Guest vdp3r@hotmail.com Posted December 22, 2007 Posted December 22, 2007 I'm trying to get Eraser to erase the folder left behind when I close a sandboxed apllication - such as Firefox - in a User account. However, I get a popup stating that Administrator privileges are required. Obviously, I don't want to browse in an account with Admin priviliges, so I experimented altering permissions to finally give Everyone permission on both the Eraser file and the folder I want to erase. But this has had no effect and still the message comes up that admin privileges are required. I thought that by giving Everyone full control both over the file doing the erasing and the folder I want erased, that would effectively give Admin privileges to that part of the User account that is demanding such privileges. It could be that I have overlooked something in permissions. However, could it be that the system recognises that, regardless of the permissions I alter, I am still in a User account and until I upgrade the whole account to an Admin account, I cannot erase the folder? So I suppose the question is: is Full Control of an object identical in every way to Admin privileges over that object (and vice versa: Admin privileges identical to Full Control)? Many thanks
Guest Dave Patrick Posted December 22, 2007 Posted December 22, 2007 Re: Administrator Privileges and permissions when in a User account Make sure inherit is turned off. -- Regards, Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup. Microsoft Certified Professional Microsoft MVP [Windows] http://www.microsoft.com/protect <vdp3r@hotmail.com> wrote: > I'm trying to get Eraser to erase the folder left behind when I close > a sandboxed apllication - such as Firefox - in a User account. > However, I get a popup stating that Administrator privileges are > required. Obviously, I don't want to browse in an account with > Admin priviliges, so I experimented altering permissions to finally > give Everyone permission on both the Eraser file and the folder I want > to erase. But this has had no effect and still the message comes up > that admin privileges are required. > > I thought that by giving Everyone full control both over the file > doing the erasing and the folder I want erased, that would effectively > give Admin privileges to that part of the User account that is > demanding such privileges. > > It could be that I have overlooked something in permissions. > However, could it be that the system recognises that, regardless of > the permissions I alter, I am still in a User account and until I > upgrade the whole account to an Admin account, I cannot erase the > folder? So I suppose the question is: is Full Control of an object > identical in every way to Admin privileges over that object (and vice > versa: Admin privileges identical to Full Control)? > > Many thanks
Guest Martin Posted December 22, 2007 Posted December 22, 2007 Re: Administrator Privileges and permissions when in a User account Thanks Dave. I did ensure inherit was off, but I think I have the answer; I browsed the Eraser forums and found that Eraser won't erase files on a compressed drive unless it's in an Admin account. It never occured to me that compression of the drive could have been the cause otherwise I would have mentioned it. Just for the record, I can manually use CCleaner to erase the folder in the user account. Anyway, I've learned a bit more about permissions in the last couple of days and no longer feel frightened to alter them. I really appreciate your response, nevertheless, and also that MVPs are still interested in Windows 2000. Martin "Dave Patrick" <DSPatrick@nospam.gmail.com> wrote in message news:A1279FBE-ACE4-42DA-928C-6B3BA3040A69@microsoft.com... > Make sure inherit is turned off. > > > -- > > Regards, > > Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup. > Microsoft Certified Professional > Microsoft MVP [Windows] > http://www.microsoft.com/protect > > <vdp3r@hotmail.com> wrote: > > I'm trying to get Eraser to erase the folder left behind when I close > > a sandboxed apllication - such as Firefox - in a User account. > > However, I get a popup stating that Administrator privileges are > > required. Obviously, I don't want to browse in an account with > > Admin priviliges, so I experimented altering permissions to finally > > give Everyone permission on both the Eraser file and the folder I want > > to erase. But this has had no effect and still the message comes up > > that admin privileges are required. > > > > I thought that by giving Everyone full control both over the file > > doing the erasing and the folder I want erased, that would effectively > > give Admin privileges to that part of the User account that is > > demanding such privileges. > > > > It could be that I have overlooked something in permissions. > > However, could it be that the system recognises that, regardless of > > the permissions I alter, I am still in a User account and until I > > upgrade the whole account to an Admin account, I cannot erase the > > folder? So I suppose the question is: is Full Control of an object > > identical in every way to Admin privileges over that object (and vice > > versa: Admin privileges identical to Full Control)? > > > > Many thanks
Guest Dave Patrick Posted December 22, 2007 Posted December 22, 2007 Re: Administrator Privileges and permissions when in a User account Glad to hear you found a solution. -- Regards, Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup. Microsoft Certified Professional Microsoft MVP [Windows] http://www.microsoft.com/protect "Martin" wrote: > Thanks Dave. I did ensure inherit was off, but I think I have the > answer; I browsed the Eraser forums and found that Eraser won't erase > files > on a compressed drive unless it's in an Admin account. It never > occured > to me that compression of the drive could have been the cause otherwise I > would have mentioned it. Just for the record, I can manually use > CCleaner to erase the folder in the user account. > > Anyway, I've learned a bit more about permissions in the last couple of > days > and no longer feel frightened to alter them. > > I really appreciate your response, nevertheless, and also that MVPs are > still interested in Windows 2000. > > Martin
Recommended Posts