Jump to content

Large Partition for Windows 2003 Server


Recommended Posts

Guest Brillmike
Posted

I am purchasing a HP NAS device with 12 500GB hard drives. I want to

configure this device as one large partition. Is there a best practices I

should follow? What is the largest partition I can create? Should I mess with

block size? I will be using HP's hardware array to configure the drives, is

there a recommended RAID level for windows for a partion using this many

drive? This is a storage only device for data that remains pretty stagnent.

 

Thanks, Mike

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days

Guest Mathieu CHATEAU
Posted

Re: Large Partition for Windows 2003 Server

 

Hello,

 

Creating a really large partition may lead to issue, like:

-Really huge chkdsk time

-Hardly able to defrag the partition

-Security corruption if around 4 Millions of file

 

You may keep one raid volume to minimize space lost but would definitely

make many partition

 

just my 2 cents

 

--

Cordialement,

Mathieu CHATEAU

http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com

 

 

"Brillmike" <brillmike@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:ED1D71FC-3FAE-4BE4-8767-DF17A515AC77@microsoft.com...

>I am purchasing a HP NAS device with 12 500GB hard drives. I want to

> configure this device as one large partition. Is there a best practices I

> should follow? What is the largest partition I can create? Should I mess

> with

> block size? I will be using HP's hardware array to configure the drives,

> is

> there a recommended RAID level for windows for a partion using this many

> drive? This is a storage only device for data that remains pretty

> stagnent.

>

> Thanks, Mike

Guest Edwin vMierlo [MVP]
Posted

Re: Large Partition for Windows 2003 Server

 

I agree with Mathieu here.

 

Question : what is your (technical) reason to create such a large volume ?

 

 

"Mathieu CHATEAU" <gollum123@free.fr> wrote in message

news:OUmXHgK8HHA.1212@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> Hello,

>

> Creating a really large partition may lead to issue, like:

> -Really huge chkdsk time

> -Hardly able to defrag the partition

> -Security corruption if around 4 Millions of file

>

> You may keep one raid volume to minimize space lost but would definitely

> make many partition

>

> just my 2 cents

>

> --

> Cordialement,

> Mathieu CHATEAU

> http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com

>

>

> "Brillmike" <brillmike@yahoo.com> wrote in message

> news:ED1D71FC-3FAE-4BE4-8767-DF17A515AC77@microsoft.com...

> >I am purchasing a HP NAS device with 12 500GB hard drives. I want to

> > configure this device as one large partition. Is there a best practices

I

> > should follow? What is the largest partition I can create? Should I mess

> > with

> > block size? I will be using HP's hardware array to configure the drives,

> > is

> > there a recommended RAID level for windows for a partion using this many

> > drive? This is a storage only device for data that remains pretty

> > stagnent.

> >

> > Thanks, Mike

>

Guest Brillmike
Posted

Re: Large Partition for Windows 2003 Server

 

We are migrating data from another source and the application can only use a

single drive letter...it is better if we can map the root folder to one

letter. It is an older application, i can split the data to two drive letters

so have two 3 TB partitions but may have the same issue

 

"Edwin vMierlo [MVP]" wrote:

> I agree with Mathieu here.

>

> Question : what is your (technical) reason to create such a large volume ?

>

>

> "Mathieu CHATEAU" <gollum123@free.fr> wrote in message

> news:OUmXHgK8HHA.1212@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> > Hello,

> >

> > Creating a really large partition may lead to issue, like:

> > -Really huge chkdsk time

> > -Hardly able to defrag the partition

> > -Security corruption if around 4 Millions of file

> >

> > You may keep one raid volume to minimize space lost but would definitely

> > make many partition

> >

> > just my 2 cents

> >

> > --

> > Cordialement,

> > Mathieu CHATEAU

> > http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com

> >

> >

> > "Brillmike" <brillmike@yahoo.com> wrote in message

> > news:ED1D71FC-3FAE-4BE4-8767-DF17A515AC77@microsoft.com...

> > >I am purchasing a HP NAS device with 12 500GB hard drives. I want to

> > > configure this device as one large partition. Is there a best practices

> I

> > > should follow? What is the largest partition I can create? Should I mess

> > > with

> > > block size? I will be using HP's hardware array to configure the drives,

> > > is

> > > there a recommended RAID level for windows for a partion using this many

> > > drive? This is a storage only device for data that remains pretty

> > > stagnent.

> > >

> > > Thanks, Mike

> >

>

>

>

Guest Mathieu CHATEAU
Posted

Re: Large Partition for Windows 2003 Server

 

you can make a DFS tree that point to share on different partition.

Map the letter to the root of the dfs, so it will be invisible from the

application.

 

 

--

Cordialement,

Mathieu CHATEAU

http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com

 

 

"Brillmike" <brillmike@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:29448D92-B91B-46AF-AFBD-2A5A22D7040E@microsoft.com...

> We are migrating data from another source and the application can only use

> a

> single drive letter...it is better if we can map the root folder to one

> letter. It is an older application, i can split the data to two drive

> letters

> so have two 3 TB partitions but may have the same issue

>

> "Edwin vMierlo [MVP]" wrote:

>

>> I agree with Mathieu here.

>>

>> Question : what is your (technical) reason to create such a large volume

>> ?

>>

>>

>> "Mathieu CHATEAU" <gollum123@free.fr> wrote in message

>> news:OUmXHgK8HHA.1212@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> > Hello,

>> >

>> > Creating a really large partition may lead to issue, like:

>> > -Really huge chkdsk time

>> > -Hardly able to defrag the partition

>> > -Security corruption if around 4 Millions of file

>> >

>> > You may keep one raid volume to minimize space lost but would

>> > definitely

>> > make many partition

>> >

>> > just my 2 cents

>> >

>> > --

>> > Cordialement,

>> > Mathieu CHATEAU

>> > http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com

>> >

>> >

>> > "Brillmike" <brillmike@yahoo.com> wrote in message

>> > news:ED1D71FC-3FAE-4BE4-8767-DF17A515AC77@microsoft.com...

>> > >I am purchasing a HP NAS device with 12 500GB hard drives. I want to

>> > > configure this device as one large partition. Is there a best

>> > > practices

>> I

>> > > should follow? What is the largest partition I can create? Should I

>> > > mess

>> > > with

>> > > block size? I will be using HP's hardware array to configure the

>> > > drives,

>> > > is

>> > > there a recommended RAID level for windows for a partion using this

>> > > many

>> > > drive? This is a storage only device for data that remains pretty

>> > > stagnent.

>> > >

>> > > Thanks, Mike

>> >

>>

>>

>>

Guest Brillmike
Posted

Re: Large Partition for Windows 2003 Server

 

Cool, Do you have any links to DFS. I will go search now too.

 

Thanks, Mike

 

"Mathieu CHATEAU" wrote:

> you can make a DFS tree that point to share on different partition.

> Map the letter to the root of the dfs, so it will be invisible from the

> application.

>

>

> --

> Cordialement,

> Mathieu CHATEAU

> http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com

>

>

> "Brillmike" <brillmike@yahoo.com> wrote in message

> news:29448D92-B91B-46AF-AFBD-2A5A22D7040E@microsoft.com...

> > We are migrating data from another source and the application can only use

> > a

> > single drive letter...it is better if we can map the root folder to one

> > letter. It is an older application, i can split the data to two drive

> > letters

> > so have two 3 TB partitions but may have the same issue

> >

> > "Edwin vMierlo [MVP]" wrote:

> >

> >> I agree with Mathieu here.

> >>

> >> Question : what is your (technical) reason to create such a large volume

> >> ?

> >>

> >>

> >> "Mathieu CHATEAU" <gollum123@free.fr> wrote in message

> >> news:OUmXHgK8HHA.1212@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> >> > Hello,

> >> >

> >> > Creating a really large partition may lead to issue, like:

> >> > -Really huge chkdsk time

> >> > -Hardly able to defrag the partition

> >> > -Security corruption if around 4 Millions of file

> >> >

> >> > You may keep one raid volume to minimize space lost but would

> >> > definitely

> >> > make many partition

> >> >

> >> > just my 2 cents

> >> >

> >> > --

> >> > Cordialement,

> >> > Mathieu CHATEAU

> >> > http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com

> >> >

> >> >

> >> > "Brillmike" <brillmike@yahoo.com> wrote in message

> >> > news:ED1D71FC-3FAE-4BE4-8767-DF17A515AC77@microsoft.com...

> >> > >I am purchasing a HP NAS device with 12 500GB hard drives. I want to

> >> > > configure this device as one large partition. Is there a best

> >> > > practices

> >> I

> >> > > should follow? What is the largest partition I can create? Should I

> >> > > mess

> >> > > with

> >> > > block size? I will be using HP's hardware array to configure the

> >> > > drives,

> >> > > is

> >> > > there a recommended RAID level for windows for a partion using this

> >> > > many

> >> > > drive? This is a storage only device for data that remains pretty

> >> > > stagnent.

> >> > >

> >> > > Thanks, Mike

> >> >

> >>

> >>

> >>

>

>

Guest Mathieu CHATEAU
Posted

Re: Large Partition for Windows 2003 Server

 

yep:

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/techinfo/overview/dfsfaq.mspx

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/techinfo/overview/dfs.mspx

http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver/en/library/b3754814-f865-4200-9ae9-66785e5e87c81033.mspx?mfr=true

 

enjoy!

 

--

Cordialement,

Mathieu CHATEAU

http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com

 

 

"Brillmike" <brillmike@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:2B040F76-7A93-4819-9578-AB8BDFBA9E7B@microsoft.com...

> Cool, Do you have any links to DFS. I will go search now too.

>

> Thanks, Mike

>

> "Mathieu CHATEAU" wrote:

>

>> you can make a DFS tree that point to share on different partition.

>> Map the letter to the root of the dfs, so it will be invisible from the

>> application.

>>

>>

>> --

>> Cordialement,

>> Mathieu CHATEAU

>> http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com

>>

>>

>> "Brillmike" <brillmike@yahoo.com> wrote in message

>> news:29448D92-B91B-46AF-AFBD-2A5A22D7040E@microsoft.com...

>> > We are migrating data from another source and the application can only

>> > use

>> > a

>> > single drive letter...it is better if we can map the root folder to one

>> > letter. It is an older application, i can split the data to two drive

>> > letters

>> > so have two 3 TB partitions but may have the same issue

>> >

>> > "Edwin vMierlo [MVP]" wrote:

>> >

>> >> I agree with Mathieu here.

>> >>

>> >> Question : what is your (technical) reason to create such a large

>> >> volume

>> >> ?

>> >>

>> >>

>> >> "Mathieu CHATEAU" <gollum123@free.fr> wrote in message

>> >> news:OUmXHgK8HHA.1212@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> >> > Hello,

>> >> >

>> >> > Creating a really large partition may lead to issue, like:

>> >> > -Really huge chkdsk time

>> >> > -Hardly able to defrag the partition

>> >> > -Security corruption if around 4 Millions of file

>> >> >

>> >> > You may keep one raid volume to minimize space lost but would

>> >> > definitely

>> >> > make many partition

>> >> >

>> >> > just my 2 cents

>> >> >

>> >> > --

>> >> > Cordialement,

>> >> > Mathieu CHATEAU

>> >> > http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com

>> >> >

>> >> >

>> >> > "Brillmike" <brillmike@yahoo.com> wrote in message

>> >> > news:ED1D71FC-3FAE-4BE4-8767-DF17A515AC77@microsoft.com...

>> >> > >I am purchasing a HP NAS device with 12 500GB hard drives. I want

>> >> > >to

>> >> > > configure this device as one large partition. Is there a best

>> >> > > practices

>> >> I

>> >> > > should follow? What is the largest partition I can create? Should

>> >> > > I

>> >> > > mess

>> >> > > with

>> >> > > block size? I will be using HP's hardware array to configure the

>> >> > > drives,

>> >> > > is

>> >> > > there a recommended RAID level for windows for a partion using

>> >> > > this

>> >> > > many

>> >> > > drive? This is a storage only device for data that remains pretty

>> >> > > stagnent.

>> >> > >

>> >> > > Thanks, Mike

>> >> >

>> >>

>> >>

>> >>

>>

>>


×
×
  • Create New...