Jump to content

MSDXM.OCX - invalid page fault


Recommended Posts

Guest Franc Zabkar
Posted

I'm experiencing invalid page faults associated with MSDXM.OCX in the

Windows\System directory. My file version is 6.4.09.1120. This file is

the "Windows Media Player 2 ActiveX Control".

 

MSDXM OCX 843,804 09-05-01 8:00p MSDXM.OCX

 

The program that is generating these faults is in development and I'm

testing it in Win98SE.

 

FWIW, my WMP version is 9.00.00.2980 according to the file properties

of wmplayer.exe, but the Help-About screen shows 9.00.00.3008. <shrug>

 

Is it possible that I have the wrong version of the subject file?

 

- Franc Zabkar

--

Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.

Guest ... et al.
Posted

Re: MSDXM.OCX - invalid page fault

 

Franc Zabkar wrote:

> I'm experiencing invalid page faults associated with MSDXM.OCX in the

> Windows\System directory. My file version is 6.4.09.1120. This file is

> the "Windows Media Player 2 ActiveX Control".

>

> MSDXM OCX 843,804 09-05-01 8:00p MSDXM.OCX

 

Looks like 6.4.*09*.x is for WinNT, 6.4.*07*.x is for Windows.

See <http://support.microsoft.com/kb/832353/> for info and (i

think) latest versions.

 

> The program that is generating these faults is in development and I'm

> testing it in Win98SE.

>

> FWIW, my WMP version is 9.00.00.2980 according to the file properties

> of wmplayer.exe, but the Help-About screen shows 9.00.00.3008. <shrug>

 

(2003-06-07) WM 09.00.00.3008 Update(KB819639) Security(ms03-021)

is probably responsible for that. It includes an updated

[WMP.dll] file.

> Is it possible that I have the wrong version of the subject file?

 

Looks like.

 

 

--

Nah-ah. I'm staying out of this. ... Now, here's my opinion.

 

Please followup in the newsgroup.

E-mail address is invalid due to spam-control.

Guest Franc Zabkar
Posted

Re: MSDXM.OCX - invalid page fault

 

On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 02:16:43 +0100, "... et al."

<look@sig.bcause.this.is.invalid> put finger to keyboard and composed:

>Franc Zabkar wrote:

>

>> I'm experiencing invalid page faults associated with MSDXM.OCX in the

>> Windows\System directory. My file version is 6.4.09.1120. This file is

>> the "Windows Media Player 2 ActiveX Control".

>>

>> MSDXM OCX 843,804 09-05-01 8:00p MSDXM.OCX

>

>Looks like 6.4.*09*.x is for WinNT, 6.4.*07*.x is for Windows.

>See <http://support.microsoft.com/kb/832353/> for info and (i

>think) latest versions.

>

>

>> The program that is generating these faults is in development and I'm

>> testing it in Win98SE.

>>

>> FWIW, my WMP version is 9.00.00.2980 according to the file properties

>> of wmplayer.exe, but the Help-About screen shows 9.00.00.3008. <shrug>

>

>(2003-06-07) WM 09.00.00.3008 Update(KB819639) Security(ms03-021)

>is probably responsible for that. It includes an updated

>[WMP.dll] file.

>

>> Is it possible that I have the wrong version of the subject file?

>

>Looks like.

 

Thanks. I downloaded this update ...

 

http://www.mdgx.com/files/MP832353.EXE

 

.... and copied the respective files to the Windows\System folder.

 

The problem is now solved.

 

- Franc Zabkar

--

Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.

Guest ... et al.
Posted

Re: MSDXM.OCX - invalid page fault

 

Franc Zabkar wrote:

> "... et al." composed:

>

>> Franc Zabkar wrote:

>>

>>> I'm experiencing invalid page faults associated with MSDXM.OCX in the

>>> Windows\System directory. My file version is 6.4.09.1120. This file is

>>> the "Windows Media Player 2 ActiveX Control".

>>>

>>> MSDXM OCX 843,804 09-05-01 8:00p MSDXM.OCX

>>

>> Looks like 6.4.*09*.x is for WinNT, 6.4.*07*.x is for Windows.

>> See <http://support.microsoft.com/kb/832353/> for info and (i

>> think) latest versions.

>>

 

Not that it matters for you (or anyone but me) but a correction:

Looks like 6.4.*09*.x is for WinNT 5.x while 6.4.*07*.x is for

the 4.x versions of both Windows and WinNT. msKB#832353 links

probably to the latest version for Windows(98/ME). WinXP got a

higher version with Service Pack 2 (SP2).

> Thanks. I downloaded this update ...

>

> http://www.mdgx.com/files/MP832353.EXE

>

> ... and copied the respective files to the Windows\System folder.

>

> The problem is now solved.

 

Easy fix then. You're welcome.

 

 

--

Nah-ah. I'm staying out of this. ... Now, here's my opinion.

 

Please followup in the newsgroup.

E-mail address is invalid due to spam-control.

Guest Rick Chauvin
Posted

Re: MSDXM.OCX - invalid page fault

 

 

 

"Franc Zabkar" <fzabkar@iinternode.on.net> wrote in message

news:lrlvn3ltkoc3i5qijh4adt71fds3pj23hn@4ax.com

[....]

> I downloaded this update ...

>

> http://www.mdgx.com/files/MP832353.EXE

>

> ... and copied the respective files to the Windows\System folder.

 

 

'files' as in plural? ..I hope not since that old patch is actually a

regression in most all ways I can see with a "current updated"

W98SE WMP v9 install.

 

msdxm.ocx would be the only one to change if you didn't already have that

v#, unless your setup is old and the other files are newer than yours,

which if that's case your versions are behind what's MS officially

current. Here's my list of updates as of the last time I kept track of it

which is a few years ago now.

 

1. 816044

2. 822964 & 278960

3. 827560

4. 832353

5. 917734

...codecs would be:

WM9Codecs9x.exe

&

wmv9VCMsetup.exe

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

If ever needed a good reference website to put timelines together is:

http://zachd.com/pss/pss.html#wmp9 ..but at this point a pita.

 

Mine is in order because I used to follow it all from the original MS

releases themselves.

 

But I just read your testing something unique anyway so maybe I typed this

all for naught.

 

Rick

 

 

 

>

> The problem is now solved.

>

> - Franc Zabkar

> --

> Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.

Guest Franc Zabkar
Posted

Re: MSDXM.OCX - invalid page fault

 

On Sun, 6 Jan 2008 10:00:58 -0500, "Rick Chauvin"

<justask@nospamz.com> put finger to keyboard and composed:

>"Franc Zabkar" <fzabkar@iinternode.on.net> wrote in message

>news:lrlvn3ltkoc3i5qijh4adt71fds3pj23hn@4ax.com

>[....]

>

>> I downloaded this update ...

>>

>> http://www.mdgx.com/files/MP832353.EXE

>>

>> ... and copied the respective files to the Windows\System folder.

>

>

>'files' as in plural? ..I hope not since that old patch is actually a

>regression in most all ways I can see with a "current updated"

>W98SE WMP v9 install.

>msdxm.ocx would be the only one to change if you didn't already have that

>v#, ...

 

The wmp.dll files remained the same (9.00.00.3093) but my original

wmpcore.dll file was version 9.00.00.2980 (11 December 2002 3:09:24

PM) whereas the patch contained version 7.10.00.3076 (21 November 2003

1:40:42 PM). So maybe I should have left it alone. Anyway, I've

reverted to version 9.00.00.2980 of wmpcore.dll and all is still

working. Thanks.

 

- Franc Zabkar

--

Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.

Guest letterman@invalid.com
Posted

Re: MSDXM.OCX - invalid page fault

 

On Sat, 05 Jan 2008 02:16:43 +0100, "... et al."

<look@sig.bcause.this.is.invalid> wrote:

>Franc Zabkar wrote:

>

>> I'm experiencing invalid page faults associated with MSDXM.OCX in the

>> Windows\System directory. My file version is 6.4.09.1120. This file is

>> the "Windows Media Player 2 ActiveX Control".

>>

>> MSDXM OCX 843,804 09-05-01 8:00p MSDXM.OCX

>

>Looks like 6.4.*09*.x is for WinNT, 6.4.*07*.x is for Windows.

>See <http://support.microsoft.com/kb/832353/> for info and (i

>think) latest versions.

>

Yeah, but this file is for Win2K, Win server 2003, and XP, not for

Win98. I just checked into it because I get this error from time to

time also. I downloaded the file and opened it with Winzip (even

though it's a .EXE). Since this is a Win98 group, why would it be of

interest to anyone using 98?

>

>> The program that is generating these faults is in development and I'm

>> testing it in Win98SE.

>>

>> FWIW, my WMP version is 9.00.00.2980 according to the file properties

>> of wmplayer.exe, but the Help-About screen shows 9.00.00.3008. <shrug>

>

>(2003-06-07) WM 09.00.00.3008 Update(KB819639) Security(ms03-021)

>is probably responsible for that. It includes an updated

>[WMP.dll] file.

>

>> Is it possible that I have the wrong version of the subject file?

>

>Looks like.

Guest ... et al.
Posted

Re: MSDXM.OCX - invalid page fault

 

letterman@invalid.com wrote:

> "... et al." wrote:

>

>> Franc Zabkar wrote:

>>

>>> I'm experiencing invalid page faults associated with MSDXM.OCX in the

>>> Windows\System directory. My file version is 6.4.09.1120. This file is

>>> the "Windows Media Player 2 ActiveX Control".

>>>

>>> MSDXM OCX 843,804 09-05-01 8:00p MSDXM.OCX

>> Looks like 6.4.*09*.x is for WinNT, 6.4.*07*.x is for Windows.

>> See <http://support.microsoft.com/kb/832353/> for info and (i

>> think) latest versions.

>>

> Yeah, but this file is for Win2K, Win server 2003, and XP, not for

> Win98. I just checked into it because I get this error from time to

> time also. I downloaded the file and opened it with Winzip (even

> though it's a .EXE). Since this is a Win98 group, why would it be of

> interest to anyone using 98?

 

The page you get from the link i gave above, give some info that

explains that [msDXM.ocx] 6.4.09.x versions was intended for them

three WinNT 5.x OS versions, while WinME (and by extension also

Win98xE) was still adviced to use 6.4.07.x versions.

 

That page has links to three different downloads and even if

Win98 isn't mentioned, if you are using (Win98FE or) Win98SE, you

should download the update-installer said to be for WinME.

'Windows Media 9.x, 7.1 and 6.4 Update(KB832353) (for WinME)':

<http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=0198F4C8-7135-4421-90CA-61C92AD35FB3>

That download, [WindowsMedia-KB832353-x86-ENU.exe], or the

alternate unofficial Win98 update-installer Franc used,

[MP832353.exe], will contain a 6.4.07.x version of [msDXM.ocx]

that will hopefully cure you just like it did Franc.

 

Since any 6.4.09.x will always be higher then any 6.4.07.y, the

update-installers /hopefully/ *should* refuse to overwrite the

wrong file so you will have a to manually extract and replace the

[msDXM.ocx] files, just like you seemed to be doing.

 

The updates also contain [WMPCore.dll] (for Windows Media 07),

and [WMP.dll] (for Windows Media 09) files, but like Rick wrote

your current installed versions might be higher and in that case

should not be replaced.

 

 

--

Nah-ah. I'm staying out of this. ... Now, here's my opinion.

 

Please followup in the newsgroup.

E-mail address is invalid due to spam-control.

×
×
  • Create New...