Guest LMO Posted August 26, 2008 Posted August 26, 2008 Aloha all. I have been using GoBack since way before Symantec stole it. I like it, as it simply rolls back my system and drives to before any unfortunate event or virus, etc. Right now I have both GoBack and System Restore running. I realize this is redundant, and wonder which is the better one to keep running. I have hit points with Restore where it is unable to restore to a point. never happened with GoBack. Just curious on this. Any opinions? Thanks.
Guest Bill in Co. Posted August 26, 2008 Posted August 26, 2008 Re: GoBack vs Restore LMO wrote: > Aloha all. > I have been using GoBack since way before Symantec stole it. I like it, as > it simply rolls back my system and drives to before any unfortunate event > or > virus, etc. Right now I have both GoBack and System Restore running. I > realize this is redundant, and wonder which is the better one to keep > running. I have hit points with Restore where it is unable to restore to a > point. never happened with GoBack. > Just curious on this. Any opinions? > Thanks. Neither. Best insurance is using Acronis True Image, to make a system backup on another HD.
Guest David B. Posted August 26, 2008 Posted August 26, 2008 Re: GoBack vs Restore Neither of those options will protect you against a hard drive crash, follow Bill's suggestion. -- ---- Crosspost, do not multipost http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm How to ask a question http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375 Help Us Help You http://dts-l.net/goodpost.htm "LMO" <gcorlin@hawaii.rr.como> wrote in message news:g8vt1n$c9a$1@aioe.org... > Aloha all. > I have been using GoBack since way before Symantec stole it. I like it, as > it simply rolls back my system and drives to before any unfortunate event > or virus, etc. Right now I have both GoBack and System Restore running. I > realize this is redundant, and wonder which is the better one to keep > running. I have hit points with Restore where it is unable to restore to a > point. never happened with GoBack. > Just curious on this. Any opinions? > Thanks. >
Guest Twayne Posted August 26, 2008 Posted August 26, 2008 Re: GoBack vs Restore > Aloha all. > I have been using GoBack since way before Symantec stole it. I like > it, as it simply rolls back my system and drives to before any > unfortunate event or virus, etc. Right now I have both GoBack and > System Restore running. I realize this is redundant, and wonder which > is the better one to keep running. I have hit points with Restore > where it is unable to restore to a point. never happened with GoBack. > Just curious on this. Any opinions? > Thanks. That's a reasonable setup when you don't have imaging or backup software to run. I used to use System REstore Points first for some problems and if that didn't work then I'd use GoBack. It is not unusual to have system restore points that won't work for one reason or another. I never noticed any difference in that when I used GoBack along with them. It's not redundant because System Restore only restores system files where GoBack restores everything on the drive that has changed, including non-system files (data). That's why it provides a file recovery option after the rollback, in order to get back any data that may not have existed then. You do want to dispense with GoBack if you go to imaging software though; they don't play nicely together. HTH
Guest Panic Posted August 26, 2008 Posted August 26, 2008 Re: GoBack vs Restore System Restore only restores System files while GoBack can restore all files including non system programs and files that you created. GoBack has saved my bacon on numerous occasions. I still have System Restore available and use True Image to produce an image on my USB hard drive in case my internal hard drive becomes unavailable. I also copy critical folders directly to my USB hard drive. I backup Quicken that way and use OEQB to backup Outlook Express data. While GoBack is an excellent protective device it is important to read the details about its operation. It is very "jealous" of any other program trying to access your hard drive. If your hard drive becomes inaccessible you must hit the space bar during initial bootup when the GoBack info appears. Then you must elect to start your computer without GoBack. Then insert your bootable disk or CD and now boot. By eliminating GoBack this way your bootable disk can now access the hard drive that was previously unavailable due to GoBack. Any time I am about to load a new program or make a major change on my computer I write down the exact time and date. Then if I find that new change has caused a problem I use GoBack to totally return my computer back to how it was at that time before I made the changetotally. "LMO" <gcorlin@hawaii.rr.como> wrote in message news:g8vt1n$c9a$1@aioe.org... > Aloha all. > I have been using GoBack since way before Symantec stole it. I like it, as > it simply rolls back my system and drives to before any unfortunate event > or virus, etc. Right now I have both GoBack and System Restore running. I > realize this is redundant, and wonder which is the better one to keep > running. I have hit points with Restore where it is unable to restore to a > point. never happened with GoBack. > Just curious on this. Any opinions? > Thanks. >
Guest LMO Posted August 26, 2008 Posted August 26, 2008 Re: GoBack vs Restore Panic; thanks for the feedback. Can I use True Image with GoBack running, or do I need to disable GoBack first? "Panic" <smartwit@home.com> wrote in message news:OmRN715BJHA.2712@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > System Restore only restores System files while GoBack can restore all > files including non system programs and files that you created. GoBack > has saved my bacon on numerous occasions. I still have System Restore > available and use True Image to produce an image on my USB hard drive in > case my internal hard drive becomes unavailable. I also copy critical > folders directly to my USB hard drive. I backup Quicken that way and use > OEQB to backup Outlook Express data. > > While GoBack is an excellent protective device it is important to read the > details about its operation. It is very "jealous" of any other program > trying to access your hard drive. If your hard drive becomes inaccessible > you must hit the space bar during initial bootup when the GoBack info > appears. Then you must elect to start your computer without GoBack. Then > insert your bootable disk or CD and now boot. By eliminating GoBack this > way your bootable disk can now access the hard drive that was previously > unavailable due to GoBack. > > Any time I am about to load a new program or make a major change on my > computer I write down the exact time and date. Then if I find that new > change has caused a problem I use GoBack to totally return my computer > back to how it was at that time before I made the changetotally. > > "LMO" <gcorlin@hawaii.rr.como> wrote in message > news:g8vt1n$c9a$1@aioe.org... >> Aloha all. >> I have been using GoBack since way before Symantec stole it. I like it, >> as it simply rolls back my system and drives to before any unfortunate >> event or virus, etc. Right now I have both GoBack and System Restore >> running. I realize this is redundant, and wonder which is the better one >> to keep running. I have hit points with Restore where it is unable to >> restore to a point. never happened with GoBack. >> Just curious on this. Any opinions? >> Thanks. >> > >
Guest Howard Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 Re: GoBack vs Restore You have to disable GoBack in order to create a WORKING image with True Image. If GoBack is not disabled, the image will be created, but it will not work when you try to restore a disk. -- Howard On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:22:31 -1000, "LMO" <gcorlin@hawaii.rr.como> wrotG: >Panic; thanks for the feedback. Can I use True Image with GoBack running, or >do I need to disable GoBack first? > >"Panic" <smartwit@home.com> wrote in message >news:OmRN715BJHA.2712@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> System Restore only restores System files while GoBack can restore all >> files including non system programs and files that you created. GoBack >> has saved my bacon on numerous occasions. I still have System Restore >> available and use True Image to produce an image on my USB hard drive in >> case my internal hard drive becomes unavailable. I also copy critical >> folders directly to my USB hard drive. I backup Quicken that way and use >> OEQB to backup Outlook Express data. >> >> While GoBack is an excellent protective device it is important to read the >> details about its operation. It is very "jealous" of any other program >> trying to access your hard drive. If your hard drive becomes inaccessible >> you must hit the space bar during initial bootup when the GoBack info >> appears. Then you must elect to start your computer without GoBack. Then >> insert your bootable disk or CD and now boot. By eliminating GoBack this >> way your bootable disk can now access the hard drive that was previously >> unavailable due to GoBack. >> >> Any time I am about to load a new program or make a major change on my >> computer I write down the exact time and date. Then if I find that new >> change has caused a problem I use GoBack to totally return my computer >> back to how it was at that time before I made the changetotally. >> >> "LMO" <gcorlin@hawaii.rr.como> wrote in message >> news:g8vt1n$c9a$1@aioe.org... >>> Aloha all. >>> I have been using GoBack since way before Symantec stole it. I like it, >>> as it simply rolls back my system and drives to before any unfortunate >>> event or virus, etc. Right now I have both GoBack and System Restore >>> running. I realize this is redundant, and wonder which is the better one >>> to keep running. I have hit points with Restore where it is unable to >>> restore to a point. never happened with GoBack. >>> Just curious on this. Any opinions? >>> Thanks. >>> >> >> >
Guest Twayne Posted August 27, 2008 Posted August 27, 2008 Re: GoBack vs Restore > You have to disable GoBack in order to create a WORKING image with > True Image. If GoBack is not disabled, the image will be created, but > it will not work when you try to restore a disk. -- Howard True. Often GoBack will also stop working and will lose restore points. You don't need goback with imagine softwrae anyway. And your machine will boot faster without all that GoBack data to read/write at every boot. > > > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:22:31 -1000, "LMO" <gcorlin@hawaii.rr.como> > wrotG: > >> Panic; thanks for the feedback. Can I use True Image with GoBack >> running, or do I need to disable GoBack first? >> >> "Panic" <smartwit@home.com> wrote in message >> news:OmRN715BJHA.2712@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>> System Restore only restores System files while GoBack can restore >>> all files including non system programs and files that you created. >>> GoBack has saved my bacon on numerous occasions. I still have >>> System Restore available and use True Image to produce an image on >>> my USB hard drive in case my internal hard drive becomes >>> unavailable. I also copy critical folders directly to my USB hard >>> drive. I backup Quicken that way and use OEQB to backup Outlook >>> Express data. >>> >>> While GoBack is an excellent protective device it is important to >>> read the details about its operation. It is very "jealous" of any >>> other program trying to access your hard drive. If your hard drive >>> becomes inaccessible you must hit the space bar during initial >>> bootup when the GoBack info appears. Then you must elect to start >>> your computer without GoBack. Then insert your bootable disk or CD >>> and now boot. By eliminating GoBack this way your bootable disk >>> can now access the hard drive that was previously unavailable due >>> to GoBack. >>> >>> Any time I am about to load a new program or make a major change on >>> my computer I write down the exact time and date. Then if I find >>> that new change has caused a problem I use GoBack to totally return >>> my computer back to how it was at that time before I made the >>> changetotally. >>> >>> "LMO" <gcorlin@hawaii.rr.como> wrote in message >>> news:g8vt1n$c9a$1@aioe.org... >>>> Aloha all. >>>> I have been using GoBack since way before Symantec stole it. I >>>> like it, as it simply rolls back my system and drives to before >>>> any unfortunate event or virus, etc. Right now I have both GoBack >>>> and System Restore running. I realize this is redundant, and >>>> wonder which is the better one to keep running. I have hit points >>>> with Restore where it is unable to restore to a point. never >>>> happened with GoBack. >>>> Just curious on this. Any opinions? >>>> Thanks.
Guest Panic Posted August 28, 2008 Posted August 28, 2008 Re: GoBack vs Restore I agree with Howard. You can create your image with GoBack installed and operating and then in Windows use the Backup Image Browser to recall anything your stored using Drive Image. But if you lose the use of your hard drive and want to boot directly to your Drive Image 7 (which I have) CD you need to disable GoBack on initial boot, choose boot from CD and you can really only use a backup made when GoBack had been disabled. I have a large USB external drive. I periodically boot with GoBack disabled to use Drive Image 7 to make a backup image I can access when booting directly to my DI 7 CD. After that backup I usually reboot and enable GoBack again to start its memory. I more frequently update my DI 7 image with GoBack installed but I realize I can only access that data from a normal hard drive bootup. I believe True Image would have the same restrictions. You can review the 2 image systems at http://www.windowsbbs.com/other-software/15678-powerquest-drive-image-vs-acronis-true-image.html "Howard" <Howard@Home.com> wrote in message news:tufab4910lci1tnfsnubseoolban5khem3@4ax.com... > You have to disable GoBack in order to create a WORKING image with > True Image. If GoBack is not disabled, the image will be created, but > it will not work when you try to restore a disk. -- Howard > > > On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:22:31 -1000, "LMO" <gcorlin@hawaii.rr.como> > wrotG: > >>Panic; thanks for the feedback. Can I use True Image with GoBack running, >>or >>do I need to disable GoBack first? >> >>"Panic" <smartwit@home.com> wrote in message >>news:OmRN715BJHA.2712@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>> System Restore only restores System files while GoBack can restore all >>> files including non system programs and files that you created. GoBack >>> has saved my bacon on numerous occasions. I still have System Restore >>> available and use True Image to produce an image on my USB hard drive in >>> case my internal hard drive becomes unavailable. I also copy critical >>> folders directly to my USB hard drive. I backup Quicken that way and >>> use >>> OEQB to backup Outlook Express data. >>> >>> While GoBack is an excellent protective device it is important to read >>> the >>> details about its operation. It is very "jealous" of any other program >>> trying to access your hard drive. If your hard drive becomes >>> inaccessible >>> you must hit the space bar during initial bootup when the GoBack info >>> appears. Then you must elect to start your computer without GoBack. >>> Then >>> insert your bootable disk or CD and now boot. By eliminating GoBack >>> this >>> way your bootable disk can now access the hard drive that was previously >>> unavailable due to GoBack. >>> >>> Any time I am about to load a new program or make a major change on my >>> computer I write down the exact time and date. Then if I find that new >>> change has caused a problem I use GoBack to totally return my computer >>> back to how it was at that time before I made the changetotally. >>> >>> "LMO" <gcorlin@hawaii.rr.como> wrote in message >>> news:g8vt1n$c9a$1@aioe.org... >>>> Aloha all. >>>> I have been using GoBack since way before Symantec stole it. I like it, >>>> as it simply rolls back my system and drives to before any unfortunate >>>> event or virus, etc. Right now I have both GoBack and System Restore >>>> running. I realize this is redundant, and wonder which is the better >>>> one >>>> to keep running. I have hit points with Restore where it is unable to >>>> restore to a point. never happened with GoBack. >>>> Just curious on this. Any opinions? >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>> >>> >>
Guest Panic Posted August 28, 2008 Posted August 28, 2008 Re: GoBack vs Restore Well, I don't have any financial interest in GoBack and I've used both GoBack and RollBack programs. I've used GoBack for about 8 years and have never had it "stop working" or "lose restore points". Like I said, it is only my first line of defense. System Restore; Drive Image; and manual backups on a USB hard drive are all backups to that. I backup Quicken and Outlook Express (using OEQB) to my external drive. I see no differing operating speed with GoBack active or disabled. Maybe 15 seconds longer bootup which is a cheap price for the level of backup. "Twayne" <nobody@devnull.spamcop.net> wrote in message news:uhS8h4GCJHA.2060@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >> You have to disable GoBack in order to create a WORKING image with >> True Image. If GoBack is not disabled, the image will be created, but >> it will not work when you try to restore a disk. -- Howard > > True. Often GoBack will also stop working and will lose restore points. > You don't need goback with imagine softwrae anyway. And your machine will > boot faster without all that GoBack data to read/write at every boot. > >> >> >> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:22:31 -1000, "LMO" <gcorlin@hawaii.rr.como> >> wrotG: >> >>> Panic; thanks for the feedback. Can I use True Image with GoBack >>> running, or do I need to disable GoBack first? >>> >>> "Panic" <smartwit@home.com> wrote in message >>> news:OmRN715BJHA.2712@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>> System Restore only restores System files while GoBack can restore >>>> all files including non system programs and files that you created. >>>> GoBack has saved my bacon on numerous occasions. I still have >>>> System Restore available and use True Image to produce an image on >>>> my USB hard drive in case my internal hard drive becomes >>>> unavailable. I also copy critical folders directly to my USB hard >>>> drive. I backup Quicken that way and use OEQB to backup Outlook >>>> Express data. >>>> >>>> While GoBack is an excellent protective device it is important to >>>> read the details about its operation. It is very "jealous" of any >>>> other program trying to access your hard drive. If your hard drive >>>> becomes inaccessible you must hit the space bar during initial >>>> bootup when the GoBack info appears. Then you must elect to start >>>> your computer without GoBack. Then insert your bootable disk or CD >>>> and now boot. By eliminating GoBack this way your bootable disk >>>> can now access the hard drive that was previously unavailable due >>>> to GoBack. >>>> >>>> Any time I am about to load a new program or make a major change on >>>> my computer I write down the exact time and date. Then if I find >>>> that new change has caused a problem I use GoBack to totally return >>>> my computer back to how it was at that time before I made the >>>> changetotally. >>>> >>>> "LMO" <gcorlin@hawaii.rr.como> wrote in message >>>> news:g8vt1n$c9a$1@aioe.org... >>>>> Aloha all. >>>>> I have been using GoBack since way before Symantec stole it. I >>>>> like it, as it simply rolls back my system and drives to before >>>>> any unfortunate event or virus, etc. Right now I have both GoBack >>>>> and System Restore running. I realize this is redundant, and >>>>> wonder which is the better one to keep running. I have hit points >>>>> with Restore where it is unable to restore to a point. never >>>>> happened with GoBack. >>>>> Just curious on this. Any opinions? >>>>> Thanks. > > >
Guest Howard Posted August 28, 2008 Posted August 28, 2008 Re: GoBack vs Restore That's not what I said. You need to disable GoBack in order to create a usable image that can be used to repair a damaged hard drive. If GoBack is not disabled when the inage is created, the restore process will not work. You do not need to uninstall GoBack; you just need to disable it using the GoBack options. Alsom note that disabling a GoBack drive can take several hours if there has been a lot of recent activity on the drive. Also, GoBack provides a maximum of 8gb of space on a hard drive for an Goback restore point. If you do something that loads a lot of data onto the hard drive, such as downloading a large movie, GoBack will lose its restore points because of excessive hard disk writes and there will be nothing to restore. You will need to wait an underterminate amount of time lasting several hours at which time GoBack will start again and create NEW restore points. The biggest offenders for destroying restore points are temp files written to a drive under GoBack control when doing a DVD burn or copy. That 8.5 gb dvd you are copying will destroy the GoBack restore point. I recommend that you have a separate hard disk not under GoBack control which can be configured for the temp files in Nero and the like. Note that multiple partitions on the same drive do not work. All partititions are on the same drive share the same GoBack characteristics. - Howard On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 18:18:11 -0700, "Panic" <smartwit@home.com> wrotG: >I agree with Howard. You can create your image with GoBack installed and >operating and then in Windows use the Backup Image Browser to recall >anything your stored using Drive Image. But if you lose the use of your >hard drive and want to boot directly to your Drive Image 7 (which I have) CD >you need to disable GoBack on initial boot, choose boot from CD and you can >really only use a backup made when GoBack had been disabled. > >I have a large USB external drive. I periodically boot with GoBack disabled >to use Drive Image 7 to make a backup image I can access when booting >directly to my DI 7 CD. After that backup I usually reboot and enable >GoBack again to start its memory. I more frequently update my DI 7 image >with GoBack installed but I realize I can only access that data from a >normal hard drive bootup. I believe True Image would have the same >restrictions. You can review the 2 image systems at >http://www.windowsbbs.com/other-software/15678-powerquest-drive-image-vs-acronis-true-image.html > >"Howard" <Howard@Home.com> wrote in message >news:tufab4910lci1tnfsnubseoolban5khem3@4ax.com... >> You have to disable GoBack in order to create a WORKING image with >> True Image. If GoBack is not disabled, the image will be created, but >> it will not work when you try to restore a disk. -- Howard >> >> >> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:22:31 -1000, "LMO" <gcorlin@hawaii.rr.como> >> wrotG: >> >>>Panic; thanks for the feedback. Can I use True Image with GoBack running, >>>or >>>do I need to disable GoBack first? >>> >>>"Panic" <smartwit@home.com> wrote in message >>>news:OmRN715BJHA.2712@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>> System Restore only restores System files while GoBack can restore all >>>> files including non system programs and files that you created. GoBack >>>> has saved my bacon on numerous occasions. I still have System Restore >>>> available and use True Image to produce an image on my USB hard drive in >>>> case my internal hard drive becomes unavailable. I also copy critical >>>> folders directly to my USB hard drive. I backup Quicken that way and >>>> use >>>> OEQB to backup Outlook Express data. >>>> >>>> While GoBack is an excellent protective device it is important to read >>>> the >>>> details about its operation. It is very "jealous" of any other program >>>> trying to access your hard drive. If your hard drive becomes >>>> inaccessible >>>> you must hit the space bar during initial bootup when the GoBack info >>>> appears. Then you must elect to start your computer without GoBack. >>>> Then >>>> insert your bootable disk or CD and now boot. By eliminating GoBack >>>> this >>>> way your bootable disk can now access the hard drive that was previously >>>> unavailable due to GoBack. >>>> >>>> Any time I am about to load a new program or make a major change on my >>>> computer I write down the exact time and date. Then if I find that new >>>> change has caused a problem I use GoBack to totally return my computer >>>> back to how it was at that time before I made the changetotally. >>>> >>>> "LMO" <gcorlin@hawaii.rr.como> wrote in message >>>> news:g8vt1n$c9a$1@aioe.org... >>>>> Aloha all. >>>>> I have been using GoBack since way before Symantec stole it. I like it, >>>>> as it simply rolls back my system and drives to before any unfortunate >>>>> event or virus, etc. Right now I have both GoBack and System Restore >>>>> running. I realize this is redundant, and wonder which is the better >>>>> one >>>>> to keep running. I have hit points with Restore where it is unable to >>>>> restore to a point. never happened with GoBack. >>>>> Just curious on this. Any opinions? >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >
Guest Twayne Posted August 28, 2008 Posted August 28, 2008 Re: GoBack vs Restore > I agree with Howard. You can create your image with GoBack installed > and operating and then in Windows use the Backup Image Browser to > recall anything your stored using Drive Image. But if you lose the > use of your hard drive and want to boot directly to your Drive Image > 7 (which I have) CD you need to disable GoBack on initial boot, > choose boot from CD and you can really only use a backup made when > GoBack had been disabled. That's apparenlty not so in all cases. It wasn't in mine; no need to kill GB to run Ghost. It must be application dependent. FWIW > > I have a large USB external drive. I periodically boot with GoBack > disabled to use Drive Image 7 to make a backup image I can access > when booting directly to my DI 7 CD. After that backup I usually > reboot and enable GoBack again to start its memory. I more > frequently update my DI 7 image with GoBack installed but I realize I > can only access that data from a normal hard drive bootup. I believe > True Image would have the same restrictions. You can review the 2 > image systems at > http://www.windowsbbs.com/other-software/15678-powerquest-drive-image-vs-acronis-true-image.html > > "Howard" <Howard@Home.com> wrote in message > news:tufab4910lci1tnfsnubseoolban5khem3@4ax.com... >> You have to disable GoBack in order to create a WORKING image with >> True Image. If GoBack is not disabled, the image will be created, but >> it will not work when you try to restore a disk. -- Howard >> >> >> On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 07:22:31 -1000, "LMO" <gcorlin@hawaii.rr.como> >> wrotG: >> >>> Panic; thanks for the feedback. Can I use True Image with GoBack >>> running, or >>> do I need to disable GoBack first? >>> >>> "Panic" <smartwit@home.com> wrote in message >>> news:OmRN715BJHA.2712@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>> System Restore only restores System files while GoBack can restore >>>> all files including non system programs and files that you >>>> created. GoBack has saved my bacon on numerous occasions. I >>>> still have System Restore available and use True Image to produce >>>> an image on my USB hard drive in case my internal hard drive >>>> becomes unavailable. I also copy critical folders directly to my >>>> USB hard drive. I backup Quicken that way and use >>>> OEQB to backup Outlook Express data. >>>> >>>> While GoBack is an excellent protective device it is important to >>>> read the >>>> details about its operation. It is very "jealous" of any other >>>> program trying to access your hard drive. If your hard drive >>>> becomes inaccessible >>>> you must hit the space bar during initial bootup when the GoBack >>>> info appears. Then you must elect to start your computer without >>>> GoBack. Then >>>> insert your bootable disk or CD and now boot. By eliminating >>>> GoBack this >>>> way your bootable disk can now access the hard drive that was >>>> previously unavailable due to GoBack. >>>> >>>> Any time I am about to load a new program or make a major change >>>> on my computer I write down the exact time and date. Then if I >>>> find that new change has caused a problem I use GoBack to totally >>>> return my computer back to how it was at that time before I made >>>> the changetotally. "LMO" <gcorlin@hawaii.rr.como> wrote in message >>>> news:g8vt1n$c9a$1@aioe.org... >>>>> Aloha all. >>>>> I have been using GoBack since way before Symantec stole it. I >>>>> like it, as it simply rolls back my system and drives to before >>>>> any unfortunate event or virus, etc. Right now I have both GoBack >>>>> and System Restore running. I realize this is redundant, and >>>>> wonder which is the better one >>>>> to keep running. I have hit points with Restore where it is >>>>> unable to restore to a point. never happened with GoBack. >>>>> Just curious on this. Any opinions? >>>>> Thanks.
Recommended Posts