Guest ivfmei@lycos.com Posted January 2, 2008 Posted January 2, 2008 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -= harassment at. work -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Once I stopped watching television and listening to the. radio at the end of 1990, "they" had to. find other ways of committing abuses. So they took what must be for them a tried. and tested route; they get at you by subversion of those around you. Since they wouldn't be able to. do that with my family or friends, that meant getting at people in the workplace to be. their mouthpieces and. do their dirty work for them. They supplied my employers in Oxford with details from what was going. on in my. private life, and what I and other people had said at my home and accommodation in Oxford. So. people at work repeated verbatim words which had been said in my home, and repeated what. I'd been doing recently. Often the most trivial things, the ones. from your domestic life, are the ones which hurt most. One manager in particular. at Oxford continuously abused me for ten months with. verbal sexual abuse, swearing, and threats to terminate my employment. After ten months. I was forced to seek psychiatric help and start taking medication, and was away from work for two. months. I spoke later with a. solicitor about what had happened at that company; he advised it was only possible to take action if you had left the company as. a result of harassment, and such an. action would have to be started very soon after leaving. Over a. year later the same manager picked on another new worker, with even more serious results;. that employee tried to commit suicide with an overdose as a result of the ill-treatment, and was forced to leave his. job. But he didn't take action. against the company, either. Abuse at work is comparable to that elsewhere in that tangible evidence. is difficult to produce, and the. abusers will always have their denials ready when challenged. And even if. a court accepts what you say happened, it still remains to prove that abuse causes the. type of breakdown I had at the end of 1992.. In a recent case before a British court, a former member of the Army. brought a case against others who had maltreated him ten years previously.. Although the court accepted that abuse had occurred, it did not agree that depressive illness necessarily followed, and denied justice. to the. plaintiff. 4164
Recommended Posts