260, while a full new system can be bought for anywhere from the $400-500 price range. "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message news:e6Vet$l7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > Here goes my life story... Hope it makes more sense to you than it does to > me... > > Also, even if I have just restarted computer and opened nothing more than > OE and SystemInformation, memory is down to 8.52 MB. Is this normal? > > > Nome do SO Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition > Versão 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 Compilação 2600 > Fabricante do SO Microsoft Corporation > Nome do sistema SMALL > Fabricante do sistema TOSHIBA > Modelo do sistema Satellite 1900 > Tipo do sistema X86-based PC > Processador x86 Family 15 Model 2 Stepping 4 GenuineIntel ~1993 Mhz > Data/versão de BIOS TOSHIBA V2.10, 10/07/2003 > Versão SMBIOS 2.31 > Directório do Windows C:\WINDOWS > Directório do sistema C:\WINDOWS\system32 > Dispositivo de arranque \Device\HarddiskVolume1 > Localização Espanha > Camada de abstracção de hardware (HAL) Versão = "5.1.2600.5512 > (xpsp.080413-2111)" > Nome de utilizador SMALL\Qim > Fuso horário Hora de Verão de GMT > Memória física total 256.00 MB > Memória física disponível 8.52 MB > Memória virtual total 2.00 GB > Memória virtual disponível 1.96 GB > Espaço de ficheiro de página 626.25 MB > Ficheiro de paginação C:\pagefile.sys > > > I have a laptop Toshiba Satellite1900-303. > "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem > news:uBA9U2l7IHA.2064@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> No problem on providing assistance. >> >> Usually the key to BIOS updating is HOW many revisions down your >> current BIOS firmware is from the latest available. It's also a good idea >> to read the change log for each release. (Readme.Txt or a .Pdf file ) & >> note whether any releases address APIC compliance issues. >> >> The issue with capped IRQs at 15 may be a BIOS setup problem. On >> some motherboards the APIC controller can be disabled. It might >> help to know what Vendor/Model motherboard you have in your PC. >> >> There are just too many variables to give you a definitive answer on >> why your setup isn't fully mapping IRQs. This problem might also be >> the lack of a proper Chipset driver being installed. ( Or out of date ). >> >> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >> news:OcLqttl7IHA.5024@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>> IRQ 15 is the highest number. >>> >>> Does this sound to you as if I could do with a Bios upgrade? >>> >>> Thank you veru much for your very comprehensive and professional >>> information. >>> >>> JB >>> >>> >>> >>> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >>> news:O$$29kl7IHA.1080@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>> Newer motherboards employ an APIC ( Advanced Programmable >>>> Interrupt Controller ). This extends the original PC IRQ range up >>>> to 23 Interrupt lines. This helps a PC to map devices using IRQ >>>> Sharing. When XP is first installed it interrogates the BIOS to see >>>> if the motherboard supports extended IRQ mapping and loads a >>>> HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) driver appropriate for the type >>>> of hardware. From the name, I'd suspect that you have an issue with >>>> some form of APIC support. You can usually determine if your >>>> setup has APIC by using System Info tool, Hardware Resources >>>> category, IRQs - and noting the highest numbered IRQ in the map. >>>> >>>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >>>> news:%23T8wBfl7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>>> Thank you so much. >>>>> >>>>> Could you give me an idea of what the ID: 1: ACPIEC is all about? >>>>> >>>>> Best >>>>> >>>>> JB >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >>>>> news:uVUMwVl7IHA.1420@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>>>> Using McAfee almost always inflicts a "Noticeable" performance loss. >>>>>> So some of your issues are most definitely related to McAfee. The >>>>>> boot >>>>>> sequence indicates service time outs ( up to 30 Seconds ). >>>>>> >>>>>> The kind of errors you report can be the result of Registry Cleaning. >>>>>> It's >>>>>> like death of a thousand cuts for a PC. The registry is a large >>>>>> database >>>>>> of "HIGHLY" interdependent links and associations. Removing what >>>>>> seems to be invalid keys/values may not result in immediate damage, >>>>>> but >>>>>> will show up later as that association is called on. >>>>>> >>>>>> Registry Cleaning ( & it's merits ) ranks as the top on-going issue >>>>>> here. >>>>>> This post is likely to kick off the "Yes it works", "No it Doesn't" >>>>>> threads. >>>>>> >>>>>> Unfortunately once the Registry is hacked on, there is no method of >>>>>> repair to a known valid state. You can probably get the machine back >>>>>> to >>>>>> a working state, but you'll never know or trust the integrity of the >>>>>> Registry. >>>>>> The time it will take to get a Clean/Error free boot may not be worth >>>>>> the >>>>>> effort. I'd be inclined to recommend a fresh install and choose >>>>>> another >>>>>> Security product excluding any McAfee or Norton brand. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you can't resist the urge to clean the Registry at the least >>>>>> invest in an >>>>>> imaging program like Acronis True Image and make regular images. This >>>>>> way when something gets broken you can roll the machine back to a >>>>>> working/reliable state. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >>>>>> news:%23fpI6pk7IHA.4040@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>>>>> Thank you very much for your help. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As for Registry cleaner the answer is yes. Over the years (4/5) I >>>>>>> have used in the past RegCleaner and more recently CCleaner. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I nver played around with Services, other than in MSconfig, where I >>>>>>> disabled most of what I felt was not necessary at Startup. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The boot is very long! I get the clock after some 15 seconds >>>>>>> followed by the battery and the sound icons, but then I have to wait >>>>>>> some 90/120 seconds for the Internet and McAfee to come up, >>>>>>> strangely usually Internet before McAfee. I have cable connected to >>>>>>> a router and then to the computer through a cable. The delay, I >>>>>>> guess in my ignorance may be due to handshaking between the computer >>>>>>> and the router with McAfee making things worse. Even after all the >>>>>>> icons are up I find it difficult to open anything at all for some >>>>>>> time. Eventually everything works reasonable well, until McAfee or >>>>>>> someone else decides to check updates and then the susytem goes into >>>>>>> a crawl, as if the memory was being hijacked. Checking on CPU use >>>>>>> does not show excessive use which makes it strange why the computer >>>>>>> should virtually hang if the CPU has over 90% free usage. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Incidentally, I have done repeatedly all sorts of Virus/trojan/etc >>>>>>> checks and I am confident that the computer is clean; unmless of >>>>>>> course all the different programmes are useless... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you again for your help. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> JB >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I will wait for your response before clearing the App and System >>>>>>> Event Logs. >>>>>>> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >>>>>>> news:ui4l7Yk7IHA.4532@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>>>>>> Has this computer ever had a Registry Cleaner used on it ? Also has >>>>>>>> any Services had their Start Mode modified. It seems to me like >>>>>>>> you've >>>>>>>> got a series of dependency group failures. I would clear both the >>>>>>>> App >>>>>>>> and System Event Logs and do a reboot. Then check both logs for all >>>>>>>> warnings and errors. Does your boot cycle time run ~45-60 Seconds >>>>>>>> or is it significantly longer. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As to the hardware issue does your Device Manager have a clean >>>>>>>> listing ? - ( No Red X's or Yellow Exclamation marks ). >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>> news:O3TlWRk7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>>>>>>> As far as Error 7023, it only happens when I Add/Delete a program >>>>>>>>> (I think only deleting). I have other Errors: 10010 DCOM which >>>>>>>>> happens EVERY TIME I start the computer and I don't know what to >>>>>>>>> do; and ID1 ACPIEC which is happening more and more frequently and >>>>>>>>> again I am at a loss. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Any help on these would be much appreciated, so that I try to >>>>>>>>> understand what is going on in my very slow computer. All the MS >>>>>>>>> updates are up to date. I have XP Home SP3. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Below the errors that I keep getting: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>>>>>> ID: 7023 >>>>>>>>> Source: Service Control Manager >>>>>>>>> Version: 5.0 >>>>>>>>> Component: System Event Log >>>>>>>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_SERVICE_EXIT_FAILED >>>>>>>>> Message: The %1 service terminated with the following error: >>>>>>>>> %2 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Explanation >>>>>>>>> The specified service stopped unexpectedly with the error >>>>>>>>> indicated in the message. The service closed >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> safely. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>>>>>> ID: 10010 >>>>>>>>> Source: DCOM >>>>>>>>> Version: 5.0 >>>>>>>>> Component: System Event Log >>>>>>>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_RPCSS_SERVER_START_TIMEOUT >>>>>>>>> Message: The server %1 did not register with DCOM within the >>>>>>>>> required timeout. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Explanation >>>>>>>>> The Component Object Model (COM) infrastructure tried to start the >>>>>>>>> named server; however, the server >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> did not reply within the required timeout period. There might be a >>>>>>>>> deadlock, or the program might not >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> have responded to the server initialization code within the >>>>>>>>> timeout period of two minutes >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>>>>>> ID: 1 >>>>>>>>> Source: ACPIEC >>>>>>>>> Version: 5.2 >>>>>>>>> Symbolic Name: ACPIEC_ERR_WATCHDOG >>>>>>>>> Message: %1: The embedded controller (EC) hardware didn't respond >>>>>>>>> within the timeout period. This >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> may indicate an error in the EC hardware or firmware, or possibly >>>>>>>>> a poorly designed BIOS which >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> accesses the EC in an unsafe manner. The EC driver will retry the >>>>>>>>> failed transaction if possible. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> escreveu na mensagem >>>>>>>>> news:O2XcQDO7IHA.1952@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>>>>>>>>> Is the system event log showing the exact same error as in the KB >>>>>>>>>> article ? Update.exe should have been updated to a much higher >>>>>>>>>> version [the latest is V. 6.3.13.0] than what is showing in the >>>>>>>>>> article by the installation of SP2 and SP3, along with the myriad >>>>>>>>>> security updates issued since this KB was published. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] >>>>>>>>>> =============== >>>>>>>>>> *-343-* FDNY >>>>>>>>>> Never Forgotten >>>>>>>>>> =============== >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Peter wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I get error 7023 repeatedly whenever I delete a programme. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I can't understand how to get the Hotfix below, and whether it >>>>>>>>>>> is applicable to XP SP3. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328213/en-us >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> help! >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
Guest Peter Posted July 25, 2008 Posted July 25, 2008 Re: Error 7023 So, you reckon that my problem with a slow computer is the amount of RAM? Let me say that I only use the computer for work (Word and PDF files) /IE browsing/Skype and little else. No games or download of videos. Thank you for all your trouble in explainig eveything. JB "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem news:ufhVNGm7IHA.2224@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > 256 Megabytes of physical RAM isn't enough with today's average > use. The operating system itself will likely allocate and use ~200 > Megabytes leaving little for background services and applications to > run with. > > Based on the age of the PC, I'd either upgrade RAM or consider > a newer system. The cost of upgrading your current one wouldn't > deliver the best value for the money. A MB/CPU & RAM swap > can be done for as little as $260, while a full new system can be > bought for anywhere from the $400-500 price range. > > "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message > news:e6Vet$l7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> Here goes my life story... Hope it makes more sense to you than it does >> to me... >> >> Also, even if I have just restarted computer and opened nothing more than >> OE and SystemInformation, memory is down to 8.52 MB. Is this normal? >> >> >> Nome do SO Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition >> Versão 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3 Compilação 2600 >> Fabricante do SO Microsoft Corporation >> Nome do sistema SMALL >> Fabricante do sistema TOSHIBA >> Modelo do sistema Satellite 1900 >> Tipo do sistema X86-based PC >> Processador x86 Family 15 Model 2 Stepping 4 GenuineIntel ~1993 Mhz >> Data/versão de BIOS TOSHIBA V2.10, 10/07/2003 >> Versão SMBIOS 2.31 >> Directório do Windows C:\WINDOWS >> Directório do sistema C:\WINDOWS\system32 >> Dispositivo de arranque \Device\HarddiskVolume1 >> Localização Espanha >> Camada de abstracção de hardware (HAL) Versão = "5.1.2600.5512 >> (xpsp.080413-2111)" >> Nome de utilizador SMALL\Qim >> Fuso horário Hora de Verão de GMT >> Memória física total 256.00 MB >> Memória física disponível 8.52 MB >> Memória virtual total 2.00 GB >> Memória virtual disponível 1.96 GB >> Espaço de ficheiro de página 626.25 MB >> Ficheiro de paginação C:\pagefile.sys >> >> >> I have a laptop Toshiba Satellite1900-303. >> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >> news:uBA9U2l7IHA.2064@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>> No problem on providing assistance. >>> >>> Usually the key to BIOS updating is HOW many revisions down your >>> current BIOS firmware is from the latest available. It's also a good >>> idea >>> to read the change log for each release. (Readme.Txt or a .Pdf file ) & >>> note whether any releases address APIC compliance issues. >>> >>> The issue with capped IRQs at 15 may be a BIOS setup problem. On >>> some motherboards the APIC controller can be disabled. It might >>> help to know what Vendor/Model motherboard you have in your PC. >>> >>> There are just too many variables to give you a definitive answer on >>> why your setup isn't fully mapping IRQs. This problem might also be >>> the lack of a proper Chipset driver being installed. ( Or out of date ). >>> >>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >>> news:OcLqttl7IHA.5024@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>> IRQ 15 is the highest number. >>>> >>>> Does this sound to you as if I could do with a Bios upgrade? >>>> >>>> Thank you veru much for your very comprehensive and professional >>>> information. >>>> >>>> JB >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >>>> news:O$$29kl7IHA.1080@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>>> Newer motherboards employ an APIC ( Advanced Programmable >>>>> Interrupt Controller ). This extends the original PC IRQ range up >>>>> to 23 Interrupt lines. This helps a PC to map devices using IRQ >>>>> Sharing. When XP is first installed it interrogates the BIOS to see >>>>> if the motherboard supports extended IRQ mapping and loads a >>>>> HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) driver appropriate for the type >>>>> of hardware. From the name, I'd suspect that you have an issue with >>>>> some form of APIC support. You can usually determine if your >>>>> setup has APIC by using System Info tool, Hardware Resources >>>>> category, IRQs - and noting the highest numbered IRQ in the map. >>>>> >>>>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:%23T8wBfl7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>>>> Thank you so much. >>>>>> >>>>>> Could you give me an idea of what the ID: 1: ACPIEC is all about? >>>>>> >>>>>> Best >>>>>> >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >>>>>> news:uVUMwVl7IHA.1420@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>>>>> Using McAfee almost always inflicts a "Noticeable" performance loss. >>>>>>> So some of your issues are most definitely related to McAfee. The >>>>>>> boot >>>>>>> sequence indicates service time outs ( up to 30 Seconds ). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The kind of errors you report can be the result of Registry >>>>>>> Cleaning. It's >>>>>>> like death of a thousand cuts for a PC. The registry is a large >>>>>>> database >>>>>>> of "HIGHLY" interdependent links and associations. Removing what >>>>>>> seems to be invalid keys/values may not result in immediate damage, >>>>>>> but >>>>>>> will show up later as that association is called on. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Registry Cleaning ( & it's merits ) ranks as the top on-going issue >>>>>>> here. >>>>>>> This post is likely to kick off the "Yes it works", "No it Doesn't" >>>>>>> threads. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Unfortunately once the Registry is hacked on, there is no method of >>>>>>> repair to a known valid state. You can probably get the machine back >>>>>>> to >>>>>>> a working state, but you'll never know or trust the integrity of the >>>>>>> Registry. >>>>>>> The time it will take to get a Clean/Error free boot may not be >>>>>>> worth the >>>>>>> effort. I'd be inclined to recommend a fresh install and choose >>>>>>> another >>>>>>> Security product excluding any McAfee or Norton brand. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If you can't resist the urge to clean the Registry at the least >>>>>>> invest in an >>>>>>> imaging program like Acronis True Image and make regular images. >>>>>>> This >>>>>>> way when something gets broken you can roll the machine back to a >>>>>>> working/reliable state. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >>>>>>> news:%23fpI6pk7IHA.4040@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your help. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As for Registry cleaner the answer is yes. Over the years (4/5) I >>>>>>>> have used in the past RegCleaner and more recently CCleaner. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I nver played around with Services, other than in MSconfig, where I >>>>>>>> disabled most of what I felt was not necessary at Startup. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The boot is very long! I get the clock after some 15 seconds >>>>>>>> followed by the battery and the sound icons, but then I have to >>>>>>>> wait some 90/120 seconds for the Internet and McAfee to come up, >>>>>>>> strangely usually Internet before McAfee. I have cable connected >>>>>>>> to a router and then to the computer through a cable. The delay, I >>>>>>>> guess in my ignorance may be due to handshaking between the >>>>>>>> computer and the router with McAfee making things worse. Even >>>>>>>> after all the icons are up I find it difficult to open anything at >>>>>>>> all for some time. Eventually everything works reasonable well, >>>>>>>> until McAfee or someone else decides to check updates and then the >>>>>>>> susytem goes into a crawl, as if the memory was being hijacked. >>>>>>>> Checking on CPU use does not show excessive use which makes it >>>>>>>> strange why the computer should virtually hang if the CPU has over >>>>>>>> 90% free usage. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Incidentally, I have done repeatedly all sorts of Virus/trojan/etc >>>>>>>> checks and I am confident that the computer is clean; unmless of >>>>>>>> course all the different programmes are useless... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you again for your help. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I will wait for your response before clearing the App and System >>>>>>>> Event Logs. >>>>>>>> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na >>>>>>>> mensagem news:ui4l7Yk7IHA.4532@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>>>>>>> Has this computer ever had a Registry Cleaner used on it ? Also >>>>>>>>> has >>>>>>>>> any Services had their Start Mode modified. It seems to me like >>>>>>>>> you've >>>>>>>>> got a series of dependency group failures. I would clear both the >>>>>>>>> App >>>>>>>>> and System Event Logs and do a reboot. Then check both logs for >>>>>>>>> all >>>>>>>>> warnings and errors. Does your boot cycle time run ~45-60 Seconds >>>>>>>>> or is it significantly longer. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> As to the hardware issue does your Device Manager have a clean >>>>>>>>> listing ? - ( No Red X's or Yellow Exclamation marks ). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >>>>>>>>> news:O3TlWRk7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>>>>>>>> As far as Error 7023, it only happens when I Add/Delete a program >>>>>>>>>> (I think only deleting). I have other Errors: 10010 DCOM which >>>>>>>>>> happens EVERY TIME I start the computer and I don't know what to >>>>>>>>>> do; and ID1 ACPIEC which is happening more and more frequently >>>>>>>>>> and again I am at a loss. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Any help on these would be much appreciated, so that I try to >>>>>>>>>> understand what is going on in my very slow computer. All the MS >>>>>>>>>> updates are up to date. I have XP Home SP3. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Below the errors that I keep getting: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>>>>>>> ID: 7023 >>>>>>>>>> Source: Service Control Manager >>>>>>>>>> Version: 5.0 >>>>>>>>>> Component: System Event Log >>>>>>>>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_SERVICE_EXIT_FAILED >>>>>>>>>> Message: The %1 service terminated with the following error: >>>>>>>>>> %2 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Explanation >>>>>>>>>> The specified service stopped unexpectedly with the error >>>>>>>>>> indicated in the message. The service closed >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> safely. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>>>>>>> ID: 10010 >>>>>>>>>> Source: DCOM >>>>>>>>>> Version: 5.0 >>>>>>>>>> Component: System Event Log >>>>>>>>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_RPCSS_SERVER_START_TIMEOUT >>>>>>>>>> Message: The server %1 did not register with DCOM within the >>>>>>>>>> required timeout. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Explanation >>>>>>>>>> The Component Object Model (COM) infrastructure tried to start >>>>>>>>>> the named server; however, the server >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> did not reply within the required timeout period. There might be >>>>>>>>>> a deadlock, or the program might not >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> have responded to the server initialization code within the >>>>>>>>>> timeout period of two minutes >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >>>>>>>>>> ID: 1 >>>>>>>>>> Source: ACPIEC >>>>>>>>>> Version: 5.2 >>>>>>>>>> Symbolic Name: ACPIEC_ERR_WATCHDOG >>>>>>>>>> Message: %1: The embedded controller (EC) hardware didn't respond >>>>>>>>>> within the timeout period. This >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> may indicate an error in the EC hardware or firmware, or possibly >>>>>>>>>> a poorly designed BIOS which >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> accesses the EC in an unsafe manner. The EC driver will retry the >>>>>>>>>> failed transaction if possible. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> "MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> escreveu na mensagem >>>>>>>>>> news:O2XcQDO7IHA.1952@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >>>>>>>>>>> Is the system event log showing the exact same error as in the >>>>>>>>>>> KB article ? Update.exe should have been updated to a much >>>>>>>>>>> higher version [the latest is V. 6.3.13.0] than what is showing >>>>>>>>>>> in the article by the installation of SP2 and SP3, along with >>>>>>>>>>> the myriad security updates issued since this KB was published. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] >>>>>>>>>>> =============== >>>>>>>>>>> *-343-* FDNY >>>>>>>>>>> Never Forgotten >>>>>>>>>>> =============== >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Peter wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I get error 7023 repeatedly whenever I delete a programme. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I can't understand how to get the Hotfix below, and whether it >>>>>>>>>>>> is applicable to XP SP3. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328213/en-us >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> help! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> JB >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
Guest Ken Blake, MVP Posted July 25, 2008 Posted July 25, 2008 Re: Error 7023 On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:42:47 +0100, "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote: > I have just noted something strange (to me) in System Information: > > I have 256 MB of physical memory, but only 24.85 available... I have a .pdf > file, a Word document, Outlook Express and 1 IE page open. > > Is this normal? I have two comments for you: 1. Yes, that's normal. Wanting to minimize the amount of memory Windows uses is a counterproductive desire. Windows is designed to use all, or most, of your memory, all the time, and that's good not bad. Free memory is wasted memory. You paid for it all and shouldn't want to see any of it wasted. Windows works hard to find a use for all the memory you have all the time. For example if your apps don't need some of it, it will use that part for caching, then give it back when your apps later need it. In this way Windows keeps all your memory working for you all the time. 2. I don't necessarily agree with R. McCarty that "256 Megabytes of physical RAM isn't enough with today's average use." You ask "So, you reckon that my problem with a slow computer is the amount of RAM?" He may be right, and that may be the problem, but I wouldn't just assume it without further investigation. Read below: How much RAM you need for good performance is *not* a one-size-fits-all situation. You get good performance if the amount of RAM you have keeps you from using the page file, and that depends on what apps you run. Most people running a typical range of business applications find that somewhere around 256-384MB works well, others need 512MB. Almost anyone will see poor performance with less than 256MB. Some people, particularly those doing things like editing large photographic images, can see a performance boost by adding even more than 512MB--sometimes much more. If you are currently using the page file significantly, more memory will decrease or eliminate that usage, and improve your performance. If you are not using the page file significantly, more memory will do nothing for you. Go to http://billsway.com/notes%5Fpublic/winxp%5Ftweaks/ and download WinXP-2K_Pagefile.zip and monitor your pagefile usage. That should give you a good idea of whether more memory can help, and if so, how much more. > "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem > news:O$$29kl7IHA.1080@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > > Newer motherboards employ an APIC ( Advanced Programmable > > Interrupt Controller ). This extends the original PC IRQ range up > > to 23 Interrupt lines. This helps a PC to map devices using IRQ > > Sharing. When XP is first installed it interrogates the BIOS to see > > if the motherboard supports extended IRQ mapping and loads a > > HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) driver appropriate for the type > > of hardware. From the name, I'd suspect that you have an issue with > > some form of APIC support. You can usually determine if your > > setup has APIC by using System Info tool, Hardware Resources > > category, IRQs - and noting the highest numbered IRQ in the map. > > > > "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message > > news:%23T8wBfl7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > >> Thank you so much. > >> > >> Could you give me an idea of what the ID: 1: ACPIEC is all about? > >> > >> Best > >> > >> JB > >> > >> > >> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem > >> news:uVUMwVl7IHA.1420@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > >>> Using McAfee almost always inflicts a "Noticeable" performance loss. > >>> So some of your issues are most definitely related to McAfee. The boot > >>> sequence indicates service time outs ( up to 30 Seconds ). > >>> > >>> The kind of errors you report can be the result of Registry Cleaning. > >>> It's > >>> like death of a thousand cuts for a PC. The registry is a large database > >>> of "HIGHLY" interdependent links and associations. Removing what > >>> seems to be invalid keys/values may not result in immediate damage, but > >>> will show up later as that association is called on. > >>> > >>> Registry Cleaning ( & it's merits ) ranks as the top on-going issue > >>> here. > >>> This post is likely to kick off the "Yes it works", "No it Doesn't" > >>> threads. > >>> > >>> Unfortunately once the Registry is hacked on, there is no method of > >>> repair to a known valid state. You can probably get the machine back to > >>> a working state, but you'll never know or trust the integrity of the > >>> Registry. > >>> The time it will take to get a Clean/Error free boot may not be worth > >>> the > >>> effort. I'd be inclined to recommend a fresh install and choose another > >>> Security product excluding any McAfee or Norton brand. > >>> > >>> If you can't resist the urge to clean the Registry at the least invest > >>> in an > >>> imaging program like Acronis True Image and make regular images. This > >>> way when something gets broken you can roll the machine back to a > >>> working/reliable state. > >>> > >>> > >>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message > >>> news:%23fpI6pk7IHA.4040@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > >>>> Thank you very much for your help. > >>>> > >>>> As for Registry cleaner the answer is yes. Over the years (4/5) I have > >>>> used in the past RegCleaner and more recently CCleaner. > >>>> > >>>> I nver played around with Services, other than in MSconfig, where I > >>>> disabled most of what I felt was not necessary at Startup. > >>>> > >>>> The boot is very long! I get the clock after some 15 seconds followed > >>>> by the battery and the sound icons, but then I have to wait some 90/120 > >>>> seconds for the Internet and McAfee to come up, strangely usually > >>>> Internet before McAfee. I have cable connected to a router and then to > >>>> the computer through a cable. The delay, I guess in my ignorance may > >>>> be due to handshaking between the computer and the router with McAfee > >>>> making things worse. Even after all the icons are up I find it > >>>> difficult to open anything at all for some time. Eventually everything > >>>> works reasonable well, until McAfee or someone else decides to check > >>>> updates and then the susytem goes into a crawl, as if the memory was > >>>> being hijacked. Checking on CPU use does not show excessive use which > >>>> makes it strange why the computer should virtually hang if the CPU has > >>>> over 90% free usage. > >>>> > >>>> Incidentally, I have done repeatedly all sorts of Virus/trojan/etc > >>>> checks and I am confident that the computer is clean; unmless of course > >>>> all the different programmes are useless... > >>>> > >>>> Thank you again for your help. > >>>> > >>>> JB > >>>> > >>>> I will wait for your response before clearing the App and System Event > >>>> Logs. > >>>> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem > >>>> news:ui4l7Yk7IHA.4532@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > >>>>> Has this computer ever had a Registry Cleaner used on it ? Also has > >>>>> any Services had their Start Mode modified. It seems to me like you've > >>>>> got a series of dependency group failures. I would clear both the App > >>>>> and System Event Logs and do a reboot. Then check both logs for all > >>>>> warnings and errors. Does your boot cycle time run ~45-60 Seconds > >>>>> or is it significantly longer. > >>>>> > >>>>> As to the hardware issue does your Device Manager have a clean > >>>>> listing ? - ( No Red X's or Yellow Exclamation marks ). > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message > >>>>> news:O3TlWRk7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > >>>>>> As far as Error 7023, it only happens when I Add/Delete a program (I > >>>>>> think only deleting). I have other Errors: 10010 DCOM which happens > >>>>>> EVERY TIME I start the computer and I don't know what to do; and ID1 > >>>>>> ACPIEC which is happening more and more frequently and again I am at > >>>>>> a loss. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Any help on these would be much appreciated, so that I try to > >>>>>> understand what is going on in my very slow computer. All the MS > >>>>>> updates are up to date. I have XP Home SP3. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Below the errors that I keep getting: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System > >>>>>> ID: 7023 > >>>>>> Source: Service Control Manager > >>>>>> Version: 5.0 > >>>>>> Component: System Event Log > >>>>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_SERVICE_EXIT_FAILED > >>>>>> Message: The %1 service terminated with the following error: > >>>>>> %2 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Explanation > >>>>>> The specified service stopped unexpectedly with the error indicated > >>>>>> in the message. The service closed > >>>>>> > >>>>>> safely. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System > >>>>>> ID: 10010 > >>>>>> Source: DCOM > >>>>>> Version: 5.0 > >>>>>> Component: System Event Log > >>>>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_RPCSS_SERVER_START_TIMEOUT > >>>>>> Message: The server %1 did not register with DCOM within the required > >>>>>> timeout. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Explanation > >>>>>> The Component Object Model (COM) infrastructure tried to start the > >>>>>> named server; however, the server > >>>>>> > >>>>>> did not reply within the required timeout period. There might be a > >>>>>> deadlock, or the program might not > >>>>>> > >>>>>> have responded to the server initialization code within the timeout > >>>>>> period of two minutes > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System > >>>>>> ID: 1 > >>>>>> Source: ACPIEC > >>>>>> Version: 5.2 > >>>>>> Symbolic Name: ACPIEC_ERR_WATCHDOG > >>>>>> Message: %1: The embedded controller (EC) hardware didn't respond > >>>>>> within the timeout period. This > >>>>>> > >>>>>> may indicate an error in the EC hardware or firmware, or possibly a > >>>>>> poorly designed BIOS which > >>>>>> > >>>>>> accesses the EC in an unsafe manner. The EC driver will retry the > >>>>>> failed transaction if possible. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> "MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> escreveu na mensagem > >>>>>> news:O2XcQDO7IHA.1952@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > >>>>>>> Is the system event log showing the exact same error as in the KB > >>>>>>> article ? Update.exe should have been updated to a much higher > >>>>>>> version [the latest is V. 6.3.13.0] than what is showing in the > >>>>>>> article by the installation of SP2 and SP3, along with the myriad > >>>>>>> security updates issued since this KB was published. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] > >>>>>>> =============== > >>>>>>> *-343-* FDNY > >>>>>>> Never Forgotten > >>>>>>> =============== > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Peter wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I get error 7023 repeatedly whenever I delete a programme. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I can't understand how to get the Hotfix below, and whether it is > >>>>>>>> applicable to XP SP3. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328213/en-us > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> help! > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> JB > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience Please Reply to the Newsgroup
Guest Peter Posted July 25, 2008 Posted July 25, 2008 Re: Error 7023 Thank you very much Ken I have downloaded and unzipped the file, but can't understand from the readme file what I am supposed to do. It asks to Run gpedit.msc. but the system can't fins the file. Help! JB "Ken Blake, MVP" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> escreveu na mensagem news:mt5k84l080jffaran563u13hio0p6b9hf4@4ax.com... > On Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:42:47 +0100, "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote: > >> I have just noted something strange (to me) in System Information: >> >> I have 256 MB of physical memory, but only 24.85 available... I have a >> .pdf >> file, a Word document, Outlook Express and 1 IE page open. >> >> Is this normal? > > > I have two comments for you: > > 1. Yes, that's normal. Wanting to minimize the amount of memory > Windows uses is a counterproductive desire. Windows is designed to use > all, or most, of your memory, all the time, and that's good not bad. > Free memory is wasted memory. You paid for it all and shouldn't want > to see any of it wasted. > > Windows works hard to find a use for all the memory you have all the > time. For example if your apps don't need some of it, it will use that > part for caching, then give it back when your apps later need it. In > this way Windows keeps all your memory working for you all the time. > > 2. I don't necessarily agree with R. McCarty that "256 Megabytes of > physical RAM isn't enough with today's average use." You ask "So, you > reckon that my problem with a slow computer is the amount of RAM?" He > may be right, and that may be the problem, but I wouldn't just assume > it without further investigation. Read below: > > How much RAM you need for good performance is *not* a > one-size-fits-all situation. You get good performance if the amount of > RAM you have keeps you from using the page file, and that depends on > what apps you run. Most people running a typical range of business > applications find that somewhere around 256-384MB works well, others > need 512MB. Almost anyone will see poor performance with less than > 256MB. Some people, particularly those doing things like editing large > photographic images, can see a performance boost by adding even more > than 512MB--sometimes much more. > > If you are currently using the page file significantly, more memory > will decrease or eliminate that usage, and improve your performance. > If you are not using the page file significantly, more memory will do > nothing for you. Go to > http://billsway.com/notes%5Fpublic/winxp%5Ftweaks/ and download > WinXP-2K_Pagefile.zip and monitor your pagefile usage. That should > give you a good idea of whether more memory can help, and if so, how > much more. > > > > >> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >> news:O$$29kl7IHA.1080@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> > Newer motherboards employ an APIC ( Advanced Programmable >> > Interrupt Controller ). This extends the original PC IRQ range up >> > to 23 Interrupt lines. This helps a PC to map devices using IRQ >> > Sharing. When XP is first installed it interrogates the BIOS to see >> > if the motherboard supports extended IRQ mapping and loads a >> > HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) driver appropriate for the type >> > of hardware. From the name, I'd suspect that you have an issue with >> > some form of APIC support. You can usually determine if your >> > setup has APIC by using System Info tool, Hardware Resources >> > category, IRQs - and noting the highest numbered IRQ in the map. >> > >> > "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >> > news:%23T8wBfl7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> >> Thank you so much. >> >> >> >> Could you give me an idea of what the ID: 1: ACPIEC is all about? >> >> >> >> Best >> >> >> >> JB >> >> >> >> >> >> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >> >> news:uVUMwVl7IHA.1420@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> >>> Using McAfee almost always inflicts a "Noticeable" performance loss. >> >>> So some of your issues are most definitely related to McAfee. The >> >>> boot >> >>> sequence indicates service time outs ( up to 30 Seconds ). >> >>> >> >>> The kind of errors you report can be the result of Registry Cleaning. >> >>> It's >> >>> like death of a thousand cuts for a PC. The registry is a large >> >>> database >> >>> of "HIGHLY" interdependent links and associations. Removing what >> >>> seems to be invalid keys/values may not result in immediate damage, >> >>> but >> >>> will show up later as that association is called on. >> >>> >> >>> Registry Cleaning ( & it's merits ) ranks as the top on-going issue >> >>> here. >> >>> This post is likely to kick off the "Yes it works", "No it Doesn't" >> >>> threads. >> >>> >> >>> Unfortunately once the Registry is hacked on, there is no method of >> >>> repair to a known valid state. You can probably get the machine back >> >>> to >> >>> a working state, but you'll never know or trust the integrity of the >> >>> Registry. >> >>> The time it will take to get a Clean/Error free boot may not be worth >> >>> the >> >>> effort. I'd be inclined to recommend a fresh install and choose >> >>> another >> >>> Security product excluding any McAfee or Norton brand. >> >>> >> >>> If you can't resist the urge to clean the Registry at the least >> >>> invest >> >>> in an >> >>> imaging program like Acronis True Image and make regular images. This >> >>> way when something gets broken you can roll the machine back to a >> >>> working/reliable state. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >> >>> news:%23fpI6pk7IHA.4040@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> >>>> Thank you very much for your help. >> >>>> >> >>>> As for Registry cleaner the answer is yes. Over the years (4/5) I >> >>>> have >> >>>> used in the past RegCleaner and more recently CCleaner. >> >>>> >> >>>> I nver played around with Services, other than in MSconfig, where I >> >>>> disabled most of what I felt was not necessary at Startup. >> >>>> >> >>>> The boot is very long! I get the clock after some 15 seconds >> >>>> followed >> >>>> by the battery and the sound icons, but then I have to wait some >> >>>> 90/120 >> >>>> seconds for the Internet and McAfee to come up, strangely usually >> >>>> Internet before McAfee. I have cable connected to a router and then >> >>>> to >> >>>> the computer through a cable. The delay, I guess in my ignorance >> >>>> may >> >>>> be due to handshaking between the computer and the router with >> >>>> McAfee >> >>>> making things worse. Even after all the icons are up I find it >> >>>> difficult to open anything at all for some time. Eventually >> >>>> everything >> >>>> works reasonable well, until McAfee or someone else decides to check >> >>>> updates and then the susytem goes into a crawl, as if the memory was >> >>>> being hijacked. Checking on CPU use does not show excessive use >> >>>> which >> >>>> makes it strange why the computer should virtually hang if the CPU >> >>>> has >> >>>> over 90% free usage. >> >>>> >> >>>> Incidentally, I have done repeatedly all sorts of Virus/trojan/etc >> >>>> checks and I am confident that the computer is clean; unmless of >> >>>> course >> >>>> all the different programmes are useless... >> >>>> >> >>>> Thank you again for your help. >> >>>> >> >>>> JB >> >>>> >> >>>> I will wait for your response before clearing the App and System >> >>>> Event >> >>>> Logs. >> >>>> "R. McCarty" <PcEngWork-NoSpam_@mindspring.com> escreveu na mensagem >> >>>> news:ui4l7Yk7IHA.4532@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >> >>>>> Has this computer ever had a Registry Cleaner used on it ? Also has >> >>>>> any Services had their Start Mode modified. It seems to me like >> >>>>> you've >> >>>>> got a series of dependency group failures. I would clear both the >> >>>>> App >> >>>>> and System Event Logs and do a reboot. Then check both logs for all >> >>>>> warnings and errors. Does your boot cycle time run ~45-60 Seconds >> >>>>> or is it significantly longer. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> As to the hardware issue does your Device Manager have a clean >> >>>>> listing ? - ( No Red X's or Yellow Exclamation marks ). >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> "Peter" <abc@here.com> wrote in message >> >>>>> news:O3TlWRk7IHA.3648@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> >>>>>> As far as Error 7023, it only happens when I Add/Delete a program >> >>>>>> (I >> >>>>>> think only deleting). I have other Errors: 10010 DCOM which >> >>>>>> happens >> >>>>>> EVERY TIME I start the computer and I don't know what to do; and >> >>>>>> ID1 >> >>>>>> ACPIEC which is happening more and more frequently and again I am >> >>>>>> at >> >>>>>> a loss. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Any help on these would be much appreciated, so that I try to >> >>>>>> understand what is going on in my very slow computer. All the MS >> >>>>>> updates are up to date. I have XP Home SP3. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Below the errors that I keep getting: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >> >>>>>> ID: 7023 >> >>>>>> Source: Service Control Manager >> >>>>>> Version: 5.0 >> >>>>>> Component: System Event Log >> >>>>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_SERVICE_EXIT_FAILED >> >>>>>> Message: The %1 service terminated with the following error: >> >>>>>> %2 >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Explanation >> >>>>>> The specified service stopped unexpectedly with the error >> >>>>>> indicated >> >>>>>> in the message. The service closed >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> safely. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >> >>>>>> ID: 10010 >> >>>>>> Source: DCOM >> >>>>>> Version: 5.0 >> >>>>>> Component: System Event Log >> >>>>>> Symbolic Name: EVENT_RPCSS_SERVER_START_TIMEOUT >> >>>>>> Message: The server %1 did not register with DCOM within the >> >>>>>> required >> >>>>>> timeout. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Explanation >> >>>>>> The Component Object Model (COM) infrastructure tried to start the >> >>>>>> named server; however, the server >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> did not reply within the required timeout period. There might be a >> >>>>>> deadlock, or the program might not >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> have responded to the server initialization code within the >> >>>>>> timeout >> >>>>>> period of two minutes >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Product: Windows Operating System >> >>>>>> ID: 1 >> >>>>>> Source: ACPIEC >> >>>>>> Version: 5.2 >> >>>>>> Symbolic Name: ACPIEC_ERR_WATCHDOG >> >>>>>> Message: %1: The embedded controller (EC) hardware didn't respond >> >>>>>> within the timeout period. This >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> may indicate an error in the EC hardware or firmware, or possibly >> >>>>>> a >> >>>>>> poorly designed BIOS which >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> accesses the EC in an unsafe manner. The EC driver will retry the >> >>>>>> failed transaction if possible. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> "MowGreen [MVP]" <mowgreen@nowandzen.com> escreveu na mensagem >> >>>>>> news:O2XcQDO7IHA.1952@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> >>>>>>> Is the system event log showing the exact same error as in the KB >> >>>>>>> article ? Update.exe should have been updated to a much higher >> >>>>>>> version [the latest is V. 6.3.13.0] than what is showing in the >> >>>>>>> article by the installation of SP2 and SP3, along with the myriad >> >>>>>>> security updates issued since this KB was published. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> MowGreen [MVP 2003-2008] >> >>>>>>> =============== >> >>>>>>> *-343-* FDNY >> >>>>>>> Never Forgotten >> >>>>>>> =============== >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Peter wrote: >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> I get error 7023 repeatedly whenever I delete a programme. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> I can't understand how to get the Hotfix below, and whether it >> >>>>>>>> is >> >>>>>>>> applicable to XP SP3. >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328213/en-us >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> help! >> >>>>>>>> >> >>>>>>>> JB >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > > -- > Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience > Please Reply to the Newsgroup
Recommended Posts