do I need to enable dot net 1.1 on server 2008?

[Guest James]

I have a program I tried to install on server 2008 which said it requires

..net 1.1.4322... I assumed this older version would be built in to server

2008 and so I checked the windows directory and there is a folder for this

specific version. So why does this program's install routine think its not

there? Do I need to explicitly enable .net 1.1 somehow first? If so where? I

did not see it listed in the add/remove features section?

[Guest Dave Patrick]

Re: do I need to enable dot net 1.1 on server 2008?

 

I'd contact the application developer.

 

 

--

 

Regards,

 

Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup.

Microsoft Certified Professional

Microsoft MVP [Windows]

http://www.microsoft.com/protect

 

 

"James" wrote:

>I have a program I tried to install on server 2008 which said it requires

>.net 1.1.4322... I assumed this older version would be built in to server

>2008 and so I checked the windows directory and there is a folder for this

>specific version. So why does this program's install routine think its not

>there? Do I need to explicitly enable .net 1.1 somehow first? If so where?

>I did not see it listed in the add/remove features section?

>

[Guest Cowboy \(Gregory A. Beamer\)]

Re: do I need to enable dot net 1.1 on server 2008?

 

..NET 1.1 is NOT installed on Windows Server 2008 by default. There is a

folder, but take a look at what is in there. It is simply a couple of

configuration files.

 

If the app is 1.1, and cannot run on 2.0 (doubtful, but the installer may

force the issue), you will either have to have them compile it for 2.0 (or

remove the restriction from the installer) or install 1.1.

 

--

Gregory A. Beamer

MVP, MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA

 

Subscribe to my blog

http://feeds.feedburner.com/GregoryBeamer#

 

or just read it:

http://feeds.feedburner.com/GregoryBeamer

 

********************************************

| Think outside the box! |

********************************************

"James" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message

news:%23y2vTYkIJHA.508@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>I have a program I tried to install on server 2008 which said it requires

>.net 1.1.4322... I assumed this older version would be built in to server

>2008 and so I checked the windows directory and there is a folder for this

>specific version. So why does this program's install routine think its not

>there? Do I need to explicitly enable .net 1.1 somehow first? If so where?

>I did not see it listed in the add/remove features section?

>

[Guest James]

Re: do I need to enable dot net 1.1 on server 2008?

 

ok Thank you.

 

"Cowboy (Gregory A. Beamer)" <NoSpamMgbworld@comcast.netNoSpamM> wrote in

message news:u$1$rSlIJHA.508@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> .NET 1.1 is NOT installed on Windows Server 2008 by default. There is a

> folder, but take a look at what is in there. It is simply a couple of

> configuration files.

>

> If the app is 1.1, and cannot run on 2.0 (doubtful, but the installer may

> force the issue), you will either have to have them compile it for 2.0 (or

> remove the restriction from the installer) or install 1.1.

>

> --

> Gregory A. Beamer

> MVP, MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA

>

> Subscribe to my blog

> http://feeds.feedburner.com/GregoryBeamer#

>

> or just read it:

> http://feeds.feedburner.com/GregoryBeamer

>

> ********************************************

> | Think outside the box! |

> ********************************************

> "James" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message

> news:%23y2vTYkIJHA.508@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>I have a program I tried to install on server 2008 which said it requires

>>.net 1.1.4322... I assumed this older version would be built in to server

>>2008 and so I checked the windows directory and there is a folder for this

>>specific version. So why does this program's install routine think its not

>>there? Do I need to explicitly enable .net 1.1 somehow first? If so where?

>>I did not see it listed in the add/remove features section?

>>

>