Guest ey.markov@iname.com Posted January 18, 2008 Posted January 18, 2008 Greetings, Some time ago I aborted a conversion to dynamic disk in my W2K Pro machine. I have attached a 250 Gb drive as slave, went into Disk Management, converted it to dynamic. Then, when I issued the same command for the first disk, the "Are you sure?" message reminded me of the drawbacks, so I clicked "No" and reverted disk 2. Problem is, ever since then disk 2 stubbornly shows as a 128 Gb drive under Disk Management. DOS tools see it properly, and I was able to partition it (32, 80, and 130 Gb), but almost every other day Windows would tell me that the third partition (the one that crosses this imaginary 128 Gb border) is corrupted, would run CHKDSK on it on startup, and sometimes fix it, sometimes corrupt all the (test) data on it beyond recognition. I thought: "Dynamic disk info is stored in the last 1 Mb of the drive, right?" Last night I ran Boot and Nuke and had it write zeroes to the entire disk 2. Booted W2K after that... and what do you know - not only did the drive show up as 128 Gb, it was once again labeled "Dynamic"! If anyone can shed some light on what the heck is going on, I'm sure I will not be the only one to be enlightened. Thanks! Yisroel
Guest Pegasus \(MVP\) Posted January 18, 2008 Posted January 18, 2008 Re: Stubborn Hard Drive Doesn't Want to Revert to Basic Disk <ey.markov@iname.com> wrote in message news:ab4ab530-1fe7-4301-9ff2-47fcb0303045@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > Greetings, > > Some time ago I aborted a conversion to dynamic disk in my W2K Pro > machine. I have attached a 250 Gb drive as slave, went into Disk > Management, converted it to dynamic. Then, when I issued the same > command for the first disk, the "Are you sure?" message reminded me of > the drawbacks, so I clicked "No" and reverted disk 2. > > Problem is, ever since then disk 2 stubbornly shows as a 128 Gb drive > under Disk Management. DOS tools see it properly, and I was able to > partition it (32, 80, and 130 Gb), but almost every other day Windows > would tell me that the third partition (the one that crosses this > imaginary 128 Gb border) is corrupted, would run CHKDSK on it on > startup, and sometimes fix it, sometimes corrupt all the (test) data > on it beyond recognition. > > I thought: "Dynamic disk info is stored in the last 1 Mb of the drive, > right?" Last night I ran Boot and Nuke and had it write zeroes to the > entire disk 2. Booted W2K after that... and what do you know - not > only did the drive show up as 128 Gb, it was once again labeled > "Dynamic"! > > If anyone can shed some light on what the heck is going on, I'm sure I > will not be the only one to be enlightened. Thanks! > > Yisroel Does your BIOS support disks larger than 130 GBytes? If yes then you must enable 48-bit LBA - see here: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;305098 Now convert your disk back to Basic, using the Disk Manager, then create the partitions you want.
Guest Andy Posted January 19, 2008 Posted January 19, 2008 Re: Stubborn Hard Drive Doesn't Want to Revert to Basic Disk On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:42:38 -0800 (PST), ey.markov@iname.com wrote: >Greetings, > >Some time ago I aborted a conversion to dynamic disk in my W2K Pro >machine. I have attached a 250 Gb drive as slave, went into Disk >Management, converted it to dynamic. Then, when I issued the same >command for the first disk, the "Are you sure?" message reminded me of >the drawbacks, so I clicked "No" and reverted disk 2. > >Problem is, ever since then disk 2 stubbornly shows as a 128 Gb drive >under Disk Management. DOS tools see it properly, and I was able to >partition it (32, 80, and 130 Gb), but almost every other day Windows >would tell me that the third partition (the one that crosses this >imaginary 128 Gb border) is corrupted, would run CHKDSK on it on >startup, and sometimes fix it, sometimes corrupt all the (test) data >on it beyond recognition. Whatever DOS tools is, it's using the BIOS to access the disk drive, so the 48-bit LBA capable BIOS allows full access to the 250GB drive. The problem is your Windows 2000 installation is not properly configured to support 48-bit LBA. See <http://support.microsoft.com/kb/305098>. > >I thought: "Dynamic disk info is stored in the last 1 Mb of the drive, >right?" Last night I ran Boot and Nuke and had it write zeroes to the >entire disk 2. Booted W2K after that... and what do you know - not >only did the drive show up as 128 Gb, it was once again labeled >"Dynamic"! > >If anyone can shed some light on what the heck is going on, I'm sure I >will not be the only one to be enlightened. Thanks! > >Yisroel
Guest ey.markov@iname.com Posted January 27, 2008 Posted January 27, 2008 Re: Stubborn Hard Drive Doesn't Want to Revert to Basic Disk On Jan 18, 8:47 pm, Andy <1...@2.3> wrote: > On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:42:38 -0800 (PST), ey.mar...@iname.com wrote: > >Greetings, > > >Some time ago I aborted a conversion to dynamic disk in my W2K Pro > >machine. I have attached a 250 Gb drive as slave, went into Disk > >Management, converted it to dynamic. Then, when I issued the same > >command for the first disk, the "Are you sure?" message reminded me of > >the drawbacks, so I clicked "No" and reverted disk 2. > > >Problem is, ever since then disk 2 stubbornly shows as a 128 Gb drive > >under Disk Management. DOS tools see it properly, and I was able to > >partition it (32, 80, and 130 Gb), but almost every other day Windows > >would tell me that the third partition (the one that crosses this > >imaginary 128 Gb border) is corrupted, would run CHKDSK on it on > >startup, and sometimes fix it, sometimes corrupt all the (test) data > >on it beyond recognition. > > Whatever DOS tools is, it's using the BIOS to access the disk drive, > so the 48-bit LBA capable BIOS allows full access to the 250GB drive. > The problem is your Windows 2000 installation is not properly > configured to support 48-bit LBA. See > <http://support.microsoft.com/kb/305098>. Thank you so much! That was it. And to think that this was a clean install of W2K SP *4* on another 250 GB drive... Now where do I ask about why the system restarts itself after a soft shutdown? Yisroel
Recommended Posts