Jump to content

Service Pack 3 for XP


Recommended Posts

Guest pc nerd
Posted

I read somewhere that there might be a service pack 3 for XP. Is that true or

is it a rumor?

 

I have a related question. I want to reinstall XP because it's acting kind

of weird. Is it possible to save the updates in a folder so they can be

reinstalled later? I know that it's possible to uninstall them.

Guest Uncle Grumpy
Posted

Re: Service Pack 3 for XP

 

pc nerd <pc nerd@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

>I read somewhere that there might be a service pack 3 for XP. Is that true or

>is it a rumor?

 

True.

 

Next year.

Guest Shenan Stanley
Posted

Re: Service Pack 3 for XP

 

pc nerd wrote:

> I read somewhere that there might be a service pack 3 for XP. Is

> that true or is it a rumor?

>

> I have a related question. I want to reinstall XP because it's

> acting kind of weird. Is it possible to save the updates in a

> folder so they can be reinstalled later? I know that it's possible

> to uninstall them.

 

Microsoft does have mentions of SP3 for Windows XP on their web pages.

http://www.microsoft.com/windows/lifecycle/servicepacks.mspx

 

"SP3 for Windows XP _____ edition is currently planned for 1H CY2008. This

date is preliminary."

 

You can download the updates and save them for later. You can even

slipstream/integrate most of them straight into your installation CD/media

to make an installation and post-installation work of Windows XP faster.

 

Each month Microsoft releases that month's updates in ISO format:

January 2006-current

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/913086

 

If you are more trusting:

 

AutoPatcher

http://www.autopatcher.com/

 

Windows Updates Downloader

http://wud.jcarle.com/

 

You can download each update manually - based off the KB Article number,

etc. That way you can back it up/burn a CD of them in case you need them or

use them to keep a slipstream/integrated (updated) Windows XP CD.

 

How to use the Windows Update Catalog

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/323166

(In order to use the Windows Update Catalog, you must use IE to get the

patches..)

 

Windows Update Catalog

http://v4.windowsupdate.microsoft.com/catalog/en/default.asp

(In order to use the Windows Update Catalog, you must use IE to get the

patches..)

 

Creating an Integrated Installation

http://snipurl.com/el43

 

Integrate software updates into your Windows installation source files

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/828930

 

Really customize your CD..

http://unattended.msfn.org/

 

Produce an up-to-date XP Distribution CD

http://xpcreate.com/

 

AutoStreamer

http://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=223562

 

You can see the critical (security and other) patches released for a given

month using the following:

 

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms##-***.mspx

 

At the end of this line you see "ms##-***.mspx" .. If you simply replace ##

with the two-digit year and the *** with the three character month

abbreviation, you will see the list of "critical" and "important" patches

for that month (since it only happens once a month usually, if you check by

the second Tuesday (wait until afternoon) of each month - you should be

fine) - note that future months will not work.

 

As an example...

 

December 2004's patches..

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms04-dec.mspx

 

March 2005's patches..

None released.. so that one will fail...

 

May 2006's patches..

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms06-may.mspx

 

January 2007's patches..

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms07-jan.mspx

 

 

Once you get on the page with each month's list of patches.. You can go to

the related KB articles and grab the appropriate files from there.

 

Need Microsoft Office updates?

http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/downloads/maincatalog.aspx

 

 

Here's a list of updates from SP2 until about April 2007 to get you

started...

 

Direct Download of Service Pack 2 (SP2) for Windows XP

http://snipurl.com/8bqy

 

Critical Updates

----------------------

Released: -- [ Web Page Address ] -- Description:

9/14/2004 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/885626 ]

-- Critical Update for Windows XP

11/22/2004 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/887742 ]

-- Update for Windows XP

12/13/2004 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/885835 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

12/13/2004 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/885836 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

12/13/2004 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/886185 ]

-- Critical Update for Windows XP

12/13/2004 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/873339 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

2/7/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/891781 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

2/7/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/888302 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

2/7/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/887472 ]

-- Security Update for Windows Messenger

4/11/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/890859 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

5/18/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/894391 ]

-- Update for Windows XP

5/24/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/896344 ]

-- Update for Windows XP

6/13/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/896358 ]

-- Security Update for Microsoft Windows XP

6/13/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/896428 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

6/24/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/900930 ]

-- Update for Windows XP

6/27/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/898461 ]

-- Update for Windows XP

7/11/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/901214 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

8/8/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/896423 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

8/8/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/899587 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

8/8/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/899591 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

8/8/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/893756 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

10/10/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/901017 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

10/10/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/902400 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

10/10/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/905749 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

10/10/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/905414 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

10/10/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/900725 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

12/12/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/910437 ]

-- Update for Windows XP

12/13/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/904706 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

1/9/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/908519 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

2/13/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/911927 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

4/10/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/911562 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

4/18/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/904942 ]

-- Update for Windows XP

4/25/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/900485 ]

-- Update for Windows XP

4/25/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/908531 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

5/9/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/913580 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

6/6/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/916595 ]

-- Update for Windows XP

6/8/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918439 ]

-- Vulnerability in ART Image Rendering Could Allow Remote Code

Execution in Internet Explorer for Windows XP SP2

6/12/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/914389 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

6/12/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917953 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

6/13/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917344 ]

-- JScript 5.6 Security Update for Windows XP SP1 and SP2

6/27/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/911280 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

7/10/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917159 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

7/10/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/914388 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

8/7/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917422 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

8/7/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/920670 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

8/7/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/922616 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

8/7/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/920683 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

8/17/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/920872 ]

-- Update for Windows XP

9/11/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/920685 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

9/11/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/922582 ]

-- Update for Windows XP

9/11/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/919007 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

10/9/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/922819 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

10/9/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/924496 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

10/9/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/923414 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

10/9/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/923191 ]

-- Security Update for Windows XP

11/14/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/920213 ]

-- Vulnerability in Microsoft Agent could allow remote code

execution

11/14/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/923789 ]

-- Vulnerabilities in Macromedia Flash Player from Adobe

could allow remote code execution

11/14/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/924270 ]

-- Vulnerability in Workstation Service could allow

remote code execution

11/14/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/928088 ]

-- Vulnerability in Microsoft XML Core Services could

allow remote code execution

11/14/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/923980 ]

-- Vulnerability in the Client Service could allow remote code

execution

12/12/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/926247 ]

-- Vulnerability in Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)

could allow remote code execution

12/12/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/926255 ]

-- Vulnerability in Windows could allow elevation of privilege

12/12/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/923694 ]

-- Cumulative security update for Outlook Express

1/9/2007 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/929969 ]

-- Vulnerability in Vector Markup Language

Could Allow Remote Code Execution

* If you have installed IE7, also install the IE7 version

of this patch!

2/13/2007 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/928255 ]

-- Vulnerability in Windows Shell Could Allow Elevation

of Privilege

2/13/2007 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/927802 ]

-- Vulnerability in Windows Image Acquisition Service

Could Allow Elevation of Privilege

2/13/2007 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/928843 ]

-- Vulnerability in HTML Help ActiveX Control Could

Allow Remote Code Execution

2/13/2007 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/927779 ]

-- Vulnerability in Microsoft Data Access Components

Could Allow Remote Code Execution

2/13/2007 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/926436 ]

-- Vulnerability in Microsoft OLE Dialog Could Allow

Remote Code Execution

2/13/2007 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/924667 ]

-- Vulnerability in Microsoft MFC Could Allow Remote

Code Execution

2/13/2007 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/918118 ]

-- Vulnerability in Microsoft RichEdit Could Allow

Remote Code Execution

2/13/2007 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/928090 ]

-- Cumulative Security Update for Internet Explorer

* If you have IE7, obtain that version of this update.

4/3/2007 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/925902 ]

-- Vulnerabilities in GDI Could Allow Remote Code Execution

4/10/2007 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/931261 ]

-- Vulnerability in Universal Plug and Play Could

Allow Remote Code Execution

4/10/2007 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/932168 ]

-- Vulnerability in Microsoft Agent Could Allow Remote

Code Execution

4/10/2007 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/930178 ]

-- Vulnerabilities in CSRSS Could Allow Remote Code

Execution

4/10/2007 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/931784 ]

-- Vulnerability in Windows Kernel Could Allow

Elevation of Privilege

 

Media Player:

-------------------

Released: -- [ Web Page Address: ] -- Description:

9/2/2004 -- [ http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=30984 ]

-- Windows Media Player 10

11/7/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/902344 ]

-- Update for WMDRM-enabled Media Players

2/13/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/911564 ]

-- Security Update for Windows Media Player Plug-in

4/11/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/911565 ]

-- Security Update for Windows Media Player 10 for Windows XP

6/12/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917734 ]

-- Security Update for Windows Media Player 10 for Windows XP

12/12/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/923689 ]

-- Vulnerability in Windows Media Format Could Allow Remote

Code Execution

 

..NET Framework:

------------------------

Released: -- [ Web Page Address: ] -- Description:

3/30/2004 -- [ http://snipurl.com/10bde ]

-- Microsoft .NET Framework Version 1.1 Redistributable Package

8/30/2004 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/885055 ]

-- Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1

2/8/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/887219 ]

-- ASP.NET Security Update for Microsoft NET Framework 1.1

Service Pack 1

3/22/2006 -- [ http://snipurl.com/10bdv ]

-- Microsoft .NET Framework Version 2.0 Redistributable

Package (x86)

7/11/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917283 ]

-- NDP 2.0 ASP.Net Security Update

10/10/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/922770 ]

-- NET Framework 2.0 SYSTEM.WEB.DLL Security Update

 

Other Updates:

---------------------

Released: -- [ Web Page Address: ] -- Description:

9/14/2004 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/873374 ]

-- Microsoft GDI+ Detection Tool

9/2/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/893803 ]

-- Windows Installer 3.1 Redistributable (v2)

10/14/2005 -- [ http://snipurl.com/10bex ]

-- Windows Media Connect 2.0

11/29/2005 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/909520 ]

-- Microsoft Base Smart Card Cryptographic Service Provider

Package: x86

10/10/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/890830 ]

-- Microsoft® Windows® Malicious Software Removal Tool

- November 2006

 

Purely OPTIONAL:

----------------------

10/18/2006 -- [ http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/downloads/ ]

-- Internet Explorer 7.0

10/30/2006 -- [ http://snipurl.com/167ea ]

-- Media Player 11

12/8/2006 -- [ http://support.microsoft.com/kb/925876 ]

-- Remote Desktop Connection 6.0 client

 

--

Shenan Stanley

MS-MVP

--

How To Ask Questions The Smart Way

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Guest Tony Meloche
Posted

Re: Service Pack 3 for XP

 

Uncle Grumpy wrote:

> pc nerd <pc nerd@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

>

>> I read somewhere that there might be a service pack 3 for XP. Is that true or

>> is it a rumor?

>

> True.

>

> Next year.

 

 

Yes. They wont be anymore definitive right now than "sometime in

2008". The SP3 size will be huge, but if you are set up to

automatically receive Windows Updates, and have been all along, those

are the lion's share of what will be in SP3, so it would be much smaller

in your case.

 

I'm almost certain I have read that Microsoft has also said it will

be the last major SP upgrade for XP. They will continue to support XP

until January (IIRC) of 2014, then it goes into the dustbin of history

as far as support from the manufacturer.

 

Tony

 

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----

http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups

----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Posted

Re: Service Pack 3 for XP

 

XP SP3 is currently in Beta Testing.

 

"pc nerd" <pc nerd@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:91958EF9-5ABE-4D97-BBE5-3D0A9383647D@microsoft.com...

>I read somewhere that there might be a service pack 3 for XP. Is that true

>or

> is it a rumor?

>

> I have a related question. I want to reinstall XP because it's acting kind

> of weird. Is it possible to save the updates in a folder so they can be

> reinstalled later? I know that it's possible to uninstall them.

Guest baynole
Posted

Re: Service Pack 3 for XP

 

On Aug 27, 11:55 pm, Tony Meloche <bomba...@i2k.com> wrote:

> I'm almost certain I have read that Microsoft has also said it will

> be the last major SP upgrade for XP. They will continue to support XP

> until January (IIRC) of 2014, then it goes into the dustbin of history

> as far as support from the manufacturer.

>

> Tony

>

 

Yeah, but at least Vista will be long-gone by then too.

Guest Ken Blake
Posted

Re: Service Pack 3 for XP

 

"pc nerd" <pc nerd@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:91958EF9-5ABE-4D97-BBE5-3D0A9383647D@microsoft.com...

>I read somewhere that there might be a service pack 3 for XP. Is that true

>or

> is it a rumor?

 

 

It does not yet exist, but its expected (not guaranteed) in the first half

of next year.

 

> I have a related question. I want to reinstall XP because it's acting kind

> of weird.

 

 

Ugh! I am very much against reinstalling as a substitute for

troubleshooting.

In my view, it's usually a mistake. With a modicum of care, it should never

be necessary to reinstall Windows (XP or any other version). I've run

Windows 3.0, 3.1, WFWG 3.11, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows 2000, and

Windows XP, each for the period of time before the next version came out,

and each on two machines here. I never reinstalled any of them, and I have

never had anything more than an occasional minor problem.

 

It's my belief that this mistaken notion stems from the technical support

people at many of the larger OEMs. Their solution to almost any problem they

don't quickly know the answer to is "reformat and reinstall." That's the

perfect solution for them. It gets you off the phone quickly, it almost

always works, and it doesn't require them to do any real troubleshooting (a

skill that most of them obviously don't possess in any great degree).

 

But it leaves you with all the work and all the problems. You have to

restore all your data backups, you have to reinstall all your programs, you

have to reinstall all the Windows and application updates,you have to locate

and install all the needed drivers for your system, you have to recustomize

Windows and all your apps to work the way you're comfortable with.

 

Besides all those things being time-consuming and troublesome, you may have

trouble with some of them: can you find all your application CDs? Can you

find all the needed installation codes? Do you have data backups to restore?

Do you even remember all the customizations and tweaks you may have

installed to make everything work the way you like?

 

Occasionally there are problems that are so difficult to solve that Windows

should be reinstalled cleanly. But they are few and far between;

reinstallation should not be a substitute for troubleshooting; it should be

a last resort, to be done only after all other attempts at troubleshooting

by a qualified person have failed.

 

If you have problems, post them here; it's likely that someone can help you

and a reinstallation won't be required.

 

 

 

Besides all the above, it's probably "acting kind of weird" because of

something you've done improperly. If you simply reinstall without finding

out what the problem was, you will probably repeat the same behavior, and

quickly find yourself back where you started.

 

 

--

Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User

Please reply to the newsgroup

Posted

Re: Service Pack 3 for XP

 

On Aug 27, 10:14 pm, "Shenan Stanley" <newshel...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

> Creating an Integrated Installation

> http://snipurl.com/el43

>

 

This link is bad

Posted

Re: Service Pack 3 for XP

 

On Aug 28, 9:39 am, "Ken Blake" <kbl...@this.is.an.invalid.domain>

wrote:

>

> Occasionally there are problems that are so difficult to solve that Windows

> should be reinstalled cleanly. But they are few and far between;

> reinstallation should not be a substitute for troubleshooting; it should be

> a last resort, to be done only after all other attempts at troubleshooting

> by a qualified person have failed.

>

> If you have problems, post them here; it's likely that someone can help you

> and a reinstallation won't be required.

>

 

It's a honorable sentiment, but finding good advice/help is hard and

to acquire all the required skills is not that simple. For many

people, including myself, it eventually becomes easier to reinstall

than to try and figure out the complex interactions between many

pieces of software. Besides, it gets rid of many installed pieces of

software and stuff that starts at every boot that one doesn't need.

 

In the end, I'd say htat to clean up a 5-year old install or to

reinstall it cleanly and install only the required software again is

much of a wash.

 

Of course, it goes without saying that the user data is easily

locatable and can be backed up/restored.

Guest Shenan Stanley
Posted

Re: Service Pack 3 for XP

 

MikeB wrote:

> On Aug 27, 10:14 pm, "Shenan Stanley" <newshel...@gmail.com> wrote:

>

>>

>> Creating an Integrated Installation

>> http://snipurl.com/el43

>>

>

> This link is bad

 

Thanks - I'll remove it.

 

It was one of the least important ones anyway - put there simply because it

was a link to a Microsoft page. The best resource, by far, in my opinion

for creating an integrated Windows XP installation CD....

 

http://unattended.msfn.org/

 

--

Shenan Stanley

MS-MVP

--

How To Ask Questions The Smart Way

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Posted

Re: Service Pack 3 for XP

 

 

"Ken Blake" <kblake@this.is.an.invalid.domain> wrote in message

news:uuX$DFY6HHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> "pc nerd" <pc nerd@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

> news:91958EF9-5ABE-4D97-BBE5-3D0A9383647D@microsoft.com...

>

>>I read somewhere that there might be a service pack 3 for XP. Is that true

>>or

>> is it a rumor?

>

>

> It does not yet exist, but its expected (not guaranteed) in the first half

> of next year.

> Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User

> Please reply to the newsgroup

Guest pc nerd
Posted

Re: Service Pack 3 for XP

 

 

 

"Ken Blake" wrote:

> "pc nerd" <pc nerd@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

> news:91958EF9-5ABE-4D97-BBE5-3D0A9383647D@microsoft.com...

>

> >I read somewhere that there might be a service pack 3 for XP. Is that true

> >or

> > is it a rumor?

>

>

> It does not yet exist, but its expected (not guaranteed) in the first half

> of next year.

>

>

> > I have a related question. I want to reinstall XP because it's acting kind

> > of weird.

>

>

> Ugh! I am very much against reinstalling as a substitute for

> troubleshooting.

> In my view, it's usually a mistake. With a modicum of care, it should never

> be necessary to reinstall Windows (XP or any other version). I've run

> Windows 3.0, 3.1, WFWG 3.11, Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows 2000, and

> Windows XP, each for the period of time before the next version came out,

> and each on two machines here. I never reinstalled any of them, and I have

> never had anything more than an occasional minor problem.

>

> It's my belief that this mistaken notion stems from the technical support

> people at many of the larger OEMs. Their solution to almost any problem they

> don't quickly know the answer to is "reformat and reinstall." That's the

> perfect solution for them. It gets you off the phone quickly, it almost

> always works, and it doesn't require them to do any real troubleshooting (a

> skill that most of them obviously don't possess in any great degree).

>

> But it leaves you with all the work and all the problems. You have to

> restore all your data backups, you have to reinstall all your programs, you

> have to reinstall all the Windows and application updates,you have to locate

> and install all the needed drivers for your system, you have to recustomize

> Windows and all your apps to work the way you're comfortable with.

>

> Besides all those things being time-consuming and troublesome, you may have

> trouble with some of them: can you find all your application CDs? Can you

> find all the needed installation codes? Do you have data backups to restore?

> Do you even remember all the customizations and tweaks you may have

> installed to make everything work the way you like?

>

> Occasionally there are problems that are so difficult to solve that Windows

> should be reinstalled cleanly. But they are few and far between;

> reinstallation should not be a substitute for troubleshooting; it should be

> a last resort, to be done only after all other attempts at troubleshooting

> by a qualified person have failed.

>

> If you have problems, post them here; it's likely that someone can help you

> and a reinstallation won't be required.

>

>

>

> Besides all the above, it's probably "acting kind of weird" because of

> something you've done improperly. If you simply reinstall without finding

> out what the problem was, you will probably repeat the same behavior, and

> quickly find yourself back where you started.

>

>

> --

> Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User

> Please reply to the newsgroup

>

>

> I got my PC in June 2005. I've only had 1 or 2 BSODs. I got an Alienware PC. One of the options that I paid for was what Alienware calls "Alien Respawn". After they installed the software, they ran an imaging program which includes a boot CD & an Image DVD. So, it will be easy for me to reinstall XP. In the last 2 years, I've installed & uninstalled software, so, I'm sure, that there are a lot of junk files on my PC. Sometimes when I go to shut down the PC, the ShutDown, Restart window takes several seconds to appear. Sometimes, it appears quickly. I have all of the install CDs for the software that I want to reinstall.

Guest Ken Blake
Posted

Re: Service Pack 3 for XP

 

"MikeB" <MPBrede@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:1188316242.166772.163840@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...

> On Aug 28, 9:39 am, "Ken Blake" <kbl...@this.is.an.invalid.domain>

> wrote:

>

>>

>> Occasionally there are problems that are so difficult to solve that

>> Windows

>> should be reinstalled cleanly. But they are few and far between;

>> reinstallation should not be a substitute for troubleshooting; it should

>> be

>> a last resort, to be done only after all other attempts at

>> troubleshooting

>> by a qualified person have failed.

>>

>> If you have problems, post them here; it's likely that someone can help

>> you

>> and a reinstallation won't be required.

>>

>

> It's a honorable sentiment, but finding good advice/help is hard and

> to acquire all the required skills is not that simple.

 

 

Both of what you say are true. But there are lots of knowledgeable people

here, and for those who ask rather than just reinstalling, most folks here

get the solutions to their problems.

 

> For many

> people, including myself, it eventually becomes easier to reinstall

> than to try and figure out the complex interactions between many

> pieces of software.

 

 

Eventually? Absolutely! I certainly don't suggest than nobody ever reformat

and reinstall. My point is that it should be a last resort, not the

automatic response to any problem. Sometimes you *do* have to give up and

bite the bullet.

 

But I've seen people who had such a simple problem as their task bar having

moved to the side of the screen reformat instead of looking for the

solution, which takes approximately two seconds to fix.

 

> Besides, it gets rid of many installed pieces of

> software and stuff that starts at every boot that one doesn't need.

 

 

True, but that's like the proverbial shooting a mosquito with an elephant

gun. There is a much less draconian solution to that problem.

 

--

Ken Blake - Microsoft MVP Windows: Shell/User

Please reply to the newsgroup

 

> In the end, I'd say htat to clean up a 5-year old install or to

> reinstall it cleanly and install only the required software again is

> much of a wash.

>

> Of course, it goes without saying that the user data is easily

> locatable and can be backed up/restored.

>

>

>

Posted

Re: Service Pack 3 for XP

 

On Aug 29, 9:46 am, "Ken Blake" <kbl...@this.is.an.invalid.domain>

wrote:

> "MikeB" <MPBr...@gmail.com> wrote in message

>

> news:1188316242.166772.163840@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com...

>

>

>

> > On Aug 28, 9:39 am, "Ken Blake" <kbl...@this.is.an.invalid.domain>

> > wrote:

>

> >> Occasionally there are problems that are so difficult to solve that

> >> Windows

> >> should be reinstalled cleanly. But they are few and far between;

> >> reinstallation should not be a substitute for troubleshooting; it should

> >> be

> >> a last resort, to be done only after all other attempts at

> >> troubleshooting

> >> by a qualified person have failed.

>

> >> If you have problems, post them here; it's likely that someone can help

> >> you

> >> and a reinstallation won't be required.

>

> > It's a honorable sentiment, but finding good advice/help is hard and

> > to acquire all the required skills is not that simple.

>

> Both of what you say are true. But there are lots of knowledgeable people

> here, and for those who ask rather than just reinstalling, most folks here

> get the solutions to their problems.

>

 

Most folks. I've asked (admittedly esoteric) questions that just

doesn't seem to get an on-target response here before. Also, I have

received useful advice sometimes. But that's a digression.

Guest no-account
Posted

Re: Service Pack 3 for XP

 

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 19:12:00 -0700, pc nerd <pc

nerd@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

>>I read somewhere that there might be a service pack 3 for XP. Is that true or

>>is it a rumor?

>>

>>I have a related question. I want to reinstall XP because it's acting kind

>>of weird. Is it possible to save the updates in a folder so they can be

>>reinstalled later? I know that it's possible to uninstall them.

 

Instead of going to Microsoft and downloading all those updates, you

should use AutoPatcher. MS has told them to stop offering the

program, but you can still find it around the net. They have stopped

development. the latest version has all the patches and hot fixes up

to August 2007. You can still pick up a copy of it here:

 

http://fileforum.betanews.com/detail/AutoPatcher_XP/1067103058/1

 

but be forewarned that it is a 300MB and then some. But it sure as

heck beats grabbin' 'em from Microsoft! You can Google for the home

page and read what Microsoft told them. I think Microsoft shot

themselves in the foot by screwing with these guys. They have been

doing a great service.

 

Booger Bandit

×
×
  • Create New...