Regcure Opinion required

[Guest Gail Rossum]

I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to be

fixed, for a price of course. My PC has some problems I am sure as its very

sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the least. Should

I pay the $30.00 & buy this or is there a free one out there also. I

regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your opinion.

Gail

[Guest Gail Rossum]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

this should have read "RegCure" not Rescuer (but that might help better)

"Gail Rossum" <mom_bear@shaw.ca> wrote in message

news:%23bckaCkAJHA.1228@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to be

>fixed, for a price of course. My PC has some problems I am sure as its very

>sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the least. Should

>I pay the $30.00 & buy this or is there a free one out there also. I

>regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your opinion.

> Gail

>

[Guest John John (MVP)]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

Keep your money in your pocket! These cleaners do more harm than good,

chances are it will bug up your computer instead of fixing it.

 

John

 

Gail Rossum wrote:

> I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to be

> fixed, for a price of course. My PC has some problems I am sure as its very

> sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the least. Should

> I pay the $30.00 & buy this or is there a free one out there also. I

> regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your opinion.

> Gail

>

>

[Guest Gail Rossum]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

Thank You!

"John John (MVP)" <audetweld@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message

news:%23bISSMkAJHA.1016@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

> Keep your money in your pocket! These cleaners do more harm than good,

> chances are it will bug up your computer instead of fixing it.

>

> John

>

> Gail Rossum wrote:

>

>> I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to

>> be fixed, for a price of course. My PC has some problems I am sure as its

>> very sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the least.

>> Should I pay the $30.00 & buy this or is there a free one out there also.

>> I regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your opinion.

>> Gail

[Guest Daave]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

"Gail Rossum" <mom_bear@shaw.ca> wrote in message

news:%23bckaCkAJHA.1228@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to

>be fixed, for a price of course. My PC has some problems I am sure as

>its very sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the

>least. Should I pay the $30.00 & buy this or is there a free one out

>there also. I regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your

>opinion.

 

You are smart to ask this question. Registry "cleaners" often do harm,

and it has never been demonstrated that they do any good. If you'd like

to explore this topic more, this is a good thread:

 

http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=28099

 

Here are the three most common causes for PC slowness:

 

1. Malicious software (malware)

 

2. Certain programs that are designed to combat malware (e.g., Norton

and McAfee). Ironically, they can slow things down because they simply

use way too many resources. Sometime they cause conflicts with other

programs. And their default mode is to scan your entire hard drive each

time you boot up.

 

3. Too many of *certain types* of programs always running in the

background -- with or without your knowledge.

 

4. Not enough RAM, which causes the PC to overly rely on the pagefile. A

quick way to determine if this is happening is to open Task Manager

(Ctrl+Alt+Del) and click the Performance tab. Then note the three values

under Commit Charge (K): in the lower left-hand corner: Total, Limit,

and Peak.

 

The Total figure represents the amount of memory you are using at that

very moment. The Peak figure represents the highest amount of memory you

used since last bootup. If both these figures are below the value of

Physical Memory (K) Total, then you probably have plenty of RAM.

Otherwise, you may want to explore this further by running Page File

Monitor for Windows XP:

 

http://www.dougknox.com/xp/utils/xp_pagefilemon.htm

 

Everything you need to know to address the other three issues and more

can be found at these links:

 

http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/slowcom.htm

 

http://www.elephantboycomputers.com/page2.html#Viruses_Malware

[Guest PA Bear [MS MVP]]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

Think your Registry needs "cleaning" or "repairing"? Read

http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=28099 and draw your own conclusions.

--

~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)

MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002

AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net

DTS-L http://dts-l.net/

 

Gail Rossum wrote:

> I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to be

> fixed, for a price of course. My PC has some problems I am sure as its

> very

> sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the least.

> Should

> I pay the $30.00 & buy this or is there a free one out there also. I

> regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your opinion.

> Gail

[Guest Bruce Chambers]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

Gail Rossum wrote:

> I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to be

> fixed, for a price of course. My PC has some problems I am sure as its very

> sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the least. Should

> I pay the $30.00 & buy this or is there a free one out there also. I

> regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your opinion.

> Gail

>

>

 

 

A registry cleaner - even a safe one, should such ever be developed

- is an exercise in, at best, futility. There is no real need for

registry cleaners, other than to provide a profit to their

manufacturers. On rare occasions, registry cleaners can be, in the

hands of a skilled technician, useful, time-saving diagnostic tools.

Otherwise, they're nothing but snake oil.

 

Why do you even think you'd ever need to clean your registry? What

specific *problems* are you actually experiencing (not some program's

bogus listing of imaginary problems) that you think can be fixed by

using a registry cleaner?

 

If you do have a problem that is rooted in the registry, it would

be far better to simply edit (after backing up, of course) only the

specific key(s) and/or value(s) that are causing the problem. After

all, why use a chainsaw when a scalpel will do the job? Additionally,

the manually changing of one or two registry entries is far less likely

to have the dire consequences of allowing an automated product to make

multiple changes simultaneously. The only thing needed to safely clean

your registry is knowledge and Regedit.exe.

 

The registry contains all of the operating system's "knowledge" of

the computer's hardware devices, installed software, the location of the

device drivers, and the computer's configuration. A misstep in the

registry can have severe consequences. One should not even turning

loose a poorly understood automated "cleaner," unless he is fully

confident that he knows *exactly* what is going to happen as a result of

each and every change.

 

Having repeatedly seen the results of inexperienced people using

automated registry "cleaners," I can only advise all but the most

experienced computer technicians (and/or hobbyists) to avoid them all.

Experience has shown me that such tools simply are not safe in the hands

of the inexperienced user. If you lack the knowledge and experience to

maintain your registry by yourself, then you also lack the knowledge and

experience to safely configure and use any automated registry cleaner,

no matter how safe they claim to be.

 

More importantly, no one has ever demonstrated that the use of an

automated registry cleaner, particularly by an untrained, inexperienced

computer user, does any real good, whatsoever. There's certainly been

no empirical evidence offered to demonstrate that the use of such

products to "clean" WinXP's registry improves a computer's performance

or stability. Given the potential for harm, it's just not worth the risk.

 

Granted, most registry "cleaners" won't cause problems each and

every time they're used, but the potential for harm is always there.

And, since no registry "cleaner" has ever been demonstrated to do any

good (think of them like treating the flu with chicken soup - there's no

real medicinal value, but it sometimes provides a warming placebo

effect), I always tell people that the risks far out-weigh the

non-existent benefits.

 

I will concede that a good registry *scanning* tool, in the hands

of an experienced and knowledgeable technician or hobbyist can be a

useful time-saving diagnostic tool, as long as it's not allowed to make

any changes automatically. But I really don't think that there are any

registry cleaners that are truly safe for the general public to use.

Experience has proven just the opposite: such tools simply are not safe

in the hands of the inexperienced user.

 

 

 

--

 

Bruce Chambers

 

Help us help you:

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

 

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

 

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary

safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

 

Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell

 

The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has

killed a great many philosophers.

~ Denis Diderot

[Guest Ken Blake]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

"Gail Rossum" <mom_bear@shaw.ca> wrote in message

news:%23bckaCkAJHA.1228@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to be

>fixed, for a price of course. My PC has some problems I am sure as its very

>sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the least. Should

>I pay the $30.00 & buy this

 

 

No!

> or is there a free one out there also.

 

Don't do that either.

 

> I regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your opinion.

 

 

Look elsewhere for the cause of your sluggishness and freezing. It's not

that the registry needs cleaning. All such programs should be avoided like

the plague. What it calls "registry

errors" are not really errors, but probably just orphaned, unused entries,

that don't represent any kind of problem.

 

I strongly recommend *against* use of registry cleaners. Cleaning of the

registry isn't needed and is dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't

use any registry cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors

of registry cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused registry

entries doesn't really hurt you.

 

The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner erroneously

removing an entry you need is far greater than any potential benefit it may

have.

[Guest Dave Head]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

On Aug 20, 11:42 am, "Ken Blake" <kbl...@this.is.an.invalid.domain>

wrote:

> "Gail Rossum" <mom_b...@shaw.ca> wrote in message

>

> news:%23bckaCkAJHA.1228@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>

> >I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to be

> >fixed, for apriceof course. My PC has some problems I am sure as its very

> >sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the least. Should

> >I pay the $30.00  & buy this

>

> No!

>

> > or is there a free one out there also.

>

> Don't do that either.

>

> > I regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your opinion.

>

> Look elsewhere for the cause of your sluggishness and freezing. It's not

> that the registry needs cleaning. All such programs should be avoided like

> the plague. What it calls "registry

> errors" are not really errors, but probably just orphaned, unused entries,

> that don't represent any kind of problem.

>

> I strongly recommend *against* use of registry cleaners. Cleaning of the

> registry isn't needed and is dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't

> use any registry cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors

> of registry cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused registry

> entries doesn't really hurt you.

>

> The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner erroneously

> removing an entry you need is far greater than any potential benefit it may

> have.

 

Regcure works GREAT.

 

But...

 

The website quotes $29.95, but when you actually authorize payment,

takes $39.95 out of your paypal account.

 

Additionally, as explained _nowhere_ in any of the websites that I can

find, the price for the software is for 1 year. It stops working

after that, and you HAVE TO BUY IT AGAIN.

 

I think that, although the software works better than any similar PC

help software that I've ever purchased, the marketing overall is

fraudulent. I won't be buying it _again_. When it dies next year, if

I want to make my machine run faster, I'll just reload the operating

system and shed all the spyware, malware, broken registry links, etc.,

etc at that time. That's what having a big external backup disk is

for...

[Guest Daave]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

"Dave Head" <rally2xs@att.net> wrote in message

news:b91bdbe8-ce12-4468-8f5f-8750d8417e76@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

> Regcure works GREAT.

 

Yeah, it works GREAT at separating a fool from his money.

> But...

>

> The website quotes $29.95, but when you actually authorize payment,

> takes $39.95 out of your paypal account.

 

Q.E.D.

[Guest Dave Head]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

On Aug 21, 2:30 pm, "John John (MVP)" <audetw...@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote:

> Dave Head wrote:

>

> > Regcure works GREAT.

> Other than that what makes you think that this fraudulent piece of junk

> works "great"?

> John

 

Because I put it on my laptop last year, ran it, and the speedup in

responses to mouse clicks and web page accesses was akin to putting a

supercharger on a V8 engine. My computer worked better than it had

for a long time.

 

Dave

[Guest Bruce Chambers]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

Dave Head wrote:

> On Aug 20, 11:42 am, "Ken Blake" <kbl...@this.is.an.invalid.domain>

> wrote:

>> "Gail Rossum" <mom_b...@shaw.ca> wrote in message

>>

>> news:%23bckaCkAJHA.1228@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>>

>>> I scanned my PC with Rescuer & of course I had 1000+errors that need to be

>>> fixed, for apriceof course. My PC has some problems I am sure as its very

>>> sluggish, freezes from time to time. Very annoying to say the least. Should

>>> I pay the $30.00 & buy this

>> No!

>>

>>> or is there a free one out there also.

>> Don't do that either.

>>

>>> I regularly "clean" out my PC but is this enough? Need your opinion.

>> Look elsewhere for the cause of your sluggishness and freezing. It's not

>> that the registry needs cleaning. All such programs should be avoided like

>> the plague. What it calls "registry

>> errors" are not really errors, but probably just orphaned, unused entries,

>> that don't represent any kind of problem.

>>

>> I strongly recommend *against* use of registry cleaners. Cleaning of the

>> registry isn't needed and is dangerous. Leave the registry alone and don't

>> use any registry cleaner. Despite what many people think, and what vendors

>> of registry cleaning software try to convince you of, having unused registry

>> entries doesn't really hurt you.

>>

>> The risk of a serious problem caused by a registry cleaner erroneously

>> removing an entry you need is far greater than any potential benefit it may

>> have.

>

> Regcure works GREAT.

>

 

How can it possibly work "great" when it (like all other so-called

registry cleaners) does absolutely nothing useful?

 

 

--

 

Bruce Chambers

 

Help us help you:

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

 

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

 

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary

safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

 

Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell

 

The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has

killed a great many philosophers.

~ Denis Diderot

[Guest Daave]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

"Dave Head" <rally2xs@att.net> wrote in message

news:d32a8d74-5fa6-46df-b9ff-6841ced5b0ce@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

On Aug 21, 2:30 pm, "John John (MVP)" <audetw...@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote:

> Dave Head wrote:

>

>>> Regcure works GREAT.

>> Other than that what makes you think that this fraudulent piece of

>> junk

>> works "great"?

>>

>> John

> Because I put it on my laptop last year, ran it, and the speedup in

> responses to mouse clicks and web page accesses was akin to putting

> a supercharger on a V8 engine. My computer worked better than it

> had for a long time.

 

Dave, is it possible you cleaned out your Temporary Internet Files at

around the same time?

 

And John, it appears your post was filtered by Microsoft!

[Guest John John (MVP)]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

Daave wrote:

> "Dave Head" <rally2xs@att.net> wrote in message

> news:d32a8d74-5fa6-46df-b9ff-6841ced5b0ce@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

> On Aug 21, 2:30 pm, "John John (MVP)" <audetw...@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote:

>

>>Dave Head wrote:

>>

>>

>>>>Regcure works GREAT.

>

>

>>>Other than that what makes you think that this fraudulent piece of

>>>junk

>>>works "great"?

>>>

>>>John

>

>

>>Because I put it on my laptop last year, ran it, and the speedup in

>>responses to mouse clicks and web page accesses was akin to putting

>>a supercharger on a V8 engine. My computer worked better than it

>>had for a long time.

>

>

> Dave, is it possible you cleaned out your Temporary Internet Files at

> around the same time?

>

> And John, it appears your post was filtered by Microsoft!

 

Won't be the first time ;-) It doesn't bother me any more than that, I

can always post in Morse code if I have to! One of my comment was that

I was surprised that nobody reported the outfit to PayPal, advertising

one price and charging a higher one when doing the transaction.

 

John

[Guest PA Bear [MS MVP]]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

John John (MVP) wrote:

<snip>

>> And John, it appears your post was filtered by Microsoft!

>

> Won't be the first time ;-)

 

cf.

http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general/msg/5e62fb1dadeab964

--

~PA Bear

[Guest Dave Head]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

On Aug 21, 10:22 pm, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid>

wrote:

> "Dave Head" <rally...@att.net> wrote in message

>

> news:d32a8d74-5fa6-46df-b9ff-6841ced5b0ce@56g2000hsm.googlegroups.com...

> On Aug 21, 2:30 pm, "John John (MVP)" <audetw...@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote:

>

> > Dave Head wrote:

>

> >>> Regcure works GREAT.

> >> Other than that what makes you think that this fraudulent piece of

> >> junk

> >> works "great"?

>

> >> John

> > Because I put it on my laptop last year, ran it, and the speedup in

> > responses to mouse clicks and web page accesses was akin to putting

> > a supercharger on a V8 engine.  My computer worked better than it

> > had for a long time.

>

> Dave, is it possible you cleaned out your Temporary Internet Files at

> around the same time?

 

As I recall, I had already done all that standard sort of thing, along

with a defrag, etc. Then I stuck this regcure thing on the laptop and

it took off like a rocket. Dunno... don't ask me... it didn't much

help on the desktop when I used it earlier this week, but on the

laptop, it was like nitromethane in the gas tank.

>

> And John, it appears your post was filtered by Microsoft!

[Guest Daave]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

"Daave" <dcwashNOSPAM@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote in message

news:PvSdnfQY6cedJjPVnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@cavtel.net...

> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message

> news:OfKLsOBBJHA.1632@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>> John John (MVP) wrote:

>> <snip>

>>>> And John, it appears your post was filtered by Microsoft!

>>>

>>> Won't be the first time ;-)

>>

>> cf.

>> http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general/msg/5e62fb1dadeab964

>

> I wonder if it had something to do with the word [*censored*]?

 

Apparently!

[Guest John John (MVP)]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

Daave wrote:

> "Daave" <dcwashNOSPAM@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote in message

> news:PvSdnfQY6cedJjPVnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@cavtel.net...

>

>>"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message

>>news:OfKLsOBBJHA.1632@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>

>>>John John (MVP) wrote:

>>><snip>

>>>

>>>>>And John, it appears your post was filtered by Microsoft!

>>>>

>>>>Won't be the first time ;-)

>>>

>>>cf.

>>>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general/msg/5e62fb1dadeab964

>>

>>I wonder if it had something to do with the word [*censored*]?

>

>

> Apparently!

 

I guess from now on we will have to call them P.T. Barnum customers!

 

John

[Guest Daave]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

"John John (MVP)" <audetweld@nbnet.nb.ca> wrote in message

news:g8mudb$38m$1@aioe.org...

> Daave wrote:

>

>> "Daave" <dcwashNOSPAM@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote in message

>> news:PvSdnfQY6cedJjPVnZ2dnUVZ_sLinZ2d@cavtel.net...

>>

>>>"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <PABearMVP@gmail.com> wrote in message

>>>news:OfKLsOBBJHA.1632@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>>

>>>>John John (MVP) wrote:

>>>><snip>

>>>>

>>>>>>And John, it appears your post was filtered by Microsoft!

>>>>>

>>>>>Won't be the first time ;-)

>>>>

>>>>cf.

>>>>http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general/msg/5e62fb1dadeab964

>>>

>>>I wonder if it had something to do with the word [*censored*]?

>>

>>

>> Apparently!

>

> I guess from now on we will have to call them P.T. Barnum customers!

 

There's one born every minute. ;-)

 

You know, it really is annoying when this happens. I've had posts

censored as well, and AFAICT, there was no reason at all for that to

have happened. But there apparently is a filter that is not quite ready

for prime time. I might just use my ISP's news server exclusively. Then

when posts don't appear on the MS news server (including mine), I just

won't know; therfore, I won't be annoyed!

[Guest Daave]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

Dave Head wrote:

> On Aug 21, 10:22 pm, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid>

> wrote:

>> Dave, is it possible you cleaned out your Temporary Internet Files at

>> around the same time?

>

> As I recall, I had already done all that standard sort of thing, along

> with a defrag, etc. Then I stuck this regcure thing on the laptop and

> it took off like a rocket. Dunno... don't ask me... it didn't much

> help on the desktop when I used it earlier this week, but on the

> laptop, it was like nitromethane in the gas tank.

 

I'll bet your performance improved because of the deletion of temp files

followed by the defrag.

[Guest Dave Head]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

On Aug 23, 9:48 am, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote:

> Dave Head wrote:

> > On Aug 21, 10:22 pm, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid>

> > wrote:

> >> Dave, is it possible you cleaned out your Temporary Internet Files at

> >> around the same time?

>

> > As I recall, I had already done all that standard sort of thing, along

> > with a defrag, etc.  Then I stuck this regcure thing on the laptop and

> > it took off like a rocket.  Dunno... don't ask me... it didn't much

> > help on the desktop when I used it earlier this week, but on the

> > laptop, it was like nitromethane in the gas tank.

>

> I'll bet your performance improved because of the deletion of temp files

> followed by the defrag.

 

Uhhh,,, if the problem had been cured by that, then why would I have

continued to try to solve it by buying Regcure?

[Guest Daave]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

"Dave Head" <rally2xs@att.net> wrote in message

news:ac370c37-65c7-4dfc-b1b7-8ccc59364936@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

On Aug 23, 9:48 am, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote:

>> I'll bet your performance improved because of the deletion of temp

>> files followed by the defrag.

> Uhhh,,, if the problem had been cured by that, then why would I have

> continued to try to solve it by buying Regcure?

 

Because you apparently believe in Regcure's placebo effect. Hey, it's

your money.

 

In case you ever want to learn what *really* causes sluggishness and how

to improve performance, see:

 

http://www3.telus.net/dandemar/slowcom.htm

[Guest Dave Head]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

On Aug 23, 3:00 pm, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote:

> "Dave Head" <rally...@att.net> wrote in message

>

> news:ac370c37-65c7-4dfc-b1b7-8ccc59364936@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

> On Aug 23, 9:48 am, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote:

>

> >> I'll bet your performance improved because of the deletion of temp

> >> files followed by the defrag.

> > Uhhh,,, if the problem had been cured by that, then why would I have

> > continued  to try to solve it by buying Regcure?

>

> Because you apparently believe in Regcure's placebo effect. Hey, it's

> your money.

 

Hey, believe whatever you want, since you've apparently made a

religion out of this. I'm just telling you my experience.

[Guest Daave]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

"Dave Head" <rally2xs@att.net> wrote in message

news:c84ec7ba-ec6d-4f80-959b-04df4ad747d0@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com...

On Aug 23, 3:00 pm, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote:

>> "Dave Head" <rally...@att.net> wrote in message

>>

>> news:ac370c37-65c7-4dfc-b1b7-8ccc59364936@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

>> On Aug 23, 9:48 am, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid>

>> wrote:

>>

>> >> I'll bet your performance improved because of the deletion of temp

>> >> files followed by the defrag.

>> > Uhhh,,, if the problem had been cured by that, then why would I

>> > have

>> > continued to try to solve it by buying Regcure?

>>

>> Because you apparently believe in Regcure's placebo effect. Hey, it's

>> your money.

> Hey, believe whatever you want, since you've apparently made a

> religion out of this. I'm just telling you my experience.

 

If you are not interesting in learning, I won't waste any more of my

time. Godspeed.

[Guest Dave Head]

Re: Regcure Opinion required

 

On Aug 24, 3:09 am, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote:

> "Dave Head" <rally...@att.net> wrote in message

>

> news:c84ec7ba-ec6d-4f80-959b-04df4ad747d0@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com...

> On Aug 23, 3:00 pm, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid> wrote:

>

>

>

>

>

> >> "Dave Head" <rally...@att.net> wrote in message

>

> >>news:ac370c37-65c7-4dfc-b1b7-8ccc59364936@i76g2000hsf.googlegroups.com....

> >> On Aug 23, 9:48 am, "Daave" <dcwashNOS...@myrealboxXYZ.invalid>

> >> wrote:

>

> >> >> I'll bet your performance improved because of the deletion of temp

> >> >> files followed by the defrag.

> >> > Uhhh,,, if the problem had been cured by that, then why would I

> >> > have

> >> > continued to try to solve it by buying Regcure?

>

> >> Because you apparently believe in Regcure's placebo effect. Hey, it's

> >> your money.

> > Hey, believe whatever you want, since you've apparently made a

> > religion out of this.  I'm just telling you my experience.

>

> If you are not interesting in learning, I won't waste any more of my

> time. Godspeed.- Hide quoted text -

>

 

Not much interested in learning something from someone that, when

given facts that happen to disagree with his own beliefs, thinks he

can change the facts, and irrationally clings to his beliefs...