How much protection?

[Guest slick1]

> After reading many and various posts in this and other Newsgroups, I am a

little curious and confused by what I read on the topic of how much

protection one needs on their system.

> All MVP's seem to agree that only one Firewall is needed; good! But many MVP's seem to disagree on how much anti-virus protection one needs. Some say only one is needed, while others say two, three or even more are needed.

> Currently on my system I have Windows Firewall, AVG (free edition 7.5), SuperAntiSpyware (free version 3.9), Spybot S&D (free version 1.5), Ad-Aware 2007 (free edition), Spyware Blaster (free edition 4.0), Windows Defender and Windows Malicious Software Tool.

> Now my question is : Do I need all this anti-virus protection or just one or two? I get a little ticked having to update definitions all the time and having my system slowed down while I'm trying to work because an anti-virus program is running at the same time. I could also use the disk space and possibly, (hopefully), speed-up the boot time.

> My System: Acer 2450 laptop

Windows XP , Home Edition

SP2

Explorer 7

> I would really appreciate any info or comments on this topic so I can finally make a decision to remove or not to remove some of my anti-virus programs. THANK-YOU !

[Guest PA Bear [MS MVP]]

Re: How much protection?

 

(Please don't use/add carats [ > ] for punctuation.)

> Currently on my system I have Windows Firewall, AVG (free edition 7.5),

> S*perAntiSpyware (free version 3.9), Spybot S&D (free version 1.5),

> Ad-Aware 2007 (free edition), Spyware Blaster (free edition 4.0), Windows

> Defender and Windows Malicious Software Tool.

 

Of all those applications, only AVG is an anti-virus application, and the

Malicious Software *Removal* Tool is not an installed application nor does

it provide any real-time protection.

 

Some would consider the real-time protections afforded by SAS, Ad-Aware

2007, Spybot, and Defender to be overkill. I'm one of them, but YMMV. If

it were my machine (and your browsing habits were as safe as mine), I'd

uninstall SAS, Ad-Aware, and Spybot...and replace AVG with something more

reliable and robust. Again, YMMV. One size does not necessarily fit all

here.

 

This is what's really important:

 

Before You Connect a New Computer to the Internet

http://www.cert.org/tech_tips/before_you_plug_in.html

 

Also see:

 

Security FAQ & Checklist

http://www.dslreports.com/faq/8463

--

~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)

MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002

AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net

DTS-L http://dts-l.net/

 

 

slick1 wrote:

>> After reading many and various posts in this and other Newsgroups, I am a

> little curious and confused by what I read on the topic of how much

> protection one needs on their system.

>> All MVP's seem to agree that only one Firewall is needed; good! But many

>> MVP's seem to disagree on how much anti-virus protection one needs. Some

>> say only one is needed, while others say two, three or even more are

>> needed.

>> Currently on my system I have Windows Firewall, AVG (free edition 7.5),

>> S*perAntiSpyware (free version 3.9), Spybot S&D (free version 1.5),

>> Ad-Aware 2007 (free edition), Spyware Blaster (free edition 4.0), Windows

>> Defender and Windows Malicious Software Tool.

>> Now my question is : Do I need all this anti-virus protection or just

>> one

>> or two? I get a little ticked having to update definitions all the time

>> and having my system slowed down while I'm trying to work because an

>> anti-virus program is running at the same time. I could also use the

>> disk

>> space and possibly, (hopefully), speed-up the boot time. My System: Acer

>> 2450 laptop

> Windows XP , Home Edition

> SP2

> Explorer 7

>> I would really appreciate any info or comments on this topic so I can

>> finally make a decision to remove or not to remove some of my anti-virus

>> programs. THANK-YOU !

[Guest slick1]

Re: How much protection?

 

To PA Bear: What would you recommend to replace AVG? (something free).

 

"PA Bear [MS MVP]" wrote:

> (Please don't use/add carats [ > ] for punctuation.)

>

> > Currently on my system I have Windows Firewall, AVG (free edition 7.5),

> > S*perAntiSpyware (free version 3.9), Spybot S&D (free version 1.5),

> > Ad-Aware 2007 (free edition), Spyware Blaster (free edition 4.0), Windows

> > Defender and Windows Malicious Software Tool.

>

> Of all those applications, only AVG is an anti-virus application, and the

> Malicious Software *Removal* Tool is not an installed application nor does

> it provide any real-time protection.

>

> Some would consider the real-time protections afforded by SAS, Ad-Aware

> 2007, Spybot, and Defender to be overkill. I'm one of them, but YMMV. If

> it were my machine (and your browsing habits were as safe as mine), I'd

> uninstall SAS, Ad-Aware, and Spybot...and replace AVG with something more

> reliable and robust. Again, YMMV. One size does not necessarily fit all

> here.

>

> This is what's really important:

>

> Before You Connect a New Computer to the Internet

> http://www.cert.org/tech_tips/before_you_plug_in.html

>

> Also see:

>

> Security FAQ & Checklist

> http://www.dslreports.com/faq/8463

> --

> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)

> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002

> AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net

> DTS-L http://dts-l.net/

>

>

> slick1 wrote:

> >> After reading many and various posts in this and other Newsgroups, I am a

> > little curious and confused by what I read on the topic of how much

> > protection one needs on their system.

> >> All MVP's seem to agree that only one Firewall is needed; good! But many

> >> MVP's seem to disagree on how much anti-virus protection one needs. Some

> >> say only one is needed, while others say two, three or even more are

> >> needed.

> >> Currently on my system I have Windows Firewall, AVG (free edition 7.5),

> >> S*perAntiSpyware (free version 3.9), Spybot S&D (free version 1.5),

> >> Ad-Aware 2007 (free edition), Spyware Blaster (free edition 4.0), Windows

> >> Defender and Windows Malicious Software Tool.

> >> Now my question is : Do I need all this anti-virus protection or just

> >> one

> >> or two? I get a little ticked having to update definitions all the time

> >> and having my system slowed down while I'm trying to work because an

> >> anti-virus program is running at the same time. I could also use the

> >> disk

> >> space and possibly, (hopefully), speed-up the boot time. My System: Acer

> >> 2450 laptop

> > Windows XP , Home Edition

> > SP2

> > Explorer 7

> >> I would really appreciate any info or comments on this topic so I can

> >> finally make a decision to remove or not to remove some of my anti-virus

> >> programs. THANK-YOU !

>

>

[Guest Frank Saunders MS-MVP IE,OE/WM]

Re: How much protection?

 

"slick1" <slick1@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:2D997DB7-F22F-4C72-83C7-4DAFCFC19401@microsoft.com...

>> After reading many and various posts in this and other Newsgroups, I am a

> little curious and confused by what I read on the topic of how much

> protection one needs on their system.

>> All MVP's seem to agree that only one Firewall is needed; good! But many

>> MVP's seem to disagree on how much anti-virus protection one needs. Some

>> say only one is needed, while others say two, three or even more are

>> needed.

>> Currently on my system I have Windows Firewall, AVG (free edition 7.5),

>> SuperAntiSpyware (free version 3.9), Spybot S&D (free version 1.5),

>> Ad-Aware 2007 (free edition), Spyware Blaster (free edition 4.0), Windows

>> Defender and Windows Malicious Software Tool.

>> Now my question is : Do I need all this anti-virus protection or just

>> one or two? I get a little ticked having to update definitions all the

>> time and having my system slowed down while I'm trying to work because an

>> anti-virus program is running at the same time. I could also use the

>> disk space and possibly, (hopefully), speed-up the boot time.

>> My System: Acer 2450 laptop

> Windows XP , Home Edition

> SP2

> Explorer 7

>> I would really appreciate any info or comments on this topic so I can

>> finally make a decision to remove or not to remove some of my anti-virus

>> programs. THANK-YOU !

 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with most of what Robear said.

To add, though:

The most important safety program is the user. No matter what you install,

if you browse dangerous sites and download dangerous programs you will get

infected. Those who know what they're doing can run for years with nothing

but a firewall and never get infected. Others can install everything you

have listed and get infected in a week.

 

--

Frank Saunders MS-MVP IE,OE/WM

http://www.fjsmjs.com

Do not reply with email

[Guest db ´¯`·.. >]

Re: How much protection?

 

it is all relative.

 

people provide suggestions

that have worked best for

them and their successful

experiences.

 

if your system runs fine

and perfect with 20 anti virals,

then "more power to you".

 

however, there are others with

systems that are inadequate or

poorly configured that can only

handle one anti virus.

 

so, there is no rule of thumb.

 

besides most all antiviral engineers

will eventually obtain the latest

threats and incorporate the

definitions/threats via online downloaded

updates - plus or minus a couple of days

and a couple of virus definitions.

 

--

 

db·´¯`·...¸><)))º>

 

"slick1" <slick1@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:2D997DB7-F22F-4C72-83C7-4DAFCFC19401@microsoft.com...

>> After reading many and various posts in this and other Newsgroups, I am a

> little curious and confused by what I read on the topic of how much

> protection one needs on their system.

>> All MVP's seem to agree that only one Firewall is needed; good! But many

>> MVP's seem to disagree on how much anti-virus protection one needs. Some say

>> only one is needed, while others say two, three or even more are needed.

>> Currently on my system I have Windows Firewall, AVG (free edition 7.5),

>> SuperAntiSpyware (free version 3.9), Spybot S&D (free version 1.5), Ad-Aware

>> 2007 (free edition), Spyware Blaster (free edition 4.0), Windows Defender and

>> Windows Malicious Software Tool.

>> Now my question is : Do I need all this anti-virus protection or just one or

>> two? I get a little ticked having to update definitions all the time and

>> having my system slowed down while I'm trying to work because an anti-virus

>> program is running at the same time. I could also use the disk space and

>> possibly, (hopefully), speed-up the boot time.

>> My System: Acer 2450 laptop

> Windows XP , Home Edition

> SP2

> Explorer 7

>> I would really appreciate any info or comments on this topic so I can finally

>> make a decision to remove or not to remove some of my anti-virus programs.

>> THANK-YOU !

[Guest slick1]

Re: How much protection?

 

Thanks to all! I'm gonna kiss some programs goodbye now. Keep-up the good

work guys & gals.

 

"db ´¯`·.. ><)))º>` .. ." wrote:

> it is all relative.

>

> people provide suggestions

> that have worked best for

> them and their successful

> experiences.

>

> if your system runs fine

> and perfect with 20 anti virals,

> then "more power to you".

>

> however, there are others with

> systems that are inadequate or

> poorly configured that can only

> handle one anti virus.

>

> so, there is no rule of thumb.

>

> besides most all antiviral engineers

> will eventually obtain the latest

> threats and incorporate the

> definitions/threats via online downloaded

> updates - plus or minus a couple of days

> and a couple of virus definitions.

>

> --

>

> db·´¯`·...¸><)))º>

>

> "slick1" <slick1@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

> news:2D997DB7-F22F-4C72-83C7-4DAFCFC19401@microsoft.com...

> >> After reading many and various posts in this and other Newsgroups, I am a

> > little curious and confused by what I read on the topic of how much

> > protection one needs on their system.

> >> All MVP's seem to agree that only one Firewall is needed; good! But many

> >> MVP's seem to disagree on how much anti-virus protection one needs. Some say

> >> only one is needed, while others say two, three or even more are needed.

> >> Currently on my system I have Windows Firewall, AVG (free edition 7.5),

> >> SuperAntiSpyware (free version 3.9), Spybot S&D (free version 1.5), Ad-Aware

> >> 2007 (free edition), Spyware Blaster (free edition 4.0), Windows Defender and

> >> Windows Malicious Software Tool.

> >> Now my question is : Do I need all this anti-virus protection or just one or

> >> two? I get a little ticked having to update definitions all the time and

> >> having my system slowed down while I'm trying to work because an anti-virus

> >> program is running at the same time. I could also use the disk space and

> >> possibly, (hopefully), speed-up the boot time.

> >> My System: Acer 2450 laptop

> > Windows XP , Home Edition

> > SP2

> > Explorer 7

> >> I would really appreciate any info or comments on this topic so I can finally

> >> make a decision to remove or not to remove some of my anti-virus programs.

> >> THANK-YOU !

>

>

[Guest C.Joseph S. Drayton]

Re: How much protection?

 

PA Bear [MS MVP] wrote:

>(Please don't use/add carats [ > ] for punctuation.)

>

>>Currently on my system I have Windows Firewall, AVG (free edition

>>7.5), S*perAntiSpyware (free version 3.9), Spybot S&D (free version

>>1.5), Ad-Aware 2007 (free edition), Spyware Blaster (free edition

>>4.0), Windows Defender and Windows Malicious Software Tool.

>

>Of all those applications, only AVG is an anti-virus application, and

>the Malicious Software Removal Tool is not an installed application

>nor does it provide any real-time protection.

>

>Some would consider the real-time protections afforded by SAS,

>Ad-Aware 2007, Spybot, and Defender to be overkill. I'm one of them,

>but YMMV. If it were my machine (and your browsing habits were as

>safe as mine), I'd uninstall SAS, Ad-Aware, and Spybot...and replace

>AVG with something more reliable and robust. Again, YMMV. One size

>does not necessarily fit all here.

>

>This is what's really important:

>

>Before You Connect a New Computer to the Internet

>http://www.cert.org/tech_tips/before_you_plug_in.html

>

>Also see:

>

>Security FAQ & Checklist

>http://www.dslreports.com/faq/8463

 

Hi Pa Bear,

 

The the concept of 'safe wex' is one that I find amusing. Any site can

be compromised. Second, if you are going to really make use of all the

information on the web then you end up going to sites that may not have

as much security as others. I tend to go to links that I see in news

groups on a regular basis. I download files from sites other than PCMAG

and CNET.

 

That might be considered 'unsafe wex', but in the process of going to

all those different sites, I have found some good tech files and

programs. When I am going to places I feel uncomfortable with, I turn

on Returnils protection mode. Other times I don't bother.

 

Their are a large number of scanners out there, so I scan my machine

regularly and if it finds something I have it delete it. For me I am

not going to limit my access to the Internet based on a white-list of

'supposedly safe' web sites.

 

--

 

Sincerely,

C.Joseph Drayton, Ph.D. AS&T

 

CSD Computer Services

Web site: http://csdcs.tlerma.com/

E-mail: csdcs@tlerma.com

[Guest Colin Barnhorst]

Re: How much protection?

 

Avast.

 

"slick1" <slick1@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:C2EAE110-A2E6-4D2A-B5D0-C69F1B54C5E2@microsoft.com...

> To PA Bear: What would you recommend to replace AVG? (something free).

>

> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" wrote:

>

>> (Please don't use/add carats [ > ] for punctuation.)

>>

>> > Currently on my system I have Windows Firewall, AVG (free edition 7.5),

>> > S*perAntiSpyware (free version 3.9), Spybot S&D (free version 1.5),

>> > Ad-Aware 2007 (free edition), Spyware Blaster (free edition 4.0),

>> > Windows

>> > Defender and Windows Malicious Software Tool.

>>

>> Of all those applications, only AVG is an anti-virus application, and the

>> Malicious Software *Removal* Tool is not an installed application nor

>> does

>> it provide any real-time protection.

>>

>> Some would consider the real-time protections afforded by SAS, Ad-Aware

>> 2007, Spybot, and Defender to be overkill. I'm one of them, but YMMV.

>> If

>> it were my machine (and your browsing habits were as safe as mine), I'd

>> uninstall SAS, Ad-Aware, and Spybot...and replace AVG with something more

>> reliable and robust. Again, YMMV. One size does not necessarily fit all

>> here.

>>

>> This is what's really important:

>>

>> Before You Connect a New Computer to the Internet

>> http://www.cert.org/tech_tips/before_you_plug_in.html

>>

>> Also see:

>>

>> Security FAQ & Checklist

>> http://www.dslreports.com/faq/8463

>> --

>> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)

>> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002

>> AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net

>> DTS-L http://dts-l.net/

>>

>>

>> slick1 wrote:

>> >> After reading many and various posts in this and other Newsgroups, I

>> >> am a

>> > little curious and confused by what I read on the topic of how much

>> > protection one needs on their system.

>> >> All MVP's seem to agree that only one Firewall is needed; good! But

>> >> many

>> >> MVP's seem to disagree on how much anti-virus protection one needs.

>> >> Some

>> >> say only one is needed, while others say two, three or even more are

>> >> needed.

>> >> Currently on my system I have Windows Firewall, AVG (free edition

>> >> 7.5),

>> >> S*perAntiSpyware (free version 3.9), Spybot S&D (free version 1.5),

>> >> Ad-Aware 2007 (free edition), Spyware Blaster (free edition 4.0),

>> >> Windows

>> >> Defender and Windows Malicious Software Tool.

>> >> Now my question is : Do I need all this anti-virus protection or just

>> >> one

>> >> or two? I get a little ticked having to update definitions all the

>> >> time

>> >> and having my system slowed down while I'm trying to work because an

>> >> anti-virus program is running at the same time. I could also use the

>> >> disk

>> >> space and possibly, (hopefully), speed-up the boot time. My System:

>> >> Acer

>> >> 2450 laptop

>> > Windows XP , Home Edition

>> > SP2

>> > Explorer 7

>> >> I would really appreciate any info or comments on this topic so I can

>> >> finally make a decision to remove or not to remove some of my

>> >> anti-virus

>> >> programs. THANK-YOU !

>>

>>

[Guest PD43]

Re: How much protection?

 

"Colin Barnhorst" <c.barnhorst@comcast.net> wrote:

>Avast.

 

It drove me bonkers with all of its updating and need to restart my

computer. Went back to AVG.

[Guest PA Bear [MS MVP]]

Re: How much protection?

 

In order: Avira AntiVir; Avast4.

 

Multi-year subscriptions to NOD32 and Kaspersky 7 (top o' the heap in my

book) are quite reasonable.

 

[Why pinch pennies when it comes to security for your computer(s), yourself

and your family? If you needed a guard dog to protect your family, would

you get a toothless, meek chihuahua from the pound ("not that there's

anything wrong with that") or a purebred Rottweiler from a reputable

breeder? Free AV apps, no matter how reputable, simply cannot stand up to

NOD32 and KAV7.]

 

 

slick1 wrote:

> To PA Bear: What would you recommend to replace AVG? (something free).

>

> "PA Bear [MS MVP]" wrote:

>

>> (Please don't use/add carats [ > ] for punctuation.)

>>

>>> Currently on my system I have Windows Firewall, AVG (free edition 7.5),

>>> S*perAntiSpyware (free version 3.9), Spybot S&D (free version 1.5),

>>> Ad-Aware 2007 (free edition), Spyware Blaster (free edition 4.0),

>>> Windows

>>> Defender and Windows Malicious Software Tool.

>>

>> Of all those applications, only AVG is an anti-virus application, and the

>> Malicious Software *Removal* Tool is not an installed application nor

>> does

>> it provide any real-time protection.

>>

>> Some would consider the real-time protections afforded by SAS, Ad-Aware

>> 2007, Spybot, and Defender to be overkill. I'm one of them, but YMMV.

>> If

>> it were my machine (and your browsing habits were as safe as mine), I'd

>> uninstall SAS, Ad-Aware, and Spybot...and replace AVG with something more

>> reliable and robust. Again, YMMV. One size does not necessarily fit all

>> here.

>>

>> This is what's really important:

>>

>> Before You Connect a New Computer to the Internet

>> http://www.cert.org/tech_tips/before_you_plug_in.html

>>

>> Also see:

>>

>> Security FAQ & Checklist

>> http://www.dslreports.com/faq/8463

>> --

>> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)

>> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002

>> AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net

>> DTS-L http://dts-l.net/

>>

>>

>> slick1 wrote:

>>>> After reading many and various posts in this and other Newsgroups, I am

>>>> a

>>> little curious and confused by what I read on the topic of how much

>>> protection one needs on their system.

>>>> All MVP's seem to agree that only one Firewall is needed; good! But

>>>> many

>>>> MVP's seem to disagree on how much anti-virus protection one needs.

>>>> Some

>>>> say only one is needed, while others say two, three or even more are

>>>> needed.

>>>> Currently on my system I have Windows Firewall, AVG (free edition 7.5),

>>>> S*perAntiSpyware (free version 3.9), Spybot S&D (free version 1.5),

>>>> Ad-Aware 2007 (free edition), Spyware Blaster (free edition 4.0),

>>>> Windows

>>>> Defender and Windows Malicious Software Tool.

>>>> Now my question is : Do I need all this anti-virus protection or just

>>>> one

>>>> or two? I get a little ticked having to update definitions all the

>>>> time

>>>> and having my system slowed down while I'm trying to work because an

>>>> anti-virus program is running at the same time. I could also use the

>>>> disk

>>>> space and possibly, (hopefully), speed-up the boot time. My System:

>>>> Acer

>>>> 2450 laptop

>>> Windows XP , Home Edition

>>> SP2

>>> Explorer 7

>>>> I would really appreciate any info or comments on this topic so I can

>>>> finally make a decision to remove or not to remove some of my

>>>> anti-virus

>>>> programs. THANK-YOU !

[Guest Ken Blake, MVP]

Re: How much protection?

 

On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:09:16 -0500, PD43 <pauld1943@comcast.net>

wrote:

> "Colin Barnhorst" <c.barnhorst@comcast.net> wrote:

>

> >Avast.

>

> It drove me bonkers with all of its updating and need to restart my

> computer.

 

 

I use Avast on all my computers here, and I'm happy with it. It

updates frequently, but that's good, not bad. When it does update, it

notifies you with a little popup window that quickly goes away by

itself.

 

Need to restart your computer? I don't remember it ever doing that.

 

 

--

Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience

Please Reply to the Newsgroup

[Guest Tony Meloche]

Re: How much protection?

 

Ken Blake, MVP wrote:

> On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 00:09:16 -0500, PD43 <pauld1943@comcast.net>

> wrote:

>

>> "Colin Barnhorst" <c.barnhorst@comcast.net> wrote:

>>

>>> Avast.

>> It drove me bonkers with all of its updating and need to restart my

>> computer.

>

>

> I use Avast on all my computers here, and I'm happy with it. It

> updates frequently, but that's good, not bad. When it does update, it

> notifies you with a little popup window that quickly goes away by

> itself.

>

> Need to restart your computer? I don't remember it ever doing that.

>

>

 

Both of Ken's statements are exactly what my experience has been, too.

 

Tony

 

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----

http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups

----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----