pfmon for 64-bit

[Guest Alex]

Do we have pfmon (Page Fault Monitor) for 64-bit Windows? It is specified

Windows Server 2003 Resource Kit is not supported for 64-bit versions...

[Guest Theo]

Re: pfmon for 64-bit

 

It's probably something that is not of any significant use

on a desktop OS. I can see using it for a Server, but what

good will it do on a desktop?

 

Alex wrote:

> Do we have pfmon (Page Fault Monitor) for 64-bit Windows? It is specified

> Windows Server 2003 Resource Kit is not supported for 64-bit versions...

[Guest Alex]

Re: pfmon for 64-bit

 

I want to use it on a server to investigate a pretty strange issue with

paging.

 

"Theo" wrote:

> It's probably something that is not of any significant use

> on a desktop OS. I can see using it for a Server, but what

> good will it do on a desktop?

>

> Alex wrote:

> > Do we have pfmon (Page Fault Monitor) for 64-bit Windows? It is specified

> > Windows Server 2003 Resource Kit is not supported for 64-bit versions...

>

[Guest Tony Sperling]

Re: pfmon for 64-bit

 

Generally speaking, if the program isn't making use of any driver-like code,

32bits should do the job. Being a monitoring piece, you could be lucky, I

think. At least as long as the server isn't Itanium based.

 

 

Tony. . .

 

 

"Alex" <Alex@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

news:379A46B9-1DC5-474E-A0F9-07703B0ACFB7@microsoft.com...

>I want to use it on a server to investigate a pretty strange issue with

> paging.

>

> "Theo" wrote:

>

>> It's probably something that is not of any significant use

>> on a desktop OS. I can see using it for a Server, but what

>> good will it do on a desktop?

>>

>> Alex wrote:

>> > Do we have pfmon (Page Fault Monitor) for 64-bit Windows? It is

>> > specified

>> > Windows Server 2003 Resource Kit is not supported for 64-bit

>> > versions...

>>

[Guest Alex]

Re: pfmon for 64-bit

 

It is Itanium based...

 

"Tony Sperling" wrote:

> Generally speaking, if the program isn't making use of any driver-like code,

> 32bits should do the job. Being a monitoring piece, you could be lucky, I

> think. At least as long as the server isn't Itanium based.

>

>

> Tony. . .

>

>

> "Alex" <Alex@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message

> news:379A46B9-1DC5-474E-A0F9-07703B0ACFB7@microsoft.com...

> >I want to use it on a server to investigate a pretty strange issue with

> > paging.

> >

> > "Theo" wrote:

> >

> >> It's probably something that is not of any significant use

> >> on a desktop OS. I can see using it for a Server, but what

> >> good will it do on a desktop?

> >>

> >> Alex wrote:

> >> > Do we have pfmon (Page Fault Monitor) for 64-bit Windows? It is

> >> > specified

> >> > Windows Server 2003 Resource Kit is not supported for 64-bit

> >> > versions...

> >>

>

>

>