Is 100k Handles too Much?

[Guest Computer Guru]

My Windows Server 2003 SP2 server (IIS 6, MySQL, Tomcat, PostgreSQL,

PHP via FastCGI) runs at a constant 90k-105k handles. The Limit is set

at 2492408.

 

I think there is something wrong since that's an insanely high count -

but the server remains fast and stable, so I'm not sure.

 

It's an x86, with 1GB of RAM (generally around 3/4ths is used).

 

 

Is there something wrong or is this perfectly OK?

[Guest Computer Guru]

Re: Is 100k Handles too Much?

 

On Jul 4, 8:17 am, Computer Guru <mqu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> My Windows Server 2003 SP2 server (IIS 6, MySQL, Tomcat, PostgreSQL,

> PHP via FastCGI) runs at a constant 90k-105k handles. The Limit is set

> at 2492408.

>

> I think there is something wrong since that's an insanely high count -

> but the server remains fast and stable, so I'm not sure.

>

> It's an x86, with 1GB of RAM (generally around 3/4ths is used).

>

> Is there something wrong or is this perfectly OK?

 

Please ignore that sentence about the limit. I was looking in the

wrong place - that's for the "commit charge"

[Guest Theo Verweij]

Re: Is 100k Handles too Much?

 

Why making a problem, when it is fast and stable?

 

Computer Guru wrote:

> My Windows Server 2003 SP2 server (IIS 6, MySQL, Tomcat, PostgreSQL,

> PHP via FastCGI) runs at a constant 90k-105k handles. The Limit is set

> at 2492408.

>

> I think there is something wrong since that's an insanely high count -

> but the server remains fast and stable, so I'm not sure.

>

> It's an x86, with 1GB of RAM (generally around 3/4ths is used).

>

>

> Is there something wrong or is this perfectly OK?

>