Guest giddyup Posted October 14, 2008 Posted October 14, 2008 I am sorry you had to take flak for your response, thanks
Guest Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] Posted October 14, 2008 Posted October 14, 2008 Re: I did mean meg, sorry - mind is foggy lately giddyup <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: > I am sorry you had to take flak for your response, thanks Hi - eh? Nobody is likely to know what you're talking about. This is a usenet group, not a web forum. You haven't posted this as a reply in an existing thread, nor have you included any quoted text to which you are replying Help us to help you: http://dts-l.net/goodpost.htm ..
Guest giddyup Posted October 14, 2008 Posted October 14, 2008 Re: I did mean meg, sorry - mind is foggy lately Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote: > giddyup <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >> I am sorry you had to take flak for your response, thanks > > Hi - eh? Nobody is likely to know what you're talking about. This is a > usenet group, not a web forum. You haven't posted this as a reply in an > existing thread, nor have you included any quoted text to which you are > replying > > > Help us to help you: > http://dts-l.net/goodpost.htm > > > . > > Sorry, thought I hit the reply under "Is it possible to partition SD Card?" Will resubmit under correct thread.
Guest Tom [Pepper] Willett Posted October 14, 2008 Posted October 14, 2008 Re: I did mean meg, sorry - mind is foggy lately : > : Sorry, thought I hit the reply under "Is it possible to partition SD Card?" : Will resubmit under correct thread. Dont' change the subject lines of posts.
Guest EncinoMan Posted October 14, 2008 Posted October 14, 2008 Re: I did mean meg, sorry - mind is foggy lately On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:31:22 -0500, giddyup <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >I am sorry you had to take flak for your response, thanks Too bad nobody knows who you are replying to or what it was involving.
Guest Gord Dibben Posted October 15, 2008 Posted October 15, 2008 Re: I did mean meg, sorry - mind is foggy lately >Too bad nobody knows who you are replying to or what it was involving. Not quite true. OP wanted to partition an SD card and mistakenly used the term "kb" instead of "mb" when referring to a size. One of his responders asked if it was a typo and the responder got flak from some idiot. Gord On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:56:57 -0500, EncinoMan <none@nobody.net> wrote: >On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:31:22 -0500, giddyup <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: > >>I am sorry you had to take flak for your response, thanks > >Too bad nobody knows who you are replying to or what it was involving.
Guest M.I.5¾ Posted October 15, 2008 Posted October 15, 2008 Re: I did mean meg, sorry - mind is foggy lately "giddyup" <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in message news:48F511A8.6080408@nospam.com... > Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] wrote: >> giddyup <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >>> I am sorry you had to take flak for your response, thanks >> >> Hi - eh? Nobody is likely to know what you're talking about. This is a >> usenet group, not a web forum. You haven't posted this as a reply in an >> existing thread, nor have you included any quoted text to which you are >> replying >> >> >> Help us to help you: >> http://dts-l.net/goodpost.htm >> >> >> . > Sorry, thought I hit the reply under "Is it possible to partition SD > Card?" > Will resubmit under correct thread. You probably did, but if you changed the subject line (which it appears you did) then it posts as a completely new topic.
Guest EncinoMan Posted October 16, 2008 Posted October 16, 2008 Re: I did mean meg, sorry - mind is foggy lately On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 17:15:25 -0700, Gord Dibben <gorddibbATshawDOTca> wrote: >>Too bad nobody knows who you are replying to or what it was involving. > >Not quite true. > >OP wanted to partition an SD card and mistakenly used the term "kb" instead >of "mb" when referring to a size. > >One of his responders asked if it was a typo and the responder got flak from >some idiot. > > >Gord > > > >On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 18:56:57 -0500, EncinoMan <none@nobody.net> wrote: > >>On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:31:22 -0500, giddyup <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: >> >>>I am sorry you had to take flak for your response, thanks >> >>Too bad nobody knows who you are replying to or what it was involving. And we were supposed to know this how? Considering none of what you have mentioned is in the post I was responding to?
Recommended Posts