File Serving: Windows 2003 Storage Server or Windows 2008 server?

[Guest Stu]

Currently we use a Windows 2003 Storage Server as our file server and this

has all our asp and files stored which is accessed from about 10 IIS6

machines using UNC share.

We are now upgrading to Windows 2008 IIS7 and wondered if it would be faster

if the file server was now moved to Windows 2008 as well to take adventage

of SMB 2.0

 

Is Windows 2008 server faster natively than the Windows 2003 Storage Server

in this type of environment for serving files?

 

Thanks.

[Guest Bill Grant]

Re: File Serving: Windows 2003 Storage Server or Windows 2008 server?

 

 

 

"Stu" <support@powerfront.com> wrote in message

news:1F205164-31F6-4A74-A9D0-EF9914E8A16D@microsoft.com...

> Currently we use a Windows 2003 Storage Server as our file server and this

> has all our asp and files stored which is accessed from about 10 IIS6

> machines using UNC share.

> We are now upgrading to Windows 2008 IIS7 and wondered if it would be

> faster if the file server was now moved to Windows 2008 as well to take

> adventage of SMB 2.0

>

> Is Windows 2008 server faster natively than the Windows 2003 Storage

> Server in this type of environment for serving files?

>

> Thanks.

 

That really depends on your client machines. Do they support SMB 2.0?

If they don't, you don't gain anything.

[Guest Stu]

Re: File Serving: Windows 2003 Storage Server or Windows 2008 server?

 

Yes like I said IIS7 Windows 2008 clients. Is SMB 2.0 going to be

significantly faster?

 

 

"Bill Grant" <not.available@online> wrote in message

news:uSfXAkuEJHA.4504@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>

>

> "Stu" <support@powerfront.com> wrote in message

> news:1F205164-31F6-4A74-A9D0-EF9914E8A16D@microsoft.com...

>> Currently we use a Windows 2003 Storage Server as our file server and

>> this has all our asp and files stored which is accessed from about 10

>> IIS6 machines using UNC share.

>> We are now upgrading to Windows 2008 IIS7 and wondered if it would be

>> faster if the file server was now moved to Windows 2008 as well to take

>> adventage of SMB 2.0

>>

>> Is Windows 2008 server faster natively than the Windows 2003 Storage

>> Server in this type of environment for serving files?

>>

>> Thanks.

>

> That really depends on your client machines. Do they support SMB 2.0?

> If they don't, you don't gain anything.