Guest zerbie45@gmail.com Posted June 12, 2008 Posted June 12, 2008 hello guys, I'm about to deploy a new HP DL 585 server with windows server 2003 enterprise edition. It's actually two of them that will be used as a cluster for sql services. the two servers have three hard disks with 74 gb each. what I want to do is use raid 1+0 so that I have two hard disks mirrored and a spare one. The other partitions (quorum and applications) will come from our san (so no need to use the local hard disks for other partitions other than the boot one). Is it ok to create a single boot partition of 74 gb ? is that too big for some reasons ? or is it ok ? what do you think ? thanks for your opinion... zz
Guest Meinolf Weber Posted June 12, 2008 Posted June 12, 2008 Re: recommended boot partition size... Hello zerbie45@gmail.com, The question is what is about the future? 2008 recommended size is 40 GB, even it uses in basic install round about 7GB. I would use it like it is. Best regards Meinolf Weber Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm > hello guys, > > I'm about to deploy a new HP DL 585 server with windows server 2003 > enterprise edition. > It's actually two of them that will be used as a cluster for sql > services. > the two servers have three hard disks with 74 gb each. > what I want to do is use raid 1+0 so that I have two hard disks > mirrored and a spare one. > The other partitions (quorum and applications) will come from our san > (so no need to use the local hard disks for other partitions other > than the boot one). > Is it ok to create a single boot partition of 74 gb ? is that too big > for some reasons ? or is it ok ? what do you think ? > > thanks for your opinion... > zz
Recommended Posts