Jump to content

Best free firewall


Recommended Posts

Guest titus12
Posted

Witch of the two, Comodo or Zone Labs, is the best free firewall for XP SP3?

 

Thank you,

David

Guest Big_Al
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

titus12 wrote:

> Witch of the two, Comodo or Zone Labs, is the best free firewall for XP

> SP3?

>

> Thank you,

> David

Define best!

 

I like zonelabs and have used it for years. I have no experience with

Comodo. I like zonelabs since it blocks outgoing as well. It will

notify you of any outgoing attempt and you can approve it or deny it,

and remember that setting for all future attempts. Its great with you

load a new program and find it accessing the internet and you didn't

think this was an internet program.

Guest Michael Jennings
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

http://www.techsupportalert.com/dr/best-free-firewall.htm

 

"titus12" <titus12@msn.com> wrote in message

news:4D226DD6-4534-4A92-9C7E-8C88A049A2FE@microsoft.com...

> Witch of the two, Comodo or Zone Labs, is the best free firewall for XP SP3?

>

> Thank you,

> David

Guest John Barnett MVP
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

From a personal viewpoint I prefer Zone Labs.

 

--

--

John Barnett MVP

Associate Expert

Windows Desktop Experience

 

Web: http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org

Web: http://vistasupport.mvps.org

 

The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any

kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy,

reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for

any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the

use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this

mail/post..

 

"titus12" <titus12@msn.com> wrote in message

news:4D226DD6-4534-4A92-9C7E-8C88A049A2FE@microsoft.com...

> Witch of the two, Comodo or Zone Labs, is the best free firewall for XP

> SP3?

>

> Thank you,

> David

Guest Pablo
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

I don't like either. But if I had to choose it would be Comodo. Zone Alarm

seriously slowed my web browsing.

 

"titus12" <titus12@msn.com> wrote in message

news:4D226DD6-4534-4A92-9C7E-8C88A049A2FE@microsoft.com...

> Witch of the two, Comodo or Zone Labs, is the best free firewall for XP

> SP3?

>

> Thank you,

> David

Guest Unknown
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

The 'BEST' and 'FREE' firewall of course is Windows. It never causes

problems like the others do.

"Big_Al" <BigAl@MD.com> wrote in message

news:y4f1k.9758$%Z1.7986@trnddc05...

> titus12 wrote:

>> Witch of the two, Comodo or Zone Labs, is the best free firewall for XP

>> SP3?

>>

>> Thank you,

>> David

> Define best!

>

> I like zonelabs and have used it for years. I have no experience with

> Comodo. I like zonelabs since it blocks outgoing as well. It will

> notify you of any outgoing attempt and you can approve it or deny it, and

> remember that setting for all future attempts. Its great with you load

> a new program and find it accessing the internet and you didn't think this

> was an internet program.

>

Guest John
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

Unknown wrote:

> The 'BEST' and 'FREE' firewall of course is Windows. It never causes

> problems like the others do.

 

That's because it's Crap.

 

John.

Guest Unknown
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

You're letting your stupidity show again.

"John" <zen@zen.co.uk> wrote in message

news:6aljgkF38nomiU1@mid.individual.net...

> Unknown wrote:

>> The 'BEST' and 'FREE' firewall of course is Windows. It never causes

>> problems like the others do.

>

> That's because it's Crap.

>

> John.

Guest John
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

Unknown wrote:

> Like I said, you are showing your stupidity. YOU said Windows firewall is

> crap and your explanation is that it only checks

> one way. What more can I say.

 

You are just mud slinging at the moment. You haven't explained why you

think it's so good.

 

John.

Guest Unknown
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

Showing your stupidity again. You said Windows firewall is crap and

explained it only checks one way.

If you read these newsgroups you'll discover everyone turns OFF the outgoing

scans.

If you read these newsgroups you'll discover no-one complains about Windows

firewall.

Mudslinging?????? You did the mudslinging. Tell us why Windows firewall is

crap.

"John" <zen@zen.co.uk> wrote in message

news:6aoh3pF37j9qoU1@mid.individual.net...

> Unknown wrote:

>> Like I said, you are showing your stupidity. YOU said Windows firewall is

>> crap and your explanation is that it only checks

>> one way. What more can I say.

>

> You are just mud slinging at the moment. You haven't explained why you

> think it's so good.

>

> John.

Guest John
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

Unknown wrote:

> Showing your stupidity again. You said Windows firewall is crap and

> explained it only checks one way.

> If you read these newsgroups you'll discover everyone turns OFF the outgoing

> scans.

> If you read these newsgroups you'll discover no-one complains about Windows

> firewall.

> Mudslinging?????? You did the mudslinging. Tell us why Windows firewall is

> crap.

> "John" <zen@zen.co.uk> wrote in message

> news:6aoh3pF37j9qoU1@mid.individual.net...

>> Unknown wrote:

>>> Like I said, you are showing your stupidity. YOU said Windows firewall is

>>> crap and your explanation is that it only checks

>>> one way. What more can I say.

>> You are just mud slinging at the moment. You haven't explained why you

>> think it's so good.

>>

>> John.

>

>

I've had enough of your repetitive responses about a subject you

obviously know very little about, so I'll leave you in peace to wallow

in your self appointed position within this newsgroup.

 

John.

Guest Frank-FL
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

Also, if one has outgoing requests, it means that your system is already

compromised.

 

"Unknown" <unknown@unknown.kom> wrote in message news:yKS1k.2865$89.189@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...

> Showing your stupidity again. You said Windows firewall is crap and

> explained it only checks one way.

> If you read these newsgroups you'll discover everyone turns OFF the outgoing

> scans.

> If you read these newsgroups you'll discover no-one complains about Windows

> firewall.

> Mudslinging?????? You did the mudslinging. Tell us why Windows firewall is

> crap.

> "John" <zen@zen.co.uk> wrote in message

> news:6aoh3pF37j9qoU1@mid.individual.net...

>> Unknown wrote:

>>> Like I said, you are showing your stupidity. YOU said Windows firewall is

>>> crap and your explanation is that it only checks

>>> one way. What more can I say.

>>

>> You are just mud slinging at the moment. You haven't explained why you

>> think it's so good.

>>

>> John.

>

>

Guest Unknown
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

Good point Frank.

"Frank-FL" <bbunny@bqik.net> wrote in message

news:uebOL2zxIHA.3968@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

Also, if one has outgoing requests, it means that your system is already

compromised.

 

"Unknown" <unknown@unknown.kom> wrote in message

news:yKS1k.2865$89.189@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com...

> Showing your stupidity again. You said Windows firewall is crap and

> explained it only checks one way.

> If you read these newsgroups you'll discover everyone turns OFF the

> outgoing

> scans.

> If you read these newsgroups you'll discover no-one complains about

> Windows

> firewall.

> Mudslinging?????? You did the mudslinging. Tell us why Windows firewall is

> crap.

> "John" <zen@zen.co.uk> wrote in message

> news:6aoh3pF37j9qoU1@mid.individual.net...

>> Unknown wrote:

>>> Like I said, you are showing your stupidity. YOU said Windows firewall

>>> is

>>> crap and your explanation is that it only checks

>>> one way. What more can I say.

>>

>> You are just mud slinging at the moment. You haven't explained why you

>> think it's so good.

>>

>> John.

>

>

Guest Unknown
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

Crap!

"John" <zen@zen.co.uk> wrote in message

news:6aqlh4F399podU1@mid.individual.net...

> Unknown wrote:

>> Showing your stupidity again. You said Windows firewall is crap and

>> explained it only checks one way.

>> If you read these newsgroups you'll discover everyone turns OFF the

>> outgoing scans.

>> If you read these newsgroups you'll discover no-one complains about

>> Windows firewall.

>> Mudslinging?????? You did the mudslinging. Tell us why Windows firewall

>> is crap.

>> "John" <zen@zen.co.uk> wrote in message

>> news:6aoh3pF37j9qoU1@mid.individual.net...

>>> Unknown wrote:

>>>> Like I said, you are showing your stupidity. YOU said Windows firewall

>>>> is crap and your explanation is that it only checks

>>>> one way. What more can I say.

>>> You are just mud slinging at the moment. You haven't explained why you

>>> think it's so good.

>>>

>>> John.

>>

>>

> I've had enough of your repetitive responses about a subject you obviously

> know very little about, so I'll leave you in peace to wallow in your self

> appointed position within this newsgroup.

>

> John.

Guest Unknown
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

By the way since it apparently (although erroneously) is obvious to you I

know nothing about

the subject, tell me precisely why, as you stated, the Windows firewall is

crap..

"John" <zen@zen.co.uk> wrote in message

news:6aqlh4F399podU1@mid.individual.net...

> Unknown wrote:

>> Showing your stupidity again. You said Windows firewall is crap and

>> explained it only checks one way.

>> If you read these newsgroups you'll discover everyone turns OFF the

>> outgoing scans.

>> If you read these newsgroups you'll discover no-one complains about

>> Windows firewall.

>> Mudslinging?????? You did the mudslinging. Tell us why Windows firewall

>> is crap.

>> "John" <zen@zen.co.uk> wrote in message

>> news:6aoh3pF37j9qoU1@mid.individual.net...

>>> Unknown wrote:

>>>> Like I said, you are showing your stupidity. YOU said Windows firewall

>>>> is crap and your explanation is that it only checks

>>>> one way. What more can I say.

>>> You are just mud slinging at the moment. You haven't explained why you

>>> think it's so good.

>>>

>>> John.

>>

>>

> I've had enough of your repetitive responses about a subject you obviously

> know very little about, so I'll leave you in peace to wallow in your self

> appointed position within this newsgroup.

>

> John.

Guest Bruce Chambers
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

Unknown wrote:

> Showing your stupidity again. You said Windows firewall is crap and

> explained it only checks one way.

 

 

Exactly. WinXP's built-in firewall is barely adequate at stopping

incoming attacks, and hiding your ports from probes. What WinXP SP2's

firewall does not do, is protect you from any Trojans or spyware that

you (or someone else using your computer) might download and install

inadvertently. It doesn't monitor out-going traffic at all, other than

to check for IP-spoofing, much less block (or at even ask you about) the

bad or the questionable out-going signals. It assumes that any

application you have on your hard drive is there because you want it

there, and therefore has your "permission" to access the Internet.

Further, because the Windows Firewall is a "stateful" firewall, it will

also assume that any incoming traffic that's a direct response to a

Trojan's or spyware's out-going signal is also authorized.

 

ZoneAlarm, Kerio, or Comodo are all much better than WinXP's

built-in firewall, and are much more easily configured, and there are

free versions of each readily available. Even the commercially

available Symantec's Norton Personal Firewall is superior by far,

although it does take a heavier toll of system performance then do

ZoneAlarm or Comodo.

 

Having said that, it's important to remember that firewalls and

anti-virus applications, which should always be used and should always

be running, while important components of "safe hex," cannot, and should

not be expected to, protect the computer user from him/herself.

Ultimately, it is incumbent upon each and every computer user to learn

how to secure his/her own computer.

 

> If you read these newsgroups you'll discover everyone turns OFF the outgoing

> scans.

 

 

No, he won't. That assertion is completely false.

 

> If you read these newsgroups you'll discover no-one complains about Windows

> firewall.

 

 

Apparently *you've* never read these newsgroups. (Or else you're

deliberately lying.)

 

> Mudslinging?????? You did the mudslinging.

 

 

Again, you've gotten it exactly backwards.

 

> Tell us why Windows firewall is

> crap.

 

 

You've already been told, repeatedly.

 

 

--

 

Bruce Chambers

 

Help us help you:

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

 

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

 

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary

safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

 

Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell

 

The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has

killed a great many philosophers.

~ Denis Diderot

Guest Movin-onward
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

Oh Bruce ... sheesh ...

 

"Bruce Chambers" <bchambers@cable0ne.n3t> wrote in message

news:OhpjNI3xIHA.5892@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> Unknown wrote:

>> Showing your stupidity again. You said Windows firewall is crap and

>> explained it only checks one way.

>

>

> Exactly. WinXP's built-in firewall is barely adequate at stopping

> incoming attacks, and hiding your ports from probes. What WinXP SP2's

> firewall does not do, is protect you from any Trojans or spyware that you

> (or someone else using your computer) might download and install

> inadvertently. It doesn't monitor out-going traffic at all, other than to

> check for IP-spoofing, much less block (or at even ask you about) the bad

> or the questionable out-going signals. It assumes that any application

> you have on your hard drive is there because you want it there, and

> therefore has your "permission" to access the Internet. Further, because

> the Windows Firewall is a "stateful" firewall, it will also assume that

> any incoming traffic that's a direct response to a Trojan's or spyware's

> out-going signal is also authorized.

>

> ZoneAlarm, Kerio, or Comodo are all much better than WinXP's built-in

> firewall, and are much more easily configured, and there are free versions

> of each readily available. Even the commercially available Symantec's

> Norton Personal Firewall is superior by far, although it does take a

> heavier toll of system performance then do ZoneAlarm or Comodo.

>

> Having said that, it's important to remember that firewalls and

> anti-virus applications, which should always be used and should always be

> running, while important components of "safe hex," cannot, and should not

> be expected to, protect the computer user from him/herself. Ultimately, it

> is incumbent upon each and every computer user to learn how to secure

> his/her own computer.

>

>

>> If you read these newsgroups you'll discover everyone turns OFF the

>> outgoing scans.

>

>

> No, he won't. That assertion is completely false.

>

>

>> If you read these newsgroups you'll discover no-one complains about

>> Windows firewall.

>

>

> Apparently *you've* never read these newsgroups. (Or else you're

> deliberately lying.)

>

>

>> Mudslinging?????? You did the mudslinging.

>

>

> Again, you've gotten it exactly backwards.

>

>

>> Tell us why Windows firewall is crap.

>

>

> You've already been told, repeatedly.

>

>

> --

>

> Bruce Chambers

>

> Help us help you:

> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

>

> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

>

> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary

> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

>

> Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand

> Russell

>

> The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has

> killed a great many philosophers.

> ~ Denis Diderot

Guest WindPipe
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

 

After using both firewalls for long periods of time, I can't speak from a security point of

view on, what stops what from coming in, going out, echoing, leaking, pinging, ... and the

rest of the firewall speak I don't know all that much about, Comodo seems to run more

efficiently on my PC. ZoneAlarm Pro from into version 6, and 7 was a bit too much on the

system resources for me, quite noticeable too. I didn't mind Kerio either.

 

ZoneAlarm's influence can easily be seen on your system in task manager, Comodo and Kerio

just aren't that rude.

 

- WindPipe

 

titus12 wrote:

> Witch of the two, Comodo or Zone Labs, is the best free firewall for XP

> SP3?

>

> Thank you,

> David

Guest Unknown
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

Now YOU are showing your stupidity. There is no need to check outgoing if

you don't allow incoming Viruses, Trojans etc.

How many posters were told to shut down outgoing scanning? How many posters

have problems due to output scanning.

Are you deaf and dumb?

"Bruce Chambers" <bchambers@cable0ne.n3t> wrote in message

news:OhpjNI3xIHA.5892@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> Unknown wrote:

>> Showing your stupidity again. You said Windows firewall is crap and

>> explained it only checks one way.

>

>

> Exactly. WinXP's built-in firewall is barely adequate at stopping

> incoming attacks, and hiding your ports from probes. What WinXP SP2's

> firewall does not do, is protect you from any Trojans or spyware that you

> (or someone else using your computer) might download and install

> inadvertently. It doesn't monitor out-going traffic at all, other than to

> check for IP-spoofing, much less block (or at even ask you about) the bad

> or the questionable out-going signals. It assumes that any application

> you have on your hard drive is there because you want it there, and

> therefore has your "permission" to access the Internet. Further, because

> the Windows Firewall is a "stateful" firewall, it will also assume that

> any incoming traffic that's a direct response to a Trojan's or spyware's

> out-going signal is also authorized.

>

> ZoneAlarm, Kerio, or Comodo are all much better than WinXP's built-in

> firewall, and are much more easily configured, and there are free versions

> of each readily available. Even the commercially available Symantec's

> Norton Personal Firewall is superior by far, although it does take a

> heavier toll of system performance then do ZoneAlarm or Comodo.

>

> Having said that, it's important to remember that firewalls and

> anti-virus applications, which should always be used and should always be

> running, while important components of "safe hex," cannot, and should not

> be expected to, protect the computer user from him/herself. Ultimately, it

> is incumbent upon each and every computer user to learn how to secure

> his/her own computer.

>

>

>> If you read these newsgroups you'll discover everyone turns OFF the

>> outgoing scans.

>

>

> No, he won't. That assertion is completely false.

>

>

>> If you read these newsgroups you'll discover no-one complains about

>> Windows firewall.

>

>

> Apparently *you've* never read these newsgroups. (Or else you're

> deliberately lying.)

>

>

>> Mudslinging?????? You did the mudslinging.

>

>

> Again, you've gotten it exactly backwards.

>

>

>> Tell us why Windows firewall is crap.

>

>

> You've already been told, repeatedly.

>

>

> --

>

> Bruce Chambers

>

> Help us help you:

> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

>

> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

>

> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary

> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

>

> Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand

> Russell

>

> The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has

> killed a great many philosophers.

> ~ Denis Diderot

Guest Movin-onward
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

Viewing this objectively, and philosophically, what does MS have to gain

with it's 'freeware' vs. known freeware companies like Zone, AVG, Avast, et

al who must gain something or not be able to continue with software design?

 

Most/all freeware is not free! The user pays with opening ports, info sent

out (albeit not identified to the buyers [we hope]) but again, our systems

are still captured by those to whom we give complete immunity (and don't pay

for the programs in $$$/pounds/shillings, deutschmarks, rubles, etc). In the

end, IMHO, we have to determine what level of risk we're willing to take

with 'freeware' - it seems to me most of it is malware/grayware/ etc. in the

strict sense of the terms. MS, IMHO, benefits overall from providing

excellent software design to keep consumers up and running safely (as much

as possible) and able to buy new products, and 'watch' us as they do.

 

 

 

 

"Unknown" <unknown@unknown.kom> wrote in message

news:zxe2k.3836$N87.183@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com...

> Now YOU are showing your stupidity. There is no need to check outgoing if

> you don't allow incoming Viruses, Trojans etc.

> How many posters were told to shut down outgoing scanning? How many

> posters have problems due to output scanning.

> Are you deaf and dumb?

> "Bruce Chambers" <bchambers@cable0ne.n3t> wrote in message

> news:OhpjNI3xIHA.5892@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>> Unknown wrote:

>>> Showing your stupidity again. You said Windows firewall is crap and

>>> explained it only checks one way.

>>

>>

>> Exactly. WinXP's built-in firewall is barely adequate at stopping

>> incoming attacks, and hiding your ports from probes. What WinXP SP2's

>> firewall does not do, is protect you from any Trojans or spyware that you

>> (or someone else using your computer) might download and install

>> inadvertently. It doesn't monitor out-going traffic at all, other than

>> to check for IP-spoofing, much less block (or at even ask you about) the

>> bad or the questionable out-going signals. It assumes that any

>> application you have on your hard drive is there because you want it

>> there, and therefore has your "permission" to access the Internet.

>> Further, because the Windows Firewall is a "stateful" firewall, it will

>> also assume that any incoming traffic that's a direct response to a

>> Trojan's or spyware's out-going signal is also authorized.

>>

>> ZoneAlarm, Kerio, or Comodo are all much better than WinXP's built-in

>> firewall, and are much more easily configured, and there are free

>> versions of each readily available. Even the commercially available

>> Symantec's Norton Personal Firewall is superior by far, although it does

>> take a heavier toll of system performance then do ZoneAlarm or Comodo.

>>

>> Having said that, it's important to remember that firewalls and

>> anti-virus applications, which should always be used and should always be

>> running, while important components of "safe hex," cannot, and should not

>> be expected to, protect the computer user from him/herself. Ultimately,

>> it is incumbent upon each and every computer user to learn how to secure

>> his/her own computer.

>>

>>

>>> If you read these newsgroups you'll discover everyone turns OFF the

>>> outgoing scans.

>>

>>

>> No, he won't. That assertion is completely false.

>>

>>

>>> If you read these newsgroups you'll discover no-one complains about

>>> Windows firewall.

>>

>>

>> Apparently *you've* never read these newsgroups. (Or else you're

>> deliberately lying.)

>>

>>

>>> Mudslinging?????? You did the mudslinging.

>>

>>

>> Again, you've gotten it exactly backwards.

>>

>>

>>> Tell us why Windows firewall is crap.

>>

>>

>> You've already been told, repeatedly.

>>

>>

>> --

>>

>> Bruce Chambers

>>

>> Help us help you:

>> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

>>

>> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

>>

>> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary

>> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

>>

>> Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand

>> Russell

>>

>> The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has

>> killed a great many philosophers.

>> ~ Denis Diderot

>

>

Guest Bruce Chambers
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

Unknown wrote:

> Now YOU are showing your stupidity.

 

 

OK, I'll try dropping down to your level for a second: "I know you

are, but what am I?" Did I hit the right age group? Was that something

you're capable of understanding?

 

> There is no need to check outgoing if

> you don't allow incoming Viruses, Trojans etc.

 

 

And you're able to guarantee 100% that everyone, yourself included, is

100% capable of ensuring that 100% of all malware is blocked? How much

money are you willing to put behind that assertion? The whole point

behind monitoring out-bound traffic is to let one know that something

slipped by one's other safeguards. Will it be 100% effective? No. But

it's certainly better than nothing.

 

> How many posters were told to shut down outgoing scanning?

 

 

None, that I've ever seen, unless one counts trolls such as yourself

who are deliberately passing out destructive advice.

 

> How many posters

> have problems due to output scanning.

 

 

With a properly configured firewall? None, whatsoever.

 

> Are you deaf and dumb?

 

 

No, nor do I see what speech and/or hearing impediments could possibly

have to do with this discussion.

 

As you've been completely unable to offer any facts or rational

arguments to support your assertions, I suggest you give it up and

refrain from embarrassing yourself further.

 

 

--

 

Bruce Chambers

 

Help us help you:

http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

 

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

 

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary

safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

 

Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell

 

The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has

killed a great many philosophers.

~ Denis Diderot

Guest Movin-onward
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

 

re > How many posters were told to shut down outgoing scanning?

 

Bruce:

 

None, that I've ever seen, unless one counts trolls such as yourself

who are deliberately passing out destructive advice.

 

Bruce, in our OE NG we often 'heard' it was useless to keep scanning

outgoing email ...

 

"Toxicity in relationships is a human pollutant (Ann Scott, March 2008)."

 

 

"Bruce Chambers" <bchambers@cable0ne.n3t> wrote in message

news:%23QxBlXAyIHA.5892@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> Unknown wrote:

>> Now YOU are showing your stupidity.

>

>

> OK, I'll try dropping down to your level for a second: "I know you are,

> but what am I?" Did I hit the right age group? Was that something you're

> capable of understanding?

>

>

>> There is no need to check outgoing if you don't allow incoming Viruses,

>> Trojans etc.

>

>

> And you're able to guarantee 100% that everyone, yourself included, is

> 100% capable of ensuring that 100% of all malware is blocked? How much

> money are you willing to put behind that assertion? The whole point

> behind monitoring out-bound traffic is to let one know that something

> slipped by one's other safeguards. Will it be 100% effective? No. But

> it's certainly better than nothing.

>

>

>> How many posters were told to shut down outgoing scanning?

>

>

> None, that I've ever seen, unless one counts trolls such as yourself who

> are deliberately passing out destructive advice.

>

>

>> How many posters have problems due to output scanning.

>

>

> With a properly configured firewall? None, whatsoever.

>

>

>> Are you deaf and dumb?

>

>

> No, nor do I see what speech and/or hearing impediments could possibly

> have to do with this discussion.

>

> As you've been completely unable to offer any facts or rational arguments

> to support your assertions, I suggest you give it up and refrain from

> embarrassing yourself further.

>

>

> --

>

> Bruce Chambers

>

> Help us help you:

> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

>

> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

>

> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary

> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

>

> Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand

> Russell

>

> The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has

> killed a great many philosophers.

> ~ Denis Diderot

Guest Hetch
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

Big_Al wrote:

 

<piggybacking>

> titus12 wrote:

>> Witch of the two, Comodo or Zone Labs, is the best free firewall for

>> XP SP3?

>>

>> Thank you,

>> David

> Define best!

>

 

titus12:

The best firewall is a SPI router combined with the native Windows

firewall.

 

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833129006

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833124007

 

 

 

If you feel you must have a software firewall, Comodo and Sunbelt

Personal firewall are good choices.

 

http://www.personalfirewall.comodo.com/

http://www.sunbelt-software.com/Home-Home-Office/Sunbelt-Personal-Firewall/

Guest Unknown
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

I honestly thought (via your posts) you were more intelligent than that.

I'm beginning to wonder.

"Bruce Chambers" <bchambers@cable0ne.n3t> wrote in message

news:%23QxBlXAyIHA.5892@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> Unknown wrote:

>> Now YOU are showing your stupidity.

>

>

> OK, I'll try dropping down to your level for a second: "I know you are,

> but what am I?" Did I hit the right age group? Was that something you're

> capable of understanding?

>

>

>> There is no need to check outgoing if you don't allow incoming Viruses,

>> Trojans etc.

>

>

> And you're able to guarantee 100% that everyone, yourself included, is

> 100% capable of ensuring that 100% of all malware is blocked? How much

> money are you willing to put behind that assertion? The whole point

> behind monitoring out-bound traffic is to let one know that something

> slipped by one's other safeguards. Will it be 100% effective? No. But

> it's certainly better than nothing.

>

>

>> How many posters were told to shut down outgoing scanning?

>

>

> None, that I've ever seen, unless one counts trolls such as yourself who

> are deliberately passing out destructive advice.

>

>

>> How many posters have problems due to output scanning.

>

>

> With a properly configured firewall? None, whatsoever.

>

>

>> Are you deaf and dumb?

>

>

> No, nor do I see what speech and/or hearing impediments could possibly

> have to do with this discussion.

>

> As you've been completely unable to offer any facts or rational arguments

> to support your assertions, I suggest you give it up and refrain from

> embarrassing yourself further.

>

>

> --

>

> Bruce Chambers

>

> Help us help you:

> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

>

> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

>

> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary

> safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

>

> Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand

> Russell

>

> The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has

> killed a great many philosophers.

> ~ Denis Diderot

Guest Michael Jennings
Posted

Re: Best free firewall

 

The flip side of free would be insanely expensive, and for that there's

the TippingPoint intrusion detection and prevention system. In the

spirit of stopping by the local Lamborghini dealership to check out

what they've got (look but don't touch), one really ought to take a

look at what peace of mind firewalls four figures & up can deliver.

×
×
  • Create New...