Skype vs. Net2Phone

[Guest mm]

The download page for Skype says that it works on win2000 and XP, it

might even say you must have one of those, but does that mean for sure

that a program written for 2000/xp won't run on win98SE or WinME?

 

Also Google Earth says that and so I didn't install it, but maybe I

should have tried, if there is some chance it would run.

 

Could it do any damage to install one of these where it wasn't

designeed to go?

 

 

If I can't do this, does anyone know if Net2Phone (which does work on

winme and 98SE) can be used to call Skype commputers?

[Guest thanatoid]

Re: Skype vs. Net2Phone

 

mm <NOPSAMmm2005@bigfoot.coim> wrote in

news:rs2uk3d7g5olgldpaonqp08k08bfji0pfo@4ax.com:

> The download page for Skype says that it works on win2000

> and XP, it might even say you must have one of those, but

> does that mean for sure that a program written for 2000/xp

> won't run on win98SE or WinME?

>

> Also Google Earth says that and so I didn't install it, but

> maybe I should have tried, if there is some chance it would

> run.

>

> Could it do any damage to install one of these where it

> wasn't designeed to go?

>

>

> If I can't do this, does anyone know if Net2Phone (which

> does work on winme and 98SE) can be used to call Skype

> commputers?

>

 

Skype doesn't call "computers", it calls any phone on the world

directly. I believe Net2Phone, as the name implies, does the

same.

 

Net2Phone is 8 or more years old and it may or may not work at

all - I have it but for some reason I never tried it. I really

should - I still run 95B on my internet computer and can't use

Skype either.

 

You can't harm a computer by installing an incompatible program

- it will either say your system is not compatible or it will

just hang or do nothing. In the worst case, reboot and clean up

whatever mess it may have made (new half-empty directories etc).

 

Still, it is WISE to put it mildly to have a complete backup of

a perfect C: drive setup done with an image program like Acronis

True Image or Ghost. No matter WHAT happens, 5 minutes later

you're back in business.

[Guest Don Phillipson]

Re: Skype vs. Net2Phone

 

"mm" <NOPSAMmm2005@bigfoot.coim> wrote in message

news:rs2uk3d7g5olgldpaonqp08k08bfji0pfo@4ax.com...

> The download page for Skype says that it works on win2000 and XP, it

> might even say you must have one of those, but does that mean for sure

> that a program written for 2000/xp won't run on win98SE or WinME?

 

No: it means (a) the manufacturer claims it will work with

some OSs and not with others; (b) it does not mean the

product is guaranteed not too run under Win98; it means

it will very probably not run under Win98. Once in a while

an app runs under an OS different from what the maker

claims on the box.

> Also Google Earth says that and so I didn't install it, but maybe I

> should have tried, if there is some chance it would run.

>

> Could it do any damage to install one of these where it wasn't

> designeed to go?

 

The likeliest source of damage is overwriting on your hard

drive a system file with the same name in the app's instal

procedure. Afterwards your other apps that call this file

may find it different and therefore perhaps may not work.

> If I can't do this, does anyone know if Net2Phone (which does work on

> winme and 98SE) can be used to call Skype commputers?

 

Voice phone calls are indifferent to the system that

creates and connects them. (Your WinME PC can be

connected to a Commodore 64 and the data does

not care how either made the connection.)

 

--

Don Phillipson

Carlsbad Springs

(Ottawa, Canada)

[Guest Buffalo]

Re: Skype vs. Net2Phone

 

 

"thanatoid" <waiting@the.exit.invalid> wrote in message

news:Xns99F7CCF4CDA44thanexit@66.250.146.158...

> mm <NOPSAMmm2005@bigfoot.coim> wrote in

> news:rs2uk3d7g5olgldpaonqp08k08bfji0pfo@4ax.com:

>

> > The download page for Skype says that it works on win2000

> > and XP, it might even say you must have one of those, but

> > does that mean for sure that a program written for 2000/xp

> > won't run on win98SE or WinME?

> >

> > Also Google Earth says that and so I didn't install it, but

> > maybe I should have tried, if there is some chance it would

> > run.

> >

> > Could it do any damage to install one of these where it

> > wasn't designeed to go?

> >

> >

> > If I can't do this, does anyone know if Net2Phone (which

> > does work on winme and 98SE) can be used to call Skype

> > commputers?

> >

>

> Skype doesn't call "computers", it calls any phone on the world

> directly. I believe Net2Phone, as the name implies, does the

> same.

>

> Net2Phone is 8 or more years old and it may or may not work at

> all - I have it but for some reason I never tried it. I really

> should - I still run 95B on my internet computer and can't use

> Skype either.

>

> You can't harm a computer by installing an incompatible program

> - it will either say your system is not compatible or it will

> just hang or do nothing. In the worst case, reboot and clean up

> whatever mess it may have made (new half-empty directories etc).

>

> Still, it is WISE to put it mildly to have a complete backup of

> a perfect C: drive setup done with an image program like Acronis

> True Image or Ghost. No matter WHAT happens, 5 minutes later

> you're back in business.

 

I run Skype on my Win98SE.

I don't use the Video features so I cannot attest to that, but the phone

part works great.

[Guest none]

Re: Skype vs. Net2Phone

 

Buffalo, do you happen to have their installer software for 98 that you

could email?

___

"Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote in message

news:09qdnWvOPLRlH9LanZ2dnUVZ_remnZ2d@comcast.com...

>

> "thanatoid" <waiting@the.exit.invalid> wrote in message

> news:Xns99F7CCF4CDA44thanexit@66.250.146.158...

> > mm <NOPSAMmm2005@bigfoot.coim> wrote in

> > news:rs2uk3d7g5olgldpaonqp08k08bfji0pfo@4ax.com:

> >

> > > The download page for Skype says that it works on win2000

> > > and XP, it might even say you must have one of those, but

> > > does that mean for sure that a program written for 2000/xp

> > > won't run on win98SE or WinME?

> > >

> > > Also Google Earth says that and so I didn't install it, but

> > > maybe I should have tried, if there is some chance it would

> > > run.

> > >

> > > Could it do any damage to install one of these where it

> > > wasn't designeed to go?

> > >

> > >

> > > If I can't do this, does anyone know if Net2Phone (which

> > > does work on winme and 98SE) can be used to call Skype

> > > commputers?

> > >

> >

> > Skype doesn't call "computers", it calls any phone on the world

> > directly. I believe Net2Phone, as the name implies, does the

> > same.

> >

> > Net2Phone is 8 or more years old and it may or may not work at

> > all - I have it but for some reason I never tried it. I really

> > should - I still run 95B on my internet computer and can't use

> > Skype either.

> >

> > You can't harm a computer by installing an incompatible program

> > - it will either say your system is not compatible or it will

> > just hang or do nothing. In the worst case, reboot and clean up

> > whatever mess it may have made (new half-empty directories etc).

> >

> > Still, it is WISE to put it mildly to have a complete backup of

> > a perfect C: drive setup done with an image program like Acronis

> > True Image or Ghost. No matter WHAT happens, 5 minutes later

> > you're back in business.

>

> I run Skype on my Win98SE.

> I don't use the Video features so I cannot attest to that, but the

phone

> part works great.

>

>

[Guest Franc Zabkar]

Re: Skype vs. Net2Phone

 

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:21:19 -0600, "none" <nospam@bogusaddress.com>

put finger to keyboard and composed:

>Buffalo, do you happen to have their installer software for 98 that you

>could email?

 

http://oldapps.com/skype.htm

 

- Franc Zabkar

--

Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.

[Guest thanatoid]

Re: Skype vs. Net2Phone

 

"Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote in

news:09qdnWvOPLRlH9LanZ2dnUVZ_remnZ2d@comcast.com:

> I run Skype on my Win98SE.

> I don't use the Video features so I cannot attest to that,

> but the phone part works great.

 

I thought it was Win2000 and up...

 

Anyway, I have 98SE Lite on my other computer but it doesn't

even have a modem let alone anything better. This machine is 95B

and will remain so until it is dead beyond resuscitation.

[Guest thanatoid]

Re: Skype vs. Net2Phone

 

Franc Zabkar <fzabkar@iinternode.on.net> wrote in

news:o2evk31dl405m4vr4ep6e0ti110ct5m3lr@4ax.com:

> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:21:19 -0600, "none"

> <nospam@bogusaddress.com> put finger to keyboard and

> composed:

>

>>Buffalo, do you happen to have their installer software for

>>98 that you could email?

>

> http://oldapps.com/skype.htm

>

> - Franc Zabkar

 

Franc, you are amazing. I knew about oldversion.com but this one

- OBVIOUS AS HECK as the name is - was unknown to me... Haven't

checked it out yet but I'm sure it's full of goodies!

[Guest mm]

Re: Skype vs. Net2Phone

 

On 30 Nov 2007 07:27:20 GMT, thanatoid <waiting@the.exit.invalid>

wrote:

>"Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote in

>news:09qdnWvOPLRlH9LanZ2dnUVZ_remnZ2d@comcast.com:

>

>> I run Skype on my Win98SE.

>> I don't use the Video features so I cannot attest to that,

>> but the phone part works great.

>

>I thought it was Win2000 and up...

>

>Anyway, I have 98SE Lite on my other computer but it doesn't

>even have a modem let alone anything better. This machine is 95B

>and will remain so until it is dead beyond resuscitation.

 

 

Given your name, are you good or not good at resuscitation?

[Guest mm]

Re: Skype vs. Net2Phone

 

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:10:51 -0500, "Don Phillipson"

<d.phillipsonSPAMBLOCK@rogers.com> wrote:

>"mm" <NOPSAMmm2005@bigfoot.coim> wrote in message

>news:rs2uk3d7g5olgldpaonqp08k08bfji0pfo@4ax.com...

>> The download page for Skype says that it works on win2000 and XP, it

>> might even say you must have one of those, but does that mean for sure

>> that a program written for 2000/xp won't run on win98SE or WinME?

>

>No: it means (a) the manufacturer claims it will work with

>some OSs and not with others; (b) it does not mean the

>product is guaranteed not too run under Win98; it means

>it will very probably not run under Win98. Once in a while

>an app runs under an OS different from what the maker

>claims on the box.

>

>> Also Google Earth says that and so I didn't install it, but maybe I

>> should have tried, if there is some chance it would run.

>>

>> Could it do any damage to install one of these where it wasn't

>> designeed to go?

>

>The likeliest source of damage is overwriting on your hard

>drive a system file with the same name in the app's instal

>procedure. Afterwards your other apps that call this file

>may find it different and therefore perhaps may not work.

 

That's exactly what I was worried about. When I've used SFC, I think

it was, system file checker, I sometimes see files whose date seems

older than it should be. That's a different problem, but it makes me

think I installed old software and it installed a dll or something

that was older than the one that was there. Or some other similar

problem.

 

For example, I'm getting a lot of errors with some module whose name I

don't remember, msg32 or something like that (that gives "Not

responding" in the cntl-alt-delete box, and I keep thinking that some

executable is too old or too new for the environment I have. WinME

laid over win98SE.

>

>> If I can't do this, does anyone know if Net2Phone (which does work on

>> winme and 98SE) can be used to call Skype commputers?

>

>Voice phone calls are indifferent to the system that

>creates and connects them. (Your WinME PC can be

>connected to a Commodore 64 and the data does

>not care how either made the connection.)

 

Good to know. Thanks. If I stay here much longer, maybe I should

encourage my friends back in the US to install either Skype or

Net2phone and then talk to me. This typing is taking a lot of time,

and I'm fairly fast.

[Guest mm]

Re: Skype vs. Net2Phone

 

On 30 Nov 2007 07:30:38 GMT, thanatoid <waiting@the.exit.invalid>

wrote:

>Franc Zabkar <fzabkar@iinternode.on.net> wrote in

>news:o2evk31dl405m4vr4ep6e0ti110ct5m3lr@4ax.com:

>

>> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 22:21:19 -0600, "none"

>> <nospam@bogusaddress.com> put finger to keyboard and

>> composed:

>>

>>>Buffalo, do you happen to have their installer software for

>>>98 that you could email?

>>

>> http://oldapps.com/skype.htm

 

Wow. It pays to ask you guys.

 

Thanks to you and Buffalo.

>>

>> - Franc Zabkar

>

>Franc, you are amazing. I knew about oldversion.com but this one

 

I didn't even know about this one!

>- OBVIOUS AS HECK as the name is - was unknown to me... Haven't

>checked it out yet but I'm sure it's full of goodies!

[Guest mm]

Re: Skype vs. Net2Phone

 

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:10:51 -0500, "Don Phillipson"

<d.phillipsonSPAMBLOCK@rogers.com> wrote:

>

>> If I can't do this, does anyone know if Net2Phone (which does work on

>> winme and 98SE) can be used to call Skype commputers?

>Voice phone calls are indifferent to the system that

>creates and connects them. (Your WinME PC can be

>connected to a Commodore 64 and the data does

>not care how either made the connection.)

 

See, this is the kind of thing a lot of blurbs say, but I realize that

is just the way they think and write and reality can be broader than

the way they express it, and I believe what you say above, but what is

below is the kind of thing that makes me ask questions.

 

"About Skype:

 

Skype is a little program for making free calls over the internet to

anyone else who also has Skype. It’s free and easy to download and

================

use, and works with most computers. Now it also supports video

conferencing over the net."

>--

>Don Phillipson

>Carlsbad Springs

>(Ottawa, Canada)

>

[Guest mm]

Re: Skype vs. Net2Phone

 

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:58:37 -0500, mm <NOPSAMmm2005@bigfoot.coim>

wrote:

 

"Skype users can speak to other Skype users for free. Skype also has

paid services allowing users to call traditional telephone numbers

(SkypeOut), receive calls from traditional phones (SkypeIn), and

receive voicemail messages." Don't know rates yet.

[Guest mm]

Re: Skype vs. Net2Phone

 

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:27:05 -0700, "Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid>

wrote:

>

>I run Skype on my Win98SE.

>I don't use the Video features so I cannot attest to that, but the phone

>part works great.

>

I don't need video. I'd have to get dressed.

 

But the Oldapp page has loads of versoins and it doesn't say how far

back one needs to go to run on win98SE or WINME (which seems almost

the same) . What version are you using?

 

(I know I could just install one after the other, but that doesn't

seem wise.)

[Guest thanatoid]

Re: Skype vs. Net2Phone

 

mm <NOPSAMmm2005@bigfoot.coim> wrote in

news:vb16l3pmqf894sv3796ufrq0mp0ngjkksb@4ax.com:

> On 30 Nov 2007 07:27:20 GMT, thanatoid

> <waiting@the.exit.invalid> wrote:

>

>>"Buffalo" <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote in

>>news:09qdnWvOPLRlH9LanZ2dnUVZ_remnZ2d@comcast.com:

>>

>>> I run Skype on my Win98SE.

>>> I don't use the Video features so I cannot attest to

>>> that, but the phone part works great.

>>

>>I thought it was Win2000 and up...

>>

>>Anyway, I have 98SE Lite on my other computer but it

>>doesn't even have a modem let alone anything better. This

>>machine is 95B and will remain so until it is dead beyond

>>resuscitation.

>

>

> Given your name, are you good or not good at resuscitation?

 

Never tried it. Wouldn't want to either, kind of icky.

[Guest thanatoid]

Re: Skype vs. Net2Phone

 

mm <NOPSAMmm2005@bigfoot.coim> wrote in

news:0u16l3lm3h1d7kssp69cvpbrl3kb4f2lkc@4ax.com:

> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:10:51 -0500, "Don Phillipson"

> <d.phillipsonSPAMBLOCK@rogers.com> wrote:

>

>>

>>> If I can't do this, does anyone know if Net2Phone (which

>>> does work on winme and 98SE) can be used to call Skype

>>> commputers?

>

>>Voice phone calls are indifferent to the system that

>>creates and connects them. (Your WinME PC can be

>>connected to a Commodore 64 and the data does

>>not care how either made the connection.)

>

> See, this is the kind of thing a lot of blurbs say, but I

> realize that is just the way they think and write and

> reality can be broader than the way they express it, and I

> believe what you say above, but what is below is the kind

> of thing that makes me ask questions.

>

> "About Skype:

>

> Skype is a little program for making free calls over the

> internet to anyone else who also has Skype. It’s free and

> easy to download and

> ================

> use, and works with most computers. Now it also supports

> video

> conferencing over the net."

 

All I can say is that I recently had someone call me from the

other side of the world and we talked for 2 hours. He told me it

cost him nothing because he was using Skype.

 

My phone rang, I answered, we talked. The connection was

excellent.

[Guest thanatoid]

Re: Skype vs. Net2Phone

 

mm <NOPSAMmm2005@bigfoot.coim> wrote in

news:v926l3toeg9b7ph4u8oo8qj0brsma5dc4q@4ax.com:

> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:27:05 -0700, "Buffalo"

> <Eric@nada.com.invalid> wrote:

>

>>

>>I run Skype on my Win98SE.

>>I don't use the Video features so I cannot attest to that,

>>but the phone part works great.

>>

> I don't need video. I'd have to get dressed.

>

> But the Oldapp page has loads of versoins and it doesn't

> say how far back one needs to go to run on win98SE or WINME

> (which seems almost the same) . What version are you

> using?

>

> (I know I could just install one after the other, but that

> doesn't seem wise.)

>

 

Oh, life is SOOO hard, isn't it?

Sigh.