Guest Computer Guru Posted July 4, 2007 Posted July 4, 2007 My Windows Server 2003 SP2 server (IIS 6, MySQL, Tomcat, PostgreSQL, PHP via FastCGI) runs at a constant 90k-105k handles. The Limit is set at 2492408. I think there is something wrong since that's an insanely high count - but the server remains fast and stable, so I'm not sure. It's an x86, with 1GB of RAM (generally around 3/4ths is used). Is there something wrong or is this perfectly OK?
Guest Computer Guru Posted July 4, 2007 Posted July 4, 2007 Re: Is 100k Handles too Much? On Jul 4, 8:17 am, Computer Guru <mqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > My Windows Server 2003 SP2 server (IIS 6, MySQL, Tomcat, PostgreSQL, > PHP via FastCGI) runs at a constant 90k-105k handles. The Limit is set > at 2492408. > > I think there is something wrong since that's an insanely high count - > but the server remains fast and stable, so I'm not sure. > > It's an x86, with 1GB of RAM (generally around 3/4ths is used). > > Is there something wrong or is this perfectly OK? Please ignore that sentence about the limit. I was looking in the wrong place - that's for the "commit charge"
Guest Theo Verweij Posted July 4, 2007 Posted July 4, 2007 Re: Is 100k Handles too Much? Why making a problem, when it is fast and stable? Computer Guru wrote: > My Windows Server 2003 SP2 server (IIS 6, MySQL, Tomcat, PostgreSQL, > PHP via FastCGI) runs at a constant 90k-105k handles. The Limit is set > at 2492408. > > I think there is something wrong since that's an insanely high count - > but the server remains fast and stable, so I'm not sure. > > It's an x86, with 1GB of RAM (generally around 3/4ths is used). > > > Is there something wrong or is this perfectly OK? >
Recommended Posts