Guest Gail Rossum Posted August 19, 2008 Posted August 19, 2008 I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to be fixed, for a price of course. My PC has some problems I am sure as its very sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the least. Should I pay the $30.00 & buy this or is there a free one out there also. I regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your opinion. Gail
Guest Gail Rossum Posted August 19, 2008 Posted August 19, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required this should have read "RegCure" not Rescuer (but that might help better) "Gail Rossum" <mom_bear@shaw.ca> wrote in message news:%23bckaCkAJHA.1228@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to be >fixed, for a price of course. My PC has some problems I am sure as its very >sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the least. Should >I pay the $30.00 & buy this or is there a free one out there also. I >regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your opinion. > Gail >
Guest John John (MVP) Posted August 19, 2008 Posted August 19, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required Keep your money in your pocket! These cleaners do more harm than good, chances are it will bug up your computer instead of fixing it. John Gail Rossum wrote: > I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to be > fixed, for a price of course. My PC has some problems I am sure as its very > sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the least. Should > I pay the $30.00 & buy this or is there a free one out there also. I > regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your opinion. > Gail > >
Guest Gail Rossum Posted August 19, 2008 Posted August 19, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required Thank You! "John John (MVP)" <audetweld@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message news:%23bISSMkAJHA.1016@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > Keep your money in your pocket! These cleaners do more harm than good, > chances are it will bug up your computer instead of fixing it. > > John > > Gail Rossum wrote: > >> I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to >> be fixed, for a price of course. My PC has some problems I am sure as its >> very sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the least. >> Should I pay the $30.00 & buy this or is there a free one out there also. >> I regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your opinion. >> Gail
Guest Daave Posted August 19, 2008 Posted August 19, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required "Gail Rossum" <mom_bear@shaw.ca> wrote in message news:%23bckaCkAJHA.1228@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to >be fixed, for a price of course. My PC has some problems I am sure as >its very sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the >least. Should I pay the $30.00 & buy this or is there a free one out >there also. I regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your >opinion. You are smart to ask this question. Registry "cleaners" often do harm, and it has never been demonstrated that they do any good. If you'd like to explore this topic more, this is a good thread: http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=28099 Here are the three most common causes for PC slowness: 1. Malicious software (malware) 2. Certain programs that are designed to combat malware (e.g., Norton and McAfee). Ironically, they can slow things down because they simply use way too many resources. Sometime they cause conflicts with other programs. And their default mode is to scan your entire hard drive each time you boot up. 3. Too many of *certain types* of programs always running in the background -- with or without your knowledge. 4. Not enough RAM, which causes the PC to overly rely on the pagefile. A quick way to determine if this is happening is to open Task Manager (Ctrl+Alt+Del) and click the Performance tab. Then note the three values under Commit Charge (K): in the lower left-hand corner: Total, Limit, and Peak. The Total figure represents the amount of memory you are using at that very moment. The Peak figure represents the highest amount of memory you used since last bootup. If both these figures are below the value of Physical Memory (K) Total, then you probably have plenty of RAM. Otherwise, you may want to explore this further by running Page File Monitor for Windows XP: http://www.dougknox.com/xp/utils/xp_pagefilemon.htm Everything you need to know to address the other three issues and more can be found at these links: http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/slowcom.htm http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/page2.html#Viruses_Malware
Guest PA Bear [MS MVP] Posted August 20, 2008 Posted August 20, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required Think your Registry needs "cleaning" or "repairing"? Read http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=28099 and draw your own conclusions. -- ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear) MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002 AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net DTS-L http://dts-l.net/ Gail Rossum wrote: > I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to be > fixed, for a price of course. My PC has some problems I am sure as its > very > sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the least. > Should > I pay the $30.00 & buy this or is there a free one out there also. I > regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your opinion. > Gail
Guest Bruce Chambers Posted August 20, 2008 Posted August 20, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required Gail Rossum wrote: > I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to be > fixed, for a price of course. My PC has some problems I am sure as its very > sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the least. Should > I pay the $30.00 & buy this or is there a free one out there also. I > regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your opinion. > Gail > > A registry cleaner - even a safe one, should such ever be developed - is an exercise in, at best, futility. There is no real need for registry cleaners, other than to provide a profit to their manufacturers. On rare occasions, registry cleaners can be, in the hands of a skilled technician, useful, time-saving diagnostic tools. Otherwise, they're nothing but snake oil. Why do you even think you'd ever need to clean your registry? What specific *problems* are you actually experiencing (not some program's bogus listing of imaginary problems) that you think can be fixed by using a registry cleaner? If you do have a problem that is rooted in the registry, it would be far better to simply edit (after backing up, of course) only the specific key(s) and/or value(s) that are causing the problem. After all, why use a chainsaw when a scalpel will do the job? Additionally, the manually changing of one or two registry entries is far less likely to have the dire consequences of allowing an automated product to make multiple changes simultaneously. The only thing needed to safely clean your registry is knowledge and Regedit.exe. The registry contains all of the operating system's "knowledge" of the computer's hardware devices, installed software, the location of the device drivers, and the computer's configuration. A misstep in the registry can have severe consequences. One should not even turning loose a poorly understood automated "cleaner," unless he is fully confident that he knows *exactly* what is going to happen as a result of each and every change. Having repeatedly seen the results of inexperienced people using automated registry "cleaners," I can only advise all but the most experienced computer technicians (and/or hobbyists) to avoid them all. Experience has shown me that such tools simply are not safe in the hands of the inexperienced user. If you lack the knowledge and experience to maintain your registry by yourself, then you also lack the knowledge and experience to safely configure and use any automated registry cleaner, no matter how safe they claim to be. More importantly, no one has ever demonstrated that the use of an automated registry cleaner, particularly by an untrained, inexperienced computer user, does any real good, whatsoever. There's certainly been no empirical evidence offered to demonstrate that the use of such products to "clean" WinXP's registry improves a computer's performance or stability. Given the potential for harm, it's just not worth the risk. Granted, most registry "cleaners" won't cause problems each and every time they're used, but the potential for harm is always there. And, since no registry "cleaner" has ever been demonstrated to do any good (think of them like treating the flu with chicken soup - there's no real medicinal value, but it sometimes provides a warming placebo effect), I always tell people that the risks far out-weigh the non-existent benefits. I will concede that a good registry *scanning* tool, in the hands of an experienced and knowledgeable technician or hobbyist can be a useful time-saving diagnostic tool, as long as it's not allowed to make any changes automatically. But I really don't think that there are any registry cleaners that are truly safe for the general public to use. Experience has proven just the opposite: such tools simply are not safe in the hands of the inexperienced user. -- Bruce Chambers Help us help you: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375 They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has killed a great many philosophers. ~ Denis Diderot
Guest Ken Blake Posted August 20, 2008 Posted August 20, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required "Gail Rossum" <mom_bear@shaw.ca> wrote in message news:%23bckaCkAJHA.1228@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to be >fixed, for a price of course. My PC has some problems I am sure as its very >sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the least. Should >I pay the $30.00 & buy this No! > or is there a free one out there also. Don't do that either. > I regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your opinion. Look elsewhere for the cause of your sluggishness and freezing. It's not that the registry needs cleaning. All such programs should be avoided like the plague. What it calls "registry errors" are not really errors, but probably just orphaned, unused entries, that don't represent any kind of problem. I strongly recommend *against* use of registry cleaners. Cleaning of the registry isn't needed and is dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't use any registry cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors of registry cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused registry entries doesn't really hurt you. The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner erroneously removing an entry you need is far greater than any potential benefit it may have.
Guest Dave Head Posted August 21, 2008 Posted August 21, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required On Aug 20, 11:42 am, "Ken Blake" <kbl...@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote: > "Gail Rossum" <mom_b...@shaw.ca> wrote in message > > news:%23bckaCkAJHA.1228@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > >I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to be > >fixed, for apriceof course. My PC has some problems I am sure as its very > >sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the least. Should > >I pay the $30.00 & buy this > > No! > > > or is there a free one out there also. > > Don't do that either. > > > I regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your opinion. > > Look elsewhere for the cause of your sluggishness and freezing. It's not > that the registry needs cleaning. All such programs should be avoided like > the plague. What it calls "registry > errors" are not really errors, but probably just orphaned, unused entries, > that don't represent any kind of problem. > > I strongly recommend *against* use of registry cleaners. Cleaning of the > registry isn't needed and is dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't > use any registry cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors > of registry cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused registry > entries doesn't really hurt you. > > The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner erroneously > removing an entry you need is far greater than any potential benefit it may > have. Regcure works GREAT. But... The website quotes $29.95, but when you actually authorize payment, takes $39.95 out of your paypal account. Additionally, as explained _nowhere_ in any of the websites that I can find, the price for the software is for 1 year. It stops working after that, and you HAVE TO BUY IT AGAIN. I think that, although the software works better than any similar PC help software that I've ever purchased, the marketing overall is fraudulent. I won't be buying it _again_. When it dies next year, if I want to make my machine run faster, I'll just reload the operating system and shed all the spyware, malware, broken registry links, etc., etc at that time. That's what having a big external backup disk is for...
Guest Daave Posted August 21, 2008 Posted August 21, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required "Dave Head" <rally2xs@att.net> wrote in message news:b91bdbe8-ce12-4468-8f5f-8750d8417e76@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... > Regcure works GREAT. Yeah, it works GREAT at separating a fool from his money. > But... > > The website quotes $29.95, but when you actually authorize payment, > takes $39.95 out of your paypal account. Q.E.D.
Guest Dave Head Posted August 21, 2008 Posted August 21, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required On Aug 21, 2:30 pm, "John John (MVP)" <audetw...@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote: > Dave Head wrote: > > > Regcure works GREAT. > Other than that what makes you think that this fraudulent piece of junk > works "great"? > John Because I put it on my laptop last year, ran it, and the speedup in responses to mouse clicks and web page accesses was akin to putting a supercharger on a V8 engine. My computer worked better than it had for a long time. Dave
Guest Bruce Chambers Posted August 22, 2008 Posted August 22, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required Dave Head wrote: > On Aug 20, 11:42 am, "Ken Blake" <kbl...@this.is.an.invalid.domain> > wrote: >> "Gail Rossum" <mom_b...@shaw.ca> wrote in message >> >> news:%23bckaCkAJHA.1228@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> >>> I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to be >>> fixed, for apriceof course. My PC has some problems I am sure as its very >>> sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the least. Should >>> I pay the $30.00 & buy this >> No! >> >>> or is there a free one out there also. >> Don't do that either. >> >>> I regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your opinion. >> Look elsewhere for the cause of your sluggishness and freezing. It's not >> that the registry needs cleaning. All such programs should be avoided like >> the plague. What it calls "registry >> errors" are not really errors, but probably just orphaned, unused entries, >> that don't represent any kind of problem. >> >> I strongly recommend *against* use of registry cleaners. Cleaning of the >> registry isn't needed and is dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't >> use any registry cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors >> of registry cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused registry >> entries doesn't really hurt you. >> >> The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner erroneously >> removing an entry you need is far greater than any potential benefit it may >> have. > > Regcure works GREAT. > How can it possibly work "great" when it (like all other so-called registry cleaners) does absolutely nothing useful? -- Bruce Chambers Help us help you: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375 They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has killed a great many philosophers. ~ Denis Diderot
Guest Daave Posted August 22, 2008 Posted August 22, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required "Dave Head" <rally2xs@att.net> wrote in message news:d32a8d74-5fa6-46df-b9ff-6841ced5b0ce@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com... On Aug 21, 2:30 pm, "John John (MVP)" <audetw...@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote: > Dave Head wrote: > >>> Regcure works GREAT. >> Other than that what makes you think that this fraudulent piece of >> junk >> works "great"? >> >> John > Because I put it on my laptop last year, ran it, and the speedup in > responses to mouse clicks and web page accesses was akin to putting > a supercharger on a V8 engine. My computer worked better than it > had for a long time. Dave, is it possible you cleaned out your Temporary Internet Files at around the same time? And John, it appears your post was filtered by Microsoft!
Guest John John (MVP) Posted August 22, 2008 Posted August 22, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required Daave wrote: > "Dave Head" <rally2xs@att.net> wrote in message > news:d32a8d74-5fa6-46df-b9ff-6841ced5b0ce@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com... > On Aug 21, 2:30 pm, "John John (MVP)" <audetw...@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote: > >>Dave Head wrote: >> >> >>>>Regcure works GREAT. > > >>>Other than that what makes you think that this fraudulent piece of >>>junk >>>works "great"? >>> >>>John > > >>Because I put it on my laptop last year, ran it, and the speedup in >>responses to mouse clicks and web page accesses was akin to putting >>a supercharger on a V8 engine. My computer worked better than it >>had for a long time. > > > Dave, is it possible you cleaned out your Temporary Internet Files at > around the same time? > > And John, it appears your post was filtered by Microsoft! Won't be the first time ;-) It doesn't bother me any more than that, I can always post in Morse code if I have to! One of my comment was that I was surprised that nobody reported the outfit to PayPal, advertising one price and charging a higher one when doing the transaction. John
Guest PA Bear [MS MVP] Posted August 22, 2008 Posted August 22, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required John John (MVP) wrote: <snip> >> And John, it appears your post was filtered by Microsoft! > > Won't be the first time ;-) cf. http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general/msg/5e62fb1dadeab964 -- ~PA Bear
Guest Dave Head Posted August 22, 2008 Posted August 22, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required On Aug 21, 10:22 pm, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote: > "Dave Head" <rally...@att.net> wrote in message > > news:d32a8d74-5fa6-46df-b9ff-6841ced5b0ce@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com... > On Aug 21, 2:30 pm, "John John (MVP)" <audetw...@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote: > > > Dave Head wrote: > > >>> Regcure works GREAT. > >> Other than that what makes you think that this fraudulent piece of > >> junk > >> works "great"? > > >> John > > Because I put it on my laptop last year, ran it, and the speedup in > > responses to mouse clicks and web page accesses was akin to putting > > a supercharger on a V8 engine. My computer worked better than it > > had for a long time. > > Dave, is it possible you cleaned out your Temporary Internet Files at > around the same time? As I recall, I had already done all that standard sort of thing, along with a defrag, etc. Then I stuck this regcure thing on the laptop and it took off like a rocket. Dunno... don't ask me... it didn't much help on the desktop when I used it earlier this week, but on the laptop, it was like nitromethane in the gas tank. > > And John, it appears your post was filtered by Microsoft!
Guest Daave Posted August 22, 2008 Posted August 22, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required "Daave" <dcwashNOSPAM@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote in message news:PvSdnfQY6cedJjPVnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@cavtel.net... > "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message > news:OfKLsOBBJHA.1632@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> John John (MVP) wrote: >> <snip> >>>> And John, it appears your post was filtered by Microsoft! >>> >>> Won't be the first time ;-) >> >> cf. >> http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general/msg/5e62fb1dadeab964 > > I wonder if it had something to do with the word [*censored*]? Apparently!
Guest John John (MVP) Posted August 22, 2008 Posted August 22, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required Daave wrote: > "Daave" <dcwashNOSPAM@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote in message > news:PvSdnfQY6cedJjPVnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@cavtel.net... > >>"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message >>news:OfKLsOBBJHA.1632@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> >>>John John (MVP) wrote: >>><snip> >>> >>>>>And John, it appears your post was filtered by Microsoft! >>>> >>>>Won't be the first time ;-) >>> >>>cf. >>>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general/msg/5e62fb1dadeab964 >> >>I wonder if it had something to do with the word [*censored*]? > > > Apparently! I guess from now on we will have to call them P.T. Barnum customers! John
Guest Daave Posted August 22, 2008 Posted August 22, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required "John John (MVP)" <audetweld@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message news:g8mudb$38m$1@aioe.org... > Daave wrote: > >> "Daave" <dcwashNOSPAM@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote in message >> news:PvSdnfQY6cedJjPVnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@cavtel.net... >> >>>"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message >>>news:OfKLsOBBJHA.1632@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>> >>>>John John (MVP) wrote: >>>><snip> >>>> >>>>>>And John, it appears your post was filtered by Microsoft! >>>>> >>>>>Won't be the first time ;-) >>>> >>>>cf. >>>>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general/msg/5e62fb1dadeab964 >>> >>>I wonder if it had something to do with the word [*censored*]? >> >> >> Apparently! > > I guess from now on we will have to call them P.T. Barnum customers! There's one born every minute. ;-) You know, it really is annoying when this happens. I've had posts censored as well, and AFAICT, there was no reason at all for that to have happened. But there apparently is a filter that is not quite ready for prime time. I might just use my ISP's news server exclusively. Then when posts don't appear on the MS news server (including mine), I just won't know; therfore, I won't be annoyed!
Guest Daave Posted August 23, 2008 Posted August 23, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required Dave Head wrote: > On Aug 21, 10:22 pm, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> > wrote: >> Dave, is it possible you cleaned out your Temporary Internet Files at >> around the same time? > > As I recall, I had already done all that standard sort of thing, along > with a defrag, etc. Then I stuck this regcure thing on the laptop and > it took off like a rocket. Dunno... don't ask me... it didn't much > help on the desktop when I used it earlier this week, but on the > laptop, it was like nitromethane in the gas tank. I'll bet your performance improved because of the deletion of temp files followed by the defrag.
Guest Dave Head Posted August 23, 2008 Posted August 23, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required On Aug 23, 9:48 am, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote: > Dave Head wrote: > > On Aug 21, 10:22 pm, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> > > wrote: > >> Dave, is it possible you cleaned out your Temporary Internet Files at > >> around the same time? > > > As I recall, I had already done all that standard sort of thing, along > > with a defrag, etc. Then I stuck this regcure thing on the laptop and > > it took off like a rocket. Dunno... don't ask me... it didn't much > > help on the desktop when I used it earlier this week, but on the > > laptop, it was like nitromethane in the gas tank. > > I'll bet your performance improved because of the deletion of temp files > followed by the defrag. Uhhh,,, if the problem had been cured by that, then why would I have continued to try to solve it by buying Regcure?
Guest Daave Posted August 23, 2008 Posted August 23, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required "Dave Head" <rally2xs@att.net> wrote in message news:ac370c37-65c7-4dfc-b1b7-8ccc59364936@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... On Aug 23, 9:48 am, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote: >> I'll bet your performance improved because of the deletion of temp >> files followed by the defrag. > Uhhh,,, if the problem had been cured by that, then why would I have > continued to try to solve it by buying Regcure? Because you apparently believe in Regcure's placebo effect. Hey, it's your money. In case you ever want to learn what *really* causes sluggishness and how to improve performance, see: http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/slowcom.htm
Guest Dave Head Posted August 24, 2008 Posted August 24, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required On Aug 23, 3:00 pm, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote: > "Dave Head" <rally...@att.net> wrote in message > > news:ac370c37-65c7-4dfc-b1b7-8ccc59364936@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... > On Aug 23, 9:48 am, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote: > > >> I'll bet your performance improved because of the deletion of temp > >> files followed by the defrag. > > Uhhh,,, if the problem had been cured by that, then why would I have > > continued to try to solve it by buying Regcure? > > Because you apparently believe in Regcure's placebo effect. Hey, it's > your money. Hey, believe whatever you want, since you've apparently made a religion out of this. I'm just telling you my experience.
Guest Daave Posted August 24, 2008 Posted August 24, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required "Dave Head" <rally2xs@att.net> wrote in message news:c84ec7ba-ec6d-4f80-959b-04df4ad747d0@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com... On Aug 23, 3:00 pm, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote: >> "Dave Head" <rally...@att.net> wrote in message >> >> news:ac370c37-65c7-4dfc-b1b7-8ccc59364936@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com... >> On Aug 23, 9:48 am, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> >> wrote: >> >> >> I'll bet your performance improved because of the deletion of temp >> >> files followed by the defrag. >> > Uhhh,,, if the problem had been cured by that, then why would I >> > have >> > continued to try to solve it by buying Regcure? >> >> Because you apparently believe in Regcure's placebo effect. Hey, it's >> your money. > Hey, believe whatever you want, since you've apparently made a > religion out of this. I'm just telling you my experience. If you are not interesting in learning, I won't waste any more of my time. Godspeed.
Guest Dave Head Posted August 24, 2008 Posted August 24, 2008 Re: Regcure Opinion required On Aug 24, 3:09 am, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote: > "Dave Head" <rally...@att.net> wrote in message > > news:c84ec7ba-ec6d-4f80-959b-04df4ad747d0@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com... > On Aug 23, 3:00 pm, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote: > > > > > > >> "Dave Head" <rally...@att.net> wrote in message > > >>news:ac370c37-65c7-4dfc-b1b7-8ccc59364936@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com.... > >> On Aug 23, 9:48 am, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> > >> wrote: > > >> >> I'll bet your performance improved because of the deletion of temp > >> >> files followed by the defrag. > >> > Uhhh,,, if the problem had been cured by that, then why would I > >> > have > >> > continued to try to solve it by buying Regcure? > > >> Because you apparently believe in Regcure's placebo effect. Hey, it's > >> your money. > > Hey, believe whatever you want, since you've apparently made a > > religion out of this. I'm just telling you my experience. > > If you are not interesting in learning, I won't waste any more of my > time. Godspeed.- Hide quoted text - > Not much interested in learning something from someone that, when given facts that happen to disagree with his own beliefs, thinks he can change the facts, and irrationally clings to his beliefs...
Recommended Posts