Guest James Posted September 29, 2008 Posted September 29, 2008 I have a program I tried to install on server 2008 which said it requires ..net 1.1.4322... I assumed this older version would be built in to server 2008 and so I checked the windows directory and there is a folder for this specific version. So why does this program's install routine think its not there? Do I need to explicitly enable .net 1.1 somehow first? If so where? I did not see it listed in the add/remove features section?
Guest Dave Patrick Posted September 29, 2008 Posted September 29, 2008 Re: do I need to enable dot net 1.1 on server 2008? I'd contact the application developer. -- Regards, Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup. Microsoft Certified Professional Microsoft MVP [Windows] http://www.microsoft.com/protect "James" wrote: >I have a program I tried to install on server 2008 which said it requires >.net 1.1.4322... I assumed this older version would be built in to server >2008 and so I checked the windows directory and there is a folder for this >specific version. So why does this program's install routine think its not >there? Do I need to explicitly enable .net 1.1 somehow first? If so where? >I did not see it listed in the add/remove features section? >
Guest Cowboy \(Gregory A. Beamer\) Posted September 29, 2008 Posted September 29, 2008 Re: do I need to enable dot net 1.1 on server 2008? ..NET 1.1 is NOT installed on Windows Server 2008 by default. There is a folder, but take a look at what is in there. It is simply a couple of configuration files. If the app is 1.1, and cannot run on 2.0 (doubtful, but the installer may force the issue), you will either have to have them compile it for 2.0 (or remove the restriction from the installer) or install 1.1. -- Gregory A. Beamer MVP, MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA Subscribe to my blog http://feeds.feedburner.com/GregoryBeamer# or just read it: http://feeds.feedburner.com/GregoryBeamer ******************************************** | Think outside the box! | ******************************************** "James" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:%23y2vTYkIJHA.508@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >I have a program I tried to install on server 2008 which said it requires >.net 1.1.4322... I assumed this older version would be built in to server >2008 and so I checked the windows directory and there is a folder for this >specific version. So why does this program's install routine think its not >there? Do I need to explicitly enable .net 1.1 somehow first? If so where? >I did not see it listed in the add/remove features section? >
Guest James Posted September 29, 2008 Posted September 29, 2008 Re: do I need to enable dot net 1.1 on server 2008? ok Thank you. "Cowboy (Gregory A. Beamer)" <NoSpamMgbworld@comcast.netNoSpamM> wrote in message news:u$1$rSlIJHA.508@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > .NET 1.1 is NOT installed on Windows Server 2008 by default. There is a > folder, but take a look at what is in there. It is simply a couple of > configuration files. > > If the app is 1.1, and cannot run on 2.0 (doubtful, but the installer may > force the issue), you will either have to have them compile it for 2.0 (or > remove the restriction from the installer) or install 1.1. > > -- > Gregory A. Beamer > MVP, MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA > > Subscribe to my blog > http://feeds.feedburner.com/GregoryBeamer# > > or just read it: > http://feeds.feedburner.com/GregoryBeamer > > ******************************************** > | Think outside the box! | > ******************************************** > "James" <noone@nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:%23y2vTYkIJHA.508@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>I have a program I tried to install on server 2008 which said it requires >>.net 1.1.4322... I assumed this older version would be built in to server >>2008 and so I checked the windows directory and there is a folder for this >>specific version. So why does this program's install routine think its not >>there? Do I need to explicitly enable .net 1.1 somehow first? If so where? >>I did not see it listed in the add/remove features section? >> >
Recommended Posts