Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello,

 

On a Windows 2003/R2 Server running a certificate authority I'm seeing

failed certificate update requests all of a sudden. It started around the

change of the year, so it might very well be some expired certificate.

 

The event log says:

 

CertSvc ID 22

 

Die Anforderung 49 konnte aufgrund eines Fehlers nicht ausgeführt werden:

Die Sperrfunktion konnte die Sperrung nicht überprüfen, da der Sperrserver

offline war. 0x80092013 (-2146885613). Die Anforderung bezog sich auf

CN=somemachinename. Weitere Informationen: Fehler beim Verifizieren der

Anforderungssignatur oder des Signierungszertifikats

 

After some searching it is my conclusion that the CA wasn't able to query

another authority on whether the used certificates might have been revoked in

the meantime. Is this correct, and where can I verify this? (I'm using a

self-created certificate that shouldn't need verification anywhere.)

 

There might be another reason, though: The machines in question (more than

one) have been equiped with a new desktop firewall recently. Do I need to

open ports for the certification update here, and for what process would that

be?

 

Any help would be much appreciated.

 

Regards,

150d

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days

Guest Jabez Gan [MVP]
Posted

Re: CertSvc Event ID 22

 

I couldn't read the event message, but have you tried seearching at

http://www.eventid.net?

 

--

Jabez Gan

Microsoft MVP: Windows Server - File Storage

"150d" <150d@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:0F849648-CF54-4B89-AA6B-B894ABA68218@microsoft.com...

> Hello,

>

> On a Windows 2003/R2 Server running a certificate authority I'm seeing

> failed certificate update requests all of a sudden. It started around the

> change of the year, so it might very well be some expired certificate.

>

> The event log says:

>

> CertSvc ID 22

>

> Die Anforderung 49 konnte aufgrund eines Fehlers nicht ausgeführt werden:

> Die Sperrfunktion konnte die Sperrung nicht überprüfen, da der Sperrserver

> offline war. 0x80092013 (-2146885613). Die Anforderung bezog sich auf

> CN=somemachinename. Weitere Informationen: Fehler beim Verifizieren der

> Anforderungssignatur oder des Signierungszertifikats

>

> After some searching it is my conclusion that the CA wasn't able to query

> another authority on whether the used certificates might have been revoked

> in

> the meantime. Is this correct, and where can I verify this? (I'm using a

> self-created certificate that shouldn't need verification anywhere.)

>

> There might be another reason, though: The machines in question (more than

> one) have been equiped with a new desktop firewall recently. Do I need to

> open ports for the certification update here, and for what process would

> that

> be?

>

> Any help would be much appreciated.

>

> Regards,

> 150d

>

Posted

Re: CertSvc Event ID 22

 

> I couldn't read the event message, but have you tried seearching at

> http://www.eventid.net?

 

Yes, I did. They have the event registered but offer no tips at all.

 

A translation of the reason would be something like that:

 

"The locking function could not check the locking status because the locking

server was offline. The request concerned CN=somemachinename. More

information: Error verifying the request signature or the signing

certificate."

 

The rest, including the exact english translation, is listed at eventid.net.


×
×
  • Create New...