Guest dubh@vodafone.ie Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 I've set up a lab to do some basic testing involving moving shares to AD. On the stand-alone (workgroup) server I've set up some shares with various permissions. The permissions need to satisfy the following criteria: 1. allow only read access to members of certain groups. 2. allow read and write access to members of certain groups. 3. allow full-control to members of certain groups to any files or folders they create within a specified share. Steps 1 and 2 work fine (as they shoud); however, I cannot get a user belonging to the 3rd group to control access etc to any folders he creaes on a share. I've tried every possible combination of Share Permissions and NTFS Security short of allowing full ANONYMOUS access to the whole drive. Can anyone shed light on this or am I missing something obvious??? Thanks Brian
Guest lforbes Posted March 21, 2008 Posted March 21, 2008 RE: W2K3 WORKGROUP share permissions problem Hi, If you look at the default permissions on C:\ of any Windows XP machine it will give you an idea. Add the user CREATOR/OWNER and give it Full Control of all subdirectories and files (usually default permission). This means anyone who creates a file or folder will get full control of that file/folder. Cheers, Lara "dubh@vodafone.ie" wrote: > I've set up a lab to do some basic testing involving moving shares to > AD. On the stand-alone (workgroup) server I've set up some shares with > various permissions. The permissions need to satisfy the following > criteria: > > 1. allow only read access to members of certain groups. > 2. allow read and write access to members of certain groups. > 3. allow full-control to members of certain groups to any files or > folders they create within a specified share. > > Steps 1 and 2 work fine (as they shoud); however, I cannot get a user > belonging to the 3rd group to control access etc to any folders he > creaes on a share. I've tried every possible combination of Share > Permissions and NTFS Security short of allowing full ANONYMOUS access > to the whole drive. Can anyone shed light on this or am I missing > something obvious??? > > Thanks > > Brian >
Recommended Posts