remote control a TS session from the console

[Guest dsm4898]

Yes, I know this is not possible and yes, I know this is by design (per

Microsoft). The workaround is to establish a remote session from the console

to itself, then remote control the other session.

 

Why is this by design? What is this trying to prevent? This is a limitation

for no apparent reason (IMHO).

 

Other than using Citrix, is there a workaround? A reg hack?

--

D.

[Guest Soo Kuan Teo [MSFT]]

Re: remote control a TS session from the console

 

Can you please share with us more detail on your scenario?

Does the work-around you suggested work for you ?

What machines/OS are you running?

Thanks

Soo Kuan

 

 

--

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

 

"dsm4898" <dsm4898@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:A82DFB44-A7C6-4A7F-9EAF-55A81A933197@microsoft.com...

> Yes, I know this is not possible and yes, I know this is by design (per

> Microsoft). The workaround is to establish a remote session from the

> console

> to itself, then remote control the other session.

>

> Why is this by design? What is this trying to prevent? This is a

> limitation

> for no apparent reason (IMHO).

>

> Other than using Citrix, is there a workaround? A reg hack?

> --

> D.

[Guest Jordan]

Re: remote control a TS session from the console

 

Always wondered that myself. It would seem foolish to think it is a

security issue of some sort seeing how you can monitor and interact from

another RDP session.

 

I am guessing that it is a functionality issue. Maybe they just can't get a

console session to view the RDP session because they can only pass the

screen movements through RDP.

 

"dsm4898" <dsm4898@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:A82DFB44-A7C6-4A7F-9EAF-55A81A933197@microsoft.com...

> Yes, I know this is not possible and yes, I know this is by design (per

> Microsoft). The workaround is to establish a remote session from the

> console

> to itself, then remote control the other session.

>

> Why is this by design? What is this trying to prevent? This is a

> limitation

> for no apparent reason (IMHO).

>

> Other than using Citrix, is there a workaround? A reg hack?

> --

> D.

>