Spybot S&D updates, again??

[Guest Heirloom]

I sent this much earlier today........still isn't showing up, even though

other's later posts are here. If this doubles up, sorry, if it doesn't,

check out the updates!

Heirloom, old and still need that nap

[Guest Gary S. Terhune]

Re: Spybot S&D updates, again??

 

I've recently had a couple of posts to this group disappear. Server issue.

 

--

Gary S. Terhune

MS-MVP Shell/User

http://www.grystmill.com

 

"Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message

news:%23KZ$WpavHHA.4688@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

>I sent this much earlier today........still isn't showing up, even though

>other's later posts are here. If this doubles up, sorry, if it doesn't,

>check out the updates!

> Heirloom, old and still need that nap

>

[Guest Mike M]

Re: Spybot S&D updates, again??

 

H,

 

Your earlier message posted 3 July 18:51 GMT is all present and correct

and buried in the pre-existing thread with the same subject "Spybot S&D

updates" which you started on 25 April 17:04 GMT.

--

Mike

PS e-mail to follow when I find the energy.

 

 

Heirloom <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote:

> I sent this much earlier today........still isn't showing up, even

> though other's later posts are here. If this doubles up, sorry, if

> it doesn't, check out the updates!

> Heirloom, old and still need that

> nap

[Guest Mart]

Re: Spybot S&D updates, again??

 

Ditto to that Mike - I thought HL had done it deliberately so didn't bother

commenting <g>

 

Mart

 

 

"Mike M" <No_Spam@Corned_Beef.Only> wrote in message

news:uQ$ApAbvHHA.4012@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

> H,

>

> Your earlier message posted 3 July 18:51 GMT is all present and correct

> and buried in the pre-existing thread with the same subject "Spybot S&D

> updates" which you started on 25 April 17:04 GMT.

> --

> Mike

> PS e-mail to follow when I find the energy.

>

>

> Heirloom <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote:

>

>> I sent this much earlier today........still isn't showing up, even

>> though other's later posts are here. If this doubles up, sorry, if

>> it doesn't, check out the updates!

>> Heirloom, old and still need that

>> nap

>

[Guest Mike M]

Re: Spybot S&D updates, again??

 

Mart <mart(NoSpam)@nospam.nospam> wrote:

> Ditto to that Mike - I thought HL had done it deliberately so didn't

> bother commenting <g>

 

<G> I'm surprised that I still have the old thread. I used to clear

messages in the Win Me groups older than seven days but have let that slip

in recent months due to their being so few. Seems as If I'm not alone if

both H and yourself are also keeping older messages.

--

Mike

[Guest Heirloom]

Re: Spybot S&D updates, again??

 

That's just too weird.............how on earth did you find it there??

Mine showed up in red because I was watching it. Yeah, I need to do some

house cleaning, too!

Heirloom, old and so are my

posts

 

"Mike M" <No_Spam@Corned_Beef.Only> wrote in message

news:%23oCslSbvHHA.4784@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> Mart <mart(NoSpam)@nospam.nospam> wrote:

>

>> Ditto to that Mike - I thought HL had done it deliberately so didn't

>> bother commenting <g>

>

> <G> I'm surprised that I still have the old thread. I used to clear

> messages in the Win Me groups older than seven days but have let that slip

> in recent months due to their being so few. Seems as If I'm not alone if

> both H and yourself are also keeping older messages.

> --

> Mike

>

>

[Guest Mart]

Re: Spybot S&D updates, again??

 

Mine seem to 'default' to about 3 months when they seem to clear themselves

after about that time. No problem with WinMe groups for the reason Mike

alluded. Don't know if there's a setting to override the 3 months other than

a manual deletion.

 

Mart

 

 

"Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message

news:Op5HHqcvHHA.1340@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> That's just too weird.............how on earth did you find it there??

> Mine showed up in red because I was watching it. Yeah, I need to do some

> house cleaning, too!

> Heirloom, old and so are my

> posts

>

> "Mike M" <No_Spam@Corned_Beef.Only> wrote in message

> news:%23oCslSbvHHA.4784@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>> Mart <mart(NoSpam)@nospam.nospam> wrote:

>>

>>> Ditto to that Mike - I thought HL had done it deliberately so didn't

>>> bother commenting <g>

>>

>> <G> I'm surprised that I still have the old thread. I used to clear

>> messages in the Win Me groups older than seven days but have let that

>> slip in recent months due to their being so few. Seems as If I'm not

>> alone if both H and yourself are also keeping older messages.

>> --

>> Mike

>>

>>

>

>

[Guest Mike M]

Re: Spybot S&D updates, again??

 

Mart <mart(NoSpam)@nospam.nospam> wrote:

> Mine seem to 'default' to about 3 months when they seem to clear

> themselves after about that time. No problem with WinMe groups for

> the reason Mike alluded. Don't know if there's a setting to override

> the 3 months other than a manual deletion.

 

Messages currently expire from the MS news server after 3 months. I used

to manually run every week a message rule I had created that deleted all

posts older than seven days on this particular account. I use multiple

accounts in OE even for the same server, for example I have an MS Win Me

account, MS XP account and a couple of others all on msnews.microsoft.com

and manually run my various rules as and when I remember.

--

Mike

[Guest webster72n]

Re: Spybot S&D updates, again??

 

Can't say that I did, Gary.

Must be an individual issue.

 

Harry.

 

 

"Gary S. Terhune" <none> wrote in message

news:u9LmvtavHHA.4612@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

> I've recently had a couple of posts to this group disappear. Server issue.

>

> --

> Gary S. Terhune

> MS-MVP Shell/User

> http://www.grystmill.com

>

> "Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message

> news:%23KZ$WpavHHA.4688@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

> >I sent this much earlier today........still isn't showing up, even though

> >other's later posts are here. If this doubles up, sorry, if it doesn't,

> >check out the updates!

> > Heirloom, old and still need that nap

> >

>

>