Guest Charles Law Posted April 23, 2008 Posted April 23, 2008 I'm not sure if this the right place, so please redirect me if there is a better place (I looked but none was obvious). I have a laptop that uses a dial-up connection to a secure network (the only route in). I also want to be able to connect to another remote network from the laptop, at the same time, via broadband. So far, all attempts have failed. If I hang-up the dial-up connection, I can see the internet, but once the dial-up is connected all I can see from the laptop is my local network (and the remote secure network, of course). The laptop has a wireless connection to my local network, and when I look at the properties there is a place to enter "Alternate Configuration", but I can't get that to make any difference. Please can anyone suggest how I might do this? TIA Charles
Guest Meinolf Weber Posted April 23, 2008 Posted April 23, 2008 Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Computer Hello Charles, Did you try with Remote Desktop over the broadband connection? Best regards Meinolf Weber Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > I'm not sure if this the right place, so please redirect me if there > is a better place (I looked but none was obvious). > > I have a laptop that uses a dial-up connection to a secure network > (the only route in). I also want to be able to connect to another > remote network from the laptop, at the same time, via broadband. > > So far, all attempts have failed. If I hang-up the dial-up connection, > I can see the internet, but once the dial-up is connected all I can > see from the laptop is my local network (and the remote secure > network, of course). > > The laptop has a wireless connection to my local network, and when I > look at the properties there is a place to enter "Alternate > Configuration", but I can't get that to make any difference. > > Please can anyone suggest how I might do this? > > TIA > > Charles >
Guest Charles Law Posted April 23, 2008 Posted April 23, 2008 Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Computer Hi Meinolf Thanks for the reply. I haven't tried RDP except over the dial-up connection. What I have tried is pinging my remote network IP when dial-up is connected and I get an instant reply from the secure network (over dial-up) saying that the host is unreachable. It seems that all traffic is sent down the dial-up path, whether it can be reached that way or not. What I think it needs is something to route only private network traffic down the dial-up path and everything else through my local gateway, but I can't see where I might set that. Charles "Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message news:ff16fb669754e8ca735372d3218a@msnews.microsoft.com... > Hello Charles, > > Did you try with Remote Desktop over the broadband connection? > > Best regards > > Meinolf Weber > Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and > confers no rights. > ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups > ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > >> I'm not sure if this the right place, so please redirect me if there >> is a better place (I looked but none was obvious). >> >> I have a laptop that uses a dial-up connection to a secure network >> (the only route in). I also want to be able to connect to another >> remote network from the laptop, at the same time, via broadband. >> >> So far, all attempts have failed. If I hang-up the dial-up connection, >> I can see the internet, but once the dial-up is connected all I can >> see from the laptop is my local network (and the remote secure >> network, of course). >> >> The laptop has a wireless connection to my local network, and when I >> look at the properties there is a place to enter "Alternate >> Configuration", but I can't get that to make any difference. >> >> Please can anyone suggest how I might do this? >> >> TIA >> >> Charles >> > >
Guest Meinolf Weber Posted April 23, 2008 Posted April 23, 2008 Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Computer Hello Charles, Maybe you can try to add a static route to the broadband gateway for the network you are trying to reach. But i think you will not be able to connect to 2 different networks simultaneously, so waht is the reason for this kind of configuration? Best regards Meinolf Weber Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > Hi Meinolf > > Thanks for the reply. I haven't tried RDP except over the dial-up > connection. What I have tried is pinging my remote network IP when > dial-up is connected and I get an instant reply from the secure > network (over dial-up) saying that the host is unreachable. > > It seems that all traffic is sent down the dial-up path, whether it > can be reached that way or not. > > What I think it needs is something to route only private network > traffic down the dial-up path and everything else through my local > gateway, but I can't see where I might set that. > > Charles > > "Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message > news:ff16fb669754e8ca735372d3218a@msnews.microsoft.com... > >> Hello Charles, >> >> Did you try with Remote Desktop over the broadband connection? >> >> Best regards >> >> Meinolf Weber >> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and >> confers no rights. >> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups >> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm >>> I'm not sure if this the right place, so please redirect me if there >>> is a better place (I looked but none was obvious). >>> >>> I have a laptop that uses a dial-up connection to a secure network >>> (the only route in). I also want to be able to connect to another >>> remote network from the laptop, at the same time, via broadband. >>> >>> So far, all attempts have failed. If I hang-up the dial-up >>> connection, I can see the internet, but once the dial-up is >>> connected all I can see from the laptop is my local network (and the >>> remote secure network, of course). >>> >>> The laptop has a wireless connection to my local network, and when I >>> look at the properties there is a place to enter "Alternate >>> Configuration", but I can't get that to make any difference. >>> >>> Please can anyone suggest how I might do this? >>> >>> TIA >>> >>> Charles >>>
Guest Newell White Posted April 23, 2008 Posted April 23, 2008 Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput More info needed. I assume you are DHCP client of whichever network you successfully connected to last. Correct me if you have a different set-up. Post results of 'route print' when you are (a) connected to secure network via dial-up (b) to your broadband network Our offsite users can access our network (via VPN) and their local printers, and see Internet via their ISP, not ours, by using a set-up called 'split tunneling'. I suspect this may only work for you if you put your dial-up modem on local Ethernet so that you access both networks via same interface. -- Regards, Newell White "Charles Law" wrote: > Hi Meinolf > > Thanks for the reply. I haven't tried RDP except over the dial-up > connection. What I have tried is pinging my remote network IP when dial-up > is connected and I get an instant reply from the secure network (over > dial-up) saying that the host is unreachable. > > It seems that all traffic is sent down the dial-up path, whether it can be > reached that way or not. > > What I think it needs is something to route only private network traffic > down the dial-up path and everything else through my local gateway, but I > can't see where I might set that. > > Charles > > > "Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message > news:ff16fb669754e8ca735372d3218a@msnews.microsoft.com... > > Hello Charles, > > > > Did you try with Remote Desktop over the broadband connection? > > > > Best regards > > > > Meinolf Weber > > Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and > > confers no rights. > > ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups > > ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > > > >> I'm not sure if this the right place, so please redirect me if there > >> is a better place (I looked but none was obvious). > >> > >> I have a laptop that uses a dial-up connection to a secure network > >> (the only route in). I also want to be able to connect to another > >> remote network from the laptop, at the same time, via broadband. > >> > >> So far, all attempts have failed. If I hang-up the dial-up connection, > >> I can see the internet, but once the dial-up is connected all I can > >> see from the laptop is my local network (and the remote secure > >> network, of course). > >> > >> The laptop has a wireless connection to my local network, and when I > >> look at the properties there is a place to enter "Alternate > >> Configuration", but I can't get that to make any difference. > >> > >> Please can anyone suggest how I might do this? > >> > >> TIA > >> > >> Charles > >> > > > > > > >
Guest Frankster Posted April 23, 2008 Posted April 23, 2008 Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Computer "Charles Law" <blank@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:%233eLpkSpIHA.1420@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > I'm not sure if this the right place, so please redirect me if there is a > better place (I looked but none was obvious). > > I have a laptop that uses a dial-up connection to a secure network (the > only route in). I also want to be able to connect to another remote > network from the laptop, at the same time, via broadband. > > So far, all attempts have failed. If I hang-up the dial-up connection, I > can see the internet, but once the dial-up is connected all I can see from > the laptop is my local network (and the remote secure network, of course). > > The laptop has a wireless connection to my local network, and when I look > at the properties there is a place to enter "Alternate Configuration", but > I can't get that to make any difference. > > Please can anyone suggest how I might do this? > > TIA > > Charles > > From your description I'd assume you are using a VPN connection. If not, you can ignore this post...LOL. Be aware that many VPN programs will specifically disable all other network connections while the VPN is connected to its parent network. What VPN client are you using? Any chance it was provided by a cell carrier and/or your corporate IT? These type custom VPN clients are notorious for this behavior. It is by design. -Frank
Guest Charles Law Posted April 23, 2008 Posted April 23, 2008 Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Computer Hi Frankster There's nothing special running on the laptop. I am just using RDP to get to the secure network. That works ok, but whilst the dial-up connection is open, all non-local traffic seems to go to the secure network, and nowhere else. Charles "Frankster" <Frank@SPAM2TRASH.com> wrote in message news:I4ednVAxbZ5soZLVnZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@giganews.com... > > "Charles Law" <blank@nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:%233eLpkSpIHA.1420@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> I'm not sure if this the right place, so please redirect me if there is a >> better place (I looked but none was obvious). >> >> I have a laptop that uses a dial-up connection to a secure network (the >> only route in). I also want to be able to connect to another remote >> network from the laptop, at the same time, via broadband. >> >> So far, all attempts have failed. If I hang-up the dial-up connection, I >> can see the internet, but once the dial-up is connected all I can see >> from the laptop is my local network (and the remote secure network, of >> course). >> >> The laptop has a wireless connection to my local network, and when I look >> at the properties there is a place to enter "Alternate Configuration", >> but I can't get that to make any difference. >> >> Please can anyone suggest how I might do this? >> >> TIA >> >> Charles >> >> > > From your description I'd assume you are using a VPN connection. If not, > you can ignore this post...LOL. Be aware that many VPN programs will > specifically disable all other network connections while the VPN is > connected to its parent network. > > What VPN client are you using? Any chance it was provided by a cell > carrier and/or your corporate IT? These type custom VPN clients are > notorious for this behavior. It is by design. > > -Frank
Guest Charles Law Posted April 23, 2008 Posted April 23, 2008 Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Computer Hi Meinolf We support our client using RDP onto their network. At the same time, we have our own servers elsewhere, that we access via the internet, and that we need to get files from for the secure network at our client's. I can go to another machine, and transfer the files to our local network, and then back on the laptop I can pick them up and transfer them to the secure network. It is just a bit tortuous having to do it in two steps, and of course takes twice as long. Charles "Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message news:ff16fb66975528ca7356929c9d4a@msnews.microsoft.com... > Hello Charles, > > Maybe you can try to add a static route to the broadband gateway for the > network you are trying to reach. But i think you will not be able to > connect to 2 different networks simultaneously, so waht is the reason for > this kind of configuration? > > Best regards > > Meinolf Weber > Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and > confers no rights. > ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups > ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > >> Hi Meinolf >> >> Thanks for the reply. I haven't tried RDP except over the dial-up >> connection. What I have tried is pinging my remote network IP when >> dial-up is connected and I get an instant reply from the secure >> network (over dial-up) saying that the host is unreachable. >> >> It seems that all traffic is sent down the dial-up path, whether it >> can be reached that way or not. >> >> What I think it needs is something to route only private network >> traffic down the dial-up path and everything else through my local >> gateway, but I can't see where I might set that. >> >> Charles >> >> "Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message >> news:ff16fb669754e8ca735372d3218a@msnews.microsoft.com... >> >>> Hello Charles, >>> >>> Did you try with Remote Desktop over the broadband connection? >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> Meinolf Weber >>> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and >>> confers no rights. >>> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups >>> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm >>>> I'm not sure if this the right place, so please redirect me if there >>>> is a better place (I looked but none was obvious). >>>> >>>> I have a laptop that uses a dial-up connection to a secure network >>>> (the only route in). I also want to be able to connect to another >>>> remote network from the laptop, at the same time, via broadband. >>>> >>>> So far, all attempts have failed. If I hang-up the dial-up >>>> connection, I can see the internet, but once the dial-up is >>>> connected all I can see from the laptop is my local network (and the >>>> remote secure network, of course). >>>> >>>> The laptop has a wireless connection to my local network, and when I >>>> look at the properties there is a place to enter "Alternate >>>> Configuration", but I can't get that to make any difference. >>>> >>>> Please can anyone suggest how I might do this? >>>> >>>> TIA >>>> >>>> Charles >>>> > >
Guest Charles Law Posted April 23, 2008 Posted April 23, 2008 Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput Hi Newell The laptop is a DHCP client on the local network, and to the secure network when connected. What do you mean by the route print? I can't post anything that explicitly relates to the secure network, for obvious reasons. It sounds like your off-site users do exactly what I want to do here. I wonder if I use the laptop just as a gateway to the secure network, and allow ICS that would do the trick? The problem would be that Windows always wants to set the IP on an ICS machine to 192.168.0.1, and that is the IP of my router. Charles "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:321245F6-3F7C-4FA3-93C9-BC77FADCE539@microsoft.com... > More info needed. > I assume you are DHCP client of whichever network you successfully > connected > to last. Correct me if you have a different set-up. > > Post results of 'route print' when you are > (a) connected to secure network via dial-up > (b) to your broadband network > > Our offsite users can access our network (via VPN) and their local > printers, > and see Internet via their ISP, not ours, by using a set-up called 'split > tunneling'. > I suspect this may only work for you if you put your dial-up modem on > local > Ethernet so that you access both networks via same interface. > -- > Regards, > Newell White > > > "Charles Law" wrote: > >> Hi Meinolf >> >> Thanks for the reply. I haven't tried RDP except over the dial-up >> connection. What I have tried is pinging my remote network IP when >> dial-up >> is connected and I get an instant reply from the secure network (over >> dial-up) saying that the host is unreachable. >> >> It seems that all traffic is sent down the dial-up path, whether it can >> be >> reached that way or not. >> >> What I think it needs is something to route only private network traffic >> down the dial-up path and everything else through my local gateway, but I >> can't see where I might set that. >> >> Charles >> >> >> "Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message >> news:ff16fb669754e8ca735372d3218a@msnews.microsoft.com... >> > Hello Charles, >> > >> > Did you try with Remote Desktop over the broadband connection? >> > >> > Best regards >> > >> > Meinolf Weber >> > Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and >> > confers no rights. >> > ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups >> > ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm >> > >> >> I'm not sure if this the right place, so please redirect me if there >> >> is a better place (I looked but none was obvious). >> >> >> >> I have a laptop that uses a dial-up connection to a secure network >> >> (the only route in). I also want to be able to connect to another >> >> remote network from the laptop, at the same time, via broadband. >> >> >> >> So far, all attempts have failed. If I hang-up the dial-up connection, >> >> I can see the internet, but once the dial-up is connected all I can >> >> see from the laptop is my local network (and the remote secure >> >> network, of course). >> >> >> >> The laptop has a wireless connection to my local network, and when I >> >> look at the properties there is a place to enter "Alternate >> >> Configuration", but I can't get that to make any difference. >> >> >> >> Please can anyone suggest how I might do this? >> >> >> >> TIA >> >> >> >> Charles >> >> >> > >> > >> >> >>
Guest Bill Grant Posted April 24, 2008 Posted April 24, 2008 Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Computer You didn't really answer the question about what remote access client you are using. Many remote access clients will prevent access to other networks. Some, such as the Microsoft dialup client, don't prevent it but it is disabled by default. You can change this in the dialup connection properties. If you are using this client, see KB 254231 . "Charles Law" <blank@nowhere.com> wrote in message news:e8V6lWVpIHA.3860@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > Hi Frankster > > There's nothing special running on the laptop. I am just using RDP to get > to the secure network. That works ok, but whilst the dial-up connection is > open, all non-local traffic seems to go to the secure network, and nowhere > else. > > Charles > > > "Frankster" <Frank@SPAM2TRASH.com> wrote in message > news:I4ednVAxbZ5soZLVnZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@giganews.com... >> >> "Charles Law" <blank@nowhere.com> wrote in message >> news:%233eLpkSpIHA.1420@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>> I'm not sure if this the right place, so please redirect me if there is >>> a better place (I looked but none was obvious). >>> >>> I have a laptop that uses a dial-up connection to a secure network (the >>> only route in). I also want to be able to connect to another remote >>> network from the laptop, at the same time, via broadband. >>> >>> So far, all attempts have failed. If I hang-up the dial-up connection, I >>> can see the internet, but once the dial-up is connected all I can see >>> from the laptop is my local network (and the remote secure network, of >>> course). >>> >>> The laptop has a wireless connection to my local network, and when I >>> look at the properties there is a place to enter "Alternate >>> Configuration", but I can't get that to make any difference. >>> >>> Please can anyone suggest how I might do this? >>> >>> TIA >>> >>> Charles >>> >>> >> >> From your description I'd assume you are using a VPN connection. If not, >> you can ignore this post...LOL. Be aware that many VPN programs will >> specifically disable all other network connections while the VPN is >> connected to its parent network. >> >> What VPN client are you using? Any chance it was provided by a cell >> carrier and/or your corporate IT? These type custom VPN clients are >> notorious for this behavior. It is by design. >> >> -Frank > >
Guest Newell White Posted April 24, 2008 Posted April 24, 2008 Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput Here is the result of 'route print > C:\rprintlog on my XP workstation: =========================================================================== Active Routes: Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.200 192.168.1.220 10 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 10 192.168.1.220 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 10 192.168.1.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 10 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 10 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 1 Default Gateway: 192.168.1.200 =========================================================================== Persistent Routes: None This maps the entire IP address space to an interface (192.168.1.220 is my ethernet card, 127.0.0.1 is a loopback to to the TCP/IP input of my PC) and a gateway (192.168.1.200 is a DSL router connecting to our ISP). So all loopbacks (127.x.y.z) and traffic for 192.168.1.220 originating in my PC never gets out onto our Ethernet LAN. Traffic for our LAN (192.168.1.x) is broadcast from my ethernet card, as are a few other special cases. Any other address p.q.r.s is sent to the DSL router. This table is set up by the DHCP server on our LAN when I log on - it assigns my IP, my net mask (defines size of LAN), and my gateway. 192.168.x.y are un-routable addresses - traffic for them will not pass either way through a router, so they are secure - our LAN speaks only to our LAN, yours speaks only to yours. This should be enough info to allow you to diagnose your rote print outputs, or ask intelligent questions if you don't want to divulge the IP of the access point to your secure network. -- Regards, Newell White "Charles Law" wrote: > > Hi Newell > > The laptop is a DHCP client on the local network, and to the secure network > when connected. > > What do you mean by the route print? I can't post anything that explicitly > relates to the secure network, for obvious reasons. > > It sounds like your off-site users do exactly what I want to do here. I > wonder if I use the laptop just as a gateway to the secure network, and > allow ICS that would do the trick? The problem would be that Windows always > wants to set the IP on an ICS machine to 192.168.0.1, and that is the IP of > my router. > > Charles > > > "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:321245F6-3F7C-4FA3-93C9-BC77FADCE539@microsoft.com... > > More info needed. > > I assume you are DHCP client of whichever network you successfully > > connected > > to last. Correct me if you have a different set-up. > > > > Post results of 'route print' when you are > > (a) connected to secure network via dial-up > > (b) to your broadband network > > > > Our offsite users can access our network (via VPN) and their local > > printers, > > and see Internet via their ISP, not ours, by using a set-up called 'split > > tunneling'. > > I suspect this may only work for you if you put your dial-up modem on > > local > > Ethernet so that you access both networks via same interface. > > -- > > Regards, > > Newell White > > > > > > "Charles Law" wrote: > > > >> Hi Meinolf > >> > >> Thanks for the reply. I haven't tried RDP except over the dial-up > >> connection. What I have tried is pinging my remote network IP when > >> dial-up > >> is connected and I get an instant reply from the secure network (over > >> dial-up) saying that the host is unreachable. > >> > >> It seems that all traffic is sent down the dial-up path, whether it can > >> be > >> reached that way or not. > >> > >> What I think it needs is something to route only private network traffic > >> down the dial-up path and everything else through my local gateway, but I > >> can't see where I might set that. > >> > >> Charles > >> > >> > >> "Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message > >> news:ff16fb669754e8ca735372d3218a@msnews.microsoft.com... > >> > Hello Charles, > >> > > >> > Did you try with Remote Desktop over the broadband connection? > >> > > >> > Best regards > >> > > >> > Meinolf Weber > >> > Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and > >> > confers no rights. > >> > ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups > >> > ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > >> > > >> >> I'm not sure if this the right place, so please redirect me if there > >> >> is a better place (I looked but none was obvious). > >> >> > >> >> I have a laptop that uses a dial-up connection to a secure network > >> >> (the only route in). I also want to be able to connect to another > >> >> remote network from the laptop, at the same time, via broadband. > >> >> > >> >> So far, all attempts have failed. If I hang-up the dial-up connection, > >> >> I can see the internet, but once the dial-up is connected all I can > >> >> see from the laptop is my local network (and the remote secure > >> >> network, of course). > >> >> > >> >> The laptop has a wireless connection to my local network, and when I > >> >> look at the properties there is a place to enter "Alternate > >> >> Configuration", but I can't get that to make any difference. > >> >> > >> >> Please can anyone suggest how I might do this? > >> >> > >> >> TIA > >> >> > >> >> Charles > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >
Guest Charles Law Posted April 24, 2008 Posted April 24, 2008 Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput Hi Newell Thanks for that. I will compare it to our own here and see what sort of differences it throws up. Cheers Charles "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:D2C1B031-0914-4B1C-9862-E4DE5DDEA54F@microsoft.com... > Here is the result of 'route print > C:\rprintlog on my XP workstation: > > =========================================================================== > Active Routes: > Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface > Metric > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.200 192.168.1.220 10 > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 > 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 10 > 192.168.1.220 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 10 > 192.168.1.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 10 > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 10 > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 1 > Default Gateway: 192.168.1.200 > =========================================================================== > Persistent Routes: > None > > This maps the entire IP address space to an interface (192.168.1.220 is my > ethernet card, 127.0.0.1 is a loopback to to the TCP/IP input of my PC) > and a > gateway (192.168.1.200 is a DSL router connecting to our ISP). > So all loopbacks (127.x.y.z) and traffic for 192.168.1.220 originating in > my > PC never gets out onto our Ethernet LAN. > Traffic for our LAN (192.168.1.x) is broadcast from my ethernet card, as > are > a few other special cases. > Any other address p.q.r.s is sent to the DSL router. > > This table is set up by the DHCP server on our LAN when I log on - it > assigns my IP, my net mask (defines size of LAN), and my gateway. > > 192.168.x.y are un-routable addresses - traffic for them will not pass > either way through a router, so they are secure - our LAN speaks only to > our > LAN, yours speaks only to yours. > > This should be enough info to allow you to diagnose your rote print > outputs, > or ask intelligent questions if you don't want to divulge the IP of the > access point to your secure network. > -- > Regards, > Newell White > > > "Charles Law" wrote: > >> >> Hi Newell >> >> The laptop is a DHCP client on the local network, and to the secure >> network >> when connected. >> >> What do you mean by the route print? I can't post anything that >> explicitly >> relates to the secure network, for obvious reasons. >> >> It sounds like your off-site users do exactly what I want to do here. I >> wonder if I use the laptop just as a gateway to the secure network, and >> allow ICS that would do the trick? The problem would be that Windows >> always >> wants to set the IP on an ICS machine to 192.168.0.1, and that is the IP >> of >> my router. >> >> Charles >> >> >> "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:321245F6-3F7C-4FA3-93C9-BC77FADCE539@microsoft.com... >> > More info needed. >> > I assume you are DHCP client of whichever network you successfully >> > connected >> > to last. Correct me if you have a different set-up. >> > >> > Post results of 'route print' when you are >> > (a) connected to secure network via dial-up >> > (b) to your broadband network >> > >> > Our offsite users can access our network (via VPN) and their local >> > printers, >> > and see Internet via their ISP, not ours, by using a set-up called >> > 'split >> > tunneling'. >> > I suspect this may only work for you if you put your dial-up modem on >> > local >> > Ethernet so that you access both networks via same interface. >> > -- >> > Regards, >> > Newell White >> > >> > >> > "Charles Law" wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Meinolf >> >> >> >> Thanks for the reply. I haven't tried RDP except over the dial-up >> >> connection. What I have tried is pinging my remote network IP when >> >> dial-up >> >> is connected and I get an instant reply from the secure network (over >> >> dial-up) saying that the host is unreachable. >> >> >> >> It seems that all traffic is sent down the dial-up path, whether it >> >> can >> >> be >> >> reached that way or not. >> >> >> >> What I think it needs is something to route only private network >> >> traffic >> >> down the dial-up path and everything else through my local gateway, >> >> but I >> >> can't see where I might set that. >> >> >> >> Charles >> >> >> >> >> >> "Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message >> >> news:ff16fb669754e8ca735372d3218a@msnews.microsoft.com... >> >> > Hello Charles, >> >> > >> >> > Did you try with Remote Desktop over the broadband connection? >> >> > >> >> > Best regards >> >> > >> >> > Meinolf Weber >> >> > Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and >> >> > confers no rights. >> >> > ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups >> >> > ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm >> >> > >> >> >> I'm not sure if this the right place, so please redirect me if >> >> >> there >> >> >> is a better place (I looked but none was obvious). >> >> >> >> >> >> I have a laptop that uses a dial-up connection to a secure network >> >> >> (the only route in). I also want to be able to connect to another >> >> >> remote network from the laptop, at the same time, via broadband. >> >> >> >> >> >> So far, all attempts have failed. If I hang-up the dial-up >> >> >> connection, >> >> >> I can see the internet, but once the dial-up is connected all I can >> >> >> see from the laptop is my local network (and the remote secure >> >> >> network, of course). >> >> >> >> >> >> The laptop has a wireless connection to my local network, and when >> >> >> I >> >> >> look at the properties there is a place to enter "Alternate >> >> >> Configuration", but I can't get that to make any difference. >> >> >> >> >> >> Please can anyone suggest how I might do this? >> >> >> >> >> >> TIA >> >> >> >> >> >> Charles >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
Guest Charles Law Posted April 24, 2008 Posted April 24, 2008 Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput Ok, my list ends like this: 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 <secure network gateway> <secure network gateway> 1 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.3 2 1 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.3 192.168.0.3 1 Default Gateway: 192.168.0.1 Is that normal? Could that be the problem? Charles "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:D2C1B031-0914-4B1C-9862-E4DE5DDEA54F@microsoft.com... > Here is the result of 'route print > C:\rprintlog on my XP workstation: > > =========================================================================== > Active Routes: > Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface > Metric > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.200 192.168.1.220 10 > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 > 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 10 > 192.168.1.220 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 10 > 192.168.1.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 10 > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 10 > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 1 > Default Gateway: 192.168.1.200 > =========================================================================== > Persistent Routes: > None > > This maps the entire IP address space to an interface (192.168.1.220 is my > ethernet card, 127.0.0.1 is a loopback to to the TCP/IP input of my PC) > and a > gateway (192.168.1.200 is a DSL router connecting to our ISP). > So all loopbacks (127.x.y.z) and traffic for 192.168.1.220 originating in > my > PC never gets out onto our Ethernet LAN. > Traffic for our LAN (192.168.1.x) is broadcast from my ethernet card, as > are > a few other special cases. > Any other address p.q.r.s is sent to the DSL router. > > This table is set up by the DHCP server on our LAN when I log on - it > assigns my IP, my net mask (defines size of LAN), and my gateway. > > 192.168.x.y are un-routable addresses - traffic for them will not pass > either way through a router, so they are secure - our LAN speaks only to > our > LAN, yours speaks only to yours. > > This should be enough info to allow you to diagnose your rote print > outputs, > or ask intelligent questions if you don't want to divulge the IP of the > access point to your secure network. > -- > Regards, > Newell White > > > "Charles Law" wrote: > >> >> Hi Newell >> >> The laptop is a DHCP client on the local network, and to the secure >> network >> when connected. >> >> What do you mean by the route print? I can't post anything that >> explicitly >> relates to the secure network, for obvious reasons. >> >> It sounds like your off-site users do exactly what I want to do here. I >> wonder if I use the laptop just as a gateway to the secure network, and >> allow ICS that would do the trick? The problem would be that Windows >> always >> wants to set the IP on an ICS machine to 192.168.0.1, and that is the IP >> of >> my router. >> >> Charles >> >> >> "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:321245F6-3F7C-4FA3-93C9-BC77FADCE539@microsoft.com... >> > More info needed. >> > I assume you are DHCP client of whichever network you successfully >> > connected >> > to last. Correct me if you have a different set-up. >> > >> > Post results of 'route print' when you are >> > (a) connected to secure network via dial-up >> > (b) to your broadband network >> > >> > Our offsite users can access our network (via VPN) and their local >> > printers, >> > and see Internet via their ISP, not ours, by using a set-up called >> > 'split >> > tunneling'. >> > I suspect this may only work for you if you put your dial-up modem on >> > local >> > Ethernet so that you access both networks via same interface. >> > -- >> > Regards, >> > Newell White >> > >> > >> > "Charles Law" wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Meinolf >> >> >> >> Thanks for the reply. I haven't tried RDP except over the dial-up >> >> connection. What I have tried is pinging my remote network IP when >> >> dial-up >> >> is connected and I get an instant reply from the secure network (over >> >> dial-up) saying that the host is unreachable. >> >> >> >> It seems that all traffic is sent down the dial-up path, whether it >> >> can >> >> be >> >> reached that way or not. >> >> >> >> What I think it needs is something to route only private network >> >> traffic >> >> down the dial-up path and everything else through my local gateway, >> >> but I >> >> can't see where I might set that. >> >> >> >> Charles >> >> >> >> >> >> "Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message >> >> news:ff16fb669754e8ca735372d3218a@msnews.microsoft.com... >> >> > Hello Charles, >> >> > >> >> > Did you try with Remote Desktop over the broadband connection? >> >> > >> >> > Best regards >> >> > >> >> > Meinolf Weber >> >> > Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and >> >> > confers no rights. >> >> > ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups >> >> > ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm >> >> > >> >> >> I'm not sure if this the right place, so please redirect me if >> >> >> there >> >> >> is a better place (I looked but none was obvious). >> >> >> >> >> >> I have a laptop that uses a dial-up connection to a secure network >> >> >> (the only route in). I also want to be able to connect to another >> >> >> remote network from the laptop, at the same time, via broadband. >> >> >> >> >> >> So far, all attempts have failed. If I hang-up the dial-up >> >> >> connection, >> >> >> I can see the internet, but once the dial-up is connected all I can >> >> >> see from the laptop is my local network (and the remote secure >> >> >> network, of course). >> >> >> >> >> >> The laptop has a wireless connection to my local network, and when >> >> >> I >> >> >> look at the properties there is a place to enter "Alternate >> >> >> Configuration", but I can't get that to make any difference. >> >> >> >> >> >> Please can anyone suggest how I might do this? >> >> >> >> >> >> TIA >> >> >> >> >> >> Charles >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
Guest Charles Law Posted April 24, 2008 Posted April 24, 2008 Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Computer Hi Bill I am using the Microsoft dial-up client, but I have already unchecked the "Use default gateway on remote network" box, but I still cannot get out onto my broadband connection through my LAN when the dial-up connection is open. Charles "Bill Grant" <not.available@online> wrote in message news:eKji1VapIHA.1768@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > You didn't really answer the question about what remote access client > you are using. > > Many remote access clients will prevent access to other networks. Some, > such as the Microsoft dialup client, don't prevent it but it is disabled > by default. You can change this in the dialup connection properties. > > If you are using this client, see KB 254231 . > > "Charles Law" <blank@nowhere.com> wrote in message > news:e8V6lWVpIHA.3860@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... >> Hi Frankster >> >> There's nothing special running on the laptop. I am just using RDP to get >> to the secure network. That works ok, but whilst the dial-up connection >> is open, all non-local traffic seems to go to the secure network, and >> nowhere else. >> >> Charles >> >> >> "Frankster" <Frank@SPAM2TRASH.com> wrote in message >> news:I4ednVAxbZ5soZLVnZ2dnUVZ_gGdnZ2d@giganews.com... >>> >>> "Charles Law" <blank@nowhere.com> wrote in message >>> news:%233eLpkSpIHA.1420@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >>>> I'm not sure if this the right place, so please redirect me if there is >>>> a better place (I looked but none was obvious). >>>> >>>> I have a laptop that uses a dial-up connection to a secure network (the >>>> only route in). I also want to be able to connect to another remote >>>> network from the laptop, at the same time, via broadband. >>>> >>>> So far, all attempts have failed. If I hang-up the dial-up connection, >>>> I can see the internet, but once the dial-up is connected all I can see >>>> from the laptop is my local network (and the remote secure network, of >>>> course). >>>> >>>> The laptop has a wireless connection to my local network, and when I >>>> look at the properties there is a place to enter "Alternate >>>> Configuration", but I can't get that to make any difference. >>>> >>>> Please can anyone suggest how I might do this? >>>> >>>> TIA >>>> >>>> Charles >>>> >>>> >>> >>> From your description I'd assume you are using a VPN connection. If not, >>> you can ignore this post...LOL. Be aware that many VPN programs will >>> specifically disable all other network connections while the VPN is >>> connected to its parent network. >>> >>> What VPN client are you using? Any chance it was provided by a cell >>> carrier and/or your corporate IT? These type custom VPN clients are >>> notorious for this behavior. It is by design. >>> >>> -Frank >> >> >
Guest Newell White Posted April 25, 2008 Posted April 25, 2008 Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput It's the 0.0.0.0 route that gets you out to the internet. From reading your comms with Bill Grant, sounds like you are not using the remote gateway of your dial-up connection, but 192.168.0.1 which I guess is your broadband router. So what are the two 0.0.0.0 entries in the case of (a) dial-up connected (b) dial-up not connected. -- Regards, Newell White "Charles Law" wrote: > Ok, my list ends like this: > > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 <secure network gateway> <secure > network gateway> 1 > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.3 > 2 1 > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.3 > 192.168.0.3 1 > Default Gateway: 192.168.0.1 > > Is that normal? Could that be the problem? > > Charles > > > "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:D2C1B031-0914-4B1C-9862-E4DE5DDEA54F@microsoft.com... > > Here is the result of 'route print > C:\rprintlog on my XP workstation: > > > > =========================================================================== > > Active Routes: > > Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface > > Metric > > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.200 192.168.1.220 10 > > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 > > 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 10 > > 192.168.1.220 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 10 > > 192.168.1.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 10 > > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 10 > > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 1 > > Default Gateway: 192.168.1.200 > > =========================================================================== > > Persistent Routes: > > None > > > > This maps the entire IP address space to an interface (192.168.1.220 is my > > ethernet card, 127.0.0.1 is a loopback to to the TCP/IP input of my PC) > > and a > > gateway (192.168.1.200 is a DSL router connecting to our ISP). > > So all loopbacks (127.x.y.z) and traffic for 192.168.1.220 originating in > > my > > PC never gets out onto our Ethernet LAN. > > Traffic for our LAN (192.168.1.x) is broadcast from my ethernet card, as > > are > > a few other special cases. > > Any other address p.q.r.s is sent to the DSL router. > > > > This table is set up by the DHCP server on our LAN when I log on - it > > assigns my IP, my net mask (defines size of LAN), and my gateway. > > > > 192.168.x.y are un-routable addresses - traffic for them will not pass > > either way through a router, so they are secure - our LAN speaks only to > > our > > LAN, yours speaks only to yours. > > > > This should be enough info to allow you to diagnose your rote print > > outputs, > > or ask intelligent questions if you don't want to divulge the IP of the > > access point to your secure network. > > -- > > Regards, > > Newell White > > > > > > "Charles Law" wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi Newell > >> > >> The laptop is a DHCP client on the local network, and to the secure > >> network > >> when connected. > >> > >> What do you mean by the route print? I can't post anything that > >> explicitly > >> relates to the secure network, for obvious reasons. > >> > >> It sounds like your off-site users do exactly what I want to do here. I > >> wonder if I use the laptop just as a gateway to the secure network, and > >> allow ICS that would do the trick? The problem would be that Windows > >> always > >> wants to set the IP on an ICS machine to 192.168.0.1, and that is the IP > >> of > >> my router. > >> > >> Charles > >> > >> > >> "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >> news:321245F6-3F7C-4FA3-93C9-BC77FADCE539@microsoft.com... > >> > More info needed. > >> > I assume you are DHCP client of whichever network you successfully > >> > connected > >> > to last. Correct me if you have a different set-up. > >> > > >> > Post results of 'route print' when you are > >> > (a) connected to secure network via dial-up > >> > (b) to your broadband network > >> > > >> > Our offsite users can access our network (via VPN) and their local > >> > printers, > >> > and see Internet via their ISP, not ours, by using a set-up called > >> > 'split > >> > tunneling'. > >> > I suspect this may only work for you if you put your dial-up modem on > >> > local > >> > Ethernet so that you access both networks via same interface. > >> > -- > >> > Regards, > >> > Newell White > >> > > >> > > >> > "Charles Law" wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi Meinolf > >> >> > >> >> Thanks for the reply. I haven't tried RDP except over the dial-up > >> >> connection. What I have tried is pinging my remote network IP when > >> >> dial-up > >> >> is connected and I get an instant reply from the secure network (over > >> >> dial-up) saying that the host is unreachable. > >> >> > >> >> It seems that all traffic is sent down the dial-up path, whether it > >> >> can > >> >> be > >> >> reached that way or not. > >> >> > >> >> What I think it needs is something to route only private network > >> >> traffic > >> >> down the dial-up path and everything else through my local gateway, > >> >> but I > >> >> can't see where I might set that. > >> >> > >> >> Charles > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> "Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message > >> >> news:ff16fb669754e8ca735372d3218a@msnews.microsoft.com... > >> >> > Hello Charles, > >> >> > > >> >> > Did you try with Remote Desktop over the broadband connection? > >> >> > > >> >> > Best regards > >> >> > > >> >> > Meinolf Weber > >> >> > Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and > >> >> > confers no rights. > >> >> > ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups > >> >> > ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > >> >> > > >> >> >> I'm not sure if this the right place, so please redirect me if > >> >> >> there > >> >> >> is a better place (I looked but none was obvious). > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I have a laptop that uses a dial-up connection to a secure network > >> >> >> (the only route in). I also want to be able to connect to another > >> >> >> remote network from the laptop, at the same time, via broadband. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> So far, all attempts have failed. If I hang-up the dial-up > >> >> >> connection, > >> >> >> I can see the internet, but once the dial-up is connected all I can > >> >> >> see from the laptop is my local network (and the remote secure > >> >> >> network, of course). > >> >> >> > >> >> >> The laptop has a wireless connection to my local network, and when > >> >> >> I > >> >> >> look at the properties there is a place to enter "Alternate > >> >> >> Configuration", but I can't get that to make any difference. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Please can anyone suggest how I might do this? > >> >> >> > >> >> >> TIA > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Charles > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> > > >
Guest Charles Law Posted April 25, 2008 Posted April 25, 2008 Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput The 0.0.0.0 entry, connected is 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 192.169.0.3 25 I tried again and I can now sort of get out onto the broadband internet whilst connected on dial-up. I say sort of, because I can connect to our SQL Server instance if I use the explicit IP address, but if I use the alias it doesn't work. I think that is what was throwing me. Any idea why the IP would work but not the alias? I have checked the alias and it is correct. It also works when not on dial-up. Charles "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:F23F7844-4583-4A7B-BB7C-99A3F152D767@microsoft.com... > It's the 0.0.0.0 route that gets you out to the internet. > > From reading your comms with Bill Grant, sounds like you are not using the > remote gateway of your dial-up connection, but 192.168.0.1 which I guess > is > your broadband router. > > So what are the two 0.0.0.0 entries in the case of (a) dial-up connected > (b) dial-up not connected. > > -- > Regards, > Newell White > > > "Charles Law" wrote: > >> Ok, my list ends like this: >> >> 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 <secure network gateway> <secure >> network gateway> 1 >> 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.3 >> 2 1 >> 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.3 >> 192.168.0.3 1 >> Default Gateway: 192.168.0.1 >> >> Is that normal? Could that be the problem? >> >> Charles >> >> >> "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:D2C1B031-0914-4B1C-9862-E4DE5DDEA54F@microsoft.com... >> > Here is the result of 'route print > C:\rprintlog on my XP workstation: >> > >> > =========================================================================== >> > Active Routes: >> > Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface >> > Metric >> > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.200 192.168.1.220 10 >> > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 >> > 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 10 >> > 192.168.1.220 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 10 >> > 192.168.1.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 10 >> > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 10 >> > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 1 >> > Default Gateway: 192.168.1.200 >> > =========================================================================== >> > Persistent Routes: >> > None >> > >> > This maps the entire IP address space to an interface (192.168.1.220 is >> > my >> > ethernet card, 127.0.0.1 is a loopback to to the TCP/IP input of my PC) >> > and a >> > gateway (192.168.1.200 is a DSL router connecting to our ISP). >> > So all loopbacks (127.x.y.z) and traffic for 192.168.1.220 originating >> > in >> > my >> > PC never gets out onto our Ethernet LAN. >> > Traffic for our LAN (192.168.1.x) is broadcast from my ethernet card, >> > as >> > are >> > a few other special cases. >> > Any other address p.q.r.s is sent to the DSL router. >> > >> > This table is set up by the DHCP server on our LAN when I log on - it >> > assigns my IP, my net mask (defines size of LAN), and my gateway. >> > >> > 192.168.x.y are un-routable addresses - traffic for them will not pass >> > either way through a router, so they are secure - our LAN speaks only >> > to >> > our >> > LAN, yours speaks only to yours. >> > >> > This should be enough info to allow you to diagnose your rote print >> > outputs, >> > or ask intelligent questions if you don't want to divulge the IP of the >> > access point to your secure network. >> > -- >> > Regards, >> > Newell White >> > >> > >> > "Charles Law" wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> Hi Newell >> >> >> >> The laptop is a DHCP client on the local network, and to the secure >> >> network >> >> when connected. >> >> >> >> What do you mean by the route print? I can't post anything that >> >> explicitly >> >> relates to the secure network, for obvious reasons. >> >> >> >> It sounds like your off-site users do exactly what I want to do here. >> >> I >> >> wonder if I use the laptop just as a gateway to the secure network, >> >> and >> >> allow ICS that would do the trick? The problem would be that Windows >> >> always >> >> wants to set the IP on an ICS machine to 192.168.0.1, and that is the >> >> IP >> >> of >> >> my router. >> >> >> >> Charles >> >> >> >> >> >> "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in >> >> message >> >> news:321245F6-3F7C-4FA3-93C9-BC77FADCE539@microsoft.com... >> >> > More info needed. >> >> > I assume you are DHCP client of whichever network you successfully >> >> > connected >> >> > to last. Correct me if you have a different set-up. >> >> > >> >> > Post results of 'route print' when you are >> >> > (a) connected to secure network via dial-up >> >> > (b) to your broadband network >> >> > >> >> > Our offsite users can access our network (via VPN) and their local >> >> > printers, >> >> > and see Internet via their ISP, not ours, by using a set-up called >> >> > 'split >> >> > tunneling'. >> >> > I suspect this may only work for you if you put your dial-up modem >> >> > on >> >> > local >> >> > Ethernet so that you access both networks via same interface. >> >> > -- >> >> > Regards, >> >> > Newell White >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > "Charles Law" wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Hi Meinolf >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for the reply. I haven't tried RDP except over the dial-up >> >> >> connection. What I have tried is pinging my remote network IP when >> >> >> dial-up >> >> >> is connected and I get an instant reply from the secure network >> >> >> (over >> >> >> dial-up) saying that the host is unreachable. >> >> >> >> >> >> It seems that all traffic is sent down the dial-up path, whether it >> >> >> can >> >> >> be >> >> >> reached that way or not. >> >> >> >> >> >> What I think it needs is something to route only private network >> >> >> traffic >> >> >> down the dial-up path and everything else through my local gateway, >> >> >> but I >> >> >> can't see where I might set that. >> >> >> >> >> >> Charles >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message >> >> >> news:ff16fb669754e8ca735372d3218a@msnews.microsoft.com... >> >> >> > Hello Charles, >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Did you try with Remote Desktop over the broadband connection? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Best regards >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Meinolf Weber >> >> >> > Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, >> >> >> > and >> >> >> > confers no rights. >> >> >> > ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups >> >> >> > ** HELP us help YOU!!! >> >> >> > http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> I'm not sure if this the right place, so please redirect me if >> >> >> >> there >> >> >> >> is a better place (I looked but none was obvious). >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I have a laptop that uses a dial-up connection to a secure >> >> >> >> network >> >> >> >> (the only route in). I also want to be able to connect to >> >> >> >> another >> >> >> >> remote network from the laptop, at the same time, via broadband. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So far, all attempts have failed. If I hang-up the dial-up >> >> >> >> connection, >> >> >> >> I can see the internet, but once the dial-up is connected all I >> >> >> >> can >> >> >> >> see from the laptop is my local network (and the remote secure >> >> >> >> network, of course). >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The laptop has a wireless connection to my local network, and >> >> >> >> when >> >> >> >> I >> >> >> >> look at the properties there is a place to enter "Alternate >> >> >> >> Configuration", but I can't get that to make any difference. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Please can anyone suggest how I might do this? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> TIA >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Charles >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
Guest Newell White Posted April 25, 2008 Posted April 25, 2008 Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput To rephrase a biblical quote: "No PC can serve two DHCP servers, for either he will obey the one and despise the other..." One of the things a DHCP server gives you (as well as an IP address) is a DNS server IP address. This is where your PC asks 'what is the numeric IP address of http://www.arsenal.com' so that it can connect you to get updates on the best football team in North London. When you are not connected to the secure dial-up, you are getting the address of a DNS server that works (it knows all about your LAN, and forwards names it doesn't recognise to the authoritative server for .com, .org, .fr, or whatever. When you connect to the secure network, I bet their DHCP server (or their login script) gives you a DNS server which is not connected to the internet, so that desktops in the secure network can't browse the web - understandable as it is a big security hole. So I guess the operators of that network don't want you to be browsing through your wireless card while you are connected to them. Ask them for confirmation of this - or just back off if to do so might light the career dissipation LED on your desktop! -- Regards, Newell White "Charles Law" wrote: > The 0.0.0.0 entry, connected is > > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 192.169.0.3 > 25 > > I tried again and I can now sort of get out onto the broadband internet > whilst connected on dial-up. I say sort of, because I can connect to our SQL > Server instance if I use the explicit IP address, but if I use the alias it > doesn't work. I think that is what was throwing me. > > Any idea why the IP would work but not the alias? I have checked the alias > and it is correct. It also works when not on dial-up. > > Charles > > > "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:F23F7844-4583-4A7B-BB7C-99A3F152D767@microsoft.com... > > It's the 0.0.0.0 route that gets you out to the internet. > > > > From reading your comms with Bill Grant, sounds like you are not using the > > remote gateway of your dial-up connection, but 192.168.0.1 which I guess > > is > > your broadband router. > > > > So what are the two 0.0.0.0 entries in the case of (a) dial-up connected > > (b) dial-up not connected. > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Newell White > > > > > > "Charles Law" wrote: > > > >> Ok, my list ends like this: > >> > >> 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 <secure network gateway> <secure > >> network gateway> 1 > >> 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.3 > >> 2 1 > >> 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.3 > >> 192.168.0.3 1 > >> Default Gateway: 192.168.0.1 > >> > >> Is that normal? Could that be the problem? > >> > >> Charles > >> > >> > >> "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >> news:D2C1B031-0914-4B1C-9862-E4DE5DDEA54F@microsoft.com... > >> > Here is the result of 'route print > C:\rprintlog on my XP workstation: > >> > > >> > =========================================================================== > >> > Active Routes: > >> > Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface > >> > Metric > >> > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.200 192.168.1.220 10 > >> > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 > >> > 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 10 > >> > 192.168.1.220 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 10 > >> > 192.168.1.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 10 > >> > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 10 > >> > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 1 > >> > Default Gateway: 192.168.1.200 > >> > =========================================================================== > >> > Persistent Routes: > >> > None > >> > > >> > This maps the entire IP address space to an interface (192.168.1.220 is > >> > my > >> > ethernet card, 127.0.0.1 is a loopback to to the TCP/IP input of my PC) > >> > and a > >> > gateway (192.168.1.200 is a DSL router connecting to our ISP). > >> > So all loopbacks (127.x.y.z) and traffic for 192.168.1.220 originating > >> > in > >> > my > >> > PC never gets out onto our Ethernet LAN. > >> > Traffic for our LAN (192.168.1.x) is broadcast from my ethernet card, > >> > as > >> > are > >> > a few other special cases. > >> > Any other address p.q.r.s is sent to the DSL router. > >> > > >> > This table is set up by the DHCP server on our LAN when I log on - it > >> > assigns my IP, my net mask (defines size of LAN), and my gateway. > >> > > >> > 192.168.x.y are un-routable addresses - traffic for them will not pass > >> > either way through a router, so they are secure - our LAN speaks only > >> > to > >> > our > >> > LAN, yours speaks only to yours. > >> > > >> > This should be enough info to allow you to diagnose your rote print > >> > outputs, > >> > or ask intelligent questions if you don't want to divulge the IP of the > >> > access point to your secure network. > >> > -- > >> > Regards, > >> > Newell White > >> > > >> > > >> > "Charles Law" wrote: > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Hi Newell > >> >> > >> >> The laptop is a DHCP client on the local network, and to the secure > >> >> network > >> >> when connected. > >> >> > >> >> What do you mean by the route print? I can't post anything that > >> >> explicitly > >> >> relates to the secure network, for obvious reasons. > >> >> > >> >> It sounds like your off-site users do exactly what I want to do here. > >> >> I > >> >> wonder if I use the laptop just as a gateway to the secure network, > >> >> and > >> >> allow ICS that would do the trick? The problem would be that Windows > >> >> always > >> >> wants to set the IP on an ICS machine to 192.168.0.1, and that is the > >> >> IP > >> >> of > >> >> my router. > >> >> > >> >> Charles > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in > >> >> message > >> >> news:321245F6-3F7C-4FA3-93C9-BC77FADCE539@microsoft.com... > >> >> > More info needed. > >> >> > I assume you are DHCP client of whichever network you successfully > >> >> > connected > >> >> > to last. Correct me if you have a different set-up. > >> >> > > >> >> > Post results of 'route print' when you are > >> >> > (a) connected to secure network via dial-up > >> >> > (b) to your broadband network > >> >> > > >> >> > Our offsite users can access our network (via VPN) and their local > >> >> > printers, > >> >> > and see Internet via their ISP, not ours, by using a set-up called > >> >> > 'split > >> >> > tunneling'. > >> >> > I suspect this may only work for you if you put your dial-up modem > >> >> > on > >> >> > local > >> >> > Ethernet so that you access both networks via same interface. > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Regards, > >> >> > Newell White > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > "Charles Law" wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> Hi Meinolf > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Thanks for the reply. I haven't tried RDP except over the dial-up > >> >> >> connection. What I have tried is pinging my remote network IP when > >> >> >> dial-up > >> >> >> is connected and I get an instant reply from the secure network > >> >> >> (over > >> >> >> dial-up) saying that the host is unreachable. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> It seems that all traffic is sent down the dial-up path, whether it > >> >> >> can > >> >> >> be > >> >> >> reached that way or not. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> What I think it needs is something to route only private network > >> >> >> traffic > >> >> >> down the dial-up path and everything else through my local gateway, > >> >> >> but I > >> >> >> can't see where I might set that. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Charles > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> "Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message > >> >> >> news:ff16fb669754e8ca735372d3218a@msnews.microsoft.com... > >> >> >> > Hello Charles, > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Did you try with Remote Desktop over the broadband connection? > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Best regards > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Meinolf Weber > >> >> >> > Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, > >> >> >> > and > >> >> >> > confers no rights. > >> >> >> > ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups > >> >> >> > ** HELP us help YOU!!! > >> >> >> > http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> I'm not sure if this the right place, so please redirect me if > >> >> >> >> there > >> >> >> >> is a better place (I looked but none was obvious). > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> I have a laptop that uses a dial-up connection to a secure > >> >> >> >> network > >> >> >> >> (the only route in). I also want to be able to connect to > >> >> >> >> another > >> >> >> >> remote network from the laptop, at the same time, via broadband. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> So far, all attempts have failed. If I hang-up the dial-up > >> >> >> >> connection, > >> >> >> >> I can see the internet, but once the dial-up is connected all I > >> >> >> >> can > >> >> >> >> see from the laptop is my local network (and the remote secure > >> >> >> >> network, of course). > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> The laptop has a wireless connection to my local network, and > >> >> >> >> when > >> >> >> >> I > >> >> >> >> look at the properties there is a place to enter "Alternate > >> >> >> >> Configuration", but I can't get that to make any difference. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Please can anyone suggest how I might do this? > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> TIA > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Charles > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> > > >
Guest Charles Law Posted April 25, 2008 Posted April 25, 2008 Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput Nice and clear. Thanks Newell. I imagined it would have been http://www.thearsenal.com, but what do I know. Charles "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:533FBF24-FE9C-4B3E-9F03-D15887F42A4E@microsoft.com... > To rephrase a biblical quote: > "No PC can serve two DHCP servers, for either he will obey the one and > despise the other..." > > One of the things a DHCP server gives you (as well as an IP address) is a > DNS server IP address. > This is where your PC asks 'what is the numeric IP address of > http://www.arsenal.com' so that it can connect you to get updates on the best > football team in North London. > > When you are not connected to the secure dial-up, you are getting the > address of a DNS server that works (it knows all about your LAN, and > forwards > names it doesn't recognise to the authoritative server for .com, .org, > .fr, > or whatever. > > When you connect to the secure network, I bet their DHCP server (or their > login script) gives you a DNS server which is not connected to the > internet, > so that desktops in the secure network can't browse the web - > understandable > as it is a big security hole. > > So I guess the operators of that network don't want you to be browsing > through your wireless card while you are connected to them. Ask them for > confirmation of this - or just back off if to do so might light the career > dissipation LED on your desktop! > -- > Regards, > Newell White > > > "Charles Law" wrote: > >> The 0.0.0.0 entry, connected is >> >> 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 192.169.0.3 >> 25 >> >> I tried again and I can now sort of get out onto the broadband internet >> whilst connected on dial-up. I say sort of, because I can connect to our >> SQL >> Server instance if I use the explicit IP address, but if I use the alias >> it >> doesn't work. I think that is what was throwing me. >> >> Any idea why the IP would work but not the alias? I have checked the >> alias >> and it is correct. It also works when not on dial-up. >> >> Charles >> >> >> "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message >> news:F23F7844-4583-4A7B-BB7C-99A3F152D767@microsoft.com... >> > It's the 0.0.0.0 route that gets you out to the internet. >> > >> > From reading your comms with Bill Grant, sounds like you are not using >> > the >> > remote gateway of your dial-up connection, but 192.168.0.1 which I >> > guess >> > is >> > your broadband router. >> > >> > So what are the two 0.0.0.0 entries in the case of (a) dial-up >> > connected >> > (b) dial-up not connected. >> > >> > -- >> > Regards, >> > Newell White >> > >> > >> > "Charles Law" wrote: >> > >> >> Ok, my list ends like this: >> >> >> >> 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 <secure network gateway> >> >> <secure >> >> network gateway> 1 >> >> 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.3 >> >> 2 1 >> >> 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.3 >> >> 192.168.0.3 1 >> >> Default Gateway: 192.168.0.1 >> >> >> >> Is that normal? Could that be the problem? >> >> >> >> Charles >> >> >> >> >> >> "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in >> >> message >> >> news:D2C1B031-0914-4B1C-9862-E4DE5DDEA54F@microsoft.com... >> >> > Here is the result of 'route print > C:\rprintlog on my XP >> >> > workstation: >> >> > >> >> > =========================================================================== >> >> > Active Routes: >> >> > Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface >> >> > Metric >> >> > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.200 192.168.1.220 >> >> > 10 >> >> > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 >> >> > 1 >> >> > 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 >> >> > 10 >> >> > 192.168.1.220 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 >> >> > 10 >> >> > 192.168.1.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 >> >> > 10 >> >> > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 >> >> > 10 >> >> > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 >> >> > 1 >> >> > Default Gateway: 192.168.1.200 >> >> > =========================================================================== >> >> > Persistent Routes: >> >> > None >> >> > >> >> > This maps the entire IP address space to an interface (192.168.1.220 >> >> > is >> >> > my >> >> > ethernet card, 127.0.0.1 is a loopback to to the TCP/IP input of my >> >> > PC) >> >> > and a >> >> > gateway (192.168.1.200 is a DSL router connecting to our ISP). >> >> > So all loopbacks (127.x.y.z) and traffic for 192.168.1.220 >> >> > originating >> >> > in >> >> > my >> >> > PC never gets out onto our Ethernet LAN. >> >> > Traffic for our LAN (192.168.1.x) is broadcast from my ethernet >> >> > card, >> >> > as >> >> > are >> >> > a few other special cases. >> >> > Any other address p.q.r.s is sent to the DSL router. >> >> > >> >> > This table is set up by the DHCP server on our LAN when I log on - >> >> > it >> >> > assigns my IP, my net mask (defines size of LAN), and my gateway. >> >> > >> >> > 192.168.x.y are un-routable addresses - traffic for them will not >> >> > pass >> >> > either way through a router, so they are secure - our LAN speaks >> >> > only >> >> > to >> >> > our >> >> > LAN, yours speaks only to yours. >> >> > >> >> > This should be enough info to allow you to diagnose your rote print >> >> > outputs, >> >> > or ask intelligent questions if you don't want to divulge the IP of >> >> > the >> >> > access point to your secure network. >> >> > -- >> >> > Regards, >> >> > Newell White >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > "Charles Law" wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi Newell >> >> >> >> >> >> The laptop is a DHCP client on the local network, and to the secure >> >> >> network >> >> >> when connected. >> >> >> >> >> >> What do you mean by the route print? I can't post anything that >> >> >> explicitly >> >> >> relates to the secure network, for obvious reasons. >> >> >> >> >> >> It sounds like your off-site users do exactly what I want to do >> >> >> here. >> >> >> I >> >> >> wonder if I use the laptop just as a gateway to the secure network, >> >> >> and >> >> >> allow ICS that would do the trick? The problem would be that >> >> >> Windows >> >> >> always >> >> >> wants to set the IP on an ICS machine to 192.168.0.1, and that is >> >> >> the >> >> >> IP >> >> >> of >> >> >> my router. >> >> >> >> >> >> Charles >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in >> >> >> message >> >> >> news:321245F6-3F7C-4FA3-93C9-BC77FADCE539@microsoft.com... >> >> >> > More info needed. >> >> >> > I assume you are DHCP client of whichever network you >> >> >> > successfully >> >> >> > connected >> >> >> > to last. Correct me if you have a different set-up. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Post results of 'route print' when you are >> >> >> > (a) connected to secure network via dial-up >> >> >> > (b) to your broadband network >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Our offsite users can access our network (via VPN) and their >> >> >> > local >> >> >> > printers, >> >> >> > and see Internet via their ISP, not ours, by using a set-up >> >> >> > called >> >> >> > 'split >> >> >> > tunneling'. >> >> >> > I suspect this may only work for you if you put your dial-up >> >> >> > modem >> >> >> > on >> >> >> > local >> >> >> > Ethernet so that you access both networks via same interface. >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> > Regards, >> >> >> > Newell White >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > "Charles Law" wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Hi Meinolf >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks for the reply. I haven't tried RDP except over the >> >> >> >> dial-up >> >> >> >> connection. What I have tried is pinging my remote network IP >> >> >> >> when >> >> >> >> dial-up >> >> >> >> is connected and I get an instant reply from the secure network >> >> >> >> (over >> >> >> >> dial-up) saying that the host is unreachable. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> It seems that all traffic is sent down the dial-up path, whether >> >> >> >> it >> >> >> >> can >> >> >> >> be >> >> >> >> reached that way or not. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> What I think it needs is something to route only private network >> >> >> >> traffic >> >> >> >> down the dial-up path and everything else through my local >> >> >> >> gateway, >> >> >> >> but I >> >> >> >> can't see where I might set that. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Charles >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message >> >> >> >> news:ff16fb669754e8ca735372d3218a@msnews.microsoft.com... >> >> >> >> > Hello Charles, >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Did you try with Remote Desktop over the broadband connection? >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Best regards >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Meinolf Weber >> >> >> >> > Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no >> >> >> >> > warranties, >> >> >> >> > and >> >> >> >> > confers no rights. >> >> >> >> > ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups >> >> >> >> > ** HELP us help YOU!!! >> >> >> >> > http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> I'm not sure if this the right place, so please redirect me >> >> >> >> >> if >> >> >> >> >> there >> >> >> >> >> is a better place (I looked but none was obvious). >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I have a laptop that uses a dial-up connection to a secure >> >> >> >> >> network >> >> >> >> >> (the only route in). I also want to be able to connect to >> >> >> >> >> another >> >> >> >> >> remote network from the laptop, at the same time, via >> >> >> >> >> broadband. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> So far, all attempts have failed. If I hang-up the dial-up >> >> >> >> >> connection, >> >> >> >> >> I can see the internet, but once the dial-up is connected all >> >> >> >> >> I >> >> >> >> >> can >> >> >> >> >> see from the laptop is my local network (and the remote >> >> >> >> >> secure >> >> >> >> >> network, of course). >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> The laptop has a wireless connection to my local network, and >> >> >> >> >> when >> >> >> >> >> I >> >> >> >> >> look at the properties there is a place to enter "Alternate >> >> >> >> >> Configuration", but I can't get that to make any difference. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Please can anyone suggest how I might do this? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> TIA >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Charles >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
Guest Newell White Posted April 28, 2008 Posted April 28, 2008 Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput Re: Connect to Multiple Networks (Simultaneously) From Same Comput We get about one PC infected per year by allowing our 30 employees unfettered access to the internet. This is an acceptable level of risk for us as a manufacturer of electronic display sub-assemblies. And an acceptable work load for me! I would have preferred http://www.themightyarsenal.com, but they went for the extreme vanilla version I quoted. -- Regards, Newell White "Charles Law" wrote: > Nice and clear. Thanks Newell. > > I imagined it would have been http://www.thearsenal.com, but what do I know. > > Charles > > > "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:533FBF24-FE9C-4B3E-9F03-D15887F42A4E@microsoft.com... > > To rephrase a biblical quote: > > "No PC can serve two DHCP servers, for either he will obey the one and > > despise the other..." > > > > One of the things a DHCP server gives you (as well as an IP address) is a > > DNS server IP address. > > This is where your PC asks 'what is the numeric IP address of > > http://www.arsenal.com' so that it can connect you to get updates on the best > > football team in North London. > > > > When you are not connected to the secure dial-up, you are getting the > > address of a DNS server that works (it knows all about your LAN, and > > forwards > > names it doesn't recognise to the authoritative server for .com, .org, > > .fr, > > or whatever. > > > > When you connect to the secure network, I bet their DHCP server (or their > > login script) gives you a DNS server which is not connected to the > > internet, > > so that desktops in the secure network can't browse the web - > > understandable > > as it is a big security hole. > > > > So I guess the operators of that network don't want you to be browsing > > through your wireless card while you are connected to them. Ask them for > > confirmation of this - or just back off if to do so might light the career > > dissipation LED on your desktop! > > -- > > Regards, > > Newell White > > > > > > "Charles Law" wrote: > > > >> The 0.0.0.0 entry, connected is > >> > >> 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 192.169.0.3 > >> 25 > >> > >> I tried again and I can now sort of get out onto the broadband internet > >> whilst connected on dial-up. I say sort of, because I can connect to our > >> SQL > >> Server instance if I use the explicit IP address, but if I use the alias > >> it > >> doesn't work. I think that is what was throwing me. > >> > >> Any idea why the IP would work but not the alias? I have checked the > >> alias > >> and it is correct. It also works when not on dial-up. > >> > >> Charles > >> > >> > >> "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > >> news:F23F7844-4583-4A7B-BB7C-99A3F152D767@microsoft.com... > >> > It's the 0.0.0.0 route that gets you out to the internet. > >> > > >> > From reading your comms with Bill Grant, sounds like you are not using > >> > the > >> > remote gateway of your dial-up connection, but 192.168.0.1 which I > >> > guess > >> > is > >> > your broadband router. > >> > > >> > So what are the two 0.0.0.0 entries in the case of (a) dial-up > >> > connected > >> > (b) dial-up not connected. > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Regards, > >> > Newell White > >> > > >> > > >> > "Charles Law" wrote: > >> > > >> >> Ok, my list ends like this: > >> >> > >> >> 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 <secure network gateway> > >> >> <secure > >> >> network gateway> 1 > >> >> 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.3 > >> >> 2 1 > >> >> 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.0.3 > >> >> 192.168.0.3 1 > >> >> Default Gateway: 192.168.0.1 > >> >> > >> >> Is that normal? Could that be the problem? > >> >> > >> >> Charles > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in > >> >> message > >> >> news:D2C1B031-0914-4B1C-9862-E4DE5DDEA54F@microsoft.com... > >> >> > Here is the result of 'route print > C:\rprintlog on my XP > >> >> > workstation: > >> >> > > >> >> > =========================================================================== > >> >> > Active Routes: > >> >> > Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface > >> >> > Metric > >> >> > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.200 192.168.1.220 > >> >> > 10 > >> >> > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 > >> >> > 1 > >> >> > 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 > >> >> > 10 > >> >> > 192.168.1.220 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 > >> >> > 10 > >> >> > 192.168.1.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 > >> >> > 10 > >> >> > 224.0.0.0 240.0.0.0 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 > >> >> > 10 > >> >> > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.220 192.168.1.220 > >> >> > 1 > >> >> > Default Gateway: 192.168.1.200 > >> >> > =========================================================================== > >> >> > Persistent Routes: > >> >> > None > >> >> > > >> >> > This maps the entire IP address space to an interface (192.168.1.220 > >> >> > is > >> >> > my > >> >> > ethernet card, 127.0.0.1 is a loopback to to the TCP/IP input of my > >> >> > PC) > >> >> > and a > >> >> > gateway (192.168.1.200 is a DSL router connecting to our ISP). > >> >> > So all loopbacks (127.x.y.z) and traffic for 192.168.1.220 > >> >> > originating > >> >> > in > >> >> > my > >> >> > PC never gets out onto our Ethernet LAN. > >> >> > Traffic for our LAN (192.168.1.x) is broadcast from my ethernet > >> >> > card, > >> >> > as > >> >> > are > >> >> > a few other special cases. > >> >> > Any other address p.q.r.s is sent to the DSL router. > >> >> > > >> >> > This table is set up by the DHCP server on our LAN when I log on - > >> >> > it > >> >> > assigns my IP, my net mask (defines size of LAN), and my gateway. > >> >> > > >> >> > 192.168.x.y are un-routable addresses - traffic for them will not > >> >> > pass > >> >> > either way through a router, so they are secure - our LAN speaks > >> >> > only > >> >> > to > >> >> > our > >> >> > LAN, yours speaks only to yours. > >> >> > > >> >> > This should be enough info to allow you to diagnose your rote print > >> >> > outputs, > >> >> > or ask intelligent questions if you don't want to divulge the IP of > >> >> > the > >> >> > access point to your secure network. > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Regards, > >> >> > Newell White > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > "Charles Law" wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Hi Newell > >> >> >> > >> >> >> The laptop is a DHCP client on the local network, and to the secure > >> >> >> network > >> >> >> when connected. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> What do you mean by the route print? I can't post anything that > >> >> >> explicitly > >> >> >> relates to the secure network, for obvious reasons. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> It sounds like your off-site users do exactly what I want to do > >> >> >> here. > >> >> >> I > >> >> >> wonder if I use the laptop just as a gateway to the secure network, > >> >> >> and > >> >> >> allow ICS that would do the trick? The problem would be that > >> >> >> Windows > >> >> >> always > >> >> >> wants to set the IP on an ICS machine to 192.168.0.1, and that is > >> >> >> the > >> >> >> IP > >> >> >> of > >> >> >> my router. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Charles > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> "Newell White" <NewellWhite@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in > >> >> >> message > >> >> >> news:321245F6-3F7C-4FA3-93C9-BC77FADCE539@microsoft.com... > >> >> >> > More info needed. > >> >> >> > I assume you are DHCP client of whichever network you > >> >> >> > successfully > >> >> >> > connected > >> >> >> > to last. Correct me if you have a different set-up. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Post results of 'route print' when you are > >> >> >> > (a) connected to secure network via dial-up > >> >> >> > (b) to your broadband network > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Our offsite users can access our network (via VPN) and their > >> >> >> > local > >> >> >> > printers, > >> >> >> > and see Internet via their ISP, not ours, by using a set-up > >> >> >> > called > >> >> >> > 'split > >> >> >> > tunneling'. > >> >> >> > I suspect this may only work for you if you put your dial-up > >> >> >> > modem > >> >> >> > on > >> >> >> > local > >> >> >> > Ethernet so that you access both networks via same interface. > >> >> >> > -- > >> >> >> > Regards, > >> >> >> > Newell White > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > "Charles Law" wrote: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> Hi Meinolf > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Thanks for the reply. I haven't tried RDP except over the > >> >> >> >> dial-up > >> >> >> >> connection. What I have tried is pinging my remote network IP > >> >> >> >> when > >> >> >> >> dial-up > >> >> >> >> is connected and I get an instant reply from the secure network > >> >> >> >> (over > >> >> >> >> dial-up) saying that the host is unreachable. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> It seems that all traffic is sent down the dial-up path, whether > >> >> >> >> it > >> >> >> >> can > >> >> >> >> be > >> >> >> >> reached that way or not. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> What I think it needs is something to route only private network > >> >> >> >> traffic > >> >> >> >> down the dial-up path and everything else through my local > >> >> >> >> gateway, > >> >> >> >> but I > >> >> >> >> can't see where I might set that. > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Charles > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> "Meinolf Weber" <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de> wrote in message > >> >> >> >> news:ff16fb669754e8ca735372d3218a@msnews.microsoft.com... > >> >> >> >> > Hello Charles, > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > Did you try with Remote Desktop over the broadband connection? > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > Best regards > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> > Meinolf Weber > >> >> >> >> > Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no > >> >> >> >> > warranties, > >> >> >> >> > and > >> >> >> >> > confers no rights. > >> >> >> >> > ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups > >> >> >> >> > ** HELP us help YOU!!! > >> >> >> >> > http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > >> >> >> >> > > >> >> >> >> >> I'm not sure if this the right place, so please redirect me > >> >> >> >> >> if > >> >> >> >> >> there > >> >> >> >> >> is a better place (I looked but none was obvious). > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> I have a laptop that uses a dial-up connection to a secure > >> >> >> >> >> network > >> >> >> >> >> (the only route in). I also want to be able to connect to > >> >> >> >> >> another > >> >> >> >> >> remote network from the laptop, at the same time, via > >> >> >> >> >> broadband. > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> So far, all attempts have failed. If I hang-up the dial-up > >> >> >> >> >> connection, > >> >> >> >> >> I can see the internet, but once the dial-up is connected all > >> >> >> >> >> I > >> >> >> >> >> can > >> >> >> >> >> see from the laptop is my local network (and the remote > >> >> >> >> >> secure > >> >> >> >> >> network, of course). > >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> The laptop has a wireless connection to my local network, and > >> >> >> >> >> when
Recommended Posts