recent post

[Guest O.J. ( not HIM )]

Sorry, new at this> I have aol... I hope that's what you mean.

--

harleyman

[Guest Bob I]

Re: recent post

 

 

 

O.J. ( not HIM ) wrote:

> Sorry, new at this> I have aol... I hope that's what you mean.

 

No problem being new, but you will want to "reply" to the message, not

create a new thread.

[Guest Tom Willett]

Re: recent post

 

Since you didn't reply in your original thread, who knows what you mean.

 

"O.J. ( not HIM )" <OJnotHIM@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:37A7BFD2-3A14-4ABF-8A75-6FB48F0E9254@microsoft.com...

| Sorry, new at this> I have aol... I hope that's what you mean.

| --

| harleyman

[Guest Ken Blake, MVP]

Re: recent post

 

On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 10:52:05 -0700, O.J. ( not HIM )

<OJnotHIM@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

> Sorry, new at this> I have aol... I hope that's what you mean.

 

 

You apparently started a new thread rather than replying to the

previous message. As a result, your message stands all alone by

itself, without any reference to anything else. So nobody here knows

who you are addressing or what this is about.

 

Please find the message you meant to reply to, and reply; don't start

a new message.

 

Also note that you are using the web interface to participate in this

newsgroup--it's the slowest, clunkiest, most error-prone method there

is, and makes everything you do, such as replying to a message,

harder. Do yourself a favor and switch to a newsreader, such as

Outlook Express, which comes with Windows. See

http://www.michaelstevenstech.com/outlookexpressnewreader.htm

 

--

Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User

Please Reply to the Newsgroup

[Guest O.J. ( not HIM )]

RE: recent post

 

This post is now closed, I've RE-posted further up. thank you

--

harleyman

 

 

"O.J. ( not HIM )" wrote:

> Sorry, new at this> I have aol... I hope that's what you mean.

> --

> harleyman