subinacl /subdirectories %SystemDrive% /grant=administrators=f/grant=SYSTEM=f fails

[Guest Trups]

subinacl /subdirectories %SystemDrive% /grant=administrators=f /

grant=SYSTEM=f

 

Giving failed on my XP. Does anyone know the reason?

Thanks

Trups

[Guest Pegasus \(MVP\)]

Re: subinacl /subdirectories %SystemDrive% /grant=administrators=f /grant=SYSTEM=f fails

 

Re: subinacl /subdirectories %SystemDrive% /grant=administrators=f /grant=SYSTEM=f fails

 

 

"Trups" <Samant.Trupti@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:415225ca-7bd6-4b99-9d4b-0c2baafa0181@n77g2000hse.googlegroups.com...

> subinacl /subdirectories %SystemDrive% /grant=administrators=f /

> grant=SYSTEM=f

>

> Giving failed on my XP. Does anyone know the reason?

> Thanks

> Trups

 

I recommend you use cacls.exe instead of subinacl.exe -

its syntax is much easier to comprehend.

[Guest Trups]

Re: subinacl /subdirectories %SystemDrive% /grant=administrators=f/grant=SYSTEM=f fails

 

Re: subinacl /subdirectories %SystemDrive% /grant=administrators=f/grant=SYSTEM=f fails

 

 

It is a requirement to use this exe. Syntax I have checked. It's

fine.

[Guest Pegasus \(MVP\)]

Re: subinacl /subdirectories %SystemDrive% /grant=administrators=f /grant=SYSTEM=f fails

 

Re: subinacl /subdirectories %SystemDrive% /grant=administrators=f /grant=SYSTEM=f fails

 

 

"Trups" <Samant.Trupti@gmail.com> wrote in message

news:4f3d7c2a-4fb2-4cbf-a5c2-491e3c2dc60d@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

>

> It is a requirement to use this exe. Syntax I have checked. It's

> fine.

 

If your syntax was OK then the command would work.

Have a look here for a full explanation of the syntax:

http://www.analogduck.com/main/subinacl

If it is a requirement in your company to use subinacl

then you probably have to spend the time to become

fully familiar with its syntax. It's not an easy task - this

is why I prefer cacls.exe or fileacl.exe.