Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It* is now a pretty common thing to monitor staff by using GPS to determine where a company car is for instance. Taxi firms use it to pin point the location of their fleet at any given moment. This is a serious weapon for scheduling scenarios.

 

Serious Criminals (Felons) are now tagged so Law Enforcement agencies can determine their location at any moment. Yes, it does not always work, but that is not the point I’m trying to make. The most recent and unfortunate child abduction cases here in the UK are either that of Madeline McCann or Shannon Mathews. Both have been big stories, child abduction sadly does occur and must be utterly traumatic for all those involved.

 

What is the problem with tagging children by law up till the age of let’s say five, at that age a chip is removed from them? I am not a parent and can only see advantages to this, and feel that this is surely inevitable. If the government is considering taxing cars (road tax) by using this technology, surely it’s just a matter of time till this is available for children.

 

There are already things like snoop available to monitor children and no-one seems to be making any objections, what do you think?

 

 

 

More...

 

View All Our Microsoft Related Feeds

  • Replies 0
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...