Multi-Core CPU patch?

[Guest KlausK]

I got to know about the multi-core processor patch for the XP SP2. I have

two desktop PC (Q6600 & E6400) running the XP SP2. Should I install the

patch? According to MS, it fixes some problems related to ACPI processor

states.

[Guest David H. Lipman]

Re: Multi-Core CPU patch?

 

From: "KlausK" <dinga@noone.com>

 

| I got to know about the multi-core processor patch for the XP SP2. I have

| two desktop PC (Q6600 & E6400) running the XP SP2. Should I install the

| patch? According to MS, it fixes some problems related to ACPI processor

| states.

|

 

Please don't Multi-Post.

Please learn to Cross-Post to pertinent, On Topic, News Groups instead.

 

--

Dave

http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html

Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[Guest Colin Barnhorst]

Re: Multi-Core CPU patch?

 

What is the KB number?

 

"KlausK" <dinga@noone.com> wrote in message

news:47cf0585$0$15178$607ed4bc@cv.net...

>I got to know about the multi-core processor patch for the XP SP2. I have

>two desktop PC (Q6600 & E6400) running the XP SP2. Should I install the

>patch? According to MS, it fixes some problems related to ACPI processor

>states.

>

[Guest KlausK]

Re: Multi-Core CPU patch?

 

 

"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message

news:uRt4cowfIHA.5280@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

> From: "KlausK" <dinga@noone.com>

>

> | I got to know about the multi-core processor patch for the XP SP2. I

> have

> | two desktop PC (Q6600 & E6400) running the XP SP2. Should I install the

> | patch? According to MS, it fixes some problems related to ACPI processor

> | states.

> |

>

> Please don't Multi-Post.

> Please learn to Cross-Post to pertinent, On Topic, News Groups instead.

>

 

I separately posted at two different XP NGs pertinent to this issue. Why is

it considered multi-post?

[Guest PD43]

Re: Multi-Core CPU patch?

 

"KlausK" <dinga@noone.com> wrote:

>> Please don't Multi-Post.

>> Please learn to Cross-Post to pertinent, On Topic, News Groups instead.

>>

>

>I separately posted at two different XP NGs pertinent to this issue. Why is

>it considered multi-post?

 

Because you separately posted at two different XP NGs.

 

When posting, do it to ALL NGs of interest at the same time... i.e.,

CROSSPOST.

[Guest David H. Lipman]

Re: Multi-Core CPU patch?

 

From: "KlausK" <dinga@noone.com>

 

>> Please don't Multi-Post.

>> Please learn to Cross-Post to pertinent, On Topic, News Groups instead.

>>

| I separately posted at two different XP NGs pertinent to this issue. Why is

| it considered multi-post?

|

 

Because you created multiple posts. If you created one post that had both news groups in

the post then your one post would go to both locations. Thus a replier who replied to the

post would also place the reply in both both groups. Thus benefiting all that read the

thread.

 

 

--

Dave

http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html

Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp

[Guest mikeyhsd]

Re: Multi-Core CPU patch?

 

because we have NET NANNIES.

 

 

 

 

mikeyhsd@sprintpcs.com

 

 

 

"KlausK" <dinga@noone.com> wrote in message news:47cf3819$0$25025$607ed4bc@cv.net...

 

"David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message

news:uRt4cowfIHA.5280@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

> From: "KlausK" <dinga@noone.com>

>

> | I got to know about the multi-core processor patch for the XP SP2. I

> have

> | two desktop PC (Q6600 & E6400) running the XP SP2. Should I install the

> | patch? According to MS, it fixes some problems related to ACPI processor

> | states.

> |

>

> Please don't Multi-Post.

> Please learn to Cross-Post to pertinent, On Topic, News Groups instead.

>

 

I separately posted at two different XP NGs pertinent to this issue. Why is

it considered multi-post?