Guest r Posted December 7, 2007 Posted December 7, 2007 I recently upgraded to a 1600 x 1200 monitor and discovered that my mouse cursors were bit small. I tried the extra large cursors but they were less than ideal. Searching on the net I found some free cursors at http://qjc.cjb.net/ that were pretty good. The set included some following basic shapes of the windows set but bolder and much easier to see. They were just right for my purposes.
Guest thanatoid Posted December 7, 2007 Posted December 7, 2007 Re: Good set of mouse cursors slightly larger than extra large r <r@bar.com> wrote in news:Xns99FF1E1B34F0CRbarcom@127.0.0.1: > I recently upgraded to a 1600 x 1200 monitor and discovered > that my mouse cursors were bit small. > > I tried the extra large cursors but they were less than > ideal. > > Searching on the net I found some free cursors at > http://qjc.cjb.net/ that were pretty good. The set > included some following basic shapes of the windows set but > bolder and much easier to see. They were just right for my > purposes. Interesting. Occasionally people post links to some "greatest since sliced bread" cursors but they're almost always just the MS crap with different colors. I see this guy actually did what needed to be done. I say interesting because I made my own arrow cursor a long time ago since I consider the stupid Windows arrow totally unacceptable (for one thing, it is not even symmetrical). My arrow is partially transparent, I dare say considerably more elegant that this guy's, while about the same size, and blinks when in "wait" mode. I consider all other cursors largely irrelevant. (After 15 years with Windows I have YET to see the "pen" cursor activate.) -- The only cure for stupidity is death. The only cure for brilliance is death. {© 2007 thanatoid}
Guest MEB Posted December 7, 2007 Posted December 7, 2007 Re: Good set of mouse cursors slightly larger than extra large "thanatoid" <waiting@the.exit.invalid> wrote in message news:Xns99FF90CE86E14thanexit@66.250.146.158... | r <r@bar.com> wrote in | news:Xns99FF1E1B34F0CRbarcom@127.0.0.1: | | > I recently upgraded to a 1600 x 1200 monitor and discovered | > that my mouse cursors were bit small. | > | > I tried the extra large cursors but they were less than | > ideal. | > | > Searching on the net I found some free cursors at | > http://qjc.cjb.net/ that were pretty good. The set | > included some following basic shapes of the windows set but | > bolder and much easier to see. They were just right for my | > purposes. | | Interesting. Occasionally people post links to some "greatest | since sliced bread" cursors but they're almost always just the | MS crap with different colors. I see this guy actually did what | needed to be done. | | I say interesting because I made my own arrow cursor a long time | ago since I consider the stupid Windows arrow totally | unacceptable (for one thing, it is not even symmetrical). My | arrow is partially transparent, I dare say considerably more | elegant that this guy's, while about the same size, and blinks | when in "wait" mode. I consider all other cursors largely | irrelevant. (After 15 years with Windows I have YET to see the | "pen" cursor activate.) | | | -- | The only cure for stupidity is death. | The only cure for brilliance is death. | { 2007 thanatoid} Hmm, your tags are .... ah well ... So the link checks good then, great, we are getting older and may need those LARGE icons some day... did you download them and check for safety? -- MEB http://peoplescounsel.orgfree.com ________
Guest thanatoid Posted December 8, 2007 Posted December 8, 2007 Re: Good set of mouse cursors slightly larger than extra large "MEB" <meb@not here@hotmail.com> wrote in news:#ZHzx0ROIHA.3816@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl: > > > "thanatoid" <waiting@the.exit.invalid> wrote in message > news:Xns99FF90CE86E14thanexit@66.250.146.158... >| r <r@bar.com> wrote in >| news:Xns99FF1E1B34F0CRbarcom@127.0.0.1: >| >| > I recently upgraded to a 1600 x 1200 monitor and >| > discovered that my mouse cursors were bit small. >| > >| > I tried the extra large cursors but they were less than >| > ideal. >| > >| > Searching on the net I found some free cursors at >| > http://qjc.cjb.net/ that were pretty good. The set >| > included some following basic shapes of the windows set >| > but bolder and much easier to see. They were just right >| > for my purposes. >| >| Interesting. Occasionally people post links to some >| "greatest since sliced bread" cursors but they're almost >| always just the MS crap with different colors. I see this >| guy actually did what needed to be done. >| >| I say interesting because I made my own arrow cursor a >| long time ago since I consider the stupid Windows arrow >| totally unacceptable (for one thing, it is not even >| symmetrical). My arrow is partially transparent, I dare >| say considerably more elegant that this guy's, while about >| the same size, and blinks when in "wait" mode. I consider >| all other cursors largely irrelevant. (After 15 years with >| Windows I have YET to see the "pen" cursor activate.) >| >| >| -- >| The only cure for stupidity is death. >| The only cure for brilliance is death. >| { 2007 thanatoid} > > Hmm, your tags are .... ah well ... Huh? > So the link checks good then, great, we are getting older > and may need > those LARGE icons some day... did you download them and > check for safety? Why should I? I just told you I made my own, and they look better. It was just a comment made in a moment of boredom. Anyway, WHY do people always think there's GOT to be malware everywhere? YOUR "newsreader" is the single most dangerous piece of software ever written. -- The only cure for stupidity is death. The only cure for brilliance is death. {© 2007 thanatoid}
Recommended Posts