Guest jeanette Posted August 8, 2007 Posted August 8, 2007 Re: Ad-Aware 2007 you win.....! J "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Updates available today. > > Zee > >
Guest Heirloom Posted August 8, 2007 Posted August 8, 2007 Re: Ad-Aware 2007 I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I do the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking for definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I currently have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount?? Heirloom, old and don't think mine is up-to-date "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > you win.....! > > J > > "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >> Updates available today. >> >> Zee >> >> > >
Guest Heirloom Posted August 8, 2007 Posted August 8, 2007 Re: Ad-Aware 2007 No confirmation........don't think I am getting it......guess the server is weighed down. Heirloom, old and so am I "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > you win.....! > > J > > "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >> Updates available today. >> >> Zee >> >> > >
Guest oops!! Posted August 8, 2007 Posted August 8, 2007 Re: Ad-Aware 2007 Yuppie!!! :)) "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > you win.....! > > J > > "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >> Updates available today. >> >> Zee >> >> > >
Guest richard Posted August 8, 2007 Posted August 8, 2007 Re: Ad-Aware 2007 Heirloom wrote: > I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I do the > Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking for > definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I currently have > 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount?? > Heirloom, old and don't think mine is > up-to-date > > "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message > news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> you win.....! >> >> J >> >> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message >> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>> Updates available today. >>> >>> Zee >>> >>> >> > > 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest. richard
Guest oops!! Posted August 8, 2007 Posted August 8, 2007 Re: Ad-Aware 2007 True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I missed. Oh well, there goes the coat. :) Zee "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Heirloom wrote: >> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I do >> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking for >> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I currently >> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount?? >> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is >> up-to-date >> >> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message >> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>> you win.....! >>> >>> J >>> >>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message >>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>> Updates available today. >>>> >>>> Zee >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > > 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest. > richard
Guest richard Posted August 8, 2007 Posted August 8, 2007 Re: Ad-Aware 2007 oops!! wrote: > True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I missed. > > Oh well, there goes the coat. > :) > > Zee Ah, heck. At least take the buttons. richard > > > > > > "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message > news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> Heirloom wrote: >>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I do >>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking for >>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I currently >>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount?? >>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is >>> up-to-date >>> >>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message >>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>> you win.....! >>>> >>>> J >>>> >>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message >>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>>> Updates available today. >>>>> >>>>> Zee >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest. >> richard > >
Guest Heirloom Posted August 8, 2007 Posted August 8, 2007 Re: Ad-Aware 2007 Maybe I am up-to-date. Odd that the new version doesn't tell you, that sucks. Actually, I have version 0014.0000 with the 91,047 signatures, but, that is what I had before the attempted update. So, is this current, or not?? Richard, I guess you and I may never know. Heirloom, old and don't go anywhere I shouldn't, anyway. (I know, that is little insurance) "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:ezIEWCe2HHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > > True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I missed. > > Oh well, there goes the coat. > :) > > Zee > > > > > > "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message > news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> Heirloom wrote: >>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I do >>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking for >>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I currently >>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount?? >>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is >>> up-to-date >>> >>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message >>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>> you win.....! >>>> >>>> J >>>> >>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message >>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>>> Updates available today. >>>>> >>>>> Zee >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest. >> richard > >
Guest Rocky T Squirrel Posted August 8, 2007 Posted August 8, 2007 Re: Ad-Aware 2007 Heirloom, My update shows the following. SE1R186 06.08.2007 files 1389441 total 4705296 sig.. 4662587 ref.. 42197 sig.. tot.. 119159 CSI fing.. 8912 CSI data 567343 not sure if that my box or the update.. :o) it took about 8 minutes to load at 0845am CDT USA 26,400 kbd connection speed.. RTS "Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message news:OU7d01e2HHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Maybe I am up-to-date. Odd that the new version doesn't tell you, that > sucks. Actually, I have version 0014.0000 with the 91,047 signatures, but, > that is what I had before the attempted update. So, is this current, or > not?? Richard, I guess you and I may never know. > Heirloom, old and don't go anywhere I shouldn't, > anyway. > (I know, that is little insurance) > > > "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:ezIEWCe2HHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > > > > True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I missed. > > > > Oh well, there goes the coat. > > :) > > > > Zee > > > > > > > > > > > > "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message > > news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > >> Heirloom wrote: > >>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I do > >>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking for > >>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I currently > >>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount?? > >>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is > >>> up-to-date > >>> > >>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message > >>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > >>>> you win.....! > >>>> > >>>> J > >>>> > >>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message > >>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > >>>>> Updates available today. > >>>>> > >>>>> Zee > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest. > >> richard > > > > > >
Guest oops!! Posted August 8, 2007 Posted August 8, 2007 Re: Ad-Aware 2007 Again, this is funny... I think we are talking same number of signatures, different version numbers. My home system updated to 0014.0000, could we be talking revised versions??? No, 2 updates on the same day, see here: http://www.lavasoft.com/support/securitycenter/blog/ Zee "Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message news:OU7d01e2HHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Maybe I am up-to-date. Odd that the new version doesn't tell you, that > sucks. Actually, I have version 0014.0000 with the 91,047 signatures, > but, that is what I had before the attempted update. So, is this current, > or not?? Richard, I guess you and I may never know. > Heirloom, old and don't go anywhere I shouldn't, > anyway. > (I know, that is little insurance) > > > "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:ezIEWCe2HHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> >> True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I missed. >> >> Oh well, there goes the coat. >> :) >> >> Zee >> >> >> >> >> >> "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message >> news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>> Heirloom wrote: >>>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I >>>> do the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking >>>> for definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I >>>> currently have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount?? >>>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is >>>> up-to-date >>>> >>>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message >>>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >>>>> you win.....! >>>>> >>>>> J >>>>> >>>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message >>>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >>>>>> Updates available today. >>>>>> >>>>>> Zee >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest. >>> richard >> >> > >
Guest Heirloom Posted August 9, 2007 Posted August 9, 2007 Re: Ad-Aware 2007 Thanks Rocky, however, I am using the 2007, and I believe from your response, you are still using the SE version. There will be some difference in those. Heirloom, old and I think it's right "Rocky T Squirrel" <gafa_usa@(nospam)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:J8ydnXyFG5wnvyfbnZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@vci.net... > Heirloom, > My update shows the following. > SE1R186 06.08.2007 > files 1389441 > total 4705296 > sig.. 4662587 > ref.. 42197 > sig.. tot.. 119159 > CSI fing.. 8912 > CSI data 567343 > > not sure if that my box or the update.. :o) > it took about 8 minutes to load at 0845am CDT USA 26,400 kbd connection > speed.. > RTS > > "Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message > news:OU7d01e2HHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >> Maybe I am up-to-date. Odd that the new version doesn't tell you, that >> sucks. Actually, I have version 0014.0000 with the 91,047 signatures, > but, >> that is what I had before the attempted update. So, is this current, or >> not?? Richard, I guess you and I may never know. >> Heirloom, old and don't go anywhere I shouldn't, >> anyway. >> (I know, that is little insurance) >> >> >> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message >> news:ezIEWCe2HHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> > >> > True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I missed. >> > >> > Oh well, there goes the coat. >> > :) >> > >> > Zee >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message >> > news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> >> Heirloom wrote: >> >>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I > do >> >>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking > for >> >>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I > currently >> >>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount?? >> >>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is >> >>> up-to-date >> >>> >> >>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message >> >>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> >>>> you win.....! >> >>>> >> >>>> J >> >>>> >> >>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message >> >>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >> >>>>> Updates available today. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Zee >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest. >> >> richard >> > >> > >> >> > >
Guest webster72n Posted August 9, 2007 Posted August 9, 2007 Re: Ad-Aware 2007 Thanks for both, "oops!!". All's well at this castel (for 'castle'). <H>. "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Updates available today. > > Zee > >
Guest Rocky T Squirrel Posted August 9, 2007 Posted August 9, 2007 Re: Ad-Aware 2007 Heirloom, Yep the SE, I'm also still runing the ME OS and I've heard that SE is best for that.. CU RTS "Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message news:u1iOhbi2HHA.5884@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Thanks Rocky, however, I am using the 2007, and I believe from your > response, you are still using the SE version. There will be some difference > in those. > Heirloom, old and I think it's right > > > "Rocky T Squirrel" <gafa_usa@(nospam)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:J8ydnXyFG5wnvyfbnZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@vci.net... > > Heirloom, > > My update shows the following. > > SE1R186 06.08.2007 > > files 1389441 > > total 4705296 > > sig.. 4662587 > > ref.. 42197 > > sig.. tot.. 119159 > > CSI fing.. 8912 > > CSI data 567343 > > > > not sure if that my box or the update.. :o) > > it took about 8 minutes to load at 0845am CDT USA 26,400 kbd connection > > speed.. > > RTS > > > > "Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message > > news:OU7d01e2HHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > >> Maybe I am up-to-date. Odd that the new version doesn't tell you, that > >> sucks. Actually, I have version 0014.0000 with the 91,047 signatures, > > but, > >> that is what I had before the attempted update. So, is this current, or > >> not?? Richard, I guess you and I may never know. > >> Heirloom, old and don't go anywhere I shouldn't, > >> anyway. > >> (I know, that is little insurance) > >> > >> > >> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message > >> news:ezIEWCe2HHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > >> > > >> > True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I missed. > >> > > >> > Oh well, there goes the coat. > >> > :) > >> > > >> > Zee > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message > >> > news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > >> >> Heirloom wrote: > >> >>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I > > do > >> >>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking > > for > >> >>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I > > currently > >> >>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount?? > >> >>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is > >> >>> up-to-date > >> >>> > >> >>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message > >> >>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > >> >>>> you win.....! > >> >>>> > >> >>>> J > >> >>>> > >> >>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message > >> >>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > >> >>>>> Updates available today. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Zee > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest. > >> >> richard > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > > > > >
Guest Heirloom Posted August 10, 2007 Posted August 10, 2007 Re: Ad-Aware 2007 Rocky, I believe that to be correct. There is a new update out today for the 2007 (and maybe SE), but, it is only for Ad-Watch which the free versions do not have. Take care, my friend....... Heirloom, old and sure is hot today "Rocky T Squirrel" <gafa_usa@(nospam)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:pPOdnXsPrrxAEybbnZ2dnUVZ_ualnZ2d@vci.net... > Heirloom, > Yep the SE, I'm also still runing the ME OS and I've heard that SE is > best for that.. > CU > RTS > > "Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message > news:u1iOhbi2HHA.5884@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> Thanks Rocky, however, I am using the 2007, and I believe from your >> response, you are still using the SE version. There will be some > difference >> in those. >> Heirloom, old and I think it's right >> >> >> "Rocky T Squirrel" <gafa_usa@(nospam)hotmail.com> wrote in message >> news:J8ydnXyFG5wnvyfbnZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@vci.net... >> > Heirloom, >> > My update shows the following. >> > SE1R186 06.08.2007 >> > files 1389441 >> > total 4705296 >> > sig.. 4662587 >> > ref.. 42197 >> > sig.. tot.. 119159 >> > CSI fing.. 8912 >> > CSI data 567343 >> > >> > not sure if that my box or the update.. :o) >> > it took about 8 minutes to load at 0845am CDT USA 26,400 kbd connection >> > speed.. >> > RTS >> > >> > "Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message >> > news:OU7d01e2HHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >> >> Maybe I am up-to-date. Odd that the new version doesn't tell you, >> >> that >> >> sucks. Actually, I have version 0014.0000 with the 91,047 signatures, >> > but, >> >> that is what I had before the attempted update. So, is this current, > or >> >> not?? Richard, I guess you and I may never know. >> >> Heirloom, old and don't go anywhere I > shouldn't, >> >> anyway. >> >> (I know, that is little insurance) >> >> >> >> >> >> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message >> >> news:ezIEWCe2HHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> >> > >> >> > True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I > missed. >> >> > >> >> > Oh well, there goes the coat. >> >> > :) >> >> > >> >> > Zee >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message >> >> > news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> >> >> Heirloom wrote: >> >> >>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. > I >> > do >> >> >>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second > "Looking >> > for >> >> >>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I >> > currently >> >> >>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount?? >> >> >>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine > is >> >> >>> up-to-date >> >> >>> >> >> >>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message >> >> >>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> >> >>>> you win.....! >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> J >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message >> >> >>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... >> >> >>>>> Updates available today. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Zee >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest. >> >> >> richard >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> > >
Recommended Posts