Guest Ziga Jakhel Posted March 27, 2008 Posted March 27, 2008 Hi, everyone! I've just installed Windows 2008 Enterprise in a Virtual PC 2007 virtual machine. The server is set up as a PDC with it's own domain forrest, and has a DNS server. DNS resolves Ok, but I have 2 major issues. 1) If connecting to/from WinXP / Windows 2003 computer, the network share is visible, but I cannot copy files. The operation fails after a few seconds, with the "Network name cannot be found" (or "is not available") error. This works OK, if the client is Vista, so I presume it's a SMB 2.0 issue. Any hints on how to force the w2k8 box to use SMB 1.0? 2) From the w2k8 box, I cannot browse to http://www.microsoft.com, http://www.mozilla.com, and a few other international sites. DNS resolution works fine (ping is ok), website is found, but I get stuck on the "waiting for response". Local (in my country) sites work fine; everything works fine from other computers in my main domain. Help would be appreciated. Regards, Sigmund Jakhel Integrum IT, Slovenia, Europe
Guest lforbes Posted March 28, 2008 Posted March 28, 2008 RE: Windows 2008 & Win XP Client blues - Network name cannot be found Hi, I don't think it is an SMB issue. According to MS's site the SMB session is set based on the clients. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb726965.aspx "Computers running Windows Server 2008 or Windows Vista support both SMB 1.0 and SMB 2.0. The version of SMB that is used for file sharing operations is determined during the SMB session negotiation. The following table shows which version of SMB that is used for various combinations of client and server computers." I haven't worked with 2008 yet and don't have any plans too for at least a year. Maybe there is an update for Windows XP and 2003 in order to connect to 2008? Have you tried mapping to the share using \\server\share and \\server.domain.local\share? Cheers, Lara "Ziga Jakhel" wrote: > Hi, everyone! > > I've just installed Windows 2008 Enterprise in a Virtual PC 2007 virtual > machine. > The server is set up as a PDC with it's own domain forrest, and has a > DNS server. > > DNS resolves Ok, but I have 2 major issues. > > 1) If connecting to/from WinXP / Windows 2003 computer, the network > share is visible, but I cannot copy files. The operation fails after a > few seconds, with the "Network name cannot be found" (or "is not > available") error. > > This works OK, if the client is Vista, so I presume it's a SMB 2.0 > issue. Any hints on how to force the w2k8 box to use SMB 1.0? > > 2) From the w2k8 box, I cannot browse to http://www.microsoft.com, > http://www.mozilla.com, and a few other international sites. DNS resolution > works fine (ping is ok), website is found, but I get stuck on the > "waiting for response". > Local (in my country) sites work fine; everything works fine from other > computers in my main domain. > > Help would be appreciated. > > Regards, > > Sigmund Jakhel > Integrum IT, Slovenia, Europe >
Guest Ziga Jakhel Posted March 28, 2008 Posted March 28, 2008 Re: Windows 2008 & Win XP Client blues - Network name cannot be found Hi, Lara! Thanks for the input... since Vista clients work, I strongly suspect SMB. I know what the docs say (which presently isn't all that much), but as a developer also know the differences to world-as-built :) The fqdn naming gives the same results. Regards, Ziga lforbes wrote: > Hi, > > I don't think it is an SMB issue. According to MS's site the SMB session is > set based on the clients. > > http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb726965.aspx > > "Computers running Windows Server 2008 or Windows Vista support both SMB 1.0 > and SMB 2.0. The version of SMB that is used for file sharing operations is > determined during the SMB session negotiation. The following table shows > which version of SMB that is used for various combinations of client and > server computers." > > I haven't worked with 2008 yet and don't have any plans too for at least a > year. Maybe there is an update for Windows XP and 2003 in order to connect to > 2008? > > Have you tried mapping to the share using \\server\share and > \\server.domain.local\share? > > Cheers, > Lara > > "Ziga Jakhel" wrote: > >> Hi, everyone! >> >> I've just installed Windows 2008 Enterprise in a Virtual PC 2007 virtual >> machine. >> The server is set up as a PDC with it's own domain forrest, and has a >> DNS server. >> >> DNS resolves Ok, but I have 2 major issues. >> >> 1) If connecting to/from WinXP / Windows 2003 computer, the network >> share is visible, but I cannot copy files. The operation fails after a >> few seconds, with the "Network name cannot be found" (or "is not >> available") error. >> >> This works OK, if the client is Vista, so I presume it's a SMB 2.0 >> issue. Any hints on how to force the w2k8 box to use SMB 1.0? >> >> 2) From the w2k8 box, I cannot browse to http://www.microsoft.com, >> http://www.mozilla.com, and a few other international sites. DNS resolution >> works fine (ping is ok), website is found, but I get stuck on the >> "waiting for response". >> Local (in my country) sites work fine; everything works fine from other >> computers in my main domain. >> >> Help would be appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> >> Sigmund Jakhel >> Integrum IT, Slovenia, Europe >>
Guest lforbes Posted March 28, 2008 Posted March 28, 2008 Re: Windows 2008 & Win XP Client blues - Network name cannot be fo Re: Windows 2008 & Win XP Client blues - Network name cannot be fo Hi, That may be indeed true. Isn't Windows 2008 server still in RC? I didn't think they have released the finished version yet but I may be wrong. That being said I share my Vista machine at home between my XP machines with no issues either way. Cheers, Lara "Ziga Jakhel" wrote: > Hi, Lara! > > Thanks for the input... since Vista clients work, I strongly suspect > SMB. I know what the docs say (which presently isn't all that much), but > as a developer also know the differences to world-as-built :) > > The fqdn naming gives the same results. > > Regards, > > Ziga > > lforbes wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I don't think it is an SMB issue. According to MS's site the SMB session is > > set based on the clients. > > > > http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb726965.aspx > > > > "Computers running Windows Server 2008 or Windows Vista support both SMB 1.0 > > and SMB 2.0. The version of SMB that is used for file sharing operations is > > determined during the SMB session negotiation. The following table shows > > which version of SMB that is used for various combinations of client and > > server computers." > > > > I haven't worked with 2008 yet and don't have any plans too for at least a > > year. Maybe there is an update for Windows XP and 2003 in order to connect to > > 2008? > > > > Have you tried mapping to the share using \\server\share and > > \\server.domain.local\share? > > > > Cheers, > > Lara > > > > "Ziga Jakhel" wrote: > > > >> Hi, everyone! > >> > >> I've just installed Windows 2008 Enterprise in a Virtual PC 2007 virtual > >> machine. > >> The server is set up as a PDC with it's own domain forrest, and has a > >> DNS server. > >> > >> DNS resolves Ok, but I have 2 major issues. > >> > >> 1) If connecting to/from WinXP / Windows 2003 computer, the network > >> share is visible, but I cannot copy files. The operation fails after a > >> few seconds, with the "Network name cannot be found" (or "is not > >> available") error. > >> > >> This works OK, if the client is Vista, so I presume it's a SMB 2.0 > >> issue. Any hints on how to force the w2k8 box to use SMB 1.0? > >> > >> 2) From the w2k8 box, I cannot browse to http://www.microsoft.com, > >> http://www.mozilla.com, and a few other international sites. DNS resolution > >> works fine (ping is ok), website is found, but I get stuck on the > >> "waiting for response". > >> Local (in my country) sites work fine; everything works fine from other > >> computers in my main domain. > >> > >> Help would be appreciated. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Sigmund Jakhel > >> Integrum IT, Slovenia, Europe > >> >
Guest Dave Michaels Posted July 30, 2008 Posted July 30, 2008 resolution? resolution? did you discover a resolution to this issue? we appear to be having a similar problem. again, vista clients, not xp - connectivity issues with W2008 file server.
Guest NeilH Posted July 30, 2008 Posted July 30, 2008 Re: resolution? Re: resolution? <Dave Michaels> wrote in message news:2008730112724victorycross@gmail.com... > did you discover a resolution to this issue? we appear to be having a similar problem. again, vista clients, not xp - connectivity issues with W2008 file server. What are you replying to?
Guest Meinolf Weber Posted July 31, 2008 Posted July 31, 2008 Re: resolution? Re: resolution? Hello Dave, If you have problems please describe them in detail and if something happens before, like crashes, new patches or updates etc. Also open a new posting for your problem. The one you are referring to is from 03/2008. Think this will not longer be monitored from the OP. Best regards Meinolf Weber Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > did you discover a resolution to this issue? we appear to be having a > similar problem. again, vista clients, not xp - connectivity issues > with W2008 file server. >
Recommended Posts