Jump to content

Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

Guest On the Bridge

By Guest On the Bridge
in Windows XP

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Popular Days

Popular Days

Guest Frank

Guest Frank

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

On the Bridge wrote:

> this is a multipage article see the links numbered Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 on the

> bottom of the post to go to the next pages

>

> http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1332&page=2

>

>

I find it amazing that the e-rag journalists fail to read or heed the

release notes for Vista SP1...specifically the part about Superfetch and

usage over time. Time of course being the operative word...time not

being something considered or used in these "tests".

Too bad...but the effect is definitely "flawed" test results.

Who really cares? Well...wannabe e-rag journalists of course.

Fukk'em!

Frank

Guest Spanky deMonkey

Guest Spanky deMonkey

Posted
Posted

You are an imposter

 

You are an imposter

 

you are an imposter of yourself...

 

another clue that shows this.. is that you 2 always post simutainiously...

You both are doris da idiot.

 

For example if you doris posts as kevpan (the theoretically real one) at 2

pm your other enemy doris as kevpan fake or spanky shows up right after you

do..

 

You can see that there is no lag between the first poster and the fake

one... if there was that would show that you are really 2 different people

but you are not. 2 people cant be online all the time ...

 

I have not seen a post from one of you idiots and not a reply from the other

idiot

 

"On the Bridge" <OntheBridge@1701.com> wrote in message

news:47ba4d11@newsgate.x-privat.org...

> this is a multipage article see the links numbered Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 on

> the bottom of the post to go to the next pages

>

> http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1332&page=2

>

Guest On the Bridge

Guest On the Bridge

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

did you see the nature of the tests done?

 

Superfetch works on launching of programs that are frequently used...

The test have very little to do with that

 

Have in mind reports say that SP3 for XP makes it even faster than XP with

SP2...

 

Superfetch is overated as a thing.. XP has prefetch that is similar, just

not that "smart"

 

and then there is a program called ebooster that does similar things for XP

as Vista has readyboost

 

I have tested this and there was no dramatic increase in speed

http://www.eboostr.com/

 

still those who are curious could try it on XP.

 

also on linux there is a better form of ram cache that is far superior to

superfetch.

 

 

"Frank" <fb@samm.zrr> wrote in message

news:un2kplqcIHA.3788@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> On the Bridge wrote:

>> this is a multipage article see the links numbered Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 on

>> the bottom of the post to go to the next pages

>>

>> http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1332&page=2

> I find it amazing that the e-rag journalists fail to read or heed the

> release notes for Vista SP1...specifically the part about Superfetch and

> usage over time. Time of course being the operative word...time not being

> something considered or used in these "tests".

> Too bad...but the effect is definitely "flawed" test results.

> Who really cares? Well...wannabe e-rag journalists of course.

> Fukk'em!

> Frank

Guest Frank

Guest Frank

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

On the Bridge wrote:

> did you see the nature of the tests done?

>

> Superfetch works on launching of programs that are frequently used...

> The test have very little to do with that

 

My point exactly and therein lies the real difference between so-called

"benchmarks" and actual usage.

Benchmarks do not translate to actual longer term usage...which is what

happens in the real world.

>

> Have in mind reports say that SP3 for XP makes it even faster than XP with

> SP2...

>

> Superfetch is overated as a thing.. XP has prefetch that is similar, just

> not that "smart"

>

> and then there is a program called ebooster that does similar things for XP

> as Vista has readyboost

>

> I have tested this and there was no dramatic increase in speed

> http://www.eboostr.com/

>

> still those who are curious could try it on XP.

>

> also on linux there is a better form of ram cache that is far superior to

> superfetch.

 

It's all bullsh*t! If you do similar tasks in XP and Vista on two

similar computers you'd know what I'm talking about.

Vista is not XP+eye-candy.

It is a different and new OS. Some XP tasks take 4-6 clicks to complete

and only take 1 click using Vista. Once XP gets to the actual tasks,

Vista has already completed it!

These "benchmark" test are flawed and can be very misleading.

Anyway who really cares. Vista is the future and the future is

here...right now!

Frank

Guest occam

Guest occam

Posted
Posted

Re: You are an imposter

 

Re: You are an imposter

 

Spanky deMonkey wrote:

> you are an imposter of yourself...

>

 

I think you have been spanking your Monkey for too long. Give it a rest.

You'll go blind.

Guest Steve Thackery

Guest Steve Thackery

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

> Have in mind reports say that SP3 for XP makes it even faster than XP with

> SP2...

 

I've just read a comprehensive test of it, and there is nothing in SP3 that

speeds up XP. It is primarily just a roll up of the countless patches and

upgrades that have streamed out since SP2.

 

SteveT

Guest On the Bridge

Guest On the Bridge

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

other sources and tests show otherwise

 

http://exo-blog.blogspot.com/2007/11/windows-xp-sp3-yields-performance-gains.html

 

that compilation of patches was said for vista too, but its not like that in

the end..

 

Vista with SP1 is faster than vista without

 

and XPsp3 is faster than XPsp2

 

 

"Steve Thackery" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message

news:udbt6ftcIHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> Have in mind reports say that SP3 for XP makes it even faster than XP

>> with SP2...

>

> I've just read a comprehensive test of it, and there is nothing in SP3

> that speeds up XP. It is primarily just a roll up of the countless

> patches and upgrades that have streamed out since SP2.

>

> SteveT

Guest On the Bridge

Guest On the Bridge

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

"Since SP3 was supposed to be mostly a bug-fix/patch consolidation release,

the unexpected speed boost comes as a nice bonus," Barth said. "In fact, XP

SP3 is shaping up to be a 'must-have' update for the majority of users who

are still running Redmond's not-so-latest and greatest desktop OS."

 

 

via

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9048658&source=rss_news50

 

 

"Steve Thackery" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message

news:udbt6ftcIHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> Have in mind reports say that SP3 for XP makes it even faster than XP

>> with SP2...

>

> I've just read a comprehensive test of it, and there is nothing in SP3

> that speeds up XP. It is primarily just a roll up of the countless

> patches and upgrades that have streamed out since SP2.

>

> SteveT

Guest Mike Hall - MVP

Guest Mike Hall - MVP

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

"On the Bridge" <OntheBridge@1701.com> wrote in message

news:47baa948$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...

> "Since SP3 was supposed to be mostly a bug-fix/patch consolidation

> release, the unexpected speed boost comes as a nice bonus," Barth said.

> "In fact, XP SP3 is shaping up to be a 'must-have' update for the majority

> of users who are still running Redmond's not-so-latest and greatest

> desktop OS."

>

>

> via

> http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9048658&source=rss_news50

>

>

> "Steve Thackery" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message

> news:udbt6ftcIHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>> Have in mind reports say that SP3 for XP makes it even faster than XP

>>> with SP2...

>>

>> I've just read a comprehensive test of it, and there is nothing in SP3

>> that speeds up XP. It is primarily just a roll up of the countless

>> patches and upgrades that have streamed out since SP2.

>>

>> SteveT

>

>

 

 

I installed XP SP3 beta on a machine here and have noticed no perceptible

increase in speed at all..

 

--

Mike Hall - MVP

How to construct a good post..

http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm

How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups..

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc

Mike's Window - My Blog..

http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx

Guest thetruthhurts @homail.com

Guest thetruthhurts @homail.com

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:42:13 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>On the Bridge wrote:

>> this is a multipage article see the links numbered Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 on the

>> bottom of the post to go to the next pages

>>

>> http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1332&page=2

>>

>>

>I find it amazing that the e-rag journalists fail to read or heed the

>release notes for Vista SP1...specifically the part about Superfetch and

>usage over time. Time of course being the operative word...time not

>being something considered or used in these "tests".

>Too bad...but the effect is definitely "flawed" test results.

>Who really cares? Well...wannabe e-rag journalists of course.

>Fukk'em!

>Frank

 

Do you have any factual data you'd care to share, Senor Village Idiot?

Guest On the Bridge

Guest On the Bridge

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

if you see a graph on that site I gave, the difference is small..

 

I would not be surprised that you cannot perceive a difference.. you were

the same one that postulated that vista was as fast as XP.. LOL

 

Even with SP1 on vista, XP still beats Vista hands down on everything... and

the difference is VERY noticeable.. and these guys have done the tests that

agree on my personal observations on many computers.

 

 

 

 

"Mike Hall - MVP" <mikehall@mvps.com> wrote in message

news:%23V6G9BwcIHA.5400@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

> "On the Bridge" <OntheBridge@1701.com> wrote in message

> news:47baa948$1@newsgate.x-privat.org...

>> "Since SP3 was supposed to be mostly a bug-fix/patch consolidation

>> release, the unexpected speed boost comes as a nice bonus," Barth said.

>> "In fact, XP SP3 is shaping up to be a 'must-have' update for the

>> majority of users who are still running Redmond's not-so-latest and

>> greatest desktop OS."

>>

>>

>> via

>> http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9048658&source=rss_news50

>>

>>

>> "Steve Thackery" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message

>> news:udbt6ftcIHA.1208@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>>> Have in mind reports say that SP3 for XP makes it even faster than XP

>>>> with SP2...

>>>

>>> I've just read a comprehensive test of it, and there is nothing in SP3

>>> that speeds up XP. It is primarily just a roll up of the countless

>>> patches and upgrades that have streamed out since SP2.

>>>

>>> SteveT

>>

>>

>

>

> I installed XP SP3 beta on a machine here and have noticed no perceptible

> increase in speed at all..

>

> --

> Mike Hall - MVP

> How to construct a good post..

> http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm

> How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups..

> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?pr=newswhelp&style=toc

> Mike's Window - My Blog..

> http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx

>

>

>

>

Guest Frank

Guest Frank

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

thetruthhurts @homail.com wrote:

> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:42:13 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>

>

>>On the Bridge wrote:

>>

>>>this is a multipage article see the links numbered Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 on the

>>>bottom of the post to go to the next pages

>>>

>>>http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1332&page=2

>>>

>>>

>>

>>I find it amazing that the e-rag journalists fail to read or heed the

>>release notes for Vista SP1...specifically the part about Superfetch and

>>usage over time. Time of course being the operative word...time not

>>being something considered or used in these "tests".

>>Too bad...but the effect is definitely "flawed" test results.

>>Who really cares? Well...wannabe e-rag journalists of course.

>>Fukk'em!

>>Frank

>

>

> Do you have any factual data you'd care to share, Senor Village Idiot?

 

Yeah you fukkin moron...it's called daily production use. Also read (if

you can) the white paper that is available concerning Vista SP1 and what

to expect when it is installed.

You're pretty stupid aren't you.

Frank

Guest thetruthhurts @homail.com

Guest thetruthhurts @homail.com

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:32:04 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>thetruthhurts @homail.com wrote:

>

>> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:42:13 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>>

>>

>>>On the Bridge wrote:

>>>

>>>>this is a multipage article see the links numbered Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 on the

>>>>bottom of the post to go to the next pages

>>>>

>>>>http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1332&page=2

>>>>

>>>>

>>>

>>>I find it amazing that the e-rag journalists fail to read or heed the

>>>release notes for Vista SP1...specifically the part about Superfetch and

>>>usage over time. Time of course being the operative word...time not

>>>being something considered or used in these "tests".

>>>Too bad...but the effect is definitely "flawed" test results.

>>>Who really cares? Well...wannabe e-rag journalists of course.

>>>Fukk'em!

>>>Frank

>>

>>

>> Do you have any factual data you'd care to share, Senor Village Idiot?

>

>Yeah you fukkin moron...it's called daily production use. Also read (if

>you can) the white paper that is available concerning Vista SP1 and what

>to expect when it is installed.

>You're pretty stupid aren't you.

>Frank

 

Yeah you're right ignore all the benchmarks, ignore the IT experts,

ignore the PC publications. All because our Village Idiot has a copy

of Vista running in the back of his video store.

Guest Frank

Guest Frank

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

thetruthhurts @homail.com wrote:

> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:32:04 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>

>

>>thetruthhurts @homail.com wrote:

>>

>>

>>>On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:42:13 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>>On the Bridge wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>this is a multipage article see the links numbered Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 on the

>>>>>bottom of the post to go to the next pages

>>>>>

>>>>>http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1332&page=2

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>

>>>>I find it amazing that the e-rag journalists fail to read or heed the

>>>>release notes for Vista SP1...specifically the part about Superfetch and

>>>>usage over time. Time of course being the operative word...time not

>>>>being something considered or used in these "tests".

>>>>Too bad...but the effect is definitely "flawed" test results.

>>>>Who really cares? Well...wannabe e-rag journalists of course.

>>>>Fukk'em!

>>>>Frank

>>>

>>>

>>>Do you have any factual data you'd care to share, Senor Village Idiot?

>>

>>Yeah you fukkin moron...it's called daily production use. Also read (if

>>you can) the white paper that is available concerning Vista SP1 and what

>>to expect when it is installed.

>>You're pretty stupid aren't you.

>>Frank

>

>

> Yeah you're right ignore all the benchmarks, ignore the IT experts,

> ignore the PC publications.

 

Ignore? Who cares about "drag-racing" computers? That is not what

computers are used for. I guess you didn't realize that huh?

 

All because our Village Idiot has a copy

of Vista running in the back of his video store.

 

Video store? Think you could stick your bald head any further up your

dumb ass you stupid POS!

Frank

Guest Frank's Momma

Guest Frank's Momma

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:29:53 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>thetruthhurts @homail.com wrote:

>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:32:04 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>>

>>

>>>thetruthhurts @homail.com wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>>On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:42:13 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>On the Bridge wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>this is a multipage article see the links numbered Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 on the

>>>>>>bottom of the post to go to the next pages

>>>>>>

>>>>>>http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1332&page=2

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>I find it amazing that the e-rag journalists fail to read or heed the

>>>>>release notes for Vista SP1...specifically the part about Superfetch and

>>>>>usage over time. Time of course being the operative word...time not

>>>>>being something considered or used in these "tests".

>>>>>Too bad...but the effect is definitely "flawed" test results.

>>>>>Who really cares? Well...wannabe e-rag journalists of course.

>>>>>Fukk'em!

>>>>>Frank

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>Do you have any factual data you'd care to share, Senor Village Idiot?

>>>

>>>Yeah you fukkin moron...it's called daily production use. Also read (if

>>>you can) the white paper that is available concerning Vista SP1 and what

>>>to expect when it is installed.

>>>You're pretty stupid aren't you.

>>>Frank

>>

>>

>> Yeah you're right ignore all the benchmarks, ignore the IT experts,

>> ignore the PC publications.

>

>Ignore? Who cares about "drag-racing" computers? That is not what

>computers are used for. I guess you didn't realize that huh?

>

>All because our Village Idiot has a copy

>of Vista running in the back of his video store.

>

>Video store? Think you could stick your bald head any further up your

>dumb ass you stupid POS!

>Frank

 

 

Frankie tell the truth we all know you run a copy of Vista home in

your gay video store.

Guest Frank

Guest Frank

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

Frank's Momma wrote:

> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:29:53 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>

>

>>thetruthhurts @homail.com wrote:

>>

>>>On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:32:04 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>>thetruthhurts @homail.com wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:42:13 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>On the Bridge wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>this is a multipage article see the links numbered Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 on the

>>>>>>>bottom of the post to go to the next pages

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1332&page=2

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>I find it amazing that the e-rag journalists fail to read or heed the

>>>>>>release notes for Vista SP1...specifically the part about Superfetch and

>>>>>>usage over time. Time of course being the operative word...time not

>>>>>>being something considered or used in these "tests".

>>>>>>Too bad...but the effect is definitely "flawed" test results.

>>>>>>Who really cares? Well...wannabe e-rag journalists of course.

>>>>>>Fukk'em!

>>>>>>Frank

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>Do you have any factual data you'd care to share, Senor Village Idiot?

>>>>

>>>>Yeah you fukkin moron...it's called daily production use. Also read (if

>>>>you can) the white paper that is available concerning Vista SP1 and what

>>>>to expect when it is installed.

>>>>You're pretty stupid aren't you.

>>>>Frank

>>>

>>>

>>>Yeah you're right ignore all the benchmarks, ignore the IT experts,

>>>ignore the PC publications.

>>

>>Ignore? Who cares about "drag-racing" computers? That is not what

>>computers are used for. I guess you didn't realize that huh?

>>

>>All because our Village Idiot has a copy

>>of Vista running in the back of his video store.

>>

>>Video store? Think you could stick your bald head any further up your

>>dumb ass you stupid POS!

>>Frank

>

>

>

> Frankie tell the truth we all know you run a copy of Vista home in

> your gay video store.

 

Afraid to post under your usual handle "thetruthhurts"...I guess it

really does huh?

You're stupid and weak...LOL!

Frank

Guest Frank's Momma

Guest Frank's Momma

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:09:35 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>Frank's Momma wrote:

>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:29:53 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>>

>>

>>>thetruthhurts @homail.com wrote:

>>>

>>>>On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:32:04 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>thetruthhurts @homail.com wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:42:13 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>On the Bridge wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>this is a multipage article see the links numbered Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 on the

>>>>>>>>bottom of the post to go to the next pages

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1332&page=2

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>I find it amazing that the e-rag journalists fail to read or heed the

>>>>>>>release notes for Vista SP1...specifically the part about Superfetch and

>>>>>>>usage over time. Time of course being the operative word...time not

>>>>>>>being something considered or used in these "tests".

>>>>>>>Too bad...but the effect is definitely "flawed" test results.

>>>>>>>Who really cares? Well...wannabe e-rag journalists of course.

>>>>>>>Fukk'em!

>>>>>>>Frank

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>Do you have any factual data you'd care to share, Senor Village Idiot?

>>>>>

>>>>>Yeah you fukkin moron...it's called daily production use. Also read (if

>>>>>you can) the white paper that is available concerning Vista SP1 and what

>>>>>to expect when it is installed.

>>>>>You're pretty stupid aren't you.

>>>>>Frank

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>Yeah you're right ignore all the benchmarks, ignore the IT experts,

>>>>ignore the PC publications.

>>>

>>>Ignore? Who cares about "drag-racing" computers? That is not what

>>>computers are used for. I guess you didn't realize that huh?

>>>

>>>All because our Village Idiot has a copy

>>>of Vista running in the back of his video store.

>>>

>>>Video store? Think you could stick your bald head any further up your

>>>dumb ass you stupid POS!

>>>Frank

>>

>>

>>

>> Frankie tell the truth we all know you run a copy of Vista home in

>> your gay video store.

>

>Afraid to post under your usual handle "thetruthhurts"...I guess it

>really does huh?

>You're stupid and weak...LOL!

>Frank

 

My mistake son, Vista Business

Guest Frank

Guest Frank

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

Frank's Momma wrote:

> On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:09:35 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>

>

>>Frank's Momma wrote:

>>

>>>On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:29:53 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>>thetruthhurts @homail.com wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>>On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 08:32:04 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>>thetruthhurts @homail.com wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>>On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:42:13 -0800, Frank <fb@samm.zrr> wrote:

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>On the Bridge wrote:

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>this is a multipage article see the links numbered Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 on the

>>>>>>>>>bottom of the post to go to the next pages

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=1332&page=2

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>>I find it amazing that the e-rag journalists fail to read or heed the

>>>>>>>>release notes for Vista SP1...specifically the part about Superfetch and

>>>>>>>>usage over time. Time of course being the operative word...time not

>>>>>>>>being something considered or used in these "tests".

>>>>>>>>Too bad...but the effect is definitely "flawed" test results.

>>>>>>>>Who really cares? Well...wannabe e-rag journalists of course.

>>>>>>>>Fukk'em!

>>>>>>>>Frank

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>Do you have any factual data you'd care to share, Senor Village Idiot?

>>>>>>

>>>>>>Yeah you fukkin moron...it's called daily production use. Also read (if

>>>>>>you can) the white paper that is available concerning Vista SP1 and what

>>>>>>to expect when it is installed.

>>>>>>You're pretty stupid aren't you.

>>>>>>Frank

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>Yeah you're right ignore all the benchmarks, ignore the IT experts,

>>>>>ignore the PC publications.

>>>>

>>>>Ignore? Who cares about "drag-racing" computers? That is not what

>>>>computers are used for. I guess you didn't realize that huh?

>>>>

>>>>All because our Village Idiot has a copy

>>>>of Vista running in the back of his video store.

>>>>

>>>>Video store? Think you could stick your bald head any further up your

>>>>dumb ass you stupid POS!

>>>>Frank

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>Frankie tell the truth we all know you run a copy of Vista home in

>>>your gay video store.

>>

>>Afraid to post under your usual handle "thetruthhurts"...I guess it

>>really does huh?

>>You're stupid and weak...LOL!

>>Frank

>

>

> My mistake son, Vista Business

 

Get a life!

Frank

Guest occam

Guest occam

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

Mike Hall - MVP wrote:

\

>

>

> I installed XP SP3 beta on a machine here and have noticed no

> perceptible increase in speed at all..

>

 

So, its your internal clock vs the timed measurements in the survey. Let

me see now....

Guest occam

Guest occam

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

Frank wrote:

>>

>> Do you have any factual data you'd care to share, Senor Village Idiot?

>

> Yeah you fukkin moron...it's called daily production use. Also read (if

> you can) the white paper that is available concerning Vista SP1 and what

> to expect when it is installed.

 

You believe everything you read Frank? Especially biased 'wish lists'

thinly guised as white papers from MS? Have a good look in the mirror

for a real "fukkin moron", you foul-mouthed zit!

Guest Frank

Guest Frank

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

occam wrote:

> Frank wrote:

>

>>>

>>> Do you have any factual data you'd care to share, Senor Village Idiot?

>>

>>

>> Yeah you fukkin moron...it's called daily production use. Also read

>> (if you can) the white paper that is available concerning Vista SP1

>> and what to expect when it is installed.

>

>

> You believe everything you read Frank? Especially biased 'wish lists'

> thinly guised as white papers from MS? Have a good look in the mirror

> for a real "fukkin moron", you foul-mouthed zit!

>

>

You idiot!

I only believe what happens on our computers.

Frank

Guest On the Bridge

Guest On the Bridge

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

I want to state here that I have discovered a phenomena called "The Frank

Effect"

whenever someone comes in close proximity to frank and starts talking to him

even via the internet,

suddenly an urge to start swearing and calling names is transfered from

frank to the other party.

 

 

 

 

"Frank" <fb@sort.zum> wrote in message

news:uZzUdGzcIHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> occam wrote:

>> Frank wrote:

>>

>>>>

>>>> Do you have any factual data you'd care to share, Senor Village Idiot?

>>>

>>>

>>> Yeah you fukkin moron...it's called daily production use. Also read (if

>>> you can) the white paper that is available concerning Vista SP1 and what

>>> to expect when it is installed.

>>

>>

>> You believe everything you read Frank? Especially biased 'wish lists'

>> thinly guised as white papers from MS? Have a good look in the mirror for

>> a real "fukkin moron", you foul-mouthed zit!

>>

>>

> You idiot!

> I only believe what happens on our computers.

> Frank

Guest Frank

Guest Frank

Posted
Posted

Re: Vista SP1 vs. XP SP2 - Benchmarked

 

On the Bridge wrote:

 

 

....nothing of any importance. Hey capin' crunch...what's wrong...can't

get that cardboard space ship to fly...LOL!

Well...go cry to your mommy.

Frank

Guest Bill Yanaire

Guest Bill Yanaire

Posted
Posted

What Frank Believes

 

What Frank Believes

 

 

"occam" <occam@razor.dot.com> wrote in message

news:eTMtZ%23ycIHA.5900@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> Frank wrote:

>

>>>

>>> Do you have any factual data you'd care to share, Senor Village Idiot?

>>

>> Yeah you fukkin moron...it's called daily production use. Also read (if

>> you can) the white paper that is available concerning Vista SP1 and what

>> to expect when it is installed.

>

> You believe everything you read Frank? Especially biased 'wish lists'

> thinly guised as white papers from MS? Have a good look in the mirror for

> a real "fukkin moron", you foul-mouthed zit!

>

>

 

Frank believes that you are a DOUCHE BAG.

 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...