Guest teddkilroy Posted May 2, 2008 Posted May 2, 2008 I am trying to create (which I have done) a GPO to push .Net 2.0 Framework to 24 computers. I have converted the .exe to .msi with freeware (Advcance Installer 6.2), created the GPO and pused it out. Computers see it, shows window after applying security settings and before you login, but my problem is that .Net 2.0 Framework requires user interaction to finish and runs in to the ULLA acceptance. Therefore it may get pushed but not installed How can this be accpomplished, to automate an installation that requires you to choose options? Thanks to those that respond.
Guest Meinolf Weber Posted May 2, 2008 Posted May 2, 2008 Re: .MSI Hello teddkilroy, Check the vendors website from Advanced installer to find a solution without requiring a user interaction. It is not part from MS support. Normally during a package creation you can automate all userinteractions, so that the user have nothing to accept. The easiest way for this official patches and updates are the WSUS 3 SP1 server. Or you can use the command line install for msi packages: http://technet2.microsoft.com/windowsserver/en/library/9361d377-9011-4e21-8011-db371fa220ba1033.mspx?mfr=true http://support.microsoft.com/kb/227091 Best regards Meinolf Weber Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > I am trying to create (which I have done) a GPO to push .Net 2.0 > Framework to 24 computers. I have converted the .exe to .msi with > freeware (Advcance Installer 6.2), created the GPO and pused it out. > > Computers see it, shows window after applying security settings and > before you login, but my problem is that .Net 2.0 Framework requires > user interaction to finish and runs in to the ULLA acceptance. > Therefore it may get pushed but not installed > > How can this be accpomplished, to automate an installation that > requires you to choose options? > > Thanks to those that respond. >
Recommended Posts