Event ID: 7034 (kb949001 & 948699) - which hotfix to use?

[Guest Barkley Bees]

I have a 2003 Server SP1 which is being used for volume snapshots (EMC

Replication Manager) and BackupExec to back them up to tape nightly. About

once a month I get the below error in the event log:

 

Event Type: Error

Event Source: Service Control Manager

Event Category: None

Event ID: 7034

Date: Date

Time: Time

User: N/A

Computer: ComputerName

Description:

The Virtual Disk Service service terminated unexpectedly. It has done this

number time(s).

 

 

After some searching around, I found the following two fixes which are meant

to resolve this issue:

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/949001 (339526_ENU_i386_zip.exe)

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/948699 (339708_ENU_i386_zip.exe)

 

They both link to separate hotfixes which show the same file information for

the update patch. That said, I'm a little confused as to why there are two

separate patches when they appear to resolve the same issue for the same

platform and which one I should be downloading and using. Has anyone come

across this matter and installed either of these hotfixes? Appreciate any

advice. Thanks.

[Guest Thee Chicago Wolf]

Re: Event ID: 7034 (kb949001 & 948699) - which hotfix to use?

 

>I have a 2003 Server SP1 which is being used for volume snapshots (EMC

>Replication Manager) and BackupExec to back them up to tape nightly. About

>once a month I get the below error in the event log:

>

>Event Type: Error

>Event Source: Service Control Manager

>Event Category: None

>Event ID: 7034

>Date: Date

>Time: Time

>User: N/A

>Computer: ComputerName

>Description:

>The Virtual Disk Service service terminated unexpectedly. It has done this

>number time(s).

>

>

>After some searching around, I found the following two fixes which are meant

>to resolve this issue:

>

>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/949001 (339526_ENU_i386_zip.exe)

>http://support.microsoft.com/kb/948699 (339708_ENU_i386_zip.exe)

>

>They both link to separate hotfixes which show the same file information for

>the update patch. That said, I'm a little confused as to why there are two

>separate patches when they appear to resolve the same issue for the same

>platform and which one I should be downloading and using. Has anyone come

>across this matter and installed either of these hotfixes? Appreciate any

>advice. Thanks.

 

You should really consider migrating to SP2 instead of using hotfixes.

In any case, either hotfix would work since they have the same

versions of the files.

 

- Thee Chicago Wolf

[Guest Meinolf Weber]

Re: Event ID: 7034 (kb949001 & 948699) - which hotfix to use?

 

Hello Barkley,

 

Use SP2 and all other updates, then go on with testing if the problem still

exist.

 

Best regards

 

Meinolf Weber

Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers

no rights.

** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups

** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm

 

> I have a 2003 Server SP1 which is being used for volume snapshots (EMC

> Replication Manager) and BackupExec to back them up to tape nightly.

> About once a month I get the below error in the event log:

>

> Event Type: Error

> Event Source: Service Control Manager

> Event Category: None

> Event ID: 7034

> Date: Date

> Time: Time

> User: N/A

> Computer: ComputerName

> Description:

> The Virtual Disk Service service terminated unexpectedly. It has done

> this

> number time(s).

> After some searching around, I found the following two fixes which are

> meant to resolve this issue:

>

> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/949001 (339526_ENU_i386_zip.exe)

> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/948699 (339708_ENU_i386_zip.exe)

>

> They both link to separate hotfixes which show the same file

> information for the update patch. That said, I'm a little confused as

> to why there are two separate patches when they appear to resolve the

> same issue for the same platform and which one I should be downloading

> and using. Has anyone come across this matter and installed either of

> these hotfixes? Appreciate any advice. Thanks.

>

[Guest Darrell Gorter[MSFT]]

RE: Event ID: 7034 (kb949001 & 948699) - which hotfix to use?

 

Hello Barkley,

They are the same, either should solve the problem.

Thanks,

Darrell Gorter[MSFT]

 

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights

--------------------

| >From: "Barkley Bees" <barkbees@nomail.com>

| >Subject: Event ID: 7034 (kb949001 & 948699) - which hotfix to use?

| >Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 19:09:54 +0900

| >Lines: 33

| >X-Priority: 3

| >X-MSMail-Priority: Normal

| >X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512

| >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579

| >X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original

| >Message-ID: <uspTIcHJJHA.4512@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>

| >Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.general

| >NNTP-Posting-Host: p222013011052.ppp.prin.ne.jp 222.13.11.52

| >Path: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl

| >Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl

microsoft.public.windows.server.general:45666

| >X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.general

| >

| >I have a 2003 Server SP1 which is being used for volume snapshots (EMC

| >Replication Manager) and BackupExec to back them up to tape nightly.

About

| >once a month I get the below error in the event log:

| >

| >Event Type: Error

| >Event Source: Service Control Manager

| >Event Category: None

| >Event ID: 7034

| >Date: Date

| >Time: Time

| >User: N/A

| >Computer: ComputerName

| >Description:

| >The Virtual Disk Service service terminated unexpectedly. It has done

this

| >number time(s).

| >

| >

| >After some searching around, I found the following two fixes which are

meant

| >to resolve this issue:

| >

| >http://support.microsoft.com/kb/949001 (339526_ENU_i386_zip.exe)

| >http://support.microsoft.com/kb/948699 (339708_ENU_i386_zip.exe)

| >

| >They both link to separate hotfixes which show the same file information

for

| >the update patch. That said, I'm a little confused as to why there are

two

| >separate patches when they appear to resolve the same issue for the same

| >platform and which one I should be downloading and using. Has anyone

come

| >across this matter and installed either of these hotfixes? Appreciate

any

| >advice. Thanks.

| >

| >

| >

| >

| >