Guest nobody Posted October 30, 2007 Posted October 30, 2007 is it better to have two servers and run dfs replication or have two servers and do clustering?
Guest Mathieu CHATEAU Posted October 30, 2007 Posted October 30, 2007 Re: dfs or cluster file server Hello, There is not any easy/obvious answer as you expect (you wouldn't answer). It depends of different factors like: -Multi geographic sites -R2 or not -number of files and size -average changes on files -Backup capacity/strategy/software -Do you have an existing san/externall array -- Cordialement, Mathieu CHATEAU English blog: http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com French blog: http://www.lotp.fr "nobody" <nobody@nobody.com> wrote in message news:eVMCOtzGIHA.1324@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... > is it better to have two servers and run dfs replication or have two > servers and do clustering? >
Guest Mathieu CHATEAU Posted October 30, 2007 Posted October 30, 2007 Re: dfs or cluster file server I meant you wouldn't ask of course :'( -- Cordialement, Mathieu CHATEAU English blog: http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com French blog: http://www.lotp.fr "Mathieu CHATEAU" <gollum123@free.fr> wrote in message news:u5NpjY0GIHA.4808@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Hello, > > There is not any easy/obvious answer as you expect (you wouldn't answer). > It depends of different factors like: > -Multi geographic sites > -R2 or not > -number of files and size > -average changes on files > -Backup capacity/strategy/software > -Do you have an existing san/externall array > > > > > -- > Cordialement, > Mathieu CHATEAU > English blog: http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com > French blog: http://www.lotp.fr > > > "nobody" <nobody@nobody.com> wrote in message > news:eVMCOtzGIHA.1324@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> is it better to have two servers and run dfs replication or have two >> servers and do clustering? >> >
Guest nobody Posted October 31, 2007 Posted October 31, 2007 Re: dfs or cluster file server Hi No san. just two boxes. so I am thinking for load balancing or ha, setup dfs with both servers using one as replica. then frs sync to both boxes. its local site. "Mathieu CHATEAU" <gollum123@free.fr> wrote in message news:u5NpjY0GIHA.4808@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... > Hello, > > There is not any easy/obvious answer as you expect (you wouldn't answer). > It depends of different factors like: > -Multi geographic sites > -R2 or not > -number of files and size > -average changes on files > -Backup capacity/strategy/software > -Do you have an existing san/externall array > > > > > -- > Cordialement, > Mathieu CHATEAU > English blog: http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com > French blog: http://www.lotp.fr > > > "nobody" <nobody@nobody.com> wrote in message > news:eVMCOtzGIHA.1324@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl... >> is it better to have two servers and run dfs replication or have two >> servers and do clustering? >> >
Recommended Posts