Ad-Aware 2007

[Guest oops!!]

Updates available today.

 

Zee

[Guest jeanette]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

 

you win.....!

 

J

 

"oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> Updates available today.

>

> Zee

>

>

[Guest Heirloom]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

 

I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I do the

Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking for

definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I currently have

91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??

Heirloom, old and don't think mine is

up-to-date

 

"jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message

news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> you win.....!

>

> J

>

> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> Updates available today.

>>

>> Zee

>>

>>

>

>

[Guest Heirloom]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

 

No confirmation........don't think I am getting it......guess the server is

weighed down.

Heirloom, old and so am I

 

"jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message

news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> you win.....!

>

> J

>

> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> Updates available today.

>>

>> Zee

>>

>>

>

>

[Guest oops!!]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

 

 

Yuppie!!!

:))

 

 

 

"jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message

news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> you win.....!

>

> J

>

> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> Updates available today.

>>

>> Zee

>>

>>

>

>

[Guest richard]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

 

Heirloom wrote:

> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I do the

> Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking for

> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I currently have

> 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??

> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is

> up-to-date

>

> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message

> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>> you win.....!

>>

>> J

>>

>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>> Updates available today.

>>>

>>> Zee

>>>

>>>

>>

>

>

 

91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest.

richard

[Guest oops!!]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

 

 

True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I missed.

 

Oh well, there goes the coat.

:)

 

Zee

 

 

 

 

 

"richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message

news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> Heirloom wrote:

>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I do

>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking for

>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I currently

>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??

>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is

>> up-to-date

>>

>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message

>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>> you win.....!

>>>

>>> J

>>>

>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>> Updates available today.

>>>>

>>>> Zee

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>

>>

>

> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest.

> richard

[Guest richard]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

 

oops!! wrote:

> True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I missed.

>

> Oh well, there goes the coat.

> :)

>

> Zee

 

Ah, heck. At least take the buttons.

richard

>

>

>

>

>

> "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message

> news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>> Heirloom wrote:

>>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I do

>>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking for

>>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I currently

>>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??

>>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is

>>> up-to-date

>>>

>>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message

>>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>>> you win.....!

>>>>

>>>> J

>>>>

>>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

>>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>>> Updates available today.

>>>>>

>>>>> Zee

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>

>> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest.

>> richard

>

>

[Guest Heirloom]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

 

Maybe I am up-to-date. Odd that the new version doesn't tell you, that

sucks. Actually, I have version 0014.0000 with the 91,047 signatures, but,

that is what I had before the attempted update. So, is this current, or

not?? Richard, I guess you and I may never know.

Heirloom, old and don't go anywhere I shouldn't,

anyway.

(I know, that is little insurance)

 

 

"oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

news:ezIEWCe2HHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>

> True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I missed.

>

> Oh well, there goes the coat.

> :)

>

> Zee

>

>

>

>

>

> "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message

> news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>> Heirloom wrote:

>>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I do

>>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking for

>>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I currently

>>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??

>>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is

>>> up-to-date

>>>

>>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message

>>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>>> you win.....!

>>>>

>>>> J

>>>>

>>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

>>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>>> Updates available today.

>>>>>

>>>>> Zee

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>>

>>

>> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest.

>> richard

>

>

[Guest Rocky T Squirrel]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

 

Heirloom,

My update shows the following.

SE1R186 06.08.2007

files 1389441

total 4705296

sig.. 4662587

ref.. 42197

sig.. tot.. 119159

CSI fing.. 8912

CSI data 567343

 

not sure if that my box or the update.. :o)

it took about 8 minutes to load at 0845am CDT USA 26,400 kbd connection

speed..

RTS

 

"Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message

news:OU7d01e2HHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> Maybe I am up-to-date. Odd that the new version doesn't tell you, that

> sucks. Actually, I have version 0014.0000 with the 91,047 signatures,

but,

> that is what I had before the attempted update. So, is this current, or

> not?? Richard, I guess you and I may never know.

> Heirloom, old and don't go anywhere I shouldn't,

> anyway.

> (I know, that is little insurance)

>

>

> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

> news:ezIEWCe2HHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

> >

> > True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I missed.

> >

> > Oh well, there goes the coat.

> > :)

> >

> > Zee

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message

> > news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> >> Heirloom wrote:

> >>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I

do

> >>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking

for

> >>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I

currently

> >>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??

> >>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is

> >>> up-to-date

> >>>

> >>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message

> >>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> >>>> you win.....!

> >>>>

> >>>> J

> >>>>

> >>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

> >>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> >>>>> Updates available today.

> >>>>>

> >>>>> Zee

> >>>>>

> >>>>>

> >>>>

> >>>

> >>>

> >>

> >> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest.

> >> richard

> >

> >

>

>

[Guest oops!!]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

 

Again, this is funny...

 

I think we are talking same number of signatures, different version numbers.

 

My home system updated to 0014.0000, could we be talking revised versions???

 

No, 2 updates on the same day, see here:

 

http://www.lavasoft.com/support/securitycenter/blog/

 

Zee

 

 

"Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message

news:OU7d01e2HHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> Maybe I am up-to-date. Odd that the new version doesn't tell you, that

> sucks. Actually, I have version 0014.0000 with the 91,047 signatures,

> but, that is what I had before the attempted update. So, is this current,

> or not?? Richard, I guess you and I may never know.

> Heirloom, old and don't go anywhere I shouldn't,

> anyway.

> (I know, that is little insurance)

>

>

> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

> news:ezIEWCe2HHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>>

>> True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I missed.

>>

>> Oh well, there goes the coat.

>> :)

>>

>> Zee

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message

>> news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>> Heirloom wrote:

>>>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I

>>>> do the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking

>>>> for definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I

>>>> currently have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??

>>>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is

>>>> up-to-date

>>>>

>>>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message

>>>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>>>>> you win.....!

>>>>>

>>>>> J

>>>>>

>>>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

>>>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>>>> Updates available today.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Zee

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest.

>>> richard

>>

>>

>

>

[Guest Heirloom]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

 

Thanks Rocky, however, I am using the 2007, and I believe from your

response, you are still using the SE version. There will be some difference

in those.

Heirloom, old and I think it's right

 

 

"Rocky T Squirrel" <gafa_usa@(nospam)hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:J8ydnXyFG5wnvyfbnZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@vci.net...

> Heirloom,

> My update shows the following.

> SE1R186 06.08.2007

> files 1389441

> total 4705296

> sig.. 4662587

> ref.. 42197

> sig.. tot.. 119159

> CSI fing.. 8912

> CSI data 567343

>

> not sure if that my box or the update.. :o)

> it took about 8 minutes to load at 0845am CDT USA 26,400 kbd connection

> speed..

> RTS

>

> "Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message

> news:OU7d01e2HHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> Maybe I am up-to-date. Odd that the new version doesn't tell you, that

>> sucks. Actually, I have version 0014.0000 with the 91,047 signatures,

> but,

>> that is what I had before the attempted update. So, is this current, or

>> not?? Richard, I guess you and I may never know.

>> Heirloom, old and don't go anywhere I shouldn't,

>> anyway.

>> (I know, that is little insurance)

>>

>>

>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

>> news:ezIEWCe2HHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>> >

>> > True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I missed.

>> >

>> > Oh well, there goes the coat.

>> > :)

>> >

>> > Zee

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> >

>> > "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message

>> > news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>> >> Heirloom wrote:

>> >>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update. I

> do

>> >>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second "Looking

> for

>> >>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I

> currently

>> >>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??

>> >>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine is

>> >>> up-to-date

>> >>>

>> >>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message

>> >>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>> >>>> you win.....!

>> >>>>

>> >>>> J

>> >>>>

>> >>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

>> >>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> >>>>> Updates available today.

>> >>>>>

>> >>>>> Zee

>> >>>>>

>> >>>>>

>> >>>>

>> >>>

>> >>>

>> >>

>> >> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest.

>> >> richard

>> >

>> >

>>

>>

>

>

[Guest webster72n]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

 

 

Thanks for both, "oops!!".

All's well at this castel (for 'castle'). <H>.

 

"oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> Updates available today.

>

> Zee

>

>

[Guest Rocky T Squirrel]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

 

Heirloom,

Yep the SE, I'm also still runing the ME OS and I've heard that SE is

best for that..

CU

RTS

 

"Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message

news:u1iOhbi2HHA.5884@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> Thanks Rocky, however, I am using the 2007, and I believe from your

> response, you are still using the SE version. There will be some

difference

> in those.

> Heirloom, old and I think it's right

>

>

> "Rocky T Squirrel" <gafa_usa@(nospam)hotmail.com> wrote in message

> news:J8ydnXyFG5wnvyfbnZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@vci.net...

> > Heirloom,

> > My update shows the following.

> > SE1R186 06.08.2007

> > files 1389441

> > total 4705296

> > sig.. 4662587

> > ref.. 42197

> > sig.. tot.. 119159

> > CSI fing.. 8912

> > CSI data 567343

> >

> > not sure if that my box or the update.. :o)

> > it took about 8 minutes to load at 0845am CDT USA 26,400 kbd connection

> > speed..

> > RTS

> >

> > "Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message

> > news:OU7d01e2HHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> >> Maybe I am up-to-date. Odd that the new version doesn't tell you, that

> >> sucks. Actually, I have version 0014.0000 with the 91,047 signatures,

> > but,

> >> that is what I had before the attempted update. So, is this current,

or

> >> not?? Richard, I guess you and I may never know.

> >> Heirloom, old and don't go anywhere I

shouldn't,

> >> anyway.

> >> (I know, that is little insurance)

> >>

> >>

> >> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

> >> news:ezIEWCe2HHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

> >> >

> >> > True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I

missed.

> >> >

> >> > Oh well, there goes the coat.

> >> > :)

> >> >

> >> > Zee

> >> >

> >> >

> >> >

> >> >

> >> >

> >> > "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message

> >> > news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> >> >> Heirloom wrote:

> >> >>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update.

I

> > do

> >> >>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second

"Looking

> > for

> >> >>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I

> > currently

> >> >>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??

> >> >>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine

is

> >> >>> up-to-date

> >> >>>

> >> >>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message

> >> >>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> >> >>>> you win.....!

> >> >>>>

> >> >>>> J

> >> >>>>

> >> >>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

> >> >>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> >> >>>>> Updates available today.

> >> >>>>>

> >> >>>>> Zee

> >> >>>>>

> >> >>>>>

> >> >>>>

> >> >>>

> >> >>>

> >> >>

> >> >> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest.

> >> >> richard

> >> >

> >> >

> >>

> >>

> >

> >

>

>

[Guest Heirloom]

Re: Ad-Aware 2007

 

Rocky, I believe that to be correct. There is a new update out today for

the 2007 (and maybe SE), but, it is only for Ad-Watch which the free

versions do not have. Take care, my friend.......

Heirloom, old and sure is hot today

 

"Rocky T Squirrel" <gafa_usa@(nospam)hotmail.com> wrote in message

news:pPOdnXsPrrxAEybbnZ2dnUVZ_ualnZ2d@vci.net...

> Heirloom,

> Yep the SE, I'm also still runing the ME OS and I've heard that SE is

> best for that..

> CU

> RTS

>

> "Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message

> news:u1iOhbi2HHA.5884@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>> Thanks Rocky, however, I am using the 2007, and I believe from your

>> response, you are still using the SE version. There will be some

> difference

>> in those.

>> Heirloom, old and I think it's right

>>

>>

>> "Rocky T Squirrel" <gafa_usa@(nospam)hotmail.com> wrote in message

>> news:J8ydnXyFG5wnvyfbnZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@vci.net...

>> > Heirloom,

>> > My update shows the following.

>> > SE1R186 06.08.2007

>> > files 1389441

>> > total 4705296

>> > sig.. 4662587

>> > ref.. 42197

>> > sig.. tot.. 119159

>> > CSI fing.. 8912

>> > CSI data 567343

>> >

>> > not sure if that my box or the update.. :o)

>> > it took about 8 minutes to load at 0845am CDT USA 26,400 kbd connection

>> > speed..

>> > RTS

>> >

>> > "Heirloom" <roland58XX@XXcox.net> wrote in message

>> > news:OU7d01e2HHA.600@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> >> Maybe I am up-to-date. Odd that the new version doesn't tell you,

>> >> that

>> >> sucks. Actually, I have version 0014.0000 with the 91,047 signatures,

>> > but,

>> >> that is what I had before the attempted update. So, is this current,

> or

>> >> not?? Richard, I guess you and I may never know.

>> >> Heirloom, old and don't go anywhere I

> shouldn't,

>> >> anyway.

>> >> (I know, that is little insurance)

>> >>

>> >>

>> >> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

>> >> news:ezIEWCe2HHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>> >> >

>> >> > True, that was version 0013.0000 dated August 6, that somehow I

> missed.

>> >> >

>> >> > Oh well, there goes the coat.

>> >> > :)

>> >> >

>> >> > Zee

>> >> >

>> >> >

>> >> >

>> >> >

>> >> >

>> >> > "richard" <rmk@wonderland.net> wrote in message

>> >> > news:e83c14d2HHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>> >> >> Heirloom wrote:

>> >> >>> I'm getting some really strange indications when trying to update.

> I

>> > do

>> >> >>> the Web Update, the little sign comes up for a split second

> "Looking

>> > for

>> >> >>> definitions" then it goes off....never noticed a download. I

>> > currently

>> >> >>> have 91,047 signatures....is that the right amount??

>> >> >>> Heirloom, old and don't think mine

> is

>> >> >>> up-to-date

>> >> >>>

>> >> >>> "jeanette" <jeany@lostincyber.com> wrote in message

>> >> >>> news:O3E0nGd2HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>> >> >>>> you win.....!

>> >> >>>>

>> >> >>>> J

>> >> >>>>

>> >> >>>> "oops!!" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message

>> >> >>>> news:uLpYxsa2HHA.5796@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> >> >>>>> Updates available today.

>> >> >>>>>

>> >> >>>>> Zee

>> >> >>>>>

>> >> >>>>>

>> >> >>>>

>> >> >>>

>> >> >>>

>> >> >>

>> >> >> 91047 is what I have. I think that is the latest.

>> >> >> richard

>> >> >

>> >> >

>> >>

>> >>

>> >

>> >

>>

>>

>

>