RE: Windows Genuine Advantage

[Guest johnnn]

RE: Windows Genuine Advantage

 

My address to all MVPs and Microsoft® developers’ network formally known as

MSDN, I am a proficient Microsoft® Windows® user. I am able to do any job

task in Microsoft® Windows® software, as the current issue is concern it is

the issue of my expertise. I wanna to tell everyone of you all that I have

the expertise to make copy of any Microsoft® software like Windows® and

Office® as legal and Genuine Validate because I have that technology

developed by Microsoft® corporation, I am a half software developer. I am

able to activate and Genuine Validate any copy of MS Windows® like Windows®

XP™, Windows® Vista™, and Office. I know The technological measures used in

Genuine Windows® Activation and Genuine Validation like Windows Product

Activation WPA, Microsoft Product Activation MPA mechanism and how its work.

It is the technology that I used has developed by Microsoft itself I can’t

make that technology but implement that technology, So now I am able to

completely and successfully do that with out any problem or condition (MPA,

WPA, WGA)

--

i wanna give you best possible solution of your Windows troubleshootings /

operating system problems, Dear, my E-Mail address is johncityny@hotmail.com,

you can feel free to e-mail me any time,

 

 

"Tom Penharston" wrote:

>

> Windows Genuine Advantage

> http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1754886,00.asp

>

> Instead of debating the merits of Genuine Advantage I'm writing this

> post to get advice on configuration steps for brand new computers once

> the initiative starts.

>

>

> INSTALLING BRAND NEW SYSTEMS OFF-LINE

>

>

> I'm under the impression that most serious administrators keep their

> machines off-line until they are patched (I do). When an unpatched

> system goes on-line the window of vulnerability may be one minute or

> one day depending on who you ask, but I think most of us agree that the

> window is becomming shorter each year as viruses become more

> aggressive. (I recall that the Blaster virus was capable of infecting

> an entire subnet in minutes.)

>

>

> QUESTIONS

>

>

> Here are my questions for home users. If Joe downloads updates through

> the Microsoft Download Center using Genuine Advantage, what's to stop

> Joe from burning a CD for Mary with the executable update files? Will

> Mary be prevented from installing the patches off-line? Thus, a window

> of vulnerabiltiy? What's the absolute best way for Mary to handle the

> situation? Please don't tell me it shouldn't be that way, just tell me

> the best answer!

>

> Similarly, can we download patches to a Macintosh or Linux computer to

> distribute to a PC?

>

> Here are some questions for business:

>

> SUS Servers have the ability to download all Microsoft updates. Will

> SUS (or SMS) undergo changes under the Windows Genuine Advantage

> initiative? Will each client computer share key codes with SUS? (That

> would be a huge addition to what is now, a very lean update server.)

> So far I'm lead to believe that just one key code would be required but

> I haven't found the information on the Microsoft website. Does anyone

> have a link?

>

> Two similar questions about bulk licensing:

>

> If an organization has purchased multiple computers through an OEM

> dealer must each computer go through Genuine Advantage? If site

> licenses (or upgrade licenses) are purchased through Microsoft's EOPEN

> Open Licensing Program must each individual system go through Genuine

> Advantage?

>

>

> WORK / HOME

>

>

> I guess it's unlikely there will be problems for institutions

> installing computers with RIS, Ghost, or other tools. There will be

> always be a way for us to build safe computers for business, education,

> etc. Genuine Advantage is just another part of the routine now.

>

> I'm a little less optomistic for home users than I am for business.

> Legitimate users will connect to the internet and race against the

> clock to reach a Genuine Advantage web server and a Windows Update web

> server. During that time the neighbor's unpatched, unlicensed,

> infected computer has a chance of making an attack. This has always

> been the case, but now this initiative is likely to cause a surge in

> unprotected systems. That means more of your fellow DSL, Cable Modem,

> or dial-up users are likely to attack you. (That's the point of most

> of the blogs and articles I've read, and I tend to agree.)

>

> In the long run, it's good news for tech-minded people who earn a

> living fixing compters for homes and small businesses, but casual users

> (those with and without valid licenses) are more or less in a fog. I'm

> trying to be neutral, but I have to make a comment about Microsoft. I

> don't think MS knows how to break the fog; I don't think they really

> know how to communicate with the average Joe. My confidence would be

> restored by an update check at boot, or ip enable, that is regulated by

> a firewall - and requires no understanding by the user. Then I'd stop

> advocating Mac OS-X and encourage folks to continue using Windows.

> (Hey, I didn't stay as neutral as I intended, but it's tough to do.)

>

> Links would be appreciated. I didn't find my answers at TechNet, maybe

> there is another part of Microsoft's site with good info.

>

> -Tom

>

>