Guest Clenna Lumina Posted August 18, 2007 Posted August 18, 2007 Re: Linux servers hacked - who would have thought Re: Linux servers hacked - who would have thought "Mike" <no@where.man> wrote in message news:no-97BCC4.12085518082007@news.supernews.com... > In article <5inac8F3pbpa4U1@mid.individual.net>, > "Clenna Lumina" <savagebeaste@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message >> news:MPG.21300b676c2f8ba4989906@adfree.Usenet.com... >> > In article <eg9VVuR4HHA.4712@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>, >> > noone@afakeddomain.net says... >> >> And that same zealotry mantra of the ignorant can be seen from the >> >> windows side too. >> > >> > Yep, it's not something that is unique to ANY OS. I use to know a >> > couple >> > network admins that logged in as a root level account on AIX for their >> > daily work - they said it made thing simpler :) >> >> It really depends on the person, but in general over the years I found >> Windows users for the most part to be less knowledgeable of how thier >> computer works than a typical Linux or Unix user. > > Which is why Windows dominates (and OS X is gaining users) and Linux is > still going nowhere after 10 years of "This year is the year of LOTD!". You must be living in an old abandoned mine if you really think Linux gone no where. It has bene continuually growing over the years and has gotten beter and more and more people have switched to it (partly due to Vista no doubt.) > Linux is still for geeks and servers. It's used for servers a plenty, but its no logner *just* for thme so stop trying to portray your clouded vision as reality, because it's far from it. > People don't want/need to know "how their computer works" any more > than they want/need to know how their TV, cell phone or microwave > oven works. They just want to turn it on and use it. Computers and typical house hold applicances are two differnt breeds of animals. In computers, to really do anything useful, you must know what you are doing. Becasue of Windows, you have hords of clueless morons who continuely whine to tech support lines and can't even describe their problem. why *shouldn't* computer users have *some* education so they aren't just utter clueless? One should have at least a basic idea of how things work in order to use it.
Guest Frank Posted August 18, 2007 Posted August 18, 2007 Re: Linux servers hacked - who would have thought Re: Linux servers hacked - who would have thought Clenna Lumina wrote: > You must be living in an old abandoned mine if you really think Linux gone > no where. It has bene continuually growing over the years and has gotten > beter and more and more people have switched to it (partly due to Vista no > doubt.) > Bullsh*t! Frank
Guest Jerry White Posted August 18, 2007 Posted August 18, 2007 Re: Linux servers hacked - who would have thought Re: Linux servers hacked - who would have thought "Frank" <fb@nospaner.cnm> wrote in message news:OYRNPRc4HHA.4400@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > Clenna Lumina wrote: > >> You must be living in an old abandoned mine if you really think Linux >> gone no where. It has bene continuually growing over the years and has >> gotten beter and more and more people have switched to it (partly due to >> Vista no doubt.) >> > > Bullsh*t! In what way?
Guest Clenna Lumina Posted August 18, 2007 Posted August 18, 2007 Re: Linux servers hacked - who would have thought Re: Linux servers hacked - who would have thought "Leythos" <void@nowhere.lan> wrote in message news:MPG.2130a71251ab012498990b@adfree.Usenet.com... > In article <5inaqfF3pv8spU1@mid.individual.net>, savagebeaste@yahoo.com > says... >> It's amazing how people like you just jump on the band wagon and show >> that >> you haven't even read the article. >> >> If you think Linux has been actually "cracked" then site an instance. >> Anyone >> can site and try over and over, or evne run an pllication that permutates >> over every combination, and/or runs through a dictionary file. I hardly >> call >> that "cracking"... most would call that a admin asleep at the helm. > > Um, you didn't understand what I wrote - I use Windows and Linux and > enjoy both, but, it clearly shows how ignorant users can compromise a > system. The fault of a bad password is the same fault that windows users > suffer, complete incompetence and ignorance. True. But the big difference is the frequency at which such dumb things happen.
Guest The poster formerly known as the poster formerly k Posted August 19, 2007 Posted August 19, 2007 Re: Linux servers hacked - who would have thought Re: Linux servers hacked - who would have thought Frank wrote: > The poster formerly known as the poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy wrote: > >> HeyBub wrote: >> >>> The poster fromerly known as 'The poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy' >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Curtis D. Levin wrote: >>>> >>>>> The poster formerly known as ??? wrote... >>>>> >>>>>> How does this negate the fact that this MVP is being a hypocrate by >>>>>> doing something that he ran another poster off of the group for? >>>>> >>>>> Simple. The other poster was writing about Ubuntu, but >>>>> probably wasn't pro vista. >>>> >>>> Non-issue, has no bearing on this subject whether someone posting an >>>> off topic post without even labeling it as an OT post is pro vista or >>>> not. >>> >>> >>> Well, isn't your complaining about the post being off-topic itself >>> off-topic? It's off-topic squared. >>> >>> In other words, isn't a complaint about something being off-topic an >>> example of hypocrisy? >>> >> >> And what does this post of yours complaining about my 'OT' post >> accomplish? The same thing, but cubed. >> > > I bet we're now gonna have a math quiz, right? > Damn! > Frank Hehe! :) Well I get off right here! Math isn't one of my stronger subjects. -- Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group: http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html "Only religious fanatics and totalitarian states equate morality with legality." - Linus Torvalds
Guest The poster formerly known as the poster formerly k Posted August 19, 2007 Posted August 19, 2007 Re: Linux servers hacked - who would have thought Re: Linux servers hacked - who would have thought HeyBub wrote: > The poster formerly known as the poster formerly known as Nina DiBoy >>> Well, isn't your complaining about the post being off-topic itself >>> off-topic? It's off-topic squared. >>> >>> In other words, isn't a complaint about something being off-topic an >>> example of hypocrisy? >>> >>> >> And what does this post of yours complaining about my 'OT' post >> accomplish? The same thing, but cubed. > > I didn't 'complain,' I simply observed. And asked a question. > > In my view, complaing about an OT post is, by definition, off-topic. > > And it's even more ridiculous for an MVP to do exactly the same thing that he has loudly complained about another poster doing! Just making an observation here. -- Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group: http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html "Only religious fanatics and totalitarian states equate morality with legality." - Linus Torvalds
Recommended Posts